Greg Boehnlein wrote:
Hello all,
Per my last message to the list, and my promise to the Developers
that I'd create RPMS if they released 0.7.0, I would like to announce the
availability of experimental RPMS for Asterisk release 0.7.1. These are
targeted at RedHat 7.3 systems, running the
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, WipeOut wrote:
This is great to see.. but why RH7.3 (or RH8 for that matter) since it
has already been EOL'ed by RH??
Couple of reasons..
1. It is a stable, known quantity that uses solid components and closely
mirrors the environment that a lot of people develop
Greg Boehnlein wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, WipeOut wrote:
This is great to see.. but why RH7.3 (or RH8 for that matter) since it
has already been EOL'ed by RH??
Couple of reasons..
1. It is a stable, known quantity that uses solid components and closely
mirrors the environment that a
WipeOut wrote:
Greg Boehnlein wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, WipeOut wrote:
This is great to see.. but why RH7.3 (or RH8 for that matter) since
it has already been EOL'ed by RH??
Couple of reasons..
1. It is a stable, known quantity that uses solid components and
closely
Senad Jordanovic wrote:
WipeOut wrote:
I understand or agree with all of your points..
My biggest problem is that RH has basically dropped me in the poo by
killing off their free version and stopping support for all the free
versions as well.. I have been looking at alternatives but so far
WipeOut wrote:
Senad Jordanovic wrote:
WipeOut wrote:
I understand or agree with all of your points..
My biggest problem is that RH has basically dropped me in the poo
by killing off their free version and stopping support for all the
free versions as well.. I have been looking at
PROTECTED] Namens Senad Jordanovic
Verzonden: donderdag 22 januari 2004 13:35
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 0.7.1 RH 7.3 RPMS Released
WipeOut wrote:
Senad Jordanovic wrote:
WipeOut wrote:
I understand or agree with all of your points..
My biggest problem
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, WipeOut wrote:
I understand or agree with all of your points..
My biggest problem is that RH has basically dropped me in the poo by
killing off their free version and stopping support for all the free
versions as well.. I have been looking at alternatives but so far
PROTECTED] Namens Senad Jordanovic
Verzonden: donderdag 22 januari 2004 13:35
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 0.7.1 RH 7.3 RPMS Released
WipeOut wrote:
Senad Jordanovic wrote:
WipeOut wrote:
I understand or agree with all of your points..
My biggest problem
This is great to see.. but why RH7.3 (or RH8 for that matter) since it
has already been EOL'ed by RH??
Couple of reasons..
1. It is a stable, known quantity that uses solid components and closely
mirrors the environment that a lot of people develop Asterisk on. It isn't
going to drastically
Ken Godee wrote:
This is great to see.. but why RH7.3 (or RH8 for that matter) since
it has already been EOL'ed by RH??
Couple of reasons..
1. It is a stable, known quantity that uses solid components and
closely mirrors the environment that a lot of people develop Asterisk
on. It isn't
On Thursday 22 January 2004 03:08, WipeOut wrote:
My biggest problem is that RH has basically dropped me in the poo
by killing off their free version and stopping support for all the
free versions as well.. I have been looking at alternatives but so
far nothing is going to fit the bill.. The
Tilghman Lesher wrote:
On Thursday 22 January 2004 03:08, WipeOut wrote:
My biggest problem is that RH has basically dropped me in the poo
by killing off their free version and stopping support for all the
free versions as well.. I have been looking at alternatives but so
far nothing is going
I am researching the use of White Box Enterprise Linux. Someone else in a
similar position with a bunch of 7.x boxes created it. He took all the SRPM
files for REL v3 and removed all the Red Hat logos and trademarks. It is the
same software as Enterprise but you can freely copy it. They also
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, WipeOut wrote:
Ken Godee wrote:
This is great to see.. but why RH7.3 (or RH8 for that matter) since
it has already been EOL'ed by RH??
Couple of reasons..
1. It is a stable, known quantity that uses solid components and
closely mirrors the environment
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Tilghman Lesher wrote:
On Thursday 22 January 2004 03:08, WipeOut wrote:
My biggest problem is that RH has basically dropped me in the poo
by killing off their free version and stopping support for all the
free versions as well.. I have been looking at alternatives but
: Thursday, January 22, 2004 11:29 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 0.7.1 RH 7.3 RPMS Released
On Thursday 22 January 2004 03:08, WipeOut wrote:
My biggest problem is that RH has basically dropped me in the poo
by killing off their free version and stopping support for all the
free
On Thu, 2004-01-22 at 12:17, Jonathan Moore wrote:
I am researching the use of White Box Enterprise Linux. Someone else in a
similar position with a bunch of 7.x boxes created it. He took all the SRPM
files for REL v3 and removed all the Red Hat logos and trademarks. It is the
same software as
On Thu, 2004-01-22 at 18:17, Jonathan Moore wrote:
I am researching the use of White Box Enterprise Linux. Someone else in a
similar position with a bunch of 7.x boxes created it. He took all the SRPM
files for REL v3 and removed all the Red Hat logos and trademarks. It is the
same software as
Greg Boehnlein wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, WipeOut wrote:
Ken Godee wrote:
The problem with running servers based on RH 6.x, 7.x and 8 is that RH
is not providing errata (security specifically) updates any more.. If
you servers are not connected to the internet then, sure stay with
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, WipeOut wrote:
Personal opinion here, but if you are relying on RedHat to be your
security provider, you have no business administering a system connected
to the Internet. Sure, they make it easier, but common sense and a solid
understanding of the applications and
21 matches
Mail list logo