On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 11:26:14PM -0800, Ira wrote:
At 08:51 PM 03/14/2006, you wrote:
In my humble opinion, EVERYONE (unless you have your own in
a different voice/language) that uses Asterisk should be using
these prompts. How about a direct link this time:
For what it's
the ulaw files the hard way...
Bob McDowell
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tzafrir
Cohen
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 2:30 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Native
I have several servers using them, but I only needed to download them
directly from you just once. I replicated the bits myself. The magic of
these advanced technologies... ;)
I could go download them a few more times if it would make you feel better.
All kidding aside, I don't think I ever
, 2006 12:57 PM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Native Sounds - in case you
missed it...
I have several servers using them, but I only needed to download them
directly from you just once. I replicated the bits myself. The magic
Douglas Garstang wrote:
Aren't you bothered by the fact that the sound file quality goes up
and down as different sound files are played? It's quite obvious to
hear the difference between a ulaw file and a gsm file.
Douglas,
I know that you have had a hard time grasping this, but not EVERY
This is just an idea. I personally love the idea of lower cpu
utilization, even more so than better sound quality. So take all your
gsm files, and convert them to ulaw, alaw, g729, etc. Now, when
someome calls in they'll always get the same quality sound files
(i.e., crappy), but cpu usage will
At 12:30 AM 03/15/2006, you wrote:
wget http://server.name/path/to/file
wget ftp://server.name/path/to/file
In fact, what I normally do is copy a link from my browser to the
command line in the terminal window and download it with wget. Saves me
an extra file copy around the net.
I'll get
I discussed the native sounds with my boss the other day. We decided not to use
them because there's only 197 sound files out of a total of 1200 installed on
the system from asterisk and the asterisk-sounds packages. We wanted to have a
consistent playback quality, rather than have it going up
At 08:51 PM 03/14/2006, you wrote:
In my humble opinion, EVERYONE (unless you have your own in
a different voice/language) that uses Asterisk should be using
these prompts. How about a direct link this time:
For what it's worth, the hardest problem I had was not being able to
On Mar 14, 2006, at 9:11 PM, Douglas Garstang wrote:
I discussed the native sounds with my boss the other day. We decided
not to use them because there's only 197 sound files out of a total of
1200 installed on the system from asterisk and the asterisk-sounds
packages. We wanted to have a
On Wed March 15 2006 17:31, Martin Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great, now your your ulaw users can hear shitty audio all the time.
Martin, let's keep this mailing list polite as free of negativity as
possible. There's no need to bite at people. You could easily have said
the same thing a
11 matches
Mail list logo
