On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 07:39 -0600, Rich Adamson wrote:
> > > To help identify the source of the delays, I built a new system this
> > > weekend from scratch. When that is complete, I'll use it to compare
> > > the differences in motherboards, OS distro's, and maybe kernel versions.
> >
> > Very go
> Can you point me to some basic doc on how to do that? I'm rather
> familiar with linux (about ten years worth), but have never tried to
> flop kernels like that.
First time I compiled my own kernel I followed the instructions on
this page : http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+Zaptel+Installati
> Rich Adamson wrote:
>
> > Any suggestions on the above would be greatly appreciated!!!
>
> Try using a non-redhat kernel. i.e. one from kernel.org.
Now that I've got a distructable system, I'd like to try that.
Can you point me to some basic doc on how to do that? I'm rather
familiar with li
Rich Adamson wrote:
Any suggestions on the above would be greatly appreciated!!!
Try using a non-redhat kernel. i.e. one from kernel.org.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-us
Rich Adamson wrote:
To help identify the source of the delays, I built a new system this
weekend from scratch. When that is complete, I'll use it to compare
the differences in motherboards, OS distro's, and maybe kernel versions.
Very good Rich, the results of that work will be very interesting.
A
> > To help identify the source of the delays, I built a new system this
> > weekend from scratch. When that is complete, I'll use it to compare
> > the differences in motherboards, OS distro's, and maybe kernel versions.
>
> Very good Rich, the results of that work will be very interesting.
And
ide
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
|Geoffrey Sachs
|Sent: Lunes, 02 de Mayo de 2005 12:13 a.m.
|To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
|Subject: Re: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Problems with TDM400P card
|
|Thanks for
On Mon, May 2, 2005 9:01 am, Kim Culhan said:
> Patches to the zaptel drivers are described on the Mantis link above.
El wrongo kimster, they're described in this post to the asterisk-bsd list:
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-bsd/2005-March/000719.html
The patches are in this post:
On Mon, May 2, 2005 8:24 am, Rich Adamson said:
> To help identify the source of the delays, I built a new system this
> weekend from scratch. When that is complete, I'll use it to compare
> the differences in motherboards, OS distro's, and maybe kernel versions.
Very good Rich, the results of th
> > Thanks for the info.
> > What hard drives are you using ide or serial ata. Does it make a
> > difference. Thanks
>
> There have been some references recently regarding disk drive types
> relating to tdm400 noise problems.
>
> Has anyone established there is a correlation between drive hardwar
On Mon, May 2, 2005 1:12 am, Geoffrey Sachs said:
> Thanks for the info.
> What hard drives are you using ide or serial ata. Does it make a
> difference. Thanks
There have been some references recently regarding disk drive types
relating to tdm400 noise problems.
Has anyone established there is a
'Kim Culhan'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Asterisk Users Mailing List -
Non-Commercial Discussion'"
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2005 7:44 AM
Subject: RE: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Problems with TDM400P card
Hows does this look?
Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accu
On April 30, 2005 10:23 am, Kim Culhan wrote:
> > If so, what do see if you run 'vmstat 1' and let it run for about
> > twenty seconds? Do you see the cpu utilization going to about 100%
> > every five or six seconds?
>
> Negative:
That's interesting; so that can potentially narrow the problemati
-Original Message-
> |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> |Rich Adamson
> |Sent: Sábado, 30 de Abril de 2005 11:07 a.m.
> |To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> |Subject: RE: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Problems with TDM400P card
-Commercial Discussion
|Subject: RE: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Problems with TDM400P card
|
|The way that zttest is written makes it a little difficult to
|interpret, but it essentially means that zttest tried to read
|8192 bytes from the TDM card, and it took more then 1 second
|to do it (the objective
t; |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> |Kim Culhan
> |Sent: Sábado, 30 de Abril de 2005 08:45 a.m.
> |To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> |Subject: Re: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Problems with TDM400P card
> |
> |On Fri, April 29, 2005 4:58 pm, GEOFFREY SACHS said:
> |> I woul
measure?
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
|Kim Culhan
|Sent: Sábado, 30 de Abril de 2005 08:45 a.m.
|To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
|Subject: Re: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Problems with TDM400P card
|
|On Fri, April 29, 2005 4:58 pm
On Sat, April 30, 2005 10:52 am, Rich Adamson said:
>> On Fri, April 29, 2005 4:58 pm, GEOFFREY SACHS said:
>>
>>> I would also be interested in alternatives to the Tdm400p. I have
>>> had endless problems with a tdm400p card not being able to get
>>> the zttest numbers above 99.975 and as a resul
> On Fri, April 29, 2005 4:58 pm, GEOFFREY SACHS said:
> > I would also be interested in alternatives to the Tdm400p. I have had
> > endless
> > problems with a tdm400p card not being able to get the zttest numbers above
> > 99.975 and as a result not being able eliminate an intermitent but
> > c
On Fri, April 29, 2005 4:58 pm, GEOFFREY SACHS said:
> I would also be interested in alternatives to the Tdm400p. I have had endless
> problems with a tdm400p card not being able to get the zttest numbers above
> 99.975 and as a result not being able eliminate an intermitent but consistent
> echo.
2005 11:54 am
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Problems with TDM400P card
Which card do you recommend using instead of the tdm400p?
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
|John Novack
|Sent: Viernes, 29 de Abril de 2005 09:19 a.m.
|To: Asterisk Us
combinations as
well as different linux versions to no avial.I would welcome some feedback on
this.
Geoffrey Sachs
- Original Message -
From: Anton Krall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, April 29, 2005 11:54 am
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Problems with TDM400P card
&
> -Original Message-
> From: Anton Krall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 1:50 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Asterisk Users Mailing List -
> Non-Commercial Discussion'
> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Problems with TDM400P card
>
: [Asterisk-Users] Problems with TDM400P card
|
|Anton Krall wrote:
|> Zttool shows nothing inside thebox.
|I have had similar problems with a TDM400 and CERTAIN
|Motherboards which are PCI 2.2 but the TDM400 is not seen, in
|my case, AT ALL The one I have reports it as an E/F but the
|silk-screen clea
How do I remove it from kudzu?
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
|Robert Webb
|Sent: Viernes, 29 de Abril de 2005 08:57 a.m.
|To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
|Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Problems with
> Zttool shows nothing inside thebox.
>
> I tried removing the x100 cards, moving the tdm card around, disabled all
> usb and unnecessary stuff still, kudzu when booting up shows the card and
> the card shows up on /etc/sysconfig/hwconf but I wonder why it shows 2 of
> these and I only have 1 tdm4
ng List - Non-Commercial Discussion
|Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Problems with TDM400P card
|
|> I have a problem getting a TDM400P card to go.
|>
|> It has 4 FXS ports (green modules) and I get this error:
|>
|> [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# ztcfg -v
|>
|> Zaptel Configurat
>
> Zttool shows nothing inside thebox.
>
> I tried removing the x100 cards, moving the tdm card around,
> disabled all usb and unnecessary stuff still, kudzu when
> booting up shows the card and the card shows up on
> /etc/sysconfig/hwconf but I wonder why it shows 2 of these
> and I only have 1 t
il de 2005 08:59 a.m.
|To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
|Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Problems with TDM400P card
|
|> I have a problem getting a TDM400P card to go.
|>
|> It has 4 FXS ports (green modules) and I get this error:
|>
|> [EMAIL PROT
> Guys
>
> I have a problem getting a TDM400P card to go.
>
> It has 4 FXS ports (green modules) and I get this error:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# ztcfg -v
>
> Zaptel Configuration
> ==
>
>
> Channel map:
>
> Channel 01: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 01) Channel 02:
> FX
> I have a problem getting a TDM400P card to go.
>
> It has 4 FXS ports (green modules) and I get this error:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# ztcfg -v
>
> Zaptel Configuration
> ==
>
>
> Channel map:
>
> Channel 01: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 01)
> Channel 02: FXS K
Anton Krall wrote:
Guys
I have a problem getting a TDM400P card to go.
It has 4 FXS ports (green modules) and I get this error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# ztcfg -v
Zaptel Configuration
==
Channel map:
Channel 01: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 01)
Channel 02: FXS Kewlstart (
32 matches
Mail list logo
