Hi Vladimir,
I tried the steps as you wrote them but i just get the same error :
Channel map:
Channel 01: FXO Kewlstart (Default) (Echo Canceler: mg2) (Slaves: 01)
Channel 04: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Echo Canceler: mg2) (Slaves: 04)
2 channels to configure.
Changing signalling on channel 1
- Original Message -
From: Remco Barendse aster...@barendse.to
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2011 5:27:27 AM
Subject: [asterisk-users] TDM400 FXO stopped working
Hi list
I have 2 servers
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, Michael L. Young wrote:
I think the clue is actually right there in the error message.
You say that port 1 is an FXO module? Then your signaling is set wrong. The
signaling should be fxsks.
For port 4, it should be fxoks.
Remember, that in the configuration files,
Remco,
In my experience something could have gone wrong with the parameters you pass
to WCTDM driver.
You may want to check your /etc/modprobe.d/dahdi.conf
Try loading the driver manually as follows:
1. Stop Asterisk
2. modprobe -r wctdm
3. modprobe wctdm
4. dahdi_cfg -vvv
Good luck,
Hi Mike,
may I ask where you purchsded your A200 card from?
I managed to get one of the pre-production cards from Sangoma back in November,
however there are some bugs with it and I am unable to flash the
firmware or run latest drivers with it.
Sure, I got it at:
Hadley Rich wrote:
Hi all,
I have hit a wall configuring a TDM400, I have set these up before without
issue but today I just can't seem to figure out what I am doing wrong.
I couldn't make TDM400/FXO work on my 1.2.5 Asterisk either. It wouldn't
answer calls, for unknown reasons. I gave up
On Thursday 23 March 2006 02:08, Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak wrote:
I have hit a wall configuring a TDM400, I have set these up before
without issue but today I just can't seem to figure out what I am doing
wrong.
I couldn't make TDM400/FXO work on my 1.2.5 Asterisk either. It wouldn't
On 3/22/06, Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hadley Rich wrote:
Hi all,
I have hit a wall configuring a TDM400, I have set these up before without
issue but today I just can't seem to figure out what I am doing wrong.
I couldn't make TDM400/FXO work on my 1.2.5
On Wednesday 22 March 2006 16:24, Hadley Rich wrote:
I have hit a wall configuring a TDM400, I have set these up before without
issue but today I just can't seem to figure out what I am doing wrong.
On an incoming call the following is produced in the Asterisk console with
verbose 4
--
2005/12/23, Rich Adamson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm really puzzled and I don't know why it is behaving this way. Any hints?Are you sure the phones and system at work are not electronic/digital sets?Yes, I'm sure phones and lines are both analogic (POTS).
2005/12/24, James B. MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
A problem I had, although different than this, was caused by having/etc/zapata.conf as koolstart when they should have been loopstart.Might be something else to try :).JESI also tried with loopstart in
zaptel.conf and zapata.conf, but without
2005/12/23, Kerry Garrison [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Possible polarity problem with the
jack.
-KerrySo I should to check I have +48VDC on the phone line (red wire is +). Right?
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users
Possible polarity problem with the
jack.
-Kerry
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Filippo
CaroneSent: Friday, December 23, 2005 2:16 PMTo:
asterisk-users@lists.digium.comSubject: [Asterisk-Users] tdm400 fxo
problem
Hi,I'm experiencing a very weird behaviour
I'm experiencing a very weird behaviour with my tdm400 with two fxo and one
fxs
modules. I setup my current
configuration at home, I tried it and it works flawlessly. I moved the
computer to my
office and plugged the fxo to
the wall plug, but when I tried to call I got a busy signal. I
Filippo Carone wrote:
I'm really puzzled and I don't know why it is behaving this way. Any
hints?
Cheers,
fc
A problem I had, although different than this, was caused by having
/etc/zapata.conf as koolstart when they should have been loopstart.
Might be something else to try :).
JES
Tom Vile wrote:
Everyone,
I have a TDM400 REV I Ver 1 board and am having an issue with 1 of the
4 FXO channels. FXO 1 always has clicks, pops and echo but the others
are crystal clear all of the time. The card is on its own IRQ zztest
shows 100% to 99.98% and is getting 1000 int per
I have a TDM400 REV I Ver 1 board and am having an issue with 1 of the
4 FXO channels. FXO 1 always has clicks, pops and echo but the others
are crystal clear all of the time. The card is on its own IRQ zztest
shows 100% to 99.98% and is getting 1000 int per second. Its not
dropping
The problem is not the module though its on the port its plugged into.
I can move the module to another port and it works fine, so I was
thinking it is the board. I guess I will call Digium and see what
they say.
thanks
On 11/22/05, Rich Adamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a TDM400 REV
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Vile
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 6:31 PM
To: Rich Adamson
Cc: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400 FXO port 1 only problem.
The problem is not the module though its on the port its plugged into.
I can move
A nasty screech. That's what callers here sometimes when they dial into
my FXO port from the PSTN. But usually, it works OK.
Is this common?
That was fairly common on the original TDM cards (rev E/F) with older
drivers. The problem would usually show up after the card has been
in
I just installed FXO module in an older TDM400 card in port 1 and had
problems. Moved it to port 2 and everything is fine now.
- Dustin -
Bill Michaelson wrote:
A nasty screech. That's what callers here sometimes when they dial
into my FXO port from the PSTN. But usually, it works OK.
Is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was pretty unhappy to see that the new cards had RJ12 sockets - you can
put RJ12 into RJ45, but not the other way round...
But I do know that a lot of people would ask if RJ12 would fit, so it might
have been to cut down on support calls.
Definitely not :-) It was
Most modern installations/buildings are wired with RJ45, as are the patch panels. RJ12 is a real pain - I had to chop up patch leads and put RJ12 sockets on the end. Very messy and a waste of time.
On Sun, 6 Nov 2005 22:04:48 -0500, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote: On Sunday 06 November 2005 21:46,
On Monday 07 November 2005 12:57, George Gardiner wrote:
Most modern installations/buildings are wired with RJ45, as are the patch
panels. RJ12 is a real pain - I had to chop up patch leads and put RJ12
sockets on the end. Very messy and a waste of time.
We just moved in to a new
Considering that I am a user 'down under' that's even funnier.
PaulH
- Original Message -
From: Kevin P. Fleming [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 2:12 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400
Brand new cards, from a recommended Digium distributor.
What rev? It'll say Freshmaker Rev x on the blue board. I *think* it was
corrected around Rev E or F IIRC, but I don't know for certain.
I spoke with Digium and the distributor tech support on it - gave them
serial numbers,
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
On Saturday 05 November 2005 22:33, Gary Eck wrote:
I have popping with FSO modules only on channel 1 - the other 3 channels
are clear.
That was corrected a long time ago. You must have an older rev TDM400 carrier
card.
-A.
Well, it must be back. I had
Rich Adamson wrote:
Brand new cards, from a recommended Digium distributor.
What rev? It'll say Freshmaker Rev x on the blue board. I *think* it was
corrected around Rev E or F IIRC, but I don't know for certain.
I spoke with Digium and the distributor tech support on it -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 1:57 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400 FXO vs FXS Interrupt performance
Rich Adamson wrote:
Brand new cards, from a recommended Digium
On Sunday 06 November 2005 21:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was pretty unhappy to see that the new cards had RJ12 sockets - you can
put RJ12 into RJ45, but not the other way round...
You've gotta be shitting me.
Why on earth do you want RJ45 jacks for POTS connections? Sure it fits but
it's
Patching in buildings with rj45 sockets.
PaulH
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Kohlsmith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 2:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400 FXO vs FXS Interrupt performance
On Sunday 06 November 2005 21
On Saturday 05 November 2005 15:55, Dustin Goodwin wrote:
I have read a lot online about interrupt related cracking/popping noise
issues on Digium cards. The weird thing is I experience it with the FXO
port on my TDM card but not on the FXS. Does this make any sense? I had
assumed an interrupt
I have popping with FSO modules only on channel 1 - the other 3 channels
are clear.
Moved slots, there are no shared interrupts, replaced the TDM400 card
and all modules - still the same result.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dustin
On Saturday 05 November 2005 22:33, Gary Eck wrote:
I have popping with FSO modules only on channel 1 - the other 3 channels
are clear.
That was corrected a long time ago. You must have an older rev TDM400 carrier
card.
-A.
___
--Bandwidth and
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew
Kohlsmith
Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2005 10:45 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400 FXO vs FXS Interrupt performance
On Saturday 05 November 2005 22:33, Gary Eck wrote:
I have popping with FSO
I do have an older card. I believe I purchased it before the FXO module
started shipping. Can I do anything to resolve or this hw problem with
the card?
- Dustin -
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
On Saturday 05 November 2005 22:33, Gary Eck wrote:
I have popping with FSO modules only on channel
On Saturday 05 November 2005 23:03, Gary Eck wrote:
Brand new cards, from a recommended Digium distributor.
What rev? It'll say Freshmaker Rev x on the blue board. I *think* it was
corrected around Rev E or F IIRC, but I don't know for certain.
I spoke with Digium and the distributor tech
On Saturday 05 November 2005 23:24, Dustin Goodwin wrote:
I do have an older card. I believe I purchased it before the FXO module
started shipping. Can I do anything to resolve or this hw problem with
the card?
Contact Digium and get the carrier card replaced under warranty.
-A.
I am having an issue where my TDM400P FXO module stops acknowledging
incoming rings after running for about a month.
My system is an AMD Athlon XP 2800+ with 256MB RAM, ABIT NF7S
motherboard, Slackware (Linux 2.4.26) and Asterisk from CVS Stable (1.0).
All outbound dialing continues to work
Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.
If your install doesn't have to be 24/7, cron a reboot at 2 am. Since I did,
it's a nonissue for me.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
Having read through the Caller ID code, it appears that this is indeed what is
happening. The Caller ID code doesn't contain any logic to trigger a timeout
if no Caller ID data stream is found, or if a stream starts and does not
terminate.
The attached patch causes the Caller ID to timeout
Hi Will,
snip
Having read through the Caller ID code, it appears that this is indeed
what is happening. The Caller ID code doesn't contain any logic to
trigger a timeout if no Caller ID data stream is found, or if a stream
starts and does not terminate.
/snip
I submitted a patch for this
On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 04:09:21PM -, Ian D. Wlloughby wrote:
I submitted a patch for this which was included in the the CVS build of
the 19th of November.
See bug http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0002909
Ian,
The code I am running includes this patch already (I checked it
Ian,
The code I am running includes this patch already (I checked it out
from CVS on the 21st), and it does not seem to resolve the problem on my
line.
The patch I have posted earlier today, which causes the Caller-ID code
to abort after 15 seconds, does resolve the problem.
Hmmm, it should
H.
Is it possible that the line is detecting a polarity event, decided that the
line is ringing and started listening for a non-existant V23 data stream, and
then the line has not in fact rung?
This would mark the line as busy (and unable to handle an outgoing call) but
when a call did in
Thud!
Will there be no FXO daughter boards for
the TDM400?
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Gene Kochanowsky
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004
7:55 PM
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400
FXO???
Any word/news on the
Will there be no FXO daughter boards for the TDM400?
There will be. Units are again in production after having an issue that
had us stuck for about 2 months.
Mark
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for the reply Mark. When do you expect to ship and are you taking
orders?
Gene
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Spencer
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 9:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400 FXO
48 matches
Mail list logo
