On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 10:06 PM, Michael Graves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All the VUC calls are recorded and available via
http://voipusersconference.org/ning/.
The post-call session is often not recorded, but the main body of the
call is available for download.
I recorded yesterday's post
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 8:14 PM, Alex Balashov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the referent of the DIDs as opposed to merely DIDs?
I think it's a question of the use of the article by a non-native
English speaker. For example in French, the word des means both
some and of the.
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 10:15 PM, Tilghman Lesher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 04 July 2008 19:59:55 Steve Totaro wrote:
FreeSwitch will be the clear winner, or at least the heart of large
scale systems with a few Asterisk boxen here and there until it
becomes more mature.
If you want
Hello All,
One of our French client is dealing in Wholesale termination business. Now
they are going to start retail of Calling Cards. They need complete IVR and
billing solution for it. Any one who has already provided such solutions
please contact.
Regards,
--
Kashif Naeem
Business
On Saturday 05 July 2008 04:24:19 Steve Totaro wrote:
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 10:15 PM, Tilghman Lesher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 04 July 2008 19:59:55 Steve Totaro wrote:
FreeSwitch will be the clear winner, or at least the heart of large
scale systems with a few Asterisk boxen
Can anyone tell me why my * is loosing the IAX user's registration?
Before, I had asterisk installed with root, and after a hardware failure I
reinstalled it under the user asterisk
I'm using exactly the same configuration as before, exactly the same version
as before but now when I try to call
Hello All,
Asterisk 1.4.20.1
SuSE 10.3
I have been building a dial plan and have run into some questions that I
have not been able to answer on Voip-info or google. I am trying to use
either Read or Background to gather user input to an IVR in a Macro. I
need to be able to branch based on the
On 11:13, Sat 05 Jul 08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone tell me why my * is loosing the IAX user's registration?
Before, I had asterisk installed with root, and after a hardware failure I
reinstalled it under the user asterisk
I'm using exactly the same configuration as before,
I'm using i6net's vxml browser in Asterisk.
I'm trying to work out how I can return the inputs from a menu or form back
into the Asterisk dial plan. Is there a variable? It's not documented if it is.
The exit tag apparently can be used to return a value (still trying to work out
how to do
On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Tilghman Lesher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 05 July 2008 04:24:19 Steve Totaro wrote:
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 10:15 PM, Tilghman Lesher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 04 July 2008 19:59:55 Steve Totaro wrote:
FreeSwitch will be the clear winner,
Are they any such things as Cell phone PSTN adapters?
Openmoko is coming out so I hope it will be possible to register it to Asterisk
and/or there will be a small iax registration program to communicate with
asterisk.
--
#Joseph
GPG KeyID: ED0E1FB7
On July 5, 2008 01:50:52 pm Joseph wrote:
Are they any such things as Cell phone PSTN adapters?
Openmoko is coming out so I hope it will be possible to register it to
Asterisk and/or there will be a small iax registration program to
communicate with asterisk.
The beauty of the OpenMoko is
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 10:15 PM, Tilghman Lesher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 04 July 2008 19:59:55 Steve Totaro wrote:
FreeSwitch will be the clear winner, or at least the heart of large
scale systems with a few Asterisk boxen here and there until it
becomes more mature.
If you want
On 07/05/08 09:59, Matt Watson wrote:
On July 5, 2008 01:50:52 pm Joseph wrote:
Are they any such things as Cell phone PSTN adapters?
Openmoko is coming out so I hope it will be possible to register it to
Asterisk and/or there will be a small iax registration program to
communicate with
On Jul 5, 2008, at 2:26 PM, Steve Totaro wrote:
Again, your ability to miss the point is astounding. I never said I
was a Freeswitch fan boy. I am just suggesting using a similar method
of locking with FreeSwitch.
Ideas, obviously Digium doesn't care enough to listen to it's users.
I'm
On 14:26, Sat 05 Jul 08, Steve Totaro wrote:
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 10:15 PM, Tilghman Lesher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 04 July 2008 19:59:55 Steve Totaro wrote:
FreeSwitch will be the clear winner, or at least the heart of large
scale systems with a few Asterisk boxen here and
Kashif Naeem wrote:
One of our French client is dealing in Wholesale termination business.
Now they are going to start retail of Calling Cards. They need complete
IVR and billing solution for it. Any one who has already provided such
solutions please contact.
I gather a2billing is usually
On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 2:47 PM, Michiel van Baak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 14:26, Sat 05 Jul 08, Steve Totaro wrote:
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 10:15 PM, Tilghman Lesher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 04 July 2008 19:59:55 Steve Totaro wrote:
FreeSwitch will be the clear winner, or at
On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Steve Totaro
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 2:47 PM, Michiel van Baak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 14:26, Sat 05 Jul 08, Steve Totaro wrote:
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 10:15 PM, Tilghman Lesher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 04 July 2008
On Sat, 5 Jul 2008, Joseph wrote:
On 07/05/08 09:59, Matt Watson wrote:
On July 5, 2008 01:50:52 pm Joseph wrote:
Are they any such things as Cell phone PSTN adapters?
Openmoko is coming out so I hope it will be possible to register it to
Asterisk and/or there will be a small iax
If anyone is interested I just completed a review of this handset. I
had it installed and in use the past couple of months. My review is
here: http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/content/view/30498/80/
Michael
--
Michael Graves
mgravesatmstvp.com
http://blog.mgraves.org
o713-861-4005
c713-201-1262
Hello Kashif,
Do you have something already working ? Here in Brazil I've worked
on some projects using Asterisk to make some passive call-centers
receive calls from their remote customers. Is it what your customer is
looking for ?
About calling cards, Is something like pre-paid cards ? Do
Hi folks,
I am curious for your thoughts on US HR 5889:
http://blamcast.net/articles/orphaned-works-open-source-copyright
While I am sure that the implications of this bill, as it appears to be
constructed, have no significant implication on Asterisk as such, it could
potentially injure the
On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 7:47 PM, Russell Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you want to talk about locking improvements, then I'm more than
happy to talk about them. Naming an application is useless. Let's
talk about the technical details that make one approach better than
the other.
You
On Saturday 05 July 2008 18:33:50 Alex Balashov wrote:
I am curious for your thoughts on US HR 5889:
http://blamcast.net/articles/orphaned-works-open-source-copyright
While I am sure that the implications of this bill, as it appears to be
constructed, have no significant implication on
Tilghman Lesher wrote:
After reading the bill in question, I have little doubt that the authors of
that blog piece are, to put it mildly, full of it. HR 5889 makes clear
mention of the diligence that is required
What would it take to retroactively conjure the due diligence?
--
Alex
Michael,
Nice review. Can this phone be provisioned without using TFTP? For
example, over the internet? Are there other provisioning methods?
Does it always require user input to start up? It looks like you need
to input the SIP login and password details every time? That sounds
very
Tilghman Lesher wrote:
On Saturday 05 July 2008 18:33:50 Alex Balashov wrote:
I am curious for your thoughts on US HR 5889:
http://blamcast.net/articles/orphaned-works-open-source-copyright
While I am sure that the implications of this bill, as it appears to be
constructed, have no
On Saturday 05 July 2008 20:01:19 Alex Balashov wrote:
Tilghman Lesher wrote:
After reading the bill in question, I have little doubt that the authors
of that blog piece are, to put it mildly, full of it. HR 5889 makes
clear mention of the diligence that is required
What would it take to
On Saturday 05 July 2008 19:59:25 Tom Poe wrote:
Tilghman Lesher wrote:
On Saturday 05 July 2008 18:33:50 Alex Balashov wrote:
I am curious for your thoughts on US HR 5889:
http://blamcast.net/articles/orphaned-works-open-source-copyright
While I am sure that the implications of this
On Jul 5, 2008, at 7:59 PM, Grey Man wrote:
From what I can gather the suggestion from the FS approach is that
each Asterisk channel should be handled after by it's own unique
thread and save the need for any locking on the channel data
structures in the first place.
Having a thread per
Russell Bryant wrote:
You have yet to bring any useful discussion to the table.
If I were you, I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for any, either :)
--
Sean Bright
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by
On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 11:33 PM, Sean Bright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Russell Bryant wrote:
You have yet to bring any useful discussion to the table.
If I were you, I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for any, either :)
--
Sean Bright
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sure I have. I have two test
Steve Totaro wrote:
There must be a reason What is it?
That is the question that *you* are being asked.
A competing project is getting better performance and you believe it has
to do with locking. What specific changes do you suggest making to the
locking infrastructure in Asterisk in
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 4:11 AM, Russell Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 5, 2008, at 7:59 PM, Grey Man wrote:
Having a thread per channel _absolutely does NOT_ remove the need for
locking to synchronize access to channel data structures.
It does if only one thread needs to access the
35 matches
Mail list logo
