simple and perfect
now is works fine!
thanks
Eric ManxPower Wieling wrote:
Remove the r option to Dial.
Bruno Castelo Branco wrote:
Hi all
When I call to any mobile and the device is power off the asterisk keep
ringing and I not able to hear the tradicional message saying this
mobile
Can I use grep ? Tried but not working. please help
Thanks Shaun___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
Hi All, how are you?
I would like to know from you if the problem can be below is a BUG of
the asterisk-1.4.21.
I did an upgrade version of asterisk-1.2.18 for the version of
asterisk-1.4.21 and now, when users try to sip friend outgoing calls
through Polycom IP 330 appliances can not be the
Dear All
FBI issues VoIP security warning on Asterisk -- but which version?
Any one know which version ?
Regards
*
No employee or agent is authorized to conclude any binding agreement on behalf
of Xplorium with another party by e-mail without
Thanks, that makes plenty of sense. I thought I could only check if a
phone as busted it's call-limit, but I just tested and it works well.
Thank you!
Mike
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Alexander
Hi,
I heard some time ago that, when running a SIP firmware, Cisco hardphones
needed a Cisco call manager to get localized (ie non-english) menus ?
Is it still true ?
Regards
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
On 14:51, Fri 12 Dec 08, Khaled Chehab wrote:
Dear All
FBI issues VoIP security warning on Asterisk -- but which version?
Any one know which version ?
Regards
Hi,
See this listpost:
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2008-December/223172.html
--
Michiel van Baak
Scott Berry schrieb:
I am trying to get Asterisk set up by using the book Asterisk: The
Future of Telephony. I am on Chapter 4. I have have set up Zaptel and
zapata.conf and also set up extensions.conf and when I run asterisk -r
at the Gnome-terminal to connect with Asterisk I get the
Shaun Wingrin schrieb:
Can I use grep ? Tried but not working.
tail -f /var/log/asterisk/messages | grep 'channels unavailable'
Philipp Kempgen
--
http://www.das-asterisk-buch.de - http://www.the-asterisk-book.com
Amooma GmbH - Bachstr. 126 - 56566 Neuwied - http://www.amooma.de
Try this first:
Cat /var/log/asterisk/messages|grep channels unavailable
Once you get grep output from this, changing the grep on the tail command
should produce the desired results.
Since the tail -f is a dynamic situation, it is much easier to make the test
on the fixed cat command.
This seemed to be specific to 1.4.19 and prior.
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Khaled Chehab
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 6:52 AM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
Hello,
I am looking for a good prepaid solution.
What is the best ?
Cordialement,
BERGANZ François
P Pensez à l'Environnement, n'imprimez ce mail que si nécessaire.
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by
You should try these steps
1. core show application park from the CLI interface
2. look at features.conf
3. one of these should offer the hint you seek
_
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Mike
On Dec 12, 2008, at 8:16 AM, Michiel van Baak wrote:
On 14:51, Fri 12 Dec 08, Khaled Chehab wrote:
Dear All
FBI issues VoIP security warning on Asterisk -- but which version?
Any one know which version ?
Regards
Hi,
See this listpost:
Hi Don,
Don Kelly wrote:
Caution---top posting. It works for me--ignore it if you like.
Without forgiving Michael's commercial message to *-users, perhaps we
can punish your top posting by highlighting your gross insensitivity to
the physically challenged! :-)
And (flame follows) we
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 08:11:51PM +1300, Michael wrote:
I put context = xyz in the sip.conf upline supplier configuration and it
ignores this and seems to place it in to default, as the incoming call rule
in extensions.conf only works when placed in [default] ruleset.
Could you please post
Did you make a [xyz] context in extensions.conf? if the sip.conf doesn't
find the content, it drops back to default.
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Tzafrir Cohen
Sent: Friday, December 12,
I just want to pdf and email faxes coming in over pstn on a TDM400P.
Outgoing faxes would just go out over pstn, not through asterisk.
All the voipinfo , etc, howto's are quite complicated. And most use
third party apps like Hylafax.
I thought there was a rxfax and txfax in 1.4. And 1.6 had
has anyone used a multivoip device from bogen MP130?
I am looking for information on how to configure it
for use with asterisk.
Jerry
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Alessandro Russo wrote:
we are using Asterisk 1.4.18.1 http://1.4.18.1/ on debian 4.0 etch,
pwlib 1.10 and openh323 1.18.
We are using MeetMe for conference calls and with two participants
there is no echo problems, but with more than two participants there
is a lot of echo that
Danny,
I've been starring at features.conf since yesterday AM, and I do realize
there is an example that looks close to what I want, but the same thing
typed in my own dialplan doesn't work.
All I want, for the sake of discussion, is to Hangup() when the call gets
out of parking after the
prepaid solution for what?
2008/12/12 BERGANZ François franc...@acropolistelecom.net
Hello,
I am looking for a good prepaid solution.
What is the best ?
Cordialement,
BERGANZ François
P Pensez à l'Environnement, n'imprimez ce mail que si nécessaire.
After some research, it seems that asterisk builds a dynamic context called
[park-dial] and puts a callback for the parker into line 1, so this would
have to be a patch/workaround.
_
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On
How is MSet() different from Set()?
Is it supposed to be a Multi-Set()?
Why was it added in 1.6?
Philipp Kempgen
--
http://www.das-asterisk-buch.de - http://www.the-asterisk-book.com
Amooma GmbH - Bachstr. 126 - 56566 Neuwied - http://www.amooma.de
Geschäftsführer: Stefan Wintermeyer,
Philipp Kempgen wrote:
How is MSet() different from Set()?
Is it supposed to be a Multi-Set()?
Why was it added in 1.6?
Philipp Kempgen
It is a Multiset application. My recollection of the addition is that due to
parser changes in 1.6, a statement like:
exten =
Mark Michelson wrote:
Philipp Kempgen wrote:
How is MSet() different from Set()?
Is it supposed to be a Multi-Set()?
Why was it added in 1.6?
Philipp Kempgen
It is a Multiset application. My recollection of the addition is that due to
parser changes in 1.6, a statement like:
Mark Michelson schrieb:
Philipp Kempgen wrote:
How is MSet() different from Set()?
Is it supposed to be a Multi-Set()?
Why was it added in 1.6?
It is a Multiset application. My recollection of the addition is that due to
parser changes in 1.6, a statement like:
exten =
Hi all,
I would like to ask please if there is a way to play a ring back tone from
asterisk when the customer try to make a call...I already added the ringing
function to the context in extensions .conf and it work perfectly...But the
issue that the asterisk server is stoping playing back his own
On Friday 12 December 2008 16:05:38 Philipp Kempgen wrote:
Mark Michelson schrieb:
Philipp Kempgen wrote:
How is MSet() different from Set()?
Is it supposed to be a Multi-Set()?
Why was it added in 1.6?
It is a Multiset application. My recollection of the addition is that due
to
michel freiha schrieb:
I would like to ask please if there is a way to play a ring back tone from
asterisk when the customer try to make a call...I already added the ringing
function to the context in extensions .conf and it work perfectly...But the
issue that the asterisk server is stoping
No, not on FXO ports. On FXO ports Asterisk considers the call answered
as soon as dialing is finished. Asterisk has no way to detect when the
far end answers when using FXO ports.
michel freiha wrote:
I would like to ask please if there is a way to play a ring back tone from
asterisk when
On Friday 12 December 2008 12:08:55 sean darcy wrote:
I just want to pdf and email faxes coming in over pstn on a TDM400P.
Outgoing faxes would just go out over pstn, not through asterisk.
All the voipinfo , etc, howto's are quite complicated. And most use
third party apps like Hylafax.
I
On Friday 12 December 2008 15:41:54 Mark Michelson wrote:
would result in a variable called FOO being set to the value
hello,BAR=world. The MSet application was added to facilitate being able
to set multiple variables in a single application call. If using MSet, the
above would instead result
Philipp Kempgen wrote:
michel freiha schrieb:
I would like to ask please if there is a way to play a ring back tone from
asterisk when the customer try to make a call...I already added the ringing
function to the context in extensions .conf and it work perfectly...But the
issue that the
Foundry serverIron does support SIP and its ASIC not a linux box Load
balancer like F5,
Refer to Chapter 10 (page 677) of ServerIron manual.
It explains everything in detail.
Also you may need to play with source nat a little bit to make your specific
configuration work, but it should work, at
One of the above is frequently used to front-end Asterisk.
I used OpenSER to front-end a farm of Asterisk servers and was very happy
with it. The ability to take a box out of service or to route a specific
DNIS to a box for testing rocks.
Since OpenSER has died (I don't care about the
At this point, it's six one, half dozen the other, although that may
change with time. Kamailio and SER appear to be joining forces. But
it's mostly a matter of your affinity with the community and the various
political forces and personalities at this point.
I personally am sticking with
But, just to be clear, the answer to your question - or more precisely,
the answer to the question underlying your question (WHY are you using
what you're using?) - is fundamentally political in its essence.
Most aspects of the case for one or the other have little to do with
technology. At
Have you checked out OpenSBC (www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/*OpenSBC)?*
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 6:19 PM, Steve Edwards asterisk@sedwards.comwrote:
One of the above is frequently used to front-end Asterisk.
I used OpenSER to front-end a farm of Asterisk servers and was very happy
with it.
Also, both projects are open source, so they can (and do) take patches
from each other both for bug fixes and for new features.
The smart project will take the good stuff from the other while
simultaneously doing a better job of providing a commercial and
political ecosystem that leads to
I am looking for a VOIP provider that can offer origination and
provide the RDNIS with each call. I am not looking for any large
volume commitment.
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To
Is there any good free / accurate online resources with detailed country
numbering plans? Failing that let's get something running ourselves.
I was also thinking maybe people present could contribute some information on
this list for now. The countries I am after are below.
To start this off I
One of the problems you'll run into is that in larger countries like the
US, and/or countries with greater amounts of telecom interconnection,
competition and deregulation, this information cannot be reduced simply
to a convenient algorithm.
The North American Numbering Plan (www.nanpa.com)
If you want an idea of what the setup looks like in NANPA land, enjoy
this convenient spreadsheet:
http://www.nanpa.com/nanp1/allutlzd.zip
Notice that there is no discernable pattern to the number space
allocated to a particular flavour of carrier.
And do beware that these are 10,000 code
On Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:24:56 you wrote:
One of the problems you'll run into is that in larger countries like the
US, and/or countries with greater amounts of telecom interconnection,
competition and deregulation, this information cannot be reduced simply
to a convenient algorithm.
The North
Michael wrote:
Yes, but calls to the USA and Canada landline/cellular cost the same.
What? No, they don't. They absolutely do not; there are many, many
different intercarrier compensation tiers here depending on operating
area and the applicable tariffs arising from regulatory
On Sat, 13 Dec 2008, Michael wrote:
I'm not saying it can't be done - just be aware that the undertaking
you're proposing is very complicated, and the information would come
from innumerable data sources (a great deal of them commercial and
expensive) and a bewilderingly overlapping array of
Jeff LaCoursiere wrote:
In general you don't need to worry about that, as when you go to buy
your routes, the splits are given to you. For example, though you
have split up New Zealand nicely I don't need that information, as the
termination provider I buy New Zealand from gives me one
In general you don't need to worry about that, as when you go to buy your
routes, the splits are given to you. For example, though you have split
up New Zealand nicely I don't need that information, as the termination
provider I buy New Zealand from gives me one price for what they deem
Only when it's simple. When a country is small or is big but has a
single state telco incumbent and a few mobile carriers, that's not too
hard.
Of course you can get blended domestic US48 termination - most people
do. But, two things happen when you hit a large traffic volume that
cause
Michael wrote:
Let's forget about USA/Canada for now as from my/most people's point of view
the routes are all so cheap (and blended) that it does not matter. I think it
is more important to focus on other countries.
What is your traffic volume such that you are claiming to speak for most
On Sat, 13 Dec 2008, Michael wrote:
In general you don't need to worry about that, as when you go to buy your
routes, the splits are given to you. For example, though you have split
up New Zealand nicely I don't need that information, as the termination
provider I buy New Zealand from
Hmm, I looked over your summary again against the route prefixes I just
gave and they seem to match. They aren't as detailed, but that isn't
important, as long as I can tell a cellular from a landline, which those
prefixes do accomplish. I don't really care how accurate they are either,
as
On Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:45:11 Alex Balashov wrote:
Michael wrote:
Let's forget about USA/Canada for now as from my/most people's point of
view the routes are all so cheap (and blended) that it does not matter. I
think it is more important to focus on other countries.
What is your traffic
On Sat, 13 Dec 2008, Michael wrote:
Hmm, I looked over your summary again against the route prefixes I just
gave and they seem to match. They aren't as detailed, but that isn't
important, as long as I can tell a cellular from a landline, which those
prefixes do accomplish. I don't really
On Sat, 13 Dec 2008, Michael wrote:
On Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:45:11 Alex Balashov wrote:
Michael wrote:
Let's forget about USA/Canada for now as from my/most people's point of
view the routes are all so cheap (and blended) that it does not matter. I
think it is more important to focus on
Michael wrote:
Well, hopefully some people outside of the USA/Canada will assist me with
other destinations on the list.
That, on the other hand, may not be a bad idea. Although I expect it
would become useless in increasing degrees proportional to the level of
deregulation and competition
You forgot Uruguay I can give you the info if you want :)
Enviado desde mi iPhone
El 13/12/2008, a las 01:10 a.m., Michael mich...@networkstuff.co.nz
escribió:
Is there any good free / accurate online resources with detailed
country
numbering plans? Failing that let's get something
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 18:57, Eric ManxPower Wieling e...@fnords.org wrote:
Philipp Kempgen wrote:
michel freiha schrieb:
I would like to ask please if there is a way to play a ring back tone from
asterisk when the customer try to make a call...I already added the ringing
function to the
On Fri, December 12, 2008 10:50 pm, Michael wrote:
Yes, but with an A-Z carrier, this can become risky when landline calls
are charged very differently to cellular calls, as is the case in NZ,
Australia and many other countries, unless someone is just a 'virtual'
provider and letting their
On Fri, December 12, 2008 10:57 pm, Michael wrote:
So therefore the over all USA and NA % is smaller from this part of the
world, hence the up line can make enough profit over all that they are
less likely to view it as a loosing proposition.
That depends entirely on who your users are
Michael wrote:
Yes, but with an A-Z carrier, this can become risky when landline calls are
charged very differently to cellular calls, as is the case in NZ, Australia
and many other countries, unless someone is just a 'virtual' provider and
letting their up line do the invoices.
Some
SIP wrote:
As a project, that's not only daunting technologically, but massively
difficult politically. A lot of those UCs aren't going to WANT to join
your coalition of information. After all, what's in it for them?
Not to mention that there are plenty of commercial consultancies, tariff
Alex Balashov wrote:
You'd be cutting into the revenue stream of folks like Telcordia, CCMI, etc.
... which, of course, there's nothing wrong with. Just be prepared to
witness the awesome power of their fully operational legal battlestation.
--
Alex Balashov
Evariste Systems
Web:
Michael wrote:
On Sat, 13 Dec 2008 19:29:23 you wrote:
Alex Balashov wrote:
You'd be cutting into the revenue stream of folks like Telcordia, CCMI,
etc.
... which, of course, there's nothing wrong with. Just be prepared to
witness the awesome power of their fully operational legal
Here is the data for Israel:
+972 is the international prefix, and then:
2,3,4,8,9 and then 7 digits: Landline, according to the dialling area;
usually copper connected phones.
7x and then 7 digits: Landline, country wide numbering (usually IP based
operators).
x: 2=Golden lines (012),
What's more, the official numbering plan authorities' information
doesn't provides even less insight into the cost structure once you take
into account that different underlying carriers have different ways of
delivering calls to different mobile providers.
For instance, yes, it is a general
Michael wrote:
There IS life outside of the USA (shock, horror!)
I am not making the metaphysical error of assuming otherwise. I'm just
pointing out that routing complexity introduces exponentially with
competition.
Anyone can download NZ's entire numbering plan down to suburb/town level
68 matches
Mail list logo
