On 05/10/12 00:09, Richard Mudgett wrote:
Please just reply to the mailing list.
oops, that was my intention, my bad.
Are you able to make calls when in PTP mode?
I just tested: yes it seams so!
The warning message is just
complaining about receiving unexpected TEI management messages
Hi all,
for smaller (or maybe even bigger) sites I'm looking for a smaller,
appliance-type like PC, preferably solid state and fanless PC.
Since it's only going to run Asterisk for a couple of extensions I don't
think CPU and RAM need to be maxed out.
Does anyone have inspiration/experience
Its rather surprising that i'm unable to find the code documentation
generated by make progdocs. It should be /usr/share or
/usr/local/share but it does not appear to be there.
Any clue?
--
-aft
--
_
-- Bandwidth and
Hello,
I've been using the Digium D40's for a few weeks now and I think they
are good for the price. There are a few UI problems but I hope/expect
they will be resolved in a firmware update or two.
Haven't looked at the SDK yet.
Thanks,
Dennis
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:38 AM, Danny Dias
We've just had one of each delivered for us to play with in our lab (Literally
an hour ago!). Not had chance to play with them yet, But initial thoughts are
they look good. Build quality seems fine for the price. I'll form more of an
opinion when i get chance to play with them properly
On 05/09/2012 08:38 PM, Danny Dias wrote:
Hello,
Im looking to buy a digium phone D70 unit just for testing on lab; to
really understand the phone and features.
I cant find any website with opinions; any here? Are they really
valuable to the price? (D70 quite expensive)
Does the SDK for
On 05/10/2012 05:08 AM, Arif Hossain wrote:
Its rather surprising that i'm unable to find the code documentation
generated by make progdocs. It should be /usr/share or
/usr/local/share but it does not appear to be there.
Any clue?
It is generated in the 'doc' directory of the source code
Dears;
How I can increase the voice volume in the analogue line (at dahdi port)
without getting a problems in the entered digits (when using Background
function)?
I got to know previously that it is possible to increase the gain at hardware
and not software, this is better to avoid getting a
I use HP Thin Clients with AstLinux installed.
HP 5720's are available on eBay for not much money, or there are many
small boards available new if you don't or can't use used. 10 watts, no
fan, no HD
Not sure what might be available in your part of the world, but there
are Sockris and ALIX
Another option is to get those routers that are capable of running dd-wrt
firmware with USB ports(for storage)
This option is rather good if you don't need any VoIP cards and if you are OK
to use sip/iax2 etc trunks.
I have my wifi router with dd-wrt firmware running asterisk for home use.
On Thursday 10 May 2012, Bart Coninckx wrote:
I'm looking for a smaller,
appliance-type like PC, preferably solid state and fanless PC.
Since it's only going to run Asterisk for a couple of extensions I don't
think CPU and RAM need to be maxed out.
Does anyone have inspiration/experience
Hello!
I will be running an Asterisk SIP Masterclass - the last one - in Barcelona in
June. During this week, I will organize a dinner for everyone working with or
interested in Asterisk, Kamailio and other Open Source platforms for realtime
communication. It's June 13th somewhere in Barcelona
On 05/10/12 13:49, A J Stiles wrote:
On Thursday 10 May 2012, Bart Coninckx wrote:
I'm looking for a smaller,
appliance-type like PC, preferably solid state and fanless PC.
Since it's only going to run Asterisk for a couple of extensions I don't
think CPU and RAM need to be maxed out.
Does
That's Soekris I suppose. Never heard of them, but it looks mighty
interesting.
Cheers,
BC
On 05/10/12 13:35, John Novack wrote:
I use HP Thin Clients with AstLinux installed.
HP 5720's are available on eBay for not much money, or there are many
small boards available new if you don't or
This is for an ISDN project, but Beronet has ISDN gateways with
ethernet, so even that might not be an issue,
cheers,
BC
On 05/10/12 13:43, Arstan Jusupov wrote:
Another option is to get those routers that are capable of running dd-wrt
firmware with USB ports(for storage)
This option is
On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 12:49 +0100, A J Stiles wrote:
On Thursday 10 May 2012, Bart Coninckx wrote:
I'm looking for a smaller,
appliance-type like PC, preferably solid state and fanless PC.
Since it's only going to run Asterisk for a couple of extensions I don't
think CPU and RAM need to
Correct. I have never been accused of being a good speller!
JN
Bart Coninckx wrote:
That's Soekris I suppose. Never heard of them, but it looks mighty
interesting.
Cheers,
BC
On 05/10/12 13:35, John Novack wrote:
I use HP Thin Clients with AstLinux installed.
HP 5720's are available on
This thread may interest you. Add a SSD and RAM and you're good to go!
http://pbxinaflash.com/community/index.php?threads/diy-piaf2-server-200.
12460/
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of John
Bart Coninckx wrote:
Hi all,
for smaller (or maybe even bigger) sites I'm looking for a smaller,
appliance-type like PC, preferably solid state and fanless PC.
Since it's only going to run Asterisk for a couple of extensions I
don't think CPU and RAM need to be maxed out.
Does anyone have
- Original Message -
On Thursday 10 May 2012, Bart Coninckx wrote:
I'm looking for a smaller,
appliance-type like PC, preferably solid state and fanless PC.
Since it's only going to run Asterisk for a couple of extensions I
don't
think CPU and RAM need to be maxed out.
Does
On Thu, 10 May 2012, A J Stiles wrote:
On Thursday 10 May 2012, Bart Coninckx wrote:
I'm looking for a smaller,
appliance-type like PC, preferably solid state and fanless PC.
Since it's only going to run Asterisk for a couple of extensions I don't
think CPU and RAM need to be maxed out.
Does
There seems to even be a 1.6 Ghz Intel Atom device.
One site I'm looking to use this for has about 40 SIP phones and three
BRIs. It's always a guessing game whether devices like this are up for
that.
If they do have some processing power, I might even consider combining
them as a highly
These prices are simply stunning ...
Little can go wrong with the CPU's speed.
awesome,
BC
On 05/10/12 14:32, Terry Brummell wrote:
This thread may interest you. Add a SSD and RAM and you're good to go!
http://pbxinaflash.com/community/index.php?threads/diy-piaf2-server-200.
12460/
Tim,
looked at these briefly, they all seemed pre-installed, correct? Is
reinstallation with, let's say, CentOS possible?
thx,
BC
On 05/10/12 14:39, Tim Nelson wrote:
Bart Coninckx wrote:
Hi all,
for smaller (or maybe even bigger) sites I'm looking for a smaller,
appliance-type like PC,
Hi Bilal,
High volume is always a big for echo cancellation. The problem is that the
signal reaches saturation and therefore reduce the effectiveness of the
detection/convergence. If your existing echo cancellation can not handle it,
you might want to try a different algorithm for echo
Dear,
I am using Fax-to-Email feature of FreePBX, now i am looking Email-To-Fax
option with freePBX, kindly update is it possible to have this feature with
FreePBX?
kindly contact me on my email miana...@msn.com if anybody have this type of
solution. thanks.
--
Regards,
M. Asif
- Original Message -
Tim,
looked at these briefly, they all seemed pre-installed, correct? Is
reinstallation with, let's say, CentOS possible?
thx,
BC
The units *can* come preinstalled with our PBX flavor (Debian, Asterisk,
FreePBX), or they can be sent bare and you can
Has anyone been able to get SLA ( Shared Line Appearance ) to work with Polycom
phones.
I want to be able to emulate a key system but I cannot figure it out.
Everything I tried so far is just not working together.
Thanks,
--E
--
I have following sip account :
Name/username HostDyn
Forcerport ACL Port Status Description
demo-alice/demo-alice 192.168.7.47 D
N 1080 Unmonitored
demo-bob/demo-bob 192.168.7.47
Has anyone been able to get SLA ( Shared Line Appearance ) to work with Polycom
phones.
I want to be able to emulate a key system but I cannot figure it out.
Everything I tried so far is just not working together.
Thanks,
--E
--
Which flavor of Asterisk and what model Polycom? Both are factors in the
possible success of the task.
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of eherr
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 9:45 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
On 05/10/2012 09:39 AM, Arif Hossain wrote:
I have following sip account :
Name/username HostDyn
Forcerport ACL Port Status Description
demo-alice/demo-alice 192.168.7.47 D
N 1080
On 05/10/2012 03:49 AM, Bart Coninckx wrote:
Hi all,
for smaller (or maybe even bigger) sites I'm looking for a smaller,
appliance-type like PC, preferably solid state and fanless PC.
Since it's only going to run Asterisk for a couple of extensions I don't
think CPU and RAM need to be maxed
- Original Message -
On 05/10/2012 03:49 AM, Bart Coninckx wrote:
Hi all,
for smaller (or maybe even bigger) sites I'm looking for a smaller,
appliance-type like PC, preferably solid state and fanless PC.
Since it's only going to run Asterisk for a couple of extensions I
don't
- Original Message -
From: Tim Nelson tnel...@rockbochs.com
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 11:43:07 AM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] looking for solid state like PC suitable for
Asterisk
Oh yeah, damn small things.
Asterisk 1.8.7.1
Polycom IP650
Thanks,
--E
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Danny Nicholas
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 10:47 AM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 07:40 -0500, Tim Nelson wrote:
- Original Message -
On Thursday 10 May 2012, Bart Coninckx wrote:
I'm looking for a smaller,
appliance-type like PC, preferably solid state and fanless PC.
Since it's only going to run Asterisk for a couple of extensions I
You read this? -
http://www.asteriskdocs.org/en/3rd_Edition/asterisk-book-html-chunk/SLA.html
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of eherr
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 12:00 PM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List -
Yes but I am not able to follow it to completion.
I think the guide is quite incomplete.
I am also trying to follow another guide which leaves things out.
I was hoping that someone has it working so they can tell me exactly what is
missing and needs to be done.
--E
From:
I was able to do it with 1.4 and an IP501. You just get your hints set up
correctly and life should be good. You set up the hints as contacts in the
directory.
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of eherr
Sent: Thursday, May
Dear;
I am talking about something else.
When I said increasing the volume from the hardware, I was mean something else.
Before when we were using Zaptel, we were able to do this (increasing the
volume from the hardware) in the /etc/modprobe.conf but currently we are using
dahdi and I do not
Unfortunately I am still a sitting duck.
Any old configs you can show me?
Its driving me insane.
I am trying to set it up in this fashion:
Everything is SIP based. I do not have ZAP/Dahdi/etc.
6 IP650 phones.
line keys 3,4,5,6 will be emulating the Key System with line keys 1 and 2
/etc/asterisk/chan_dahdi.conf is where you control txgain and rxgain in
DAHDI.
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of bilal ghayyad
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 1:37 PM
To:
Since you are doing all SIP, you would want something like this:
exten = 1000,hint,SIP/100
exten = 2000,hint,SIP/200
exten = 3000,hint,SIP/300
exten = 4000,hint,SIP/400
Then set up your lines to look for 1000@default, 2000@default, etc.
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:36:51AM -0700, bilal ghayyad wrote:
When I said increasing the volume from the hardware, I was mean
something else. Before when we were using Zaptel, we were able to
do this (increasing the volume from the hardware) in the
/etc/modprobe.conf but currently we are
Would those be the shared lines?
Continuing with the assumption they are, I need to set them up in stations in
the SLA.conf file?
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Danny Nicholas
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 2:44
Correct - the sla.conf makes the line active the hint makes it accessible
by the phone.
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of eherr
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 1:51 PM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
Then on my polycom what are the configurations?
Is it with the line keys such as reg.1 be my extension with line key set to 2
and reg.2 be 1000 ( SLA line 1 ) reg.3 = 200 ( SLA
line 2 )
Or is this set up in the bottom part of the configs under the attendant section?
--E
From:
Hi All,
I did downgrade to asterisk 1.6.2.6 and dahdi 2.3 which is working with
other BRI line (in our NL office), but I get this type of errores:
-- Called G1/0788744550
[May 10 20:07:20] ERROR[27479]: chan_dahdi.c:12280 dahdi_pri_error: ACK
received for '1' outside of window of '0' to '0',
I am sure there should be another place .. if I increased it from
chan_dahdi.conf, the voice quality is bad and the calls will disconnecting
while we are talking ..
Increasing voice volume from chan_dahdi means increasing it at software level,
I am sure there is a place to increase it at
On 10-05-12 21:10, khalid touati wrote:
Hi All,
I did downgrade to asterisk 1.6.2.6 and dahdi 2.3 which is working with
other BRI line (in our NL office), but I get this type of errores:
-- Called G1/0788744550
[May 10 20:07:20] ERROR[27479]: chan_dahdi.c:12280 dahdi_pri_error: ACK
Thank you Patrick for the detailed info, it does make perfect sense to me,
I never expected that Digium cards have such an problem!
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Patrick Lists
asterisk-l...@puzzled.xs4all.nl wrote:
On 10-05-12 21:10, khalid touati wrote:
Hi All,
I did downgrade to
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Kevin P. Fleming kpflem...@digium.com wrote:
On 05/10/2012 09:39 AM, Arif Hossain wrote:
I have following sip account :
Name/username Host Dyn
Forcerport ACL Port Status Description
On 05/10/2012 03:20 PM, khalid touati wrote:
Thank you Patrick for the detailed info, it does make perfect sense to
me, I never expected that Digium cards have such an problem!
There are patches in the works already (being tested by users in Europe)
to deal with this layer 1 issue. Upcoming
On 05/10/2012 03:36 PM, Arif Hossain wrote:
Asterisk is not a SIP proxy. If you are entering a SIP URI into your phone,
and that URI does not resolve to the Asterisk server as its target, then the
INVITE request sent by the phone should not even be sent to Asterisk at all
(it should go to
On 05/10/12 18:38, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
On 05/10/2012 03:49 AM, Bart Coninckx wrote:
Hi all,
for smaller (or maybe even bigger) sites I'm looking for a smaller,
appliance-type like PC, preferably solid state and fanless PC.
Since it's only going to run Asterisk for a couple of extensions I
- Original Message -
On 05/10/12 18:38, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
On 05/10/2012 03:49 AM, Bart Coninckx wrote:
Hi all,
for smaller (or maybe even bigger) sites I'm looking for a smaller,
appliance-type like PC, preferably solid state and fanless PC.
Since it's only going to run
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Kevin P. Fleming kpflem...@digium.com wrote:
You'll have to provide more details (primarily a CLI log) then in order for
anyone to be able to help you. You said that Asterisk shows extension is
rejected, but extensions don't get rejected. Extensions can be 'not
When I execute the Action commands set then the Event would response back.
How would I know which Action are they belong/reference to?
For example:
ACTION: Originate
Channel: SIP/test
Exten: 215
Timeout: 3
Context: test
Priority: 1
ActionID: 1333
Response: Success
ActionID:
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-
boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Tim Nelson
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 2:58 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] looking for solid
On 10-05-12 23:47, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
On 05/10/2012 03:20 PM, khalid touati wrote:
Thank you Patrick for the detailed info, it does make perfect sense to
me, I never expected that Digium cards have such an problem!
There are patches in the works already (being tested by users in Europe)
Thank you Kevin! thanks Patrickhope a new release will come out soon!
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Patrick Lists
asterisk-l...@puzzled.xs4all.nl wrote:
On 10-05-12 23:47, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
On 05/10/2012 03:20 PM, khalid touati wrote:
Thank you Patrick for the detailed info,
Patrick,
I got confused though is this true:
Any Asterisk soft+digium hdw = it doesn't work
Any Asterisk soft+sangoma hdw = it works
Patched asterisk soft+digium hdw = it will work (per Kevin)
On May 10, 2012 9:06 PM, khalid touati khalidtou...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you Kevin! thanks
Hi Khalid,
Judging from that bug report I *think*:
On 11-05-12 03:39, khalid touati wrote:
Patrick,
I got confused though is this true:
Any Asterisk soft+digium hdw = it doesn't work
There seem to be combinations that do work. It is my understanding from
that bugreport that an older libpri
Hi All,
I have this strange problem on a newly installed PBX. 1.8.12.0. I have other
installs of 1.8.12.0 that does not exhibit this problem.
I can run from the console
/usr/sbin/fax2mail --cid-name Console Execuation --cid-number 61123123
--dest-exten 8960 -f
Sorry I meant to mention that Asterisk is running as root.
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Klaverstyn, David
C
Sent: Friday, 11 May 2012 3:33 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject:
Thank you for your reply Patrick!
for the first situation, I did try asterisk 1.6.2.6 and dahdi 2.3 but with
no success.
Can anyone suggest a combination that works till a patch is released?
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:48 PM, Patrick Lists
asterisk-l...@puzzled.xs4all.nl wrote:
Hi Khalid,
2012/5/10, A J Stiles asterisk_l...@earthshod.co.uk:
On Thursday 10 May 2012, Bart Coninckx wrote:
I'm looking for a smaller,
appliance-type like PC, preferably solid state and fanless PC.
Since it's only going to run Asterisk for a couple of extensions I don't
think CPU and RAM need to be
68 matches
Mail list logo
