Re: [asterisk-users] problem starting asterisk, unable to load chan_zap

2007-06-14 Thread Sebastian Reitenbach
Hi, Two things come to mind, (1) being that you don't have the TE110P card jumped for an E1. (2) UDEV isn't creating the devices fast enough for the driver load. My guess is it's UDEV. You can test this theory by creating a startup script that loads the modules, put a sleep statement

RE: [asterisk-users] Changing the From field in Asterisk email/voicemail

2007-06-14 Thread Mark Davies
Should be able to edit the following lines in /etc/asterisk/voicemail.conf ; Who the e-mail notification should appear to come from serveremail=asterisk ;[EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Suber Sent: Wednesday, 6 June 2007 2:20

Re: [asterisk-users] problem starting asterisk, unable to load chan_zap

2007-06-14 Thread Sebastian Reitenbach
Hi, Easy to check if the problem is udev: ls -l /sys/class/zaptel there are lots of subdirectories in there, at least after a rmmod modprobe. I can reboot later to see how it looks like before that. If there are files there and not under /dev/zap, udev is to blame. in /dev/zap there

Re: [asterisk-users] problem starting asterisk, unable to load chan_zap

2007-06-14 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 08:10:33AM +0200, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote: Hi, Two things come to mind, (1) being that you don't have the TE110P card jumped for an E1. (2) UDEV isn't creating the devices fast enough for the driver load. My guess is it's UDEV. You can test this

[asterisk-users] Re: asterisk testing - thanx!

2007-06-14 Thread Atis
On 6/14/07, George Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thank you both for your expert responses to my question about asterisk testing on the asterisk newsgroup. I'm taking my follow up questions off-line... 1) SIPP looks like just what I need for SIP testing, thanx. You also mentioned dialplan

Re: [asterisk-users] Queue problem

2007-06-14 Thread Elmar Haneke
Set your core debug level to greater than 2 SET DEBUG seems not to have any effect on my asterisk. Let us know what you find. The effect was caused by an misconfigured phone: The phone did nod signal busy but ringing due to an call waiting indication. Switching off call wating indication

[asterisk-users] TDM400p and te110p configuration.

2007-06-14 Thread Matt Scott
Dear users. My current setup uses a euroISDN E1 with 8 cahnnels for incoming and outgoing calls from a digium te110p. Currently all phones use SIP. However, I need to add some faxes lines and some POS credit card machines. These will require POTS lines with a fixed DDI. I have purchased the

Re: [asterisk-users] What is the state of Asterisk Secure Remote Communications?

2007-06-14 Thread Tim Panton
On 13 Jun 2007, at 22:48, Alvin Austin wrote: Hello all, The wiki has a fairly detailed description of the the issues involved with encryption of Asterisk calls: http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+encryption I'm interested in hearing what is working for people today. I think the

[asterisk-users] Qualify renders all SIP peers unreachable

2007-06-14 Thread randulo
I totally puzzled by this situation. I have asterisk 1.4.4 behind NAT. All SIP peers are working properly to place or receive calls. Any SIP peer or friend whether NATted or not will become UNREACHABLE if qualify=yes. I have identical peers on the other asterisk 1.2.16 production server. In

Re: [asterisk-users] TDM400p and te110p configuration.

2007-06-14 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 09:45:01AM +0100, Matt Scott wrote: Dear users. My current setup uses a euroISDN E1 with 8 cahnnels for incoming and outgoing calls from a digium te110p. Currently all phones use SIP. However, I need to add some faxes lines and some POS credit card machines.

Re: [asterisk-users] Addons

2007-06-14 Thread Alexandre VERNIOL
Hi If you use debian install the libmysqlclient-dev package David a écrit : Hello Asterisk-Users, I'm trying to install addons 1.2.6 on Asterisk 1.2.16 (is that OK?), but my MySQL server is installed on a different sever, so the MAKE of the addons fails with the following (truncated) error

RE: [asterisk-users] WAV file best sound quality

2007-06-14 Thread Akpome Akpoguma
thanks for you response. Am using sip to access the sound files.The sound files are recorded with higher sampling rate and 'soxed'to 8khz on the IVR machine... could it be that resampling is responsible for the degradation?Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:44:10 -0400From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

Re: [asterisk-users] TDM400p and te110p configuration.

2007-06-14 Thread Matt Scott
I purchased FXS modules so that I could terminate the machines or faxes (eg just like a standard phone) the outgoing/incoming channel will be be provided by my E1. I hope I have the right modules for the job? - Original Message - From: Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:

RE: [asterisk-users] (no subject)

2007-06-14 Thread Akpome Akpoguma
Hi Guy,. you should at least put a subject any way follow this link http://nerdvittles.com/index.php?p=134 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 18:36:54 +0530 Subject: [asterisk-users] (no subject) Hi, please help me in developing and

[asterisk-users] Sugar Auto-Dial with Asterisk?

2007-06-14 Thread Matt
Before I go and start coding is anyone aware of an auto-dialer plugin for Sugar CRM that will allow me to click a button when I'm in someone's account and have my phone ring and then connect me to them? ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by

Re: [asterisk-users] TDM400p and te110p configuration.

2007-06-14 Thread William Moore
On 6/14/07, Matt Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I purchased FXS modules so that I could terminate the machines or faxes (eg just like a standard phone) the outgoing/incoming channel will be be provided by my E1. I hope I have the right modules for the job? You do indeed have the right

Re: [asterisk-users] Sugar Auto-Dial with Asterisk?

2007-06-14 Thread Nuria Fernandez
Exist a module VoiceRD to do that. JuntaDeAndalucia_es_sf_diphone 2007/6/14, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Before I go and start coding is anyone aware of an auto-dialer plugin for Sugar CRM that will allow me to click a button when I'm in someone's account and have my phone ring and then

[asterisk-users] Adtran feature codes, extensions

2007-06-14 Thread Charles Ulrich
Greetings, We have An Adtran 616 Total Access device talking to a colocated Asterisk machine over MGCP. Calls placed to the phones connected to the Adtran go through as do outgoing calls from the phone (prefixed by 9), but feature access codes (*97 for voicemail, for example) and

Re: [asterisk-users] Sugar Auto-Dial with Asterisk?

2007-06-14 Thread Matt
I see that module, but it does not work with the current version of Sugar. Does anyone have a solution that works with the current version of Sugar? On 6/14/07, Nuria Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Exist a module VoiceRD to do that. JuntaDeAndalucia_es_sf_diphone 2007/6/14, Matt [EMAIL

Re: [asterisk-users] Sugar Auto-Dial with Asterisk?

2007-06-14 Thread EdPimentl
Try vTiger -E On 6/14/07, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I see that module, but it does not work with the current version of Sugar. Does anyone have a solution that works with the current version of Sugar? On 6/14/07, Nuria Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Exist a module VoiceRD to do

Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Slightly OT:CSU on Digium cards, and it's requirement

2007-06-14 Thread C F
On 6/13/07, Erik Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/13/07, C F [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is just weird I wrote it in caps so you can read it but you still didn't read it so here it is again: its a T1 card that does NOT have a CSU in it, and it is working fine and yes it is a T1

Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Slightly OT:CSU on Digium cards, and it's requirement

2007-06-14 Thread C F
On 6/13/07, Jon Pounder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting C F [EMAIL PROTECTED]: This is just weird I wrote it in caps so you can read it but you still didn't read it so here it is again: its a T1 card that does NOT have a CSU in it, and it is working fine and yes it is a T1 providing PRI.

Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Slightly OT:CSU on Digium cards, and it's requirement

2007-06-14 Thread C F
On 6/13/07, Jon Pounder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting Erik Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 6/13/07, C F [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is just weird I wrote it in caps so you can read it but you still didn't read it so here it is again: its a T1 card that does NOT have a CSU in it, and it

[asterisk-users] Linksys SPA941

2007-06-14 Thread Shad Mortazavi
Dear Group, I have just purchased two Linksys SPA941 and flashed these to the latest firmware. Everything works well except for the Hold button? Has anyone else experienced the same issue? What was the solution? Kind Regards Shad Mortazavi ___

[asterisk-users] ESI Phone System Integration

2007-06-14 Thread Jeremy Mann
ESI Phone systems are supposed to support IP stations via SIP integration(http://www.esi-estech.com/products/systems/ESICS/), has anyone ever tried to link Asterisk with one of these? I'm thinking my asterisk box could be an extension off that phone system, that would then provide a Dial by

Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom sip.cfg / voIpProt.SIP.requestValidation.x.request.y.event

2007-06-14 Thread Lee Jenkins
Lee Jenkins wrote: Hi all, My company has pretty much standardized on Polycom phones and I am in the beginning phase of writing a GUI for administering/managing polycom provisioning at multiple sites which we intend to release as OS. I've started studying the docs and I'm having trouble

Re: [asterisk-users] Sugar Auto-Dial with Asterisk?

2007-06-14 Thread Matt
Thanks for the suggestion, unfortunately we are using SugarCRM. On 6/14/07, EdPimentl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Try vTiger -E On 6/14/07, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I see that module, but it does not work with the current version of Sugar. Does anyone have a solution that works with the

Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Slightly OT:CSU on Digium cards, and it's requirement

2007-06-14 Thread Jon Pounder
Quoting C F [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 6/13/07, Jon Pounder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting C F [EMAIL PROTECTED]: This is just weird I wrote it in caps so you can read it but you still didn't read it so here it is again: its a T1 card that does NOT have a CSU in it, and it is working fine and

Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Slightly OT:CSU on Digium cards, and it's requirement

2007-06-14 Thread Jon Pounder
Quoting C F [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 6/13/07, Jon Pounder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting Erik Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 6/13/07, C F [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is just weird I wrote it in caps so you can read it but you still didn't read it so here it is again: its a T1 card that

Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Slightly OT:CSU on Digium cards, and it's requirement

2007-06-14 Thread mail-lists
I probably shouldn't be hijacking this thread but it seems that there's some people paying attention here that know what they're talking about. We've recently acquired a cisco IAD 2400 router with 2MFT-T1 VWIC card in it. Doing some cursory reading It seems that this card can be interfaced

Re: [asterisk-users] SIP Options Reply Ignored

2007-06-14 Thread randulo
I am seeing this too on both Polycom and Linksys phones, as well as external SIP peerns not behind NAT, such as FWD. I've posted a couple of times about it, but I don't see the posts. On 6/3/07, Ian Clough [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi I have FC6 system in the office running SVN-trunk-r63567

[asterisk-users] real-time HINTS

2007-06-14 Thread Tony Plack
I noticed that there is a function in the func_odbc.conf called PRESENCE exists. I am assuming that this goes into dial plan but it is not clear how this might be used. Any ideas? ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

[asterisk-users] Sending text to a phone that's no in-use ...

2007-06-14 Thread Gordon Henderson
Anyone know if it's possible to send a line of text to a phone that's not currently in-use? What I want is: SendText(SIP/101, Hello World) but that doesn't exist ... I'm after an application where someone (say a receptionist) can send one of a small set of pre-defined messages, so that

Re: [asterisk-users] Sending text to a phone that's no in-use ...

2007-06-14 Thread Rob Schall
If they're polycom 501s or higher, you could have each phone use a different homepage. Those pages could be loaded dynamically (say in php) and then you could just store the message to display in a database. Probably easiest to maintain and create an interface for. Rob Gordon Henderson wrote:

[asterisk-users] ODBC voicemail questions

2007-06-14 Thread Kyle Sexton
Before I head down the path of converting voicemail to an ODBC backend, I have a couple questions that I was hoping someone would know. 1. Is the voicemail message stored in the datbase, or just it's location/filename? 2. Does MWI propagate when using an ODBC backend? 3. If it does both of

Re: [asterisk-users] Sending text to a phone that's no in-use ...

2007-06-14 Thread Gordon Henderson
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Rob Schall wrote: If they're polycom 501s or higher, you could have each phone use a different homepage. Those pages could be loaded dynamically (say in php) and then you could just store the message to display in a database. Probably easiest to maintain and create an

Re: [asterisk-users] Linksys SPA941

2007-06-14 Thread Matt
We had several of these when we were first playing around with Asterisk. They are somewhat nice. The audio quality left some to be desired, however, we did not have a hold button issue. On 6/14/07, Shad Mortazavi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear Group, I have just purchased two Linksys SPA941

Re: [asterisk-users] Linksys SPA941

2007-06-14 Thread John Millican
On Thursday June 14 2007 1:12 pm, Matt wrote: We had several of these when we were first playing around with Asterisk. They are somewhat nice. The audio quality left some to be desired, however, we did not have a hold button issue. On 6/14/07, Shad Mortazavi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear

Re: [asterisk-users] Sending text to a phone that's no in-use ...

2007-06-14 Thread Mojo with Horan Company, LLC
I think you mean 60x not 50x. The polycom 501s don't have the microbrowser. Rob Schall wrote: If they're polycom 501s or higher, you could have each phone use a different homepage. Those pages could be loaded dynamically (say in php) and then you could just store the message to display in a

Re: [asterisk-users] WAV file best sound quality

2007-06-14 Thread randulo
On 6/13/07, Akpome Akpoguma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have been using wav files with sample rate of 8khz and 8 bits and I find the sound quality really poor. 8khz is correct, if you are using 8 bits, you need to use 16 bits if I'm not mistaken. ___

Re: [asterisk-users] Sending text to a phone that's no in-use ...

2007-06-14 Thread Jason Parker
I believe the newer versions of firmware do implement the microbrowser on the 501. - Mojo with Horan Company, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think you mean 60x not 50x. The polycom 501s don't have the microbrowser. Rob Schall wrote: If they're polycom 501s or higher, you could have

Re: [asterisk-users] Sending text to a phone that's no in-use ...

2007-06-14 Thread Mojo with Horan Company, LLC
Actually, sorry to not research this first: 14759: Added microbrowser support to the SoundPoint IP 501 platform from http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/index.php?page=Polycom+Microbrowser But I'm not sure which SIP firmware this is talking about being present in. Mojo with Horan Company, LLC

Re: [asterisk-users] Sending text to a phone that's no in-use ...

2007-06-14 Thread Dave Fullerton
Actually they do, but only if you're running SIP firmware 2.1 or higher. Mojo with Horan Company, LLC wrote: I think you mean 60x not 50x. The polycom 501s don't have the microbrowser. Rob Schall wrote: If they're polycom 501s or higher, you could have each phone use a different homepage.

Re: [asterisk-users] Sending text to a phone that's no in-use ...

2007-06-14 Thread Mojo with Horan Company, LLC
Awesome, thanks for this tip! Moj Dave Fullerton wrote: Actually they do, but only if you're running SIP firmware 2.1 or higher. Mojo with Horan Company, LLC wrote: I think you mean 60x not 50x. The polycom 501s don't have the microbrowser. Rob Schall wrote: If they're polycom 501s or

Re: [asterisk-users] WAV file best sound quality

2007-06-14 Thread Matt
Ahh I didn't see that in the first post. Yes Mr. SpamSucks is correct. You should use 8khz @ 16bits. Using 8khz @ 8bits will sound like a drowning goat under water. On 6/14/07, randulo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/13/07, Akpome Akpoguma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have been using wav files

[asterisk-users] Asterisk GUI

2007-06-14 Thread bilal ghayyad
Hi List; Where I can download Asterisk GUI and what I can have benifit from it? Regards Bilal Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.

Re: [asterisk-users] Qualify renders all SIP peers unreachable

2007-06-14 Thread Jaswinder Singh
What does sip show peers output ? Also set a timeout in millisec like qualify=200 instead of qualify=yes On 14/06/07, randulo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I totally puzzled by this situation. I have asterisk 1.4.4 behind NAT. All SIP peers are working properly to place or receive calls. Any SIP

[asterisk-users] Que on A2Billing

2007-06-14 Thread Nitesh Divecha
Hello All, I got one quick question on A2Billing. Specs: - - A2Billing v1.3 - OS CentOS 4.5 - Asterisk 1.2 - Zaptel 1.2 Did the installation and everything is working as it suppose to... Using the A2Billing documentation, I created the RateCard, SIP Trunks, and SIP Customers. I was also able

Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Slightly OT:CSU on Digium cards, and it's requirement

2007-06-14 Thread Nick Seraphin
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, C F wrote: On 6/13/07, Erik Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/13/07, C F [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is just weird I wrote it in caps so you can read it but you still didn't read it so here it is again: its a T1 card that does NOT have a CSU in it, and it

[asterisk-users] b410p

2007-06-14 Thread Luis José Da Silva González
Hello, I'm trying to set up a b410p rdsi card, and I'm having problems getting it up. I followed the instruction on asteriskguru and everything seem to be fine but all leds on the card are in red. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# uname -a Linux rdsipbx 2.6.15.7 #2 Tue Jun 5 16:37:07 CEST 2007 i686 i686

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk GUI

2007-06-14 Thread Erik Anderson
On 6/14/07, bilal ghayyad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi List; Where I can download Asterisk GUI and what I can have benifit from it? Whaddya know - there's a whole page on the wiki dedicated to such things: http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+GUI ;-) I'm a CLI-only guy myself, so I can't

Re: [asterisk-users] Qualify renders all SIP peers unreachable

2007-06-14 Thread randulo
On 6/14/07, Jaswinder Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What does sip show peers output ? Also set a timeout in millisec like qualify=200 instead of qualify=yes Doesn't matter. I've used qualify=2000 There is another thread about this now, OPTIONS response from the phone is ignored.

Re: [asterisk-users] Sending text to a phone that's no in-use ...

2007-06-14 Thread Rob Schall
Yes they do. If you download the newest boot rom, they sure do have it now. I was surprised myself when I saw the feature, but we use it on all of our 501s here. The resolution isn't pretty, but it works. :) Rob Mojo with Horan Company, LLC wrote: I think you mean 60x not 50x. The polycom

Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Slightly OT:CSU on Digium cards, and it's requirement

2007-06-14 Thread Alex Balashov
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Nick Seraphin wrote: Bottom line is, no matter what the FCC says... and if somehow you managed to get it to work without a CSU... I believe the phone company would have a fit if they knew you connected equipment to their network without a CSU on it. They're very big on

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk GUI

2007-06-14 Thread Rob Schall
Voip-info has some different links to packages out there for a gui based asterisk. In my experience, I've found it much easier to tweak a dialplan and user accounts by hand. We are using realtime/mysql for all our voicemail/sip/extensions, and I have a small gui I made that creates those initial

Re: [asterisk-users] Que on A2Billing

2007-06-14 Thread Guillermo Salas M.
On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 14:46 -0400, Nitesh Divecha wrote: Hello All, I got one quick question on A2Billing. Specs: - - A2Billing v1.3 - OS CentOS 4.5 - Asterisk 1.2 - Zaptel 1.2 Did the installation and everything is working as it suppose to... Using the A2Billing documentation, I

Re: [asterisk-users] Sending text to a phone that's no in-use ...

2007-06-14 Thread Mojo with Horan Company, LLC
Thanks, everybody, for bringing this to my attention! I can't wait to play around with it! Moj Rob Schall wrote: Yes they do. If you download the newest boot rom, they sure do have it now. I was surprised myself when I saw the feature, but we use it on all of our 501s here. The resolution

[asterisk-users] question on capacity

2007-06-14 Thread Jerry Geis
Can one server (like AMD 6000+ X2) with 2 GIG ram running asterisk 1.4 handle having 2100 wireless phones connected. All phones will not be talking at the same time only a couple will be. There may be 1 T1 card in the box. Will this work? If not how does one handle this situation. Thanks,

Re: [asterisk-users] question on capacity

2007-06-14 Thread »Steven Ringwald«
Jerry Geis wrote: Can one server (like AMD 6000+ X2) with 2 GIG ram running asterisk 1.4 handle having 2100 wireless phones connected. All phones will not be talking at the same time only a couple will be. There may be 1 T1 card in the box. Will this work? If not how does one handle this

Re: [asterisk-users] question on capacity

2007-06-14 Thread Remco Post
Jerry Geis wrote: Can one server (like AMD 6000+ X2) with 2 GIG ram running asterisk 1.4 handle having 2100 wireless phones connected. All phones will not be talking at the same time only a couple will be. There may be 1 T1 card in the box. Will this work? If not how does one handle this

[asterisk-users] Unicall + MFC/R2 line dropped immediately after connect

2007-06-14 Thread Peter Gubis
Hi, I am trying to set up an E1 line with CAS signaling using available unicall patches with libmfcr2 implementation. Inbound calls works well, I am able to get DNIS and ANI from incoming call, but I am still not able to make an outbound call with our local carrier. After tweaking of

[asterisk-users] My Kernel

2007-06-14 Thread bilal ghayyad
Hi List; I did yum install kernel and yum install kernel-devel, now when I type 'uname' -a I have the following: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /]# 'uname' -a Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.15-1.2054_FC5smp #1 SMP Tue Mar 14 16:05:46 EST 2006 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux And when I type rpm -q kernel, then I

Re: [asterisk-users] My Kernel

2007-06-14 Thread Remco Post
bilal ghayyad wrote: Hi List; I did yum install kernel and yum install kernel-devel, now when I type 'uname' -a I have the following: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /]# 'uname' -a Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.15-1.2054_FC5smp #1 SMP Tue Mar 14 16:05:46 EST 2006 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux And

Re: [asterisk-users] Crashes with Spandsp, app_rxfax.c, and asterisk 1.4.4

2007-06-14 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 11:21:49PM -0500, Rob Ristroph wrote: Hi everybody, I have a Fedora Core 4 x86 32 bit install, which I recently upgraded from asterisk 1.2 to the office 1.4.4 tarball. In the process of doing that I had to upgrade some autoconf/automake stuff, but it

Re: [asterisk-users] My Kernel

2007-06-14 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 03:02:20PM -0700, bilal ghayyad wrote: Hi List; I did yum install kernel and yum install kernel-devel, now when I type 'uname' -a I have the following: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /]# 'uname' -a Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.15-1.2054_FC5smp #1 SMP Tue Mar 14 16:05:46 EST

Re: [asterisk-users] My Kernel

2007-06-14 Thread David Gomillion
On 6/14/07, Remco Post [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: bilal ghayyad wrote: Hi List; I did yum install kernel and yum install kernel-devel, now when I type 'uname' -a I have the following: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /]# 'uname' -a Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.15-1.2054_FC5smp #1 SMP Tue Mar 14

RE: [asterisk-users] Unicall + MFC/R2 line dropped immediately afterconnect

2007-06-14 Thread Oscar Carriles
Hi, Clearback signal due to billing pulses normally drops calls after a fixed amount of time 2 minutes or so, Can you stablish an outbound call and after a while it drops? Or it never succeds? -Mensaje original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de Peter Gubis

Re: [asterisk-users] ODBC voicemail questions

2007-06-14 Thread Jared Smith
On 6/14/07, Kyle Sexton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey Kyle! 1. Is the voicemail message stored in the datbase, or just it's location/filename? Yes, the voicemail message itself is stored in the database, as a BLOB or large object file. 2. Does MWI propagate when using an ODBC backend?

Re: [asterisk-users] Sending text to a phone that's no in-use ...

2007-06-14 Thread Philipp von Klitzing
Hi! Anyone know if it's possible to send a line of text to a phone that's not currently in-use? What I want is: SendText(SIP/101, Hello World) but that doesn't exist ... Snom's or Grandstream GXP2000's I'm afraid... Sending text to them while in a call works fine (although

Re: [asterisk-users] Que on A2Billing

2007-06-14 Thread Nitesh Divecha
That was easy... Thanks a million man... Dunno what I was thinking and went too far writing custom scripts... Cheers, Nitesh Guillermo Salas M. wrote: On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 14:46 -0400, Nitesh Divecha wrote: Hello All, I got one quick question on A2Billing. Specs: - - A2Billing v1.3 -

[asterisk-users] testing

2007-06-14 Thread John D. Scott
Please disregard. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] My Kernel

2007-06-14 Thread Jeff Davis
David Gomillion wrote: That's true. But isn't it easier to tell him to check his /boot/grub/grub.conf file? And only one line... Easier, but not smarter. If you'll excuse me I have some wild animals to feed. -- Jeff Davis Netsource Consulting ___

Re: [asterisk-users] Slightly OT:CSU on Digium cards, and it's requirement

2007-06-14 Thread C F
On 6/14/07, Nick Seraphin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, C F wrote: On 6/13/07, Erik Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/13/07, C F [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is just weird I wrote it in caps so you can read it but you still didn't read it so here it is again:

Re: [asterisk-users] Slightly OT:CSU on Digium cards, and it's requirement

2007-06-14 Thread C F
What I am thinking is that a CSU could provide mutiple functions, error handling, diagnostics and signal boosting, which is not built into the Panasonic equipment, but the lower level signaling that a CSU could provide is built into it, and that's why it works. As far as I knew before I read it

Re: [asterisk-users] Slightly OT:CSU on Digium cards, and it's requirement

2007-06-14 Thread Alex Balashov
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, C F wrote: but the lower level signaling that a CSU could provide is built into it Possible. In any event, it is this function that describes the essential aspects of a CSU. But I think the standard is very clear on the requirements for OAMP stuff too. -- Alex

Re: [asterisk-users] Slightly OT:CSU on Digium cards, and it's requirement

2007-06-14 Thread Nick Seraphin
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, C F wrote: Bottom line is, no matter what the FCC says... and if somehow you managed to get it to work without a CSU... I believe the phone company would have a fit if they knew you connected equipment to their network without a CSU on it. They're very big on

[asterisk-users] Reinvite / one-way media.

2007-06-14 Thread Alex Balashov
I have two phones on a network behind NAT. Enabling canreinvite=yes on the Asterisk server allows them to talk to each other very effectively through the local network. Unfortunately, calling any outside destinations yields one-way media issues where the far end can hear me but I can't hear

[asterisk-users] app_rxfax vs (iaxmodem+hylafax)

2007-06-14 Thread Paradise Dove
can anybody help me to choose the most reliable fax solution for * . after googling the net i found that there are at least two solutions for this, app_rxfax+spandsp and iaxmodem+hylafax. - what's the differences between these two? - which one's better? why? thanks