Re: [asterisk-users] Strange CLI behaviour

2008-04-12 Thread Benoit
asterisk 1.4.18.1 for AsteriskNow. benoit ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4.22 Queues problems (Fifo or not ?)

2008-12-18 Thread Benoit
just arrived. However this doesn't happens everytimes Is it normal ? regards, benoit ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4.22 Queues problems (Fifo or not ?)

2008-12-18 Thread Benoit
Atis Lezdins a écrit : Calls are distributed in Priority+FIFO. Do you set ${QUEUE_PRIO} before sending call to queue? Perhaps you're forgetting it in some part of dialplan. Thanks for the hint, could be usefull, however i'm not using it anywhere right now

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4.22 Queues problems (Fifo or not ?)

2008-12-18 Thread Benoit
Philipp Kempgen a écrit : Benoit schrieb: I'm having a question with asterisk queue system, is it a fifo or a lifo or random ? Depends on the strategy. http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+call+queues Philipp Kempgen ? The strategy is for call distribution to member

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4.22 Queues problems (Fifo or not ?)

2008-12-18 Thread Benoit
Atis Lezdins a écrit : On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 8:50 PM, Darrin Henshaw dhens...@ignition.bm wrote: I believe you are correct Atis. Philipp within your queue setup do you have any announcements? If so read the posting on

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4.22 Queues problems (Fifo or not ?)

2008-12-18 Thread Benoit
Atis Lezdins a écrit : You could enable core set verbose 3 and core set debug 1, and then post corresponding log when you see this happens. Ok so, what you are saying is that this shouldn't happens ? (in normal conditions the queue should be a fifo) Anyway, i had the idea this was caused

Re: [asterisk-users] how to set the busy signal usign softphones

2008-12-20 Thread Benoit
nik600 a écrit : Hi to all. I'm using Asterisk 1.4 with Sjphone as softphone. My problem is that when a SIP user is busy, he still receive calls from asterisk. I've tried to setup the call-limit preference to 1, but with this kind of configuration the user can't transfer calls, as the

[asterisk-users] Disconnect queues members every night

2008-12-22 Thread Benoit
queues, is there one or should i manually maintain a list ? regards, benoit ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman

Re: [asterisk-users] Disconnect queues members every night

2008-12-31 Thread Benoit
of their shift, they must do so. Putting in place an automated soluition will make them sloppier, so be sure this is something you can control. Just my two eurocents, l. 2008/12/22 Benoit maver...@maverick.eu.org mailto:maver...@maverick.eu.org Hi, To force user to behave

[asterisk-users] Troubles with AEL

2008-12-31 Thread Benoit
Hi, I'm migrating some macro from extension.conf format to AEL and they are some things i don't understand, and some i don't evan know how to get them working. Example: Doing this queueMemberList=${QUEUE_MEMBER_LIST(queue)}; won't make any warning message, however the resulting

Re: [asterisk-users] Troubles with AEL

2008-12-31 Thread Benoit
Benoit a écrit : Hi, .. Also, there is this construct which isn't working: if( ${DB_EXISTS(family/key)} ) { } else { } However i can't find a workaround in this case ... any idea ? Well, never mind ths one, some space got stuck in the macro

[asterisk-users] Deprecated Realtime application, what's to be gained ???

2009-01-02 Thread Benoit
Hi, After seeing in pbx/ael/ael-test/ael-test5/extensions.ael some interesting use case of RealTime to store extension data (forwardto, dnd, ...) i started to play with it. To my surprise the two applications RealTime() / RealtimeUpdate() have been deprecated in favor of the REALTIME()

Re: [asterisk-users] Deprecated Realtime application, what's to be gained ???

2009-01-02 Thread Benoit
Benoit a écrit : Hi, After seeing in pbx/ael/ael-test/ael-test5/extensions.ael some interesting use case of RealTime to store extension data (forwardto, dnd, ...) i started to play with it. To my surprise the two applications RealTime() / RealtimeUpdate() have been deprecated in favor

Re: [asterisk-users] B410p, Ast1.4, France Tél ecom Numeris Double T0 problem

2009-01-05 Thread Benoit
Olivier Fauchon a écrit : Hi. When I call my RNIS numbers (with a mobile phone for example), I can see 2 incoming calls on the IPBX, which should not happend. I'm not sure if it's a problem with the telco France Telecom and their ISDN setup, or if it's a problem with the MISDN driver on

Re: [asterisk-users] Agents, Queues and logon/logoff

2009-01-05 Thread Benoit
Ariel Dorfman a écrit : Hi all This is my first post. As the subject says, I need to implement on my call center the Agent functionality, son the agents could logon and logoff to the queue How can I do this configuration? Or where can I read some info about it Regards Ariel To

Re: [asterisk-users] AEL Variable Warning Messages

2009-01-05 Thread Benoit
Brent Davidson a écrit : Watkins, Bradley wrote: ... Well, before I file a bug I have another question... In AEL, what is the correct syntax? Do all variable references still need to be wrapped in ${} or not? If they do, then the documentation on voip-info.org needs to be

Re: [asterisk-users] How to use AMD Answering Machine Detect ?

2009-01-07 Thread Benoit
Daniel Varella a écrit : Hi everybody, Happy New Year ! I'm trying to detect if a call was answered by a machine (linke voicemail systems) or a human. I would like to use AMD (Answering Machine Detect) command, but with my configuration it was not possible get there. Follow

Re: [asterisk-users] Could you compile mISDN 1.1.8 on Lenny ?

2009-01-08 Thread Benoit
I don't think your problem is somehow related to the debian release ... However since mISDN 1.1.8 was released to support kernel 2.6.24 25 the 18/06/2008 and the kernel 2.6.26 was released the 13/07/2008 an incompatibility between both could very well be possible. Well and it's quite simple,

[asterisk-users] Queues, SIP channel and In Use

2009-01-09 Thread Benoit
Hi, I'm a little surprised, up until 1.4.22 my agents where using an IAX channel to ZoIPer Softphone, however since after the upgrade to .22 we experienced a problem with hangup failure between zoiper and asterisk (look like bug http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=13184) i made them switch to

Re: [asterisk-users] how many quad T1 cards

2009-01-09 Thread Benoit
Isn't anyone using this kind of thing http://www.red-fone.com/ for this kind of massive HA deployment ? there is a case study on their web site using 4 asterisk boxes and 8 red-fone T1 to Ethernet bridges to handle 900 concurrent calls. (I would say that using all this nice hardware on Linksys

Re: [asterisk-users] Queues, SIP channel and In Use

2009-01-09 Thread Benoit
Mark Michelson a écrit : Benoit wrote: Hi, I'm a little surprised, up until 1.4.22 my agents where using an IAX channel to ZoIPer Softphone, however since after the upgrade to .22 we experienced a problem with hangup failure between zoiper and asterisk (look like bug http

Re: [asterisk-users] Could you compile mISDN 1.1.8 on Lenny ?

2009-01-10 Thread Benoit
Olivier a écrit : 2009/1/9 Philipp Kempgen philipp.kemp...@amooma.de mailto:philipp.kemp...@amooma.de Olivier schrieb: Before diving into this, I would very pleased to know if someone could yes or no, successfully compile mISDN 1.1.8 on Lenny (latest RC1 or beta2

Re: [asterisk-users] Lenny. Where to find zaptel patches

2009-01-10 Thread Benoit
Olivier a écrit : Hi, While issuing make, I've got: ... CC [M] /usr/src/zaptel-1.4.11~dfsg/kernel/zaptel-base.o /usr/src/zaptel-1.4.11~dfsg/kernel/zaptel-base.c: In function âzt_registerâ: /usr/src/zaptel-1.4.11~dfsg/kernel/zaptel-base.c:5230: error: implicit declaration of function

Re: [asterisk-users] B410p, Ast1.4, France Tél ecom Numeris Double T0 problem

2009-01-10 Thread Benoit
Olivier Fauchon a écrit : Hi Benoit, Thx for your previous reply. I tired your configuration , and I still have the problem . When 1 make a call to my SDA(DDI) number, I can see 2 incoming calls in the isdn stack. What do you think about that ? P[ 2] channel with stid:0 for one

Re: [asterisk-users] How to monitor asterisk with SNMP?

2009-01-11 Thread Benoit
I've given a shot at res_snmp, which does include some interesting datas, however i see the following problem: The astChanTypeTable if fully dynamic (one can have SIP as row 2 while another at 12, i don't even know if the sequence is persistent within one's setup). To create nice

Re: [asterisk-users] sip peer permit/deny - Need some explanation

2009-01-11 Thread Benoit
Something like has been discussed a few day ago, i think you need to remove the host= string and add username/password. Right now asterisk may allow you request from the autorized IP ranges, but the authentification of the request fail due to the invalid host. you need to switch to

Re: [asterisk-users] How to monitor asterisk with SNMP?

2009-01-12 Thread Benoit
Well, at worst you can make use of the exec and pass_persist feature of snmpd that way you can build you own script that will run locally to the asterisk box and query using snmp Grygoriy Dobrovolskyy a écrit : I wonder if the same is possible with centreon ? Someone is using centreon here ?

Re: [asterisk-users] Dahdi caused Kernel to segfault

2009-01-13 Thread Benoit
Personnaly, i had recently encountered a global machine check exception with two cards (TE220p and B410) and many kernel panic with mISDN (mostly if i tried to unload it). Dahdi still hasn't failed me (directly) Thomas Kenyon a écrit : Yesterday, a low-duty production server that I maintain

[asterisk-users] Digium TE220 supported protocol

2009-01-15 Thread Benoit
Hi, Our potentiel next phone provider ask me a question i can't answer for sure, maybe someone here knows ? He says that is equipement only support VN4 protocol or more, or ETSI, however i can't find matching terms in the digium documentation or the chan_dahdi/dahdi/system.conf files... Any

Re: [asterisk-users] Digium TE220 supported protocol

2009-01-16 Thread Benoit
Laurent a écrit : Those terms would be ISDN-related. VN4 is Version Number 4, and ETSI is the European standards-adopting organization for telecoms. So you might want to check for E1 support (ISDN in Europe, basically) if you want to connect a PRI-capable equipment - I assume that's what you

Re: [asterisk-users] Digium TE220 supported protocol

2009-01-16 Thread Benoit
Benoit a écrit : Laurent a écrit : Those terms would be ISDN-related. VN4 is Version Number 4, and ETSI is the European standards-adopting organization for telecoms. So you might want to check for E1 support (ISDN in Europe, basically) if you want to connect a PRI-capable equipment - I

Re: [asterisk-users] Digium TE220 supported protocol

2009-01-18 Thread Benoit
Laurent a écrit : ... I read somewhere (can't remember where, sorry) that double framing is equivalent to basic framing. Presumably it is also equivalent to no crc. If that's correct, then I would say you can use the same setup as you have with FT, it looks good to me. Ok, thanks As

Re: [asterisk-users] Digium TE220 supported protocol

2009-01-19 Thread Benoit
Laurent a écrit : Le 19.01.2009 08:50, Benoit a écrit : Laurent a écrit : Well, the telcos techs said a straight cable should do the trick, but since i didn't get any isdn link up with the straight, i built a crossover like what you described, with no luck either

Re: [asterisk-users] Digium TE220 supported protocol

2009-01-20 Thread Benoit
Laurent a écrit : Le 19.01.2009 08:50, Benoit a écrit : Laurent a écrit : Well, the telcos techs said a straight cable should do the trick, but since i didn't get any isdn link up with the straight, i built a crossover like what you described, with no luck either

Re: [asterisk-users] Digium TE220 supported protocol

2009-01-20 Thread Benoit
Benoit a écrit : Laurent a écrit : Did you check (like with a multimeter or something similar) the connectivity of your cable ? the first E1 crossover cable I made had a problem (entirely my own fault) and I thought it didn't work. The way I checked was by connecting the two ports

Re: [asterisk-users] Fw: Re: mISDN BRI Asterisk 1.4

2009-01-21 Thread Benoit
I now this page has something like that: http://www.softwink.com/papers/Installation_Securing_VoIP_With_Linux/ but on a PRI and not a BRI, but maybe it can be extrapolated Lee Wilson a écrit : Its been a few days, I was wondering if anyone else has any ideas on how to get this to work? If

Re: [asterisk-users] Reading/Writing the Astdb

2009-01-24 Thread Benoit
I second that, while read an berkeley db file outside of it's main application can work fine, writing in it would certainly lead to huge trouble (data loss, corrupted file, ...) A berkeley db file is .. a file, not a database server David fire a écrit : external DB? like mysql? 2009/1/24

Re: [asterisk-users] Which policy for ISDN BRI support in NT/PtMP ?

2009-01-26 Thread Benoit
Olivier a écrit : From my point of view, the most important feature is TE-PTMP as this the one used here (in France) when connecting a new Asterisk-based IPBX to ISDN (I really don't know why TE-PTP is not used for that). Well this may depend of some parameter. We have a dual BRI line from

Re: [asterisk-users] Which policy for ISDN BRI support in NT/PtMP ?

2009-01-26 Thread Benoit
Olivier a écrit : Anyway, according your own experience, how frequent is this PTP case ? I can't say, i don't have any other experience than our own lines That's the point : as much as possible, we're trying to avoid any re-configuration of legacy equipment. So, how would you order TE/NT,

Re: [asterisk-users] extensions ending with #...

2009-02-05 Thread Benoit
f...@hotbox.ru a écrit : Hi everyone! I've set up asterisk ip-pbx to implement IVR menu and encountered such a problem: when users dial the destinaion phone number and end it up with # asterisk still waits until timeout in WaitExten() is reached. Well i don't see anything in the doc

[asterisk-users] QUEUE_MEMBER_COUNT: Bug or functionality ?

2009-03-07 Thread benoit
extra line could do not harm. If not, this would be nice to be fixed :) (Asterisk 1.4.23.1) regards, benoit ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit

Re: [asterisk-users] Faxing success rate on PRI

2009-03-08 Thread benoit
Here is my current setup: E1 = [Asterisk with TE220p] = IAX Trunk (routed network) = [Asterisk with TDM800p] = Fax/Copy Machine This seems to work fine, a few failed Fax or very slow sending/process sometimes but no complaining users, so this must be ok :) My previous try was: E1 =

Re: [asterisk-users] Faxing success rate on PRI

2009-03-08 Thread benoit
Remco Barendse a écrit : On Sun, 8 Mar 2009, benoit wrote: Here is my current setup: E1 = [Asterisk with TE220p] = IAX Trunk (routed network) = [Asterisk with TDM800p] = Fax/Copy Machine The TE220P and the TDM800P are in different Asterisk boxes? Any particular reason

Re: [asterisk-users] Faxing success rate on PRI

2009-03-08 Thread benoit
Doug Lytle a écrit : benoit wrote: Remco Barendse a écrit : On Sun, 8 Mar 2009, benoit wrote: Here is my current setup: E1 = [Asterisk with TE220p] = IAX Trunk (routed network) = [Asterisk with TDM800p] = Fax/Copy Machine

[asterisk-users] Using HASH() and REALTIME_HASH()

2010-01-09 Thread Benoit
})});(adding of double quote) Is it normal ? benoit -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com

Re: [asterisk-users] Using HASH() and REALTIME_HASH()

2010-01-12 Thread Benoit
Le 10/01/2010 07:53, Tilghman Lesher a écrit : On Saturday 09 January 2010 15:22:29 Benoit wrote: I'm playing around with asterisk 1.6.2.0 and the first try was to replace my now non-functionning 'app-realtime' macro which emulated RealTime with REALTIME_HASH() There is very few

Re: [asterisk-users] Hardware issue, was Using HASH() and REALTIME_HASH()

2010-01-13 Thread Benoit
Le 12/01/2010 16:35, Tilghman Lesher a écrit : On Tuesday 12 January 2010 04:44:36 Benoit wrote: I just experienced another problem however i have two rnis cards, one b410p and one te220, while the later works prefectly i can't really make the first one work, using DAHDI or mISDN under

Re: [asterisk-users] Hardware issue, was Using HASH() and REALTIME_HASH()

2010-01-22 Thread Benoit
Le 13/01/2010 09:57, Benoit a écrit : Le 12/01/2010 16:35, Tilghman Lesher a écrit : On Tuesday 12 January 2010 04:44:36 Benoit wrote: I just experienced another problem however i have two rnis cards, one b410p and one te220, while the later works prefectly i can't really make

Re: [asterisk-users] Hardware issue, was Using HASH() and REALTIME_HASH()

2010-01-23 Thread Benoit
On 22/01/2010 19:10, Benoit wrote: Le 13/01/2010 09:57, Benoit a écrit : Le 12/01/2010 16:35, Tilghman Lesher a écrit : On Tuesday 12 January 2010 04:44:36 Benoit wrote: I just experienced another problem however i have two rnis cards, one b410p and one te220, while

Re: [asterisk-users] Error redirecting an incoming call of a SIP provider to a local extension

2010-02-20 Thread Benoit
On 20/02/2010 01:35, Daniel Bareiro wrote: alderamin*CLI -- Executing [...@from-internal:1] Dial(SIP/danib-089f8820, SIP/300|30|tTrm) in new stack [Feb 19 19:22:50] WARNING[19254]: app_dial.c:1237 dial_exec_full: Unable to create channel of type 'SIP' (cause 20 - Unknown) == Everyone

[asterisk-users] Dahdi Congestion status

2010-02-21 Thread Benoit
Hi, I'm using an half T1 line on a asterisk (obviously :)) 1.6.2.4 system, up to recently everything was fine but we are starting to experience the call limitation of the line (15). So as to warn user of the problem i attached a vocal notification to the CONGESTION status after a Dial(), but it

Re: [asterisk-users] TE410P Spans offline/red after power down/restart

2010-02-22 Thread Benoit
Le 22/02/2010 09:28, Conor McTernan a écrit : I've just encountered an odd problem with our Digium TE410P card and was wondering if anyone has experienced something similar before. There is one similar request on this list from a few weeks back iirc We quickly removed the card and checked the

Re: [asterisk-users] How to stop intruder from registering sip?

2010-06-12 Thread Benoit
On 12/06/2010 15:09, sean darcy wrote: I decided to include the following in each sip.conf stanza that has an outgoing context: deny=0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 permit=10.10.10.0/24 If all your phones are on a defined network like that, you really should use iptables to allow inbound SIP from the

[asterisk-users] application call to Gosub affects flow of control, and needs to be re-written using AEL

2010-07-23 Thread Benoit
Hi, For some reason (outbound call tracking) I've got a few different outbound call process (using a macro for queuemetrics logging, or direct call) i wanted to factorise the routing process so i came up with something like the following. All in one it's working like expected, however every

Re: [asterisk-users] application call to Gosub affects flow of control, and needs to be re-written using AEL

2010-07-23 Thread Benoit
Le 23/07/2010 16:44, Zeeshan Zakaria a écrit : Hi, I try to avoid any warnings, as they can turn into errors later. well, that's exactly the point of this inquiry :) I remember having problems with GoSub long time ago, don't remember what it was, but I moved to macros after that. For

[asterisk-users] Enhancing snmp mib

2010-08-18 Thread Benoit
Hi, I'm quite pleased with the asterisk/res_snmp integration (at least a right one :) not some hackish scripted thingy) but i felt it's missing quite a few datas. What i would need is: * Per channels, number of inbound call received since asterisk startup (like a network interface) *

[asterisk-users] Issue with transfer (sip)

2010-09-17 Thread Benoit
Hi, I'm experiencing an issue with asterisk 1.6.2.10 12rc1, i'm not sure if it's to be expected or not, so here it is: When transferring call (blind-transfer) using asterisk feature key, things are working OK, however when using ZoIPer's transfer key (which is implemented with a Refer-To SIP

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk died without any message, segfault

2010-10-27 Thread Benoit
On 27/10/2010 12:59, Krzysztof Urbaniak wrote: Hi! We've experienced asterisk has gone without any message, it wasn't any segfault, anything in asterisk messages log that says about shutting down. How do you launch asterisk ? did you try without 'safe_asterisk' or anything like it, just

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk died without any message, segfault

2010-10-28 Thread Benoit
Le 28/10/2010 08:41, Krzysztof Urbaniak a écrit : 2010/10/27 Benoitmaver...@maverick.eu.org: On 27/10/2010 12:59, Krzysztof Urbaniak wrote: Hi! We've experienced asterisk has gone without any message, it wasn't any segfault, anything in asterisk messages log that says about shutting down.

Re: [asterisk-users] Big practical systems

2010-11-07 Thread Benoit
On 07/11/2010 19:29, Cary Fitch wrote: I don't want to start the How many calls can Asterisk handle? discussion or How many angels can stand on the point of a pin? discussion either. But can anyone contribute some practical knowledge of systems that take in channel bank T1s or DS3s from far

Re: [asterisk-users] Assigning an extension to a roaming phone

2011-02-22 Thread Benoit
to be dialed by an unknown party this way) Regards, benoit -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Livevoip still no DTMF?

2005-03-31 Thread Mike Benoit
setup a livevoip DID and indeed the DTMF does not work. The same asterisk context works via broadvoice and via direct dialing in to the asterisk server via SIP. Just no DTMF with calls via livevoip. I'm running Asterisk CVS-v1-0-03/06/05-23:15:12 -- Mike Benoit [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Asterisk-Users] NuFone, VoIPJet, circuit (fast) busy question

2005-04-01 Thread Mike Benoit
it does) while this tends to take a while with VoIPJet. I've also seen 'circuit fast busy' message - what is the difference between the two? Thanks, Jean-Michel. -- Mike Benoit [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Liveviop problem

2005-04-07 Thread Mike Benoit
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Mike Benoit [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Liveviop problem

2005-04-07 Thread Mike Benoit
Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Benoit Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 7:57 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Liveviop problem Speaking of LiveVOIP and there west coast server

Re: [Asterisk-Users] sipura 3000 - Call Leg/Transaction Does Not Exist - only happens sometimes

2005-04-10 Thread Mike Benoit
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Mike Benoit [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Overheard conversation. Comments please !

2005-04-14 Thread Mike Benoit
mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Mike Benoit [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Recommendation for dialplan in case of DDoS atta cks?

2005-02-28 Thread Mike Benoit
/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Mike Benoit [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] No ringback over IAX - LiveVoip

2005-03-11 Thread Mike Benoit
/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Mike Benoit [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Management Interface... Do you want one?

2004-01-21 Thread Mike Benoit
Hi All, I realize there has been much talk about Asterisk web interfaces in the past, and there are even a few created such as vmail.cgi and Astweb. However, coming from the perspective of trying to convince upper management of a large multinational company to convert its entire phone

Re: [Asterisk-Users] RxFax - Fast carrier training failed

2004-06-17 Thread Mike Benoit
, or are you using a codec other than u-law or A-law? Sometimes the slow control messages will get through the wrong modem, but the fast modem for the images never will. Regards, Steve Mike Benoit wrote: I'm trying to send a fax to my asterisk box, however shortly after connecting the fax

Re: [Asterisk-Users] RxFax - Fast carrier training failed

2004-06-17 Thread Mike Benoit
code 1 On Thu, 2004-06-17 at 13:33 -0700, Mike Benoit wrote: Good question Steve. My setup is basically: Fax Machine - PSTN - X100P - Asterisk - RxFax I'm not even sure, does Asterisk do encoding if its not sending the call to a SIP device, or over IAX? In the mean time I configured

[Asterisk-Users] 3-way calling woes... Nasty static and inconsistent flash detection?

2004-06-25 Thread Mike Benoit
callwaitingcallerid=yes threewaycalling=yes transfer=yes cancallforward=yes callreturn=yes musiconhold=default faxdetect=both echocancel=yes echocancelwhenbridged=yes echotraining=800 -- Mike Benoit [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Zap X100P oscillation

2004-06-28 Thread Mike Benoit
-users -- Mike Benoit [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Customized Call Parking

2004-06-29 Thread Mike Benoit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Mike Benoit [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL

[Asterisk-Users] Echo cancellation, when software doesn't cut it. Whats next?

2004-06-30 Thread Mike Benoit
of getting the right technician on the phone? Thanks. -- Mike Benoit [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Can't transfer with Zap and SPA-2000

2004-07-01 Thread Mike Benoit
] ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Mike Benoit [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Echo cancellation, when software doesn't cut it. Whats next?

2004-07-01 Thread Mike Benoit
, 2004-06-30 at 22:42 -0500, Daniel Jimenez wrote: Mike Benoit wrote: So whats the next step? How much money are you willing to put in the project? Are you talking POTS lines or a PRI? If this is a serious project and you'd really like to clear it up I'd look at a Cisco device (maybe

[Asterisk-Users] SPA-2000, call for help testing echo issues...

2004-07-01 Thread Mike Benoit
calls are made from SPA-2000's to PSTN numbers through Asterisk, asterisk is just amplifying the SPA-2000's own echo somehow. Any test results are welcome, I would be very interested if other people are unable to replicate my results. -- Mike Benoit [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Echo -when software doesn't cut it.

2004-07-01 Thread Mike Benoit
://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Mike Benoit [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman

[Asterisk-Users] Does the SPA-3000 get rid of echo that the X100P can't?

2004-07-10 Thread Mike Benoit
After trying everything under the sun to get rid of echo on my X100P, I'm curious if anyone managed to solve the echo issues by switching to a SPA-3000? As well, if you have multiple SPA-3000's, can you create dial-out groups similar to the Dial(ZAP/g1) functionality? Thanks. -- Mike Benoit

Re: [Asterisk-Users] UPDATE - Echo cancellation, when software doesn't cut it. Whats next?

2004-07-11 Thread Mike Benoit
this point the finger at Asterisk code having issues? On Wed, 2004-06-30 at 16:36 -0700, Mike Benoit wrote: Over the last couple weeks I've tried everything I could get my hands on in an attempt to get rid of my echo problems. Using a CVS checkout of just yesterday, I've tried every echo

Re: [Asterisk-Users] UPDATE - Echo cancellation, when softwaredoesn't cut it. Whats next?

2004-07-12 Thread Mike Benoit
at 02:06 -0400, Anton wrote: No it points to Cell phone companies having better hardware echo cancellation on their lines, also cell phones themselves have a hardware echo can built in. - Original Message - From: Mike Benoit [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July

Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX2 calls through IAXTEL.com

2004-07-13 Thread Mike Benoit
visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Mike Benoit [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http

Re: [Asterisk-Users] spa-3000 review?

2004-07-14 Thread Mike Benoit
Dameon and Wolfgang, Have either of you experienced echo when making a call from the FXS port to the FXO port on the SPA-3000? Thanks -- Mike Benoit [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com

[Asterisk-Users] Reverse Hold feature prototype...

2004-07-15 Thread Mike Benoit
in to something like parkedcalls. But for now, the above works relatively well. The biggest drawback is there is no way to get back to call on hold until it times out. Enjoy. -- Mike Benoit [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Asterisk-Users] echotraining on T1 circuits

2004-07-21 Thread Mike Benoit
/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Mike Benoit [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo

[Asterisk-Users] RAID affecting X100P performance...

2004-07-21 Thread Mike Benoit
: 1.562500 Is this a poor mainboard issue, or is it actually not possible to do IDE software RAID on a machine running Asterisk with X100P cards? Is anyone currently doing it? Thanks. -- Mike Benoit [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list

Re: [Asterisk-Users] RAID affecting X100P performance...

2004-07-21 Thread Mike Benoit
://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Mike Benoit [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http

Re: [Asterisk-Users] RAID affecting X100P performance...

2004-07-21 Thread Mike Benoit
the X100P card, or the TDM400 for that matter I'm interested if it has the same issue, and run the same test. See if you notice any cutting out. -- Mike Benoit [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com

Re: [Asterisk-Users] SPA-2000 Dropped calls

2004-11-30 Thread Mike Benoit
/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Mike Benoit [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL

Re: [Asterisk-Users] SPA-2000 Dropped calls

2004-11-30 Thread Mike Benoit
thing here. A bad SPA? -- Tim Schacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] 218-844-5985 On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 12:31, Mike Benoit wrote: This sounds similar to the issue I have been dealing with for the past several months. Are the calls just being dropped, or is the SPA rebooting itself? One

Re: [Asterisk-Users] SPA-2000 Dropped calls

2004-12-01 Thread Mike Benoit
/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Mike Benoit [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Asterisk-Users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] SPA-2000 Dropped calls

2004-12-01 Thread Mike Benoit
, Brian Roy wrote: On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 16:01:16 -0800, Mike Benoit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Don't run LISa on the same network as any SPA-2000 or SPA-3000. (maybe even any Sipura device?) I have a problem with mine locking up, but not while talking. When it sits idle for a period of time I come

[Asterisk-Users] Spandsp 0.0.2pre6 configure fails sanity check.

2004-12-21 Thread Mike Benoit
installed: gcc-3.3.2-9mdk gcc-cpp-3.3.2-9mdk Any ideas how to fix this? Thanks. -- Mike Benoit [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http

[Asterisk-Users] IAX2 insists on not using port 4569??

2004-12-21 Thread Mike Benoit
-- Mike Benoit [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Connecting SPA-300 to Asterisk

2004-09-18 Thread Mike Benoit
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Mike Benoit [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Status of conference calls at Astricon ?

2004-09-22 Thread Mike Benoit
: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Mike Benoit [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http

Re: [Asterisk-Users] SPA-3k outbound calls...

2004-10-11 Thread Mike Benoit
/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Mike Benoit [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: SPA3000 as a replacement for X100P

2004-10-11 Thread Mike Benoit
/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Mike Benoit [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo

  1   2   3   >