[asterisk-users] Any timeframe for the release of the Asterisk 11-Lumenvox connector bridge?

2013-01-18 Thread Steve Prior
I'm starting to think about migrating from an old Asterisk box to a new one and 
want to use the Asterisk 11 long term support release, but need Lumenvox 
integration and I don't see the Asterisk 11 connector bridge for Lumenvox 
available yet.  Lumenvox tech support says this is under Digiums control.  Can 
anyone give an idea of how soon it'll be available?


Steve

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
  http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Corba interface

2010-06-20 Thread Steve Prior
On 6/15/2010 9:57 AM, Muro, Sam wrote:
 Does anyone know how to configure asterisk to be able to query Corba
 interface directly from the dialplan

I do it by implementing my dialplan as a Java server using the asterisk Java 
FastAGI interface, then from Java I can make all the CORBA calls I want (I 
personally use JacORB).  Check 
http://www.lumenvox.com/partners/digium/applicationzone/projects/javaPizza.aspx 
for some sample code on the Java part - this happens to drive Lumenvox to 
handle 
a call, but you can easily hack it to stick CORBA calls in.

Steve

-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Here is Step by Step Example of Asterisk PBX System Install and configuration

2009-04-18 Thread Steve Prior
Tilghman Lesher wrote:
 Emacs is a nice operating system, but it lacks a decent editor. :-P
 

It's also a nice religion.

Steve


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Open door automatically...

2008-08-14 Thread Steve Prior
Carlos Chavez wrote:
   I have a new setup that uses a 2N Entrycom door phone that has a switch
 to open an electric lock.  The way this works is that when you are
 speaking with someone at the door you dial a code and it releases the
 lock on the door.  This part works great.  
 
   My customer wants to be able to dial a certain number and have the door
 open automatically without having to wait on the phone.  I can simulate
 this option by using the D option of the Dial command to send DTMF to
 the door phone once it answers.  The only problem is that they do not
 want to wait until the door phone answers.  They just want to dial a
 number and hangup immediately.  How can I do this?

Maybe something like the number the user dials runs an AGI script which 
creates a call file which dials the real device.

Steve

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Panasonic Door phone monitor to Asterisk box?

2008-08-01 Thread Steve Prior
C F wrote:
 the Panasonic model you mention will only work with a panasonic PBX.
 and no it does NOT plug into a station port on the Panasonic but onto
 the door card of any of the Panasonic systems.
 Having installed that Panasonic video doorboxes in the past I would
 suggest stay away from it. it is not as nice as the brouchures make it
 look, and extremly overpriced.

Glad I asked.  Here's what I REALLY want to do...  I like the look of 
the Panasonic door unit - looks like a simple doorbell, but has a 
camera, mic, speaker in there as well as the button.  I want the camera 
(NTSC) hooked to a video capture card full time so that system can 
always see outside.  I'm happy with a plain old doorbell sounding when 
the button is pressed.  I don't care about the inside wall mounted panel 
at all, and I'd be happy to have the mic/speaker connected to my 
asterisk box somehow.  This means:

- the doorbell works with a chime
- my home automation/security system can always view out the camera
- I can call the outside unit from my Asterisk PBX and talk to whoever 
is out there.

It all starts with the outside hardware, do you (or anyone else) know of 
a nice looking unit preferably along the lines of the look of the 
Panasonic unit?

Steve

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Panasonic Door phone monitor to Asterisk box?

2008-07-31 Thread Steve Prior
I'm considering getting a Panasonic video door phone system (VL-GM301A) 
which can interface with a PBX and would like to connect it to my 
Asterisk box with an analog FXS port.  Of course the Panasonic 
documentation only talks about hooking it up to a Panasonic PBX which 
only talks about using Panasonic phones, so it's hard to tell whether 
the 2 wire connection from the door phone monitor is analog or digital. 
  The video door phone itself hooks to the door phone monitor with a 2 
conductor wire, so that part is clearly digital since video, audio, and 
button press all go through that wire, but since the door phone central 
station apparently plugs into a Panasonic PBX FXS port which possibly 
supports fax machines I'm thinking that this might be an ordinary analog 
connection.

Does anyone know if the door phone interface is analog or digital? 
Anyone have experience with interfacing with one?

Thanks
Steve

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Magnetic door locks

2008-07-17 Thread Steve Prior
Paul Hales wrote:
 I remember driving past a building with a magnetic door lock (where a 
 friend worked) late one night, and he noticed that their door was open 
 and swinging in the breeze. Turns out that if you lost power, this 
 particular door would open up as well.
 
 PaulH

Heck, that was the whole premise behind the bad guys opening the vault in the 
first Die Hard movie - get the feds to cut the power...

Steve


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Poor audio quality with TDM400 card

2008-07-13 Thread Steve Prior
Try adding the following to your voicemail.conf context:

format=wav49|wav

Steve

Leotis buchanan wrote:
 Hey Guys,
 
 I have configured my first asterisk box. it works ok so apart, but the 
 playback sound quality is terrible, its low  and the output sounds 
 distorted and its seems to have been clipped.
 
 Can anyone help.
 
 
 
 
 
 On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Chris Rowson 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
   Hi, this is my first post to the list, but I have tried to search
   elsewhere for a solution
   SNIP
   I'm using sipgate.co.uk http://sipgate.co.uk for incoming
 calls, but when I make a test
   call from the PSTN, the call just dies without connecting to my
   Astlinux box. (I'm monitoring asterisk console via 'asterisk
 -rv'
   and see nothing).
   SNIP
 
 Thanks for the suggestions. I ran tcpdump and it indicated that
 traffic on that port was being forwarded to the asterisk server. It
 looks like I basically wrote a load of nonsense in the extensions.conf
 file. I edited the file to input the extension the incoming call
 should be coming from and it now works.
 
 Working file ---
 
 [from-pots]
 exten = 277,1,Answer()
 exten = 277,n,Wait(3)
 exten = 277,n,Playback(tt-weasels)
 exten = 277,n,Hangup()
 
 So in summary it was basically me misconfiguring the box...
 
 Cheers
 
 Chris
 
 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
 
 AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
 Register Now: http://www.astricon.net
 
 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Leotis Buchanan
 Manager/Electronic Design Systems Engineer
 Exterbox.com
 
 
 
 
 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
 
 AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
 Register Now: http://www.astricon.net
 
 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Database Handling

2008-05-21 Thread Steve Prior


Tilghman Lesher wrote:
 Correct; it's actually a workaround for a bug in the MySQL drivers.  It was
 discovered long after 1.2 was end-of-lifed.
 

I got bit by MySQL reconnects on some other software I wrote I think when I 
jumped from MySQL 4.* to 5.*.  If memory serves, here is the relevant info from 
the official MySQL documentation:

From: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/upgrading-from-4-1.html

The reconnect flag in the MYSQL structure is set to 0 by mysql_real_connect(). 
Only those client programs which did not explicitly set this flag to 0 or 1 
after mysql_real_connect()  experience a change. Having automatic reconnection 
enabled by default was considered too dangerous (due to the fact that table 
locks, temporary tables, user variables, and session variables are lost after 
reconnection).


This may explain why this is happening in Asterisk.  In the case of my other 
code the answer was not to keep a long term connection through idle periods.

Steve

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Which Cepstral Voice to license

2008-05-08 Thread Steve Prior
The Allison voice is nice and matches with the built in recordings fairly well.

Steve


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] New generic sounds

2008-05-02 Thread Steve Prior
Quoting Philipp Kempgen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Thank you for calling 911. All of our representatives are currently
 busy. Your estimated hold time is 2 hours and 15 minutes. Thank you
 for your patience. ... MOH

More like:

Thank you for calling 911.  All of our representatives are currently busy.  To
hear tips for for resuscitating yourself on the back of a chair press 1 or
visit our website at www.911selfhelp.com.

Steve


This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] DUDE!!!!! was RE: Dialplan Visualization(Extensions.conf or Dialplan Show)

2008-04-18 Thread Steve Prior
Quoting Steve Totaro [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 You may have a point although I was more doing a favor or looking
 out rather than trying to push my wares on someone where they did not
 fit.
 Thanks,
 Steve Totaro

I for one found your post about the cheap machines very useful and would
appreciate them in the future.  Because I'm generally interested in Asterisk
itself and not the business I don't subscribe to the biz list.

Steve T, I think the only reason you were called on this was because the other
posters who were violating the spirit of the rules were trying to obfuscate
their own issues and you should ignore this.

Steve Prior


This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] FYI about my Mona Vie business venture

2008-03-24 Thread Steve Prior
BerkHolz, Steven wrote:
 Here is a list of what it is supposed to do:
...
 Improves mental clarity/focus

Just wait until that benefit really kicks in and you realize you've 
joined a pyramid scheme...

Steve

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Mail Server

2008-03-13 Thread Steve Prior
Mike Hammett wrote:
 I need to setup a small mail server on a local network.  It only needs 
 SMTP ability as it's just so Asterisk can send out emails.  The machine 
 has sendmail installed.  My primary mail server seems to be rejecting 
 the messages.  Some research says something isn't configured properly.  
 What do I have to do so the outside world accepts emails from my 
 Asterisk box?  It is behind a NAT.

On the mail server machine add the IP address or name of the asterisk 
box to /etc/mail/relay-domains and restart sendmail.

Steve

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Best alternative for getting prompts recorded.

2008-03-11 Thread Steve Prior
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Thanks everyone for the reply.
 
 Till now we had simple IVR so we recorded it ourself.
 Now I have a requirement where customer needs a customized message to be 
 played to customer. I am basically looking for some Text to Speech software 
 that would be cost effective (most probably a open source) and would convert 
 Text to Speech.
 
 I tried Fetival, but the quality of the sound is not good. Can we improve the 
 sound quality of Festival somehow.
Cepstrel is good, cheap, and now has an Allison (yes, THAT Allison) voice!

Steve

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] TDM400P phone won't ring

2008-02-06 Thread Steve Prior
Shane Wegner wrote:
 Hello all,
 
 I have two handsets connected to FXS ports on a TDM400P,
 both GE models but one rings and the other does not.  The
 phone models are not identical.  The phone which doesn't
 ring on the TDM does ring when connected to a regular POTS
 line and I tried connecting another phone to the port and
 it rings fine.

Do you have the power connector on the TDM400P card hooked up?

Steve

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Replacement for Allison

2008-01-24 Thread Steve Prior
Matthew Rubenstein wrote:
   Is anyone else interested in creating new voices for Festival (the
 voice synth bundled with Asterisk) that might not be as good as
 Allison's recordings, but are better than the current Festival voices?

If you try to do live voice synth for prompts you'll probably run into 
something I encountered - the background and speechbackground (I also 
use Lumenvox in addition to Cepstrel) only take a file.  That means 
unless I'm missing something you can't have a TTS prompt that can be 
interrupted like a recorded file.  The workaround of TTS to a file and 
then play the file sounds to me like it would introduce delays and 
besides it's ugly.

That's why I posted a suggestion to the recently created 
asteriskideas.org that background and speechbackground be enhanced to 
take an app in addition to a simple file.  If you agree, then please 
vote for it.

Steve

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] AsteriskIdeas.org :: Comment on submitted ideas

2008-01-23 Thread Steve Prior
Johansson Olle E wrote:
 I can't say that ideas are pouring in to AsteriskIdeas.org, but we  
 still have a few ideas worth a discussion.

I entered one and submitted it, but then it seems it was caught in 
approval mode and never showed up by the time I gave up looking at the 
site.  Now that you mention it I see it's there.

Steve

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Interrupt the swift text

2008-01-15 Thread Steve Prior
Naveen Palani wrote:
 Does anyone have any ideas i can work it out. How can i have 
 the Asterisk cmd Background inside macro? or how to execute the GoTo 
 command? 

I have really started to wish for 2 new standard commands - 
BackgroundApp and SpeechBackgroundApp to be added to Asterisk just for 
this sort of situation.

Steve

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Mark Spencer and guest(s) LIVE today at 12 Noon EST - 11 Central - 17:00 UTC

2008-01-06 Thread Steve Prior


randulo wrote:
 On Jan 6, 2008 12:45 AM, Steve Prior [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Can you make a podcast out of these recordings by creating an XML file 
 indexing
 them?  That way it would be much easier for us to pick them up as they come 
 out.
 
 http://feeds.feedburner.com/AstUser

Got it, thanks!

Steve


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Mark Spencer and guest(s) LIVE today at 12 Noon EST - 11 Central - 17:00 UTC

2008-01-05 Thread Steve Prior
randulo wrote:
 After hours with Allison Smith, Voice of Asterisk
 
 Some of you may want to listen to the after hours of the conference
 where Allison called in. The first thing she said was I am not
 muted!
 
 Player at http://voipUsersConference.org
 
 Full Mp3 downloads list: http://food4wine.ning.com/conference

Can you make a podcast out of these recordings by creating an XML file indexing 
them?  That way it would be much easier for us to pick them up as they come out.

Steve


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] How are you using Asterisk at Home ?

2007-10-10 Thread Steve Prior
 GNUbie wrote:
 
 By the way, my Asterisk PBX server is also my wireless access point, 
 web server, file server, music server, VPN server, database server, 
 firewall and router.


Repeat after me - NEVER NEVER NEVER run other servers on your
router/firewall machine!!!  That machine needs to be a maximum security
low vulnerability box and running all sorts of stuff on it conflicts
with that.  Your web server is probably your weakest link in security,
so I wouldn't put your file server, music server, or database server on
that same box because if someone hacks through some webapp you've
installed (it's happened to me with both the TWiki and awstats packages)
then if they've got root on your web server box you don't want them
messing with the other stuff.

I know it sounds like overkill, but I see three boxes here:

1 - firewall/router
2 - web server and other public facing services (sendmail for example)
3 - internal facing services - database, asterisk, file/music server

Some day when box #2 gets rooted (and it will eventually) you'll thank
me...

Steve



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Cepstral's Allison is having troublespeaking clearly

2007-09-06 Thread Steve Prior
Kai-Uwe Jensen wrote:
 How are you playing the voice? Do you use something like app_swift
 or app_cepstral? Just fixed app_swift for my own installation by
 changing the framesize constant definition from 160*4 to 20,
 after googling for a similar issue. Works like a charm now. It only
 broke recently, i.e. not with the first 1.4.x releases, but maybe only
 a couple of months ago.

Can you specify exactly where you made this change?   I'm looking at the 
source for app_swift-0.9 right now and don't see a framesize constant.
I'm getting some breakup when using app_swift over an IAX connection and 
thought I'd try this.

Thanks
Steve


___

Sign up now for AstriCon 2007!  September 25-28th.  http://www.astricon.net/ 

--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] phone as control interface (was 99 bottles of beer)

2007-08-22 Thread Steve Prior
Steve Edwards wrote:

 Personally, I hate voice recognition systems. Voice prompts are 
 great, but don't take away my keypad.

I never proposed to take away your keypad, I just wanted to add the
voice option as well.  What I do want to get rid of is the step
below where you press ** to get into remote mode.  What I think would
be smoother is to have the extensions organized in such a way that
the first button press (or voice utterance) is enough to determine
whether the session is a phone call or an automation request.  Then
as soon as the phone is picked up you'd get into the automation context
and the voice menu you gave would start right away.  Then if it turned
out that first button meant that the user really wanted to make a call,
then Asterisk would shift into the normal call dialplan, but reprocess
that already pressed key as part of the phone number to dial.

I think that we can provide something more intelligent when the
phone is first picked up than your basic dialtone and not require
extra button presses to get into the right mode.  Your desire is for
speed and so is mine.

Steve

 
 Maybe I'm too far out on the edge of the bell curve, but I CAN remember 
 what Alison was prattling about long enough to be told which key to press. 
 Also, keys are much faster, especially once memorized as will happen 
 quickly for something as frequently used as the TV.
 
 Think of a task like muting the TV:
 
 ) Off-hook
 ) Dialtone
 ) Press ** (change to remote mode)
 ) To control the...
 ) Press 1
 ) To change the vol...
 ) Press 1
 ) To mut...
 ) Press 0


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] phone as control interface (was 99 bottles of beer)

2007-08-21 Thread Steve Prior
Steve Edwards wrote:

 Almost every room in my house has a phone -- if I could teach my kids to 
 put them back where they belong.
 
 This could easily be extended to recognize which phone was used so it 
 could control the Myth FE in that room.
 
 Also, it could/should be extended to control x10 devices as well...
 
 To control the tv in this room, press 1. To control a tv in another room, 
 press 2. To control the outside lights, press 3. To control the 
 sprinklers, press 4, ...

A while back I was thinking along the lines of using a phone as a
home automation interface, though I was thinking of it in combination
with a voice recognitition system such as Lumenvox.  It occured to
me that when you want to turn the lights on, you don't really want to
pick up a phone, dial a special extension, and then start using menus.

What I was thinking about was what if instead of a dialtone you are
brought directly to a home automation voice menu which works in
parallel with your normal dial plan.  If you wanted to make a call,
just ignore the voice menu and dial normally.  If you wanted to
turn on the lights, just say lights on. or somesuch.  Having a
traditional dialtone seems unnecessary when you can get more function
instead.

The trick is doing this without giving up on the use of nice existing
GUIs to manage the dialplan that we have now.  I'd like some way of
merging in the voice dialtone function with the existing dialplan
such that initially both are active, but as soon as either a phrase is
recognized or a button is pressed the system branches to one or the other,
but that button or phrase is passed through to the rest of the processing
and not just an extra prompt getting in the way.

Does this spark anyone's imagination or ideas to implement?

Steve

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] phone as control interface (was 99 bottles of beer)

2007-08-21 Thread Steve Prior
Steve Prior wrote:

 What I was thinking about was what if instead of a dialtone you are
 brought directly to a home automation voice menu which works in
 parallel with your normal dial plan.  If you wanted to make a call,
 just ignore the voice menu and dial normally.  If you wanted to
 turn on the lights, just say lights on. or somesuch.  Having a
 traditional dialtone seems unnecessary when you can get more function
 instead.
 
 The trick is doing this without giving up on the use of nice existing
 GUIs to manage the dialplan that we have now.  I'd like some way of
 merging in the voice dialtone function with the existing dialplan
 such that initially both are active, but as soon as either a phrase is
 recognized or a button is pressed the system branches to one or the other,
 but that button or phrase is passed through to the rest of the processing
 and not just an extra prompt getting in the way.

Now that the idea is coming back to me a bit, here's a possiblity.
When the phone is picked up it is auto-dialed into the voice driven/home 
control application AGI.
At this point there are three options:

1. User utters a voice command.
2. User presses a touch tone which is meant for home control.
3. User presses a touch tone meant for the dial plan.

option 2 vs 3 would be determined by internal extensions starting with
a given number and dial 9 to reach an outside line, so other digits
could be used for home control.

As soon as option 3 is detected the voice AGI stuffs the touch tone back
into the processing buffer, transfers to the normal diaplan, and exits.
 From there the normal dialplan handles the call normally.

So, does anyone know if it is possible to stuff a touch tone event back into the
processing stream so it can be handled by the new dialplan context?

Steve

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] LumenVox Speech Recognition

2007-08-14 Thread Steve Prior
randulo wrote:
 Nitesh,
 
 I've messed with the Lumenvox starter kit. If you are serious about
 this field, I think it's a must see. It was easy to set up and there
 are demos available. Their support is excellent. There is a quiet
 mailing list where questions are never ignored and most problems are
 solved AFAIK.

I'll agree that the Lumevox starter kit is a great starting point.  I 
started out with the dialplan version of their pizza demo and quickly
realized that using a dialplan would degenerate into spaghetti code very 
quickly.  So using the Asterisk-java library I ported their pizza demo 
to Java (my code is now one of the demos on that page).  I found this 
combined with Cepstral to be a great platform that could be used to 
write data driven voice recognition applications.

If you are doing something interesting, the Lumenvox folks are very 
helpful in getting you going.

Steve

 
 Take a look here for demos, etc.
 
 http://lumenvox.com/partners/integrator/digium/applicationzone/i
 
 /r


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk setup for church / conference call / speaker system integration

2007-05-17 Thread Steve Prior

Tim Litwiller wrote:
Oh and we will also want to record the services so that if someone wants 
a copy or to listen later they can call in to listen or we can burn then 
a copy. So I'll need to program a recording menu system that is somewhat 
automated and lists the last few weeks of services by date or something.


This part sounds like a podcast to me.

Steve
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk setup for church / conference call/ speaker system integration

2007-05-17 Thread Steve Prior

Dean Collins wrote:


Worth looking at using Talkshoe for this application maybe?


My personal podcast authoring tool is vi (and you thought it was
just a website authoring tool...) so I don't have any user friendly
recommendations, but there's got to be a lot out there.

Steve
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Microsoft's Move Into IP PBX Market

2007-05-16 Thread Steve Prior
I'm sure everyone loves the idea of patch Tuesday for their phone 
system.  Phones were too boring before, this will make them nice and 
exciting again...


Steve

George Pajari wrote:

 From c|net News:
On Monday,Microsoft and nine leading phone manufacturers--Asustek 
Computer, GN, LG-Nortel, NEC, Plantronics, Plycom, Samsung, Tatung, and 
Vitelix--announced the public beta program for Microsoft Office 
Communications Server 2007 and Microsoft Office Communicator 2007.


http://news.com.com/8301-10784_3-9719931-7.html?part=rsssubj=newstag=2547-1_3-0-20 





___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Is STP wire decent for analog phones?

2007-04-15 Thread Steve Prior
I've got a run of Shielded Twisted Pair (4 conductors) which used to be 
a Token Ring Network drop and I'm not using it anymore.  Would it be 
decent to replace the ends with normal analog phone connectors and use 
it for a phone extension, or is STP unsuitable for that?


Thanks
Steve
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] How well does a celldock work with Asterisk?

2007-04-06 Thread Steve Prior
I've seen in the wiki that it is possible to use a celldock device to 
use a cell phone as a PSTN line to Asterisk, but I haven't seen any 
comments as to how well this actually works.  I was thinking about 
hooking a celldock to a FXO input of my Digium TDM400P card and use it 
to connect via bluetooth to my RAZR V3C.  I am aware of the software 
solution (chan_bluetooth), but my Asterisk box is a bit far away from 
where I want to keep the phone so the celldock seems to be the more 
convenient solution for me.


Any comments about the sound quality or issues in making it work?

Thanks
Steve

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] How well does a celldock work with Asterisk?

2007-04-06 Thread Steve Prior

Steve Prior wrote:
I've seen in the wiki that it is possible to use a celldock device to 
use a cell phone as a PSTN line to Asterisk, but I haven't seen any 
comments as to how well this actually works.  I was thinking about 
hooking a celldock to a FXO input of my Digium TDM400P card and use it 
to connect via bluetooth to my RAZR V3C.  I am aware of the software 
solution (chan_bluetooth), but my Asterisk box is a bit far away from 
where I want to keep the phone so the celldock seems to be the more 
convenient solution for me.


Any comments about the sound quality or issues in making it work?


I just found out that the celldock I'm talking about is also called the 
Dock-N-Talk.


I look forward to hearing about experiences in using it with Asterisk.

Steve

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Cepstral and numbers

2007-03-19 Thread Steve Prior

Julian Lyndon-Smith wrote:

Does anyone have any idea on how to force cepstral to convert a number 
to speech ?


I have noticed that sometimes it speaks the number correctly, and at 
others it doesn't.


1) 787 is pronounced 7-8-7
2) 123 is pronounced one-hundred and twenty-three.

1) is wrong for what i need, 2) is perfect.

Is there anyway of forcing numbers to be pronounced as 2) ?

I've tried looking at the ssml tags ..

TIA

Julian


Total guess on my part, but by any chance does it use 1) if the number isn't
separated by whitespace from something preceeding it, but 2) if it is?

This would make a traffic report for example read correctly:

The traffic on I-84 is moving at 60 MPH.

Where you'd want I-84 read using 1) and 60 using 2)

Steve
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Cepstral voices

2007-03-17 Thread Steve Prior

Lee Jenkins wrote:
Funny you should mention FastAGI.  I am implementing a variation of my 
DTSwift app through an Object Pascal based FastAGI scripting server now.


http://www.datatrakpos.com/pos/datatalk/images/asterpas.htm

The newer version just uses the System() AGI command to build the file 
to play through the shell.  I'd be open to any suggestions for a more 
efficient way of doing it.




Sorry for not answering faster - was busy shoveling snow.

Once you've got app_swift installed, saying something
should be pretty close to:

AGI.Exec('Swift','This is something to say.');

And since it doesn't render to a file first you'll probably experience
less of a delay to say something.

Steve
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Cepstral voices

2007-03-16 Thread Steve Prior

Julian Lyndon-Smith wrote:
what's the easiest way of using cepstral voices with asterisk ? On their 
website, in the ssml page 
(http://www.cepstral.com/cgi-bin/support?page=ssml), they say


Asterisk PBX
SSML can be used with Cepstral voices in Asterisk by simply embedding 
the markup into the input text.


what input text ? To what application ?


I agree completely with the app_swift suggestion from loopfree as Kai 
suggested.  It provides the app_Swift which you can use from within a 
dialplan.  In fact, if you're getting fancy by using a fastAGI bound 
language(as I'm doing with asterisk-java), app_swift becomes the only 
good option.


slight rantI think Cepstral should be providing an app_swift like 
binding themselves because if you're writing an application which is 
going to use information from a back end business model in creating the 
speech (and this is something they seem to think is their future and I 
agree), then a high level language through fastAGI seems by far the best 
way to control the call.

/slight rant

Stay away from app_cepstral, if you're Googling it appears to be an 
option, but it didn't work for me.


Steve
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Is Allison going to be banned from foreign travel over polar bears?

2007-03-08 Thread Steve Prior

I read this story and thought of Allison's prompt to try not to think about blue 
eyed polar bears.
Will she be banned from foreign travel now?

Steve Prior

-- snip --
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Polar bears, sea ice and global warming are taboo subjects, at least in 
public, for some U.S. scientists attending meetings abroad, environmental groups and a top federal 
wildlife official said on Thursday.


http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=topNewsstoryid=2007-03-08T222736Z_01_N08259521_RTRUKOC_0_US-POLARBEARS-SCIENTISTS.xmlsrc=rss
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Which Java FastAGI implementation has the most market share?

2007-02-05 Thread Steve Prior



Matthew Rubenstein wrote:


The real advantage in choosing an AGI (or CGI or ...) platform/language
is *reusing* the existing code that already runs on that platform, with


Well of course you should pick whatever AGI implementation matches the 
rest of your environment best.



minimal porting to the platform in that language. How much does a Java
application, net/bean, or modern (1.4-6.x) class have to be revised to
make it work with asterisk-java as FastAGI instead of, say, AGI, CGI,
commandline, browser JVM, or other execution environment/UI?


I'm not totally sure you're asking the right question here. 
Asterisk-java in combination with Asterisk and in my case Lumenvox is 
just a user interface for whatever application I am developing.  In my 
case it's not even the only user interface I've created for my system 
(which happens to be in Home Automation which uses CORBA to connect the 
pieces together) - I've also got a web interface as well as other 
standalone front ends and even the light switches can be considered part 
of the UI (and therefore non reusable).  Asterisk-java provides you with 
an ordinary JRE environment where you might not be in direct control of 
main() (though you can be if you really want to), but that's similar to 
the other server environments you mentioned (browser JVM is a different 
animal).


So the real question isn't so much how a class needs to be revised for 
asterisk-java, it is does your back end system provide a robust API such 
that you can be dropped naked in the middle of a JRE woods and without 
anything more than some additions to the CLASSPATH be able to interact 
with your back end system.


Steve

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Which Java FastAGI implementation has the most market share?

2007-02-04 Thread Steve Prior

Kate Kretz wrote:

Steve, keep me in touch please ?
We are also looking for moving all our activities to java platform.

Let me know if You'll find/test something like asterisk2billing written 
in java ?


I haven't received any feedback at all on the relative use of the java
options, but I'm pretty happy with the way a little project turned out 
in asterisk-java.


My project was to see how well asterisk-java would work in combination 
with Lumenvox to create a speech enabled AGI, so just for kicks I've 
ported their Pizza ordering demo to Java using it.  In the process I've 
been working with Lumenvox to fix the couple of problems which turned up 
as a result of this experiment, and use an asterisk-java code change 
which is available in their latest svn.


Sometime soon my code will be made available most likely through the 
Lumenvox site so others can use it as a starting point.


Overall I'll say that I really like using Java to control such a dial 
plan.  In this particular case the output is a simple pizza order which 
I've modeled as a plain old Java object (POJO), so once the dial plan 
has built up the object it can simply be passed to whatever back end 
(possibly J2EE) code which processes the transaction without regard for 
the user interface that created it.  Sounds very maintainable to me.  I 
did the development/test right in the Eclipse IDE and could use the 
debugger when necessary - I've got to believe that's better than trying 
to trace through a regular dial plan.


I also really like the fact that aside from sound files and just a 
couple of lines of dial plan code to call the Java, all the actual Java 
code is running in a different server box so I'm keeping the load down 
on my Asterisk box and have flexibility in where I deploy things.


Steve



Cheers,
Kate


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Which Java FastAGI implementation has the most market share?

2007-01-31 Thread Steve Prior
When I was looking for a Java FastAGI interface for Asterisk I came 
across asterisk-java first and didn't realize there was more than one 
out there.  It seems to work fine and I've got my first project working 
with it, but I was wondering which Java FastAGI implementation is the 
most popular and how they compare against each other.


So I'm aware of:
asterisk-java
JastAGI
OrderlyCalls

Any comments on who the front runner is and why?


Steve
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Nufone

2007-01-15 Thread Steve Prior

Wiley Siler wrote:
Are these guys still around?  I cannot get to _www.nufone.net_ 
file://www.nufone.net or nufone.com


Not only can I get to their website, but yesterday I called their 
customer service and for the first time ever it was actually answered by 
a live person.


Steve

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] FYI Panasonic Wireless Phone MWI

2006-12-16 Thread Steve Prior

Noah Miller wrote:

Last week I asked about MWI indicators on wireless phones that would work
with Asterisk. I sent a message off to Panasonic asking them about it
because in their ads they specifically stated that the indicator works
with and requires phone company voicemail subscription.

 That indicator will not work for your
 voicemail. We do not have any phone system that has a message alert
 indicator that will work both for your voicemail and your answering
 machine.


How exactly did you phrase the question to their tech support?  If you 
described Asterisk as an answering machine then you'd get the wrong 
answer.  If you described Asterisk as a PBX which provides a signal just 
like a telco voicemail would, then the answer would make sense.


Steve
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] TDM400P won't ring GM phone of mere 0.1B

2006-12-14 Thread Steve Prior

Yuan LIU wrote:

The feature request # is 4542, but I don't know any associated bug 
number, nor with what phones other people had to tweak.  My phone is a 
GE 27935GE3-B. (Don't know what possessed me to say GM:-)


Yuan Liu


Just gotta ask - you did plug in the power supply connection on the
board, right?

Steve
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] 5.8gig phone MWI

2006-12-09 Thread Steve Prior

Tom Lynn wrote:
You're trying to teach a pig to sing.  The uniden items you refer to 
probably have their own internal answering machine, mine does.  It's 
designed to light the lamp only when it's own machine has a message.


You're giving out totally incorrect information.  The TRU-8866 unit
I mentioned is a 2 line unit (which I wanted), but does NOT have a built
in answering machine (which I didn't want).  Uniden seems to offer 
models with and without answering machine function.  However, despite 
the fact that it does not have a built in answering machine, the 
handsets and base unit both support MWI.


I believe that Uniden does make a single line version of this phone, and
I bet it also supports MWI - especially since they've standardized their
handsets to be universal across their latest line.

Steve
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] 5.8gig phone MWI

2006-12-08 Thread Steve Prior

Doug Crompton wrote:


Does anyone have personal experience with a 5.8gig wireless phone (system)
that has an MWI that WORKS with asterisk via fxs (in my case spa3k)
generated MWI. I know the spa3k does stuttered dialtone but not sure if it
generates FSK MWI.

I see some that state they do but I also see reviews that say they don't.

Doug


I've tested the MWI with the Uniden TRU-8866 phone and it works for me.
I've tested it with the Digium TDM400P FXS.

Steve
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Is there any Asterisk controllable thermostat?

2006-12-06 Thread Steve Prior

Doug Crompton wrote:

and it works great. Now I have one more way to control X10 devices. I can
even call my VM on the way home and turn on my lights or whatever before I
get home.

Doug


I've started to play with writing some code using the Java FastAGI 
interface to connect to my home automation system.  The code is

working and I could now write whatever I wanted, but I haven't figured
out what would be a reasonable menu interface that wouldn't be very
annoying to use.  I'd be very interested to hear what menu structures
and what actual capabilities people have found useful and nice to use.

For example, has anyone come up with something less annoying than the
following dialog:

Press 1 for living room, press 2 for outside, press 3 for bedroom
(I press 2)
Press 1 for porch light, press 2 for garage light
(I press 1)
Press 1 to turn on, Press 2 to turn off, Press 3 to say current status
(I press 1)
congratulations, you just spent several minutes just to turn on a light!


Steve
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Found GSM version, but any better WAV or ULAW recordings of Steve or Ian out there?

2006-11-16 Thread Steve Prior

Lacy Moore - Aspendora wrote:



Can anyone point me in the direction of a
WAV or ULAW recording of those names?

 
http://www.digium.com/en/products/voice/allisonsmith/


Thanks, but I meant a recording that already exists - I thought
since both Steve and Ian already exist in GSM there might be ones
around somewhere in WAV or ULAW.

Steve
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Found GSM version, but any better WAV or ULAW recordings of Steve or Ian out there?

2006-11-15 Thread Steve Prior
I'm looking for the best recording I can get of Allison saying Steve 
or Ian.  I found gsm recordings of both out there but was looking for 
something higher quality.  Can anyone point me in the direction of a

WAV or ULAW recording of those names?

Thanks in advance
Steve

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] FW: NuFone Update: DIDs

2006-05-04 Thread Steve Prior

Rich Adamson wrote:



At least outbound calls still work, even though they changed IP 
addresses (and probably colo locations).





Maybe not so much now.  I just got a disconnect notice from nufone
which states that I have a positive balance in my account, but still
need to add money to bring it up above zero for my account to be
re-enabled.  Somebody just broke the billing code I think...

Steve
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] [Asterisk-Dev] Peter Nixon to Speak at Cluecon

2005-07-11 Thread Steve Prior

Brian West wrote:

Peter Nixon will be making the trip to Chicago to speak at Cluecon,  
he'll be speaking on the topic of Real world deployment of Open  


Is there an echo in here?

Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM card and voicemail volume

2005-06-27 Thread Steve Prior

Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:

On Monday 27 June 2005 14:26, David Brodbeck wrote:


There was a bug filed about this.  It was marked as a wontfix, as I recall,
because no one would step forward with code or $$$.



Were either of those the actual reason given in the bug?  Honestly, is it 
asshole day today or something?


-A.


Here is the text of the last 2 bug comments by MikeJ (who I would assume
closed the bug).

--- snip 1 ---
Ok, somone put up a bounty for this or get a patch on here or there is 
really no point it keeping this open. Adding the code to raise the 
record volume on the other couple formats should be easy enough. Are we 
also seeing another issue here than the difference between the different 
formats still?


--- snip 2 ---
Ok, it seems no one is interested enough in this to fund the work. If 
anyone wants this to get resolved, please create a bounty on the wiki or 
contact an asterisk consultant to perform the work. This may be 
re-opened when there is a patch to review.


 end snip ---
David's explanation was exactly right.  Andrew, when
you checked the bug comments and saw this, did you come to a different 
conclusion?  Do you agree that a bug isn't a bug anymore just because
nobody puts up a bounty to fix it?  It seems a little more unreasonable 
to me that this would be the case as it was mostly reported as occuring 
with the supported product we paid for from Digium (the TDM400P), in 
part to support their continued development of Asterisk.


Steve

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] LOOKING TO HIRE

2005-05-19 Thread Steve Prior
Iqbal wrote:
and my $0.02 when u want something done quick u write a script...its
amazing how these small things eventually grow into something big, in
other words alot of what we have out here/there/everywhere started of in
a small script on the back of a napkinif u wanna see what scripts
can do...see the human genome project...
A programming language is one of the languages you wish a program had been
written in when the perl code you've been given to look at got too big and
unmanageable.
Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Setting DID info for analog Zap channels

2005-05-16 Thread Steve Prior
Is there any way to fill in the DID information for analog Zap
channels?  I've got a TDM422P and since I know the phone numbers
associated with each of the 2 FXO channels I'd like to set that
so that future extensions contexts can use it and the caller-id
info in the form mydidnum/callerid like I can with VOIP DIDs.
I haven't found if there is a variable that can be set with this
info.
If there is an easy way to set the DID information, then I believe
I can provide a solution for some [EMAIL PROTECTED] users who are trying to
make use of incoming call routing for Zap channels.
Thanks
Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Can the originator of a call transfer it?

2005-05-12 Thread Steve Prior
I've been getting familiar with call parking between a SIP extension
and a Zap extension.  I noticed that if either extension calls the 
other, then on the receiving phone I can press #70 to transfer the call
to the parking extension.  However, the phone that originated the call
cannot do so.  This is important to me because in a home setting I
want to be able to make a call from one phone and then switch to
using a different one to continue the call.

Am I missing some bit of configuration that would allow this?
Thanks
Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] SIPURA SPA-2000 webserver dead after firmware upgrade

2005-05-10 Thread Steve Prior
I just got a refurb Sipura SPA-2000 and was able to assign it an IP
address with DHCP and ping the device, but then I ran the firmware 
upgrade utility to bring it up to spa2k-2.0.13g which seemed to
work just fine, but after it rebooted I cannot connect to its
webserver for configuration.  I can still ping the unit.  When
I use the built in voice menu it reads back the right IP address,
webserver port, and claims the webserver is enabled, but I can't
connect to port 80 on the device and running the firmware upgrade
utility says that it cannot connect to the unit either.

Has anyone seen something like that and is there a fix?  A google
search didn't turn up any apparent hits.
Thanks
Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIPURA SPA-2000 webserver dead after firmware upgrade

2005-05-10 Thread Steve Prior
David Boyd wrote:
Run nmap against the ip address and see what ports are active for tcp
service. Maybe you can connect via a different port (I know it should be
80), and see if the configuration is different between voice and web
dave
Good suggestion, unfortunatly I didn't like the results:
root:~# nmap -p 1- sipura2
Starting nmap 3.50 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2005-05-10 22:24 EDT
All  scanned ports on sipura2 (192.168.0.32) are: closed
Nmap run completed -- 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 3.427 seconds
root:~# ping sipura2
PING sipura2 (192.168.0.32): 56 octets data
64 octets from 192.168.0.32: icmp_seq=0 ttl=250 time=0.8 ms
64 octets from 192.168.0.32: icmp_seq=1 ttl=250 time=0.8 ms
--- sipura2 ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 0.8/0.8/0.8 ms
Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sipura SPA2000 dialplan vs Asterisk dialplan

2005-05-02 Thread Steve Prior
Trevor Peirce wrote:
Steve Prior wrote:
the SPA2000 does for me over the one in Asterisk.  Is there a way to 
disable
the use of the SPA2000 dialplan so I don't have to keep it in synch?  
Or is
there some reason why it would be a bad idea for me to do so?

Sure just put x. as your dial plan and any number will be accepted.  
The catch is you'll have to wait for the Short (Long?) Digit Timeout to 
pass before the call goes to asterisk for processing. If the SPA has an 
idea of what digit combinations are accepted it will wait until it has a 
match and send the call along at just the right time.  No delays waiting 
the digit timer to expire.
Thanks for the info.  I also have an IAXy and it doesn't have anything like
the concept of a dial plan in the ATA, but I've never noticed any kind of
digit delay either - how long is this timeout on the Sipura?  So does the
IAXy just send digits as they come in whereas the Sipura tries to collect
them and send them all at once?
It sounds like a strategy might be to use the X. dialplan while I'm
tinkering with the Asterisk side of things, and once I've got something
I want to keep stable I'd make the Sipura dial plan more specific.
Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] voicemail volume with sipura 3000

2005-05-02 Thread Steve Prior
snacktime wrote:
The problem is that voicemail messages are way too quiet.  You can't
hear enough to understand what is being said.   If someone answers the
phone before the 20 seconds the volume is fine.  If I dial from the
sipura line 1 into voicemail and leave a message the volume it just
fine also.
Chris
Welcome to bug #2023...
http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0002023
Looks like a codec volume loss issue.
Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] voicemail volume with sipura 3000

2005-05-02 Thread Steve Prior
Tim Connolly wrote:
Use wav, not gsm or wav49. 
/etc/asterisk/voicemail.conf 
;
; Voicemail Configuration
;
[general]
format=wav
While that workaround does fix the volume, it means the message as
an email attachment feature is effectively useless because
of attachment size issues.  Same for retrieving the messages through
the web interface unless you have lots of bandwidth between the
user and webserver.
A real fix to the bug I mentioned would cause all of these issues
to be fixed.
Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Sipura SPA2000 dialplan vs Asterisk dialplan

2005-05-01 Thread Steve Prior
I've got a Sipura SPA2000 ATA basically working (I can place calls between the
extensions plugged into each of its ports) and part of that was setting up the
dial plan on the SPA2000 to match the one in Asterisk.  This seems like a pain
to deal with long term and I don't know what exactly the dial plan built into
the SPA2000 does for me over the one in Asterisk.  Is there a way to disable
the use of the SPA2000 dialplan so I don't have to keep it in synch?  Or is
there some reason why it would be a bad idea for me to do so?
Thanks
Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk@Home bug

2005-04-30 Thread Steve Prior
I disabled serial port login by commenting out the ttys0 line in
/etc/inittab.  Then after I rebooted the machine the message stopped.
There is a way to make this take effect without rebooting the machine,
but I was too lazy at the time...
I don't know what the real cause is though.  If you actually did need
to login through the serial port you couldn't use my fix.
Steve
Manny A. Wise wrote:
After installation of [EMAIL PROTECTED] v1, I have an annoying message in 
the screen, anyone know how to fix it

 

INIT: Id s0 respawning too fast: disable for 5 minutes
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] using * for Internet call waiting

2005-04-21 Thread Steve Prior
Gary Carr wrote:
Wondering if it is possible or if something already exist to setup * to 
offer Internet Call Waiting. For those that do not know what it is, it's 
a small application that runs on a users computer that will pop up a 
window letting them know they have a incoming call and who it is from 
then they can choose to take the call which will disconnect their dialup 
modem and ring their phone or send the call to voice mail.
That doesn't really make sense if the * box is in your house because
if the phone line is tied up for a dialup call, then the * box doesn't
have a phone line to receive the call either (unless you had call hunting
in which case you wouldn't need the feature in the first place).  This
sounds like the sort of feature that can only be offered on the
central office side which can know your line is tied up and then know
to email/alert you.
The other scenario is having an * box in a call center that is forwarding
calls to agents and notifies them by TCP/IP if when it tries their
extension and gets a busy signal.  This sounds possible, but I don't
think it's what you meant.
Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Database lookups?

2005-04-07 Thread Steve Prior
Jan Johansson wrote:
Is it possible (How complicated is it?) to do this;
IVR plays the usual please type your order number, finish with pound

Then I would like to query a MSSQL database server, looking up the 
Status column from a row where ordernr = the entered order number.

Depending on the result of the lookup, play one of two messages  (Yes, 
ready for pickup or No, your order is not ready).

Can someone clue me in on which docs I should start with? Or is there an 
example of this somewhere?
If Perl is your thing then take a look at:
http://ruk.ca/code/amazon.pl
This is a script which plays a prompt message, accepts a number (in this case
an ISBN), does a lookup based on that data, then plays a response.  If you
can hack the database lookup part yourself, then this script should give you
a framework for what you need.
Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Backup for linux/asterisk

2005-03-24 Thread Steve Prior
Jeff Glassman wrote:
My question is as follows.  Is there a backup program that will save to 
a tape drive or a USB CD Writer so if I mess up an install I dont have 
to go through a complete reinstall?   I saw a few programs out there but 
they required X windows and from what I read it is suggested that X 
windows not be installed on an Asterisk box.

 
I recently used G4U from:
http://www.feyrer.de/g4u/
See if it does what you need.
Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] IAXY Polarity

2005-03-20 Thread Steve Prior
Yesterday I was using one of the cheap Radio Shack phone polarity on various
phone outlets in my house and ended up plugging it into my IAXY.  While the
regular phone jacks tested OK, the IAXY tested as being reverse polarity.
The tester was plugged directly into the IAXY so there is no chance of this
being caused by crossed wires.
Is this something that is misconfigured on the IAXY, a hardware issue with the 
IAXY, or just not really a problem anyway?

Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] About the weather..

2005-03-18 Thread Steve Prior
Matt Riddell wrote:
dean collins wrote:
There is a script on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] sourceforge list that reads the
weather for you.
Basically ftp's a text file from the BOM and then uses festival to read
it out to you

:)
Yeah but he doesn't want to use festival.  He wants to use the recorded 
prompts by Allison.

I guess you could parse the text to look for cloudy/sunny/raining etc 
and then use that to form the playback statement.
The festival approach is required when you use the National Weather Service
text forecasts which are less formally written and meant to be read by a
human - I did a survey of the kind of language used in them a while back and
they contain all sorts of fuzzy language which is hard to interpret by
computer.
The recorded prompts by Allison are more in line with the very language 
structured
text forecasts typically seen by pilots - I'm not sure what feeds for this type
are available.  Also the National Weather Service now has highly structured XML
forecasts available which while being more work to deal with the XML should be
much easier to automatically interpret and use the appropriate recordings.  I
believe they use a SOAP API for the data and there was a bit of a stir when they
first started making this data available from other companies who charged for
this kind of information and didn't like the idea of the government freely
distributing what the citizens had already paid for (no bias here...).
I looked at working with this data feed a while back, but didn't have time then
and haven't gotten back to it yet.
Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] About the weather..

2005-03-18 Thread Steve Prior
Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steve Prior) writes:
The recorded prompts by Allison are more in line with the very
language structured text forecasts typically seen by pilots 

There are home weather stations with computer interfaces that simply
tell you the current stats (temp, pressure, humidity, wind direction,
wind speed, rainfall rate).  Converting this information to something
that could use the asterisk sound snippets wouldn't be that hard.
-wolfgang
You're right (I even have a weather station on my roof), but I thought 
the discussion was more about the forecast than the current stats.

Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Wildcard X100P or TDM400P?

2005-03-08 Thread Steve Prior
Steven Critchfield wrote:
TDM400P with FXO daughter card includes 1 hour of Digium support. It is
supposed to support other line types. If you have trouble, it is likely
you will get direct support from Digium and from the community here. 
It should be noted that several people including myself are having voicemail
volume problems with the TDM400P (is anyone having it with the X100P?) which
for us makes the card unusable for what was intended (a basic home PBX/answering
machine).
This is documented in bug #2023:
http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0002023
You'll also notice that it has been dormant for quite some time.
Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] festival text for weather report

2005-02-17 Thread Steve Prior
dean collins wrote:
Hi Ernie,
Man I hope you didn't write all of that for me, I feel really bad now, someone 
posted to the list about 15 mins after I posted with the solution lol- I've 
already been playing with it for hours working out what other sites I can get 
it to read from as well.
Thanks anyway - good practive I guess.
I'm modifying the festival wikki page once I work out how.
Please add what you ended up with sooner rather than later.  I'm interested 
in
the same weather forecast as you (in fact I'm in the same forecast region as 
you),
but I've also been wondering what's around in terms of traffic information.
http://www.hudsonvalleytraveler.com/perl/IncidentCongestionRpt.pl
Might be of interest to you as well, but unfortunatly they only provide the
data in HTML format - I've already emailed them about how easy and useful it
would be to provide XML as well...
My future hope is that I'd set up a DID that I could call from my cell phone
headset using the voice dialing built into the phone, and then get a traffic
report read to me without pressing any phone buttons.  That either means using
a dedicated phone number or getting even a very primitive speech recognition 
going
to chose between a very limited number of options.
The speech recognition part seems like it's going to be a while (I'd love it
if someone else figures this part out before I get there...)
Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] ANNOUNCEMENT : NEW CallingCard Application forAsterisk

2005-01-26 Thread Steve Prior
Sergey Kuznetsov wrote:
Robert,
It is better to stay with Postgres. If you don't want to loose your 
business stay away from MySQL.

regarding MySQL and Postgres. I would say Postgres is a Open Source 
Oracle. It's very stable, very scalable
and it's perfectly works under serious workload. MySQL is dying at the 
same configuration.
I have client of mine who having issue with MySQL. Under some workload ( 
10 users inserting at the same time )
it corrupts the index. Even MySQL 4.0.X is still corrupts the indexes 
under heavy load.

All the Best!
Sergey.
There might be reasons to prefer Postgress over MySQL, but I find it 
hard to believe that scalability is one of them - I mean we're talking
about the database that runs Slashdot which is so scalable that users
reading it routinely take down other websites with the load.

Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Your Acerbic Tyrant will be off line for about 10 days

2005-01-25 Thread Steve Prior
Race Vanderdecken wrote:
Greetings List,
I know many of you are looking for advice from me but I am moving from
the 28th until about the 4th of February.
Race Vanderdecken
Hmm, let me check my schedule...  Sorry, no that doesn't work
for me - you'll have to reschedule.
Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] UPS for Asterisk

2005-01-24 Thread Steve Prior
One word of caution in case you have X10 equipment.  I recently found out
the hard way that some of APC's newest UPS models will cause interference
with X10 signals going over the powerline.  I'm not talking about the X10
signal not going through the UPC - that would be expected.  I'm saying that
in my case it interfered with X10 signals elsewhere in the circuit the UPC
was on.  Plugging the UPC into an X10 noise filter solved the problem.
Steve
steve szmidt wrote:
The days of shoddy UPS's are long gone, unless you always buy the cheapest 
stuff you can find all the time. In which case you might be able to find 
something crappy. APC gives good support and make decent UPS's at a decent 
price.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] UPS for Asterisk

2005-01-24 Thread Steve Prior
Andrew Thompson wrote:
Steve Prior wrote:
I have an X10 dimmer switch in my bedroom. Initially, it operated fine, 
no troulbe to speak of. Then, all of a sudden, it started randomly 
turning on the main room light in the middle of the night.

I didn't notice this for a while, mainly because it doesn't bother me 
unless I'm already awake. But my wife mentioned that it wakes her up and 
she has to get up to turn it off. (The remote switch seems to have give 
out, but that could be the battery.)

I am remembering now, that one day I got mad at the power blinking out 
so I brought in a heavy duty (well, at least heavy, two part, average 
geek would only want to move one piece at a time) UPS for my asterisk box.

Could this be a symptom of the interference you spoke of?
What filters have you used?
Thanks.
My problem was of the modules aren't receiving signals anymore variety
which would indicate that something (in this case the UPS) was putting out
noise on the power lines, not what you experienced.  You might have a module
that's getting flaky or something else is generating signals.  The filter
I used had been siting in my closet for a few years, but I probably bought
it from smarthome.com and they have a couple of them.
Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] UPS for Asterisk

2005-01-24 Thread Steve Prior
steve szmidt wrote:
On Monday 24 January 2005 12:12, Steve Prior wrote:
One word of caution in case you have X10 equipment.  I recently found out
the hard way that some of APC's newest UPS models will cause interference
with X10 signals going over the powerline.  I'm not talking about the X10
signal not going through the UPC - that would be expected.  I'm saying that
in my case it interfered with X10 signals elsewhere in the circuit the UPC
was on.  Plugging the UPC into an X10 noise filter solved the problem.
Steve

That's interesting. Good fix too! I suspect that might not be all too uncommon 
as they all generate tones for the frequence. Have you tried it with a few 
different UPS's?

I do have other UPS's in the house that didn't cause a problem, but there 
are
lots of factors (X10 is a pretty hard thing to make reliable on a good day).
I've had all sorts of stuff cause noise on the line including a breadmaker and
some old IBM displays.  If you're serious about X10 for home automation it's a
good idea to have a few noise filters around for things that come up.  I only
mentioned this on this list because I thought the same sort of person who might
put a PBX in their house probably has some X10 there too unless they did 
something
else very high end.
Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Help! - Unintelligible prompts and music

2005-01-10 Thread Steve Prior
AHBLWEB wrote:
Aha! Remove the Digium card and everything sounds fine.  Leaves me with a
SIP-only server though. 

Looks like I'd better RMA that sucker. 
I had a similar problem with a TDM11B - even VOIP calls to the Digium 
demo server were broken up when the card was in and the FXO and FXS 
ports didn't work, but VOIP was fine with only the ztdummy driver.  I 
drove myself NUTS for over a weekend trying to get it to work.  Once I 
got a replacement TDM11B card everything started working normally 
(except for the low volume voicemail problem).  BTW, the modules on the 
original card were fine (I still have them), it was just the backplane
card that was bad.

Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Is asterisk that unstable ????

2004-12-30 Thread Steve Prior
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like to joke that Microsoft uptime is measured in hours
Unix/Novell is always in years,months, and days.
It's not just you.  A while back Microsoft was running a TV ad
where a server was bragging that it was so reliable that it hadn't
even seen the sysadmin for DAYS.  Can you imagine what would have
happened to a Unix company who ran the same ad?  Everyone would
be laughing their butts off...
Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Dialtone for Software phone?

2004-12-28 Thread Steve Prior
Lane wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible with asterisk to deliver a dialtone to a software phone, such 
as kphone?

I'm able to dial, but the silence seems to confuse my users :)
Tell it's a software cell phone.
NEXT!!!
Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] caller id NUMBER in addition to or in place of NAME

2004-12-26 Thread Steve Prior
Eric Wieling aka ManxPower wrote:
I seem to recall a bug regarding this.  Are you using 1.0.3, 1.0.x CVS 
STABLE, or CVS-HEAD.  The problem is that what was listed in the 
voicemail.conf.sample as the default e-mail message was, in fact, not 
the default e-mail message.  Uncommenting out the example message fixed 
the problem.
Yup, you got it right.  I chased that issue once.
Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] caller id NUMBER in addition to or in place of NAME

2004-12-26 Thread Steve Prior
I just checked the code and didn't see any way to change the pager email
body or subject like you can the regular email notification - only the from 
string.  If you wanted to hack it, the messages are in apps/app_voicemail.c
on or about line 1033.

Steve
Dorn Hetzel wrote:
  Now the regular emails have the name and number ...
However, the pager emails still have name only...  Is there a string
variable to redefine the subject/body sent to the pageremail?
Regards,
-Dorn
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Predictive dialer

2004-12-26 Thread Steve Prior
mattf wrote:
Hello,
The asGUIclient suite has a predictive dialer component to it(VICIDIAL) and
it can function well on multiple Asterisk servers at once using a single
MySQL server backend. It performs on par with several mid-level commercial
dialers that we have compared it to(Nobel, TripleP, DataTel, etc...) and it
is free as in GPL. We released a new version of the suite last week with
many enhancements.
Before I found Asterisk I never heard the term predictive dialer before.  
Is it
the feature used to make annoying telemarketing calls?  Does it have any
popular non-annoying uses?
Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk in parallel with PSTN

2004-12-23 Thread Steve Prior
Andrei (MPI) wrote:
richard wrote:
Asterisk also ring (so that all three of them are ringing), and then 
someone can then choose which phone they want to answer?

Hi Richard,
Absolutely, you can do that with Asterisk. Though VoiP telephone 
(Asterisk) may start ringing a second later than analog phones connected 
to the line directly. I do not think that would be a problem.
I believe you should note that if Asterisk is configured for callerid
that the SIP phone won't ring until your non-Asterisk phones have rung
twice.  This is because Asterisk gets the CID before it passes the call
through.  I'd like to be wrong about this, but I believe that's what I've
been told.
Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Another Asterisk Certification

2004-12-22 Thread Steve Prior
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Man, this is sick! :-)))
Isn't there a law against unclearly-marked jokes (except on April 1st, of
course)? Some people could even take you seriously! :-))
I'm rolling on the floor here :-
Regards,
   Telmo.
Then I guess you haven't seen this one:
http://www.j-walk.com/other/conf/
Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] How to demo the Power of Asterisk

2004-12-09 Thread Steve Prior
Adam Goryachev wrote:
Hi all,
I have the opportunity to demo asterisk to a large group of people, and
was just wandering *how* to do that?
ie, I can put a couple of phones on a desk, which looks nice, but
doesn't really look exciting, because they are just phones so, how
do you 'demo' the true power of asterisk??
Personally I thought the AGI script on the Wiki that allows you to key
in the ISBN of a book and have Asterisk read back it's current price on
amazon.com to be pretty cool.
Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Bluetooth with *

2004-12-06 Thread Steve Prior
Jon Radon wrote:
That's useful for covering a larger area, but not really for
pinpointing a users location.  BTP is intended to be used with
multiple bluetooth sensors/adapters.  It determines where to send a
call by which sensor has a greater signal strength to your bluetooth
device.
My cell phone (Mot V710) is discoverable for only 90 seconds when I
actually tell it to be.  Will BTP work by pairing the BT adapter to
the phone and then polling to see if the paired device is there?
Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Fax pass-throught.

2004-11-29 Thread Steve Prior
Alessandro Ren wrote:


I've found the fax extention setting, but this is not what I want to 
do. I'd like to dial from the line on the other side of the IAX channel 
to a fax, to cut long distance costs, and send a FAX from the source IAX 
channel. Like bellow:

source 
 destination
 FAX --- Asterisk  --- internet --- Asterisk --- 
external line - PSTN --  FAX

I haven't done this, but I've heard that faxing through a voip connection
is problematic.  Have you considered the possibility (if you control both
Asterisk installations in your diagram) that you could fax to a virtual
fax on the source Asterisk system which would capture to a file, email or
file transfer the image to the other Asterisk box which would then dial out
and send to the final destination?  This assumes your source and destination
actually have to be real fax machines, otherwise you have even more options.
Check out:
http://scottstuff.net/scott/archives/000152.html
and see if it gives you any ideas.
Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Low Volume WAV Files in Email Attachments

2004-11-27 Thread Steve Prior
Philippe Daoust wrote:
I have read several posts regarding this problem but can't find one with 
a solution...

I see the same issue:
Voicemails picked up by handset have normal volume, but voicemail sent 
as a wav attachments in email are so low they are barely usable...

Is there a way to fix the volume before they are emailed out?
Thanks for any tips.
Sign up and join the fun in bug #2023...
http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0002023
I'd also recommend emailing support at digium - not because
you'll get anywhere, but to keep them aware that people are
interested in getting this fixed.  I've got the same problem and
emailed support last week and got very little to encourage me
that it's any kind of priority.
What are you using for telephone hardware?  Your situation is
a little different in that you say the voicemails play back at
decent volume over the phone - are you testing with voicemails
left through a POTS line connection in all cases?
I'm pretty new myself, but I've got C skills and am planning to
get back to looking over the code myself soon.
Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] vm notification no longer contains calling party

2004-11-24 Thread Steve Prior
I noticed that the commented out mail message in voicemail.conf isn't actually
what is the default.  I fell into the trap that because it was there as a sample
and commented out that I assumed it was actually the default and it's close,
but not exactly.  Maybe the default behavior actually changed and should be 
changed
back, but actually putting it in your voicemail.conf from the sample file is 
the fix.
Hope this helps
Steve Prior
Jason Peck wrote:
Hello all,
I recently updated * to 1.0.x from a CVS version downloaded in July, at
the request of BroadVoice.  Every since the upgrade, the email
notifications that a voicemail has been left only contains CIDName and
not CIDNum.  Here's an example:

I've installed 1.0.0, 1.0.2, and the latest CVS, and they all seem to be
having this problem.  I've searched through a couple months of the
mailing list, and briefly in the bugdb, but I haven't been able to find
anyone else that seems to be having this problem as well.  Has anyone
seen this before?  Is it a known bug?  Might I have something
misconfigured?
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] vm notification no longer contains calling party

2004-11-24 Thread Steve Prior
Jason Peck wrote:
I take it that you are talking about the commented out ;emailbody=
line?  I guess that could be.  I just figured that since it was: 
Yup, that's the one.
Looking at app_voicemail.c there is a line that says: 

pbx_builtin_setvar_helper(ast, VM_CALLERID, (callerid ? callerid : an
unknown caller));
The pbx_builtin_setvar_helper function, as well as how it's called in
app_voicemail.c, is the same in my old and new versions.  I can't find
exactly where the CDRs are written, but one would assume that it uses a
similar function to get CIDName and CIDNum.
--jason
At first I wasn't that curious once I got it fixed by uncommenting the 
emailbody
line in voicemain.conf.  I still think it is a little weird that the commented
line in the sample file doesn't match what the default really is, but I'll get
over it.
Since you seem to be more interested in the details I took a look through the 
CVS
histories and found where the change really happened (it wasn't caused by the 
line
you mentioned).  Between revisions 1.151 and 1.152 of app_voicemail.c the lines:
fprintf(p, Dear %s:\n\n\tJust wanted to let you know you were just left a %s long message (number 
%d)\n
in mailbox %s from %s, on %s so you might\n
want to check it when you get a chance.  Thanks!\n\n\t\t\t\t--Asterisk\n\n, vmu-fullname,
dur, msgnum + 1, mailbox, (callerid ? callerid : an unknown caller), date);

were changed to:
fprintf(p, Dear %s:\n\n\tJust wanted to let you know you were just left a %s long message (number 
%d)\n
in mailbox %s from %s, on %s so you might\n
want to check it when you get a chance.  Thanks!\n\n\t\t\t\t--Asterisk\n\n, vmu-fullname,
dur, msgnum + 1, mailbox, (cidname ? cidname : (cidnum ? cidnum : an unknown caller)), date);

And this is what caused the new behavior.  I happen to think that the 
sample file should
also have been changed to reflect the new default to avoid confusion.
Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Patching asterisk for spandsp

2004-11-22 Thread Steve Prior
I just ran into this last weekend.  I believe that you are using a version
of spandsp which is for an older version of Asterisk.
First I had to use the most recent version of spandsp from
the source (if there is anything later by the time you get there use it):
ftp://ftp.opencall.org/pub/spandsp/spandsp-0.0.2pre6/
Instructions on how to add it to extensions.conf are also a bit changed from
what you probably saw in the wiki.  I found the following site to
do the trick:
http://scottstuff.net/scott/archives/000152.html
All in all his approach works well.  I had to find and install
mime-construct, and had to remember to create the directory under /var/spool 
where
the faxes would go (he uses /var/spool/asterisk-fax but I prefer 
/var/spool/asterisk/fax)
but once I did that I started getting pdf emails.
The thing that he doesn't seem to do is to clean up those fax files
after a while.
Good luck
Steve
Eric Rees wrote:
When I try to patch the Makefile for asterisk with the 
Apps_makefile.patch from Spandsp I get the following error.

patching file Makefile
Hunk #1 FAILED at 47.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 76.
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED
Has anybody seen this.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Patching asterisk for spandsp

2004-11-22 Thread Steve Prior
Steve Prior wrote:
I just ran into this last weekend.  I believe that you are using a version
of spandsp which is for an older version of Asterisk.
 ...
Good luck
Steve
I forgot to mention that I didn't yet get fax tone detection working, my
success so far has been setting up an extension for spandsp which I am
calling from my fax machine on another extension.  The fax machine is
hooked up to a fxs port on my TDM22B.  I haven't tried it yet, but I
believe that the fix is in adding one of the following to zapata.conf:
;faxdetect=both
;faxdetect=incoming
;faxdetect=outgoing
;faxdetect=no
I also think the following are needed:
echocancel=yes
echocancelwhenbridged=yes
Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Patching asterisk for spandsp

2004-11-22 Thread Steve Prior
Gregory Junker wrote:
Just for sanity's sake, I went back and read the README on the site 
again, and it does say:

Add the files rxfax.c, txfax.c and dtmftotext.c (the last one has 
nothing to do with the fax machine, but my makefile patch expects it to 
be present)

You have to grab the dtmftotext.c file as well, which also is not part 
of the tarball. That could be the problem.

Greg
I found the dtmftotext.c wasn't needed for the most recent version of
spandsp on the ftp site, and I also didn't have to modify the Makfile
with the path where to put the fax files - it is now set in extensions.conf
instead.  Examples of this are at scott's site in my original note on this.
Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Patching asterisk for spandsp

2004-11-22 Thread Steve Prior
Michael Welter wrote:
echocancel=yes
echocancelwhenbridged=yes
Steve Underwood says not to use echo cancel on a fax line.
Mike
Oops, you're right.  I knew I was not supposed to use echocancel, but
somehow got these two lines backwards.
Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Recording from AGI playback is LOW

2004-11-16 Thread Steve Prior
Jerry Geis wrote:
I am doing a record in my AGI. When I play it back at that moment
on the phone it sounds just fine.
When I do a play file.gsm it is REAL LOW on the soundcard
When I send dial using IAX2 to another asterisk box and play it on Zap/2 
it is low also.

When I play demo-congrats.gsm on the soundcard it is just fine.
Any ideas why or what to do?
I'm chasing a similar issue (normal sound levels for calls and playback
of canned recordings, but very low voicemail volume) and noticed that
when I leave a voicemail the uncompressed WAV file is at normal volume
but the 2 compressed versions are very low volume.  Apparently under the
covers the system uses sox to create these compressed files.
My current theory is that my version of sox is old (12.17.3) and that
maybe that level of the software has volume problems when converting
files.  Tonight I plan to upgrade to a new version and see if the
problem goes away.
As an interesting data point can you do a sox -V and report your
version number?  If I'm right this may solve both of our problems.
Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Recording from AGI playback is LOW

2004-11-16 Thread Steve Prior
Steven Critchfield wrote:
but the 2 compressed versions are very low volume.  Apparently under the
covers the system uses sox to create these compressed files.

No it doesn't. The uncompressed version is also getting a double
amplification by shifting the bits up before saving and all the
compressed versions aren't doing the same thing. I know this as I have
done work in the formats directory.
OK, that's good information in the right direction, but then what should be
done to fix it?  Am I the only person having problems with low volume
voicemail recordings?  Is there a code patch to apply somewhere?
Thanks
Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Recording from AGI playback is LOW

2004-11-16 Thread Steve Prior
Steven Critchfield wrote:
OK, that's good information in the right direction, but then what should be
done to fix it?  Am I the only person having problems with low volume
voicemail recordings?  Is there a code patch to apply somewhere?

As far as I know there is no code patch to be applied. The question
comes basically when the recordings go off the PSTN. In the uncompressed
WAV format, the audio is downshifted for playback. This means it is
played at the same volume as any of the compressed formats. The question
then I guess is maybe we need to be able to specify a gain setting and
deal with it before we route the audio to the audio writers. But then
again, my memory about the internals is fuzzy and not up to date right
now as to whether that is doable. Maybe the gain setting in the
uncompressed wav format should be removed.
It seems to me that the uncompressed file has it right here - if I playback 
the
uncompressed file from winamp it is just a little low, but in the ballpark.
If I do the same for the compressed files it is very low.  I would think
the goal would be for the volume in all of the files to be playable without
cranking up the volume.
But something about all of this seems a little odd to me since I'm new
to Asterisk and I would assume if this is the cause that it would have
been brought up and solved a long time ago.
So I ask again - when live conversation is generally at a decent volume
is it common for voicemail recorded messages to be low(er) volume?  When
other users have Asterisk email the recording do they generally have to
raise the volume controls on their computers to hear it?
Thanks
Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Avoiding 2 ring callerid delay for calls that don't go to voicemail

2004-11-15 Thread Steve Prior
I have my dialplan configured for an incoming call on the FXO to connect right
through to a FXS on the TDM100P.  Because of the callerid the calling party
gets 2 rings before asterisk picks up and then it's another 2 before the caller
id shows up on the analog phone connected to the FXS module.  I understand that
the 2 rings are needed to collect CID, but is there any way to tell asterisk
that since it's passing right through to the phone to streamline the process
to 2 rings total instead of 4?  People will almost be at the point of hanging up
when I've just seen the CID at the phone for the first time.  The only time the
callerid would be used by Asterisk itself would be if the call goes to 
voicemail.
Any hints?
Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Is IAXTEL working?

2004-11-15 Thread Steve Prior
As a test I'm trying to call the Asterisk shipping dept at (700) 428-6004
and have had no success.  Is IAXTEL working?  I have had no problems
with the Inter Asterisk connection part of the Asterisk demo.
Is there anything wrong with what I've got below?
Here is the log (password substituted of course):
-- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/2-1'
-- Executing Dial(Zap/2-1, 
IAX2/sprior:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED]) in new stack
-- Called sprior:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nov 15 22:18:45 NOTICE[24211]: chan_iax2.c:2199 auto_congest: Auto-congesting 
call due to slow response
-- IAX2/69.73.19.178:4569/2 is circuit-busy
-- Hungup 'IAX2/69.73.19.178:4569/2'
  == Everyone is busy/congested at this time
  == Auto fallthrough, channel 'Zap/2-1' status is 'CHANUNAVAIL'
-- Hungup 'Zap/2-1'

I've got the following in my iax.conf:
register = sprior:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
And the following in my extensions.conf:
[globals]
IAXINFO=sprior:password
[iaxtel]
exten = _1700NXX,1,Dial(IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED])
exten = _1888NXX,1,Dial(IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED])
exten = _1877NXX,1,Dial(IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED])
exten = _1866NXX,1,Dial(IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED])
exten = _1800NXX,1,Dial(IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Thanks
Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] 3 - TDM31B Card Installation Difficulty

2004-11-14 Thread Steve Prior
Begumisa Gerald M wrote:
o I can call the analog phone from X-Lite however on receiving, I cannot
  hear much voice.  What I hear is choppy sound corresponding to whatever
  I say from the analog side.  When someone speaks from the X-lite side,
  nothing is heard from the analog phone.
If you call from X-Lite to the demo menus can you hear them clearly (no
choppy sound)?  Given the problems you are having this might point to a
bad TDM100P card.  I recently had to swap out a TDM100P card (rev H) for
a replacement (rev G) card because the card apparently wasn't supplying correct
timing for Asterisk.  This even affected X-Lite to demo calls where the
FXO and FXS modules weren't even being used.  The way to check is to switch to
the ztdummy driver instead of the TDM100P driver and see if the X-Lite - demo
calls become clear.  I don't know if was a defective card or a REV H issue, but
now at least working.  The other symptoms in my case were no dialtone through
the FXS card and the FXO card not answering incoming calls.
Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] 3 - TDM31B Card Installation Difficulty

2004-11-14 Thread Steve Prior
Begumisa Gerald M wrote:
Mmm.  I have a spare one.  I'll replace the one that doesn't give dialtone
and see what happens.
I'm not jumping to any conclusions, but please note the revision of the card
you're taking out and the rev of the card you're putting in.  In my case
the modules on the card were perfectly fine - it's the backbone card itself
that supplies the timing and had the problem.
Thanks alot Steve.  I'll fix the card and let you know what happens.
I'm very much a newbie myself, but I seem to be (only) a couple of days
ahead of you :-)
Rgds,
Gerald.
Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] WAV file volume in voicemail - anyone actually solve this?

2004-11-14 Thread Steve Prior
I have seen several posts asking about how to increase the WAV file volume for
voicemail recordings, but haven't really seen a definitive answer.  A while
back Mark Spencer mentioned a #define GAIN as a possible solution, but I haven't
seen if that has been made the official solution (and does anyone have a 
suggested value - I see the default is 2).

Has this problem been solved or have an official workaround?
Thanks
Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


  1   2   >