[asterisk-users] Bug in contact header from Asterisk 1.6.0.3-rc1 ?

2009-01-01 Thread Egbert
Hi all, I'm not sure wether it is a bug or not, so I'm asking for your opinion before submitting it to the bugtracker. The problem: I use asterisk with in sip.conf a non standard bind port of 5070 set. Now when asterisk sends out an Invite message to my sip proxy, the contact header in de

Re: [asterisk-users] Bug in contact header from Asterisk 1.6.0.3-rc1 ?

2009-01-01 Thread Alex Balashov
Hello, 1) How are you setting the nonstandard bind port? Just with a bindport on the specific peer? 2) The Record-Route header is only for proxies, so it is not relevant here; a B2BUA cannot set one. 3) What happens if you have the proxy append a 'received' parameter to the Contact URI

[asterisk-users] Bug in contact header from Asterisk 1.6.0.3-rc1 ?

2008-12-29 Thread Egbert Groot
Hi all, I'm not sure wether it is a bug or not, so I'm asking for your opinion before submitting it to the bugtracker. The problem: I use asterisk with in sip.conf a non standard bind port of 5070 set. Now when asterisk sends out an Invite message to my sip proxy, the contact header in de

Re: [asterisk-users] bug in Asterisk 1.4.22?

2008-10-26 Thread Vahan Yerkanian
Abel Monzon wrote: and then in my softphone I call to 1 the asterisk log say this: -- Launched AGI Script /usr/local/share/asterisk/agi-bin/a2billing.php == a2billing.php: Failed to execute '/usr/local/share/asterisk/agi-bin/a2billing.php': No such file or directory --

Re: [asterisk-users] bug in Asterisk 1.4.22?

2008-10-26 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
Hi First off, you replied a previous mail to the list, and hence your message appears as part of a previous thread. To post a new message start a new message. Also, On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 01:47:03AM -0400, Abel Monzon wrote: Hello is my idea or this is a bug? The thing is that I have in my

Re: [asterisk-users] bug in Asterisk 1.4.22?

2008-10-26 Thread Juan Rodríguez
Also check the file permissions and if you are using a RedHat like OS, check the SELinux. And about using a2billing,I recommend you to use version 1.4.21 or less. On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 3:30 AM, Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Hi First off, you replied a previous mail to the list, and

[asterisk-users] bug in Asterisk 1.4.22?

2008-10-25 Thread Abel Monzon
Hello is my idea or this is a bug? The thing is that I have in my asterisk.conf this: [directories] astetcdir = /usr/local/etc/asterisk astmoddir = /usr/local/lib/asterisk/modules astvarlibdir = /usr/local/share/asterisk astdatadir = /usr/local/share/asterisk astagidir =

[asterisk-users] Bug tracker having issues

2008-07-04 Thread Doug Lytle
( ! ) Fatal error: Maximum execution time of 30 seconds exceeded in /var/www/insects.digium.com/core/config_api.php on line 32 Call Stack # Time MemoryFunctionLocation 1 0.0006 98216{main}( )../bugnote_add.php:0 2 0.242013136160

[asterisk-users] Bug in voicemail's serveremail setting in 1.4.18

2008-03-19 Thread OCG Technical Support
Since upgrading from asterisk 1.2.x to 1.4.18 I've noticed a change (bug) in the voicemail messaging emailing operation. I had set serveremail option to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and under ast 1.2.x messages arrived at user mailboxes from [EMAIL PROTECTED] . However, since upgrading emails

Re: [asterisk-users] Bug in voicemail's serveremail setting in 1.4.18

2008-03-19 Thread OCG Technical Support
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of OCG Technical Support Sent: March-19-08 9:41 AM To: Asterisk Users List Subject: [asterisk-users] Bug in voicemail's serveremail setting in 1.4.18 Since upgrading from asterisk 1.2.x to 1.4.18 I've noticed a change (bug) in the voicemail messaging emailing operation. I

Re: [asterisk-users] Bug in voicemail's serveremail setting in 1.4.18

2008-03-19 Thread OCG Technical Support
to tell sendmail to trust the asterisk account or voicemail from address From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of OCG Technical Support Sent: March-19-08 9:57 AM To: Asterisk Users List Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Bug in voicemail's serveremail setting in 1.4.18

Re: [asterisk-users] Bug in voicemail's serveremail setting in 1.4.18

2008-03-19 Thread OCG Technical Support
List Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Bug in voicemail's serveremail setting in 1.4.18 For more info, I grab the relevant portion of the maillog. It looks like asterisk is trying to send using the right from email, but it's getting changed. This would suggest a sendmail problem, EXCEPT, it works

[asterisk-users] Bug #0010567, any news?

2007-10-10 Thread Carlos Barros
Hi guys, I'm not sure here is the best place to ask, but, anyone has some news regarding to this bug? I'm having problems with this in one customer. Thanks Carlos Barros ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

[asterisk-users] Bug labs

2007-09-18 Thread Dean Collins
I thought this would interest a few people on the list - asterisk enabled home security video recording dvr anyone? http://deancollinsblog.blogspot.com/2007/09/bug-labs-opensource-hardware .html I had a really interesting conference call today about a new startup called

Re: [asterisk-users] bug in 1.2.24

2007-09-15 Thread Anton Krall
Subject: [asterisk-users] bug in 1.2.24 Here is our dial plan. You need to avoid double recording as well when you transfer the call to other extension. exten = 7141,3,Set(CALLFILENAME=q${EXTEN}-${TIMESTAMP}-${UNIQUEID}) exten = 7141,4,Set(__FROM-EXT-QUEUES=ext-queues) exten = 7141,5,MixMonitor

Re: [asterisk-users] bug in 1.2.24

2007-09-14 Thread Michiel van Baak
On 13:33, Fri 14 Sep 07, Isaac Xiao wrote: Here is our dial plan. You need to avoid double recording as well when you transfer the call to other extension. exten = 7141,3,Set(CALLFILENAME=q${EXTEN}-${TIMESTAMP}-${UNIQUEID}) exten = 7141,4,Set(__FROM-EXT-QUEUES=ext-queues) exten =

[asterisk-users] bug in 1.2.24

2007-09-13 Thread Isaac Xiao
Here is our dial plan. You need to avoid double recording as well when you transfer the call to other extension. exten = 7141,3,Set(CALLFILENAME=q${EXTEN}-${TIMESTAMP}-${UNIQUEID}) exten = 7141,4,Set(__FROM-EXT-QUEUES=ext-queues) exten = 7141,5,MixMonitor(${CALLFILENAME}.gsm|b) exten =

Re: [asterisk-users] bug in 1.2.24

2007-09-12 Thread Anton Krall
2007 06:24 p.m. To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [asterisk-users] bug in 1.2.24 It is not a bug. attended Transfer is using Local channel, if you have a look the debug log from CLI, you will see why it fails. To solve this problem, enable recording before the calls go into the queue

[asterisk-users] bug in 1.2.24

2007-09-11 Thread Anton Krall
GUys.. I dont know if this is a known bug or not but I just tested and replicated this one over and over again. It involves call transfer from calls that entered the pbx via a queue.. say a call comes in and its thrown in a queue, somebody answers the call but then wants to transfer the call to

[asterisk-users] bug in 1.2.24

2007-09-11 Thread Isaac Xiao
It is not a bug. attended Transfer is using Local channel, if you have a look the debug log from CLI, you will see why it fails. To solve this problem, enable recording before the calls go into the queue. Exten = ,1,MixMonitor(...) Exten = ,2,Goto(ext-queue, , 1) This will

[asterisk-users] Bug in Ex-Girlfriend logic?

2007-06-21 Thread Douglas Garstang
I have this in my dialplan... [general] static=yes writeprotect=no clearglobalvars=no [start] exten = 5000,1,Answer exten = 5000,n,Wait(1) exten = 5000,n,NoOp(${CALLERID(num)}) exten = 5000,n,Playback(tt-monkeys) which, when I dial 5000, executes this... == Parsing

[asterisk-users] Bug no. 8680 (billsec is 0 even when the call is answered) in Asterisk 1.4.2

2007-05-09 Thread Roi Stork
We recently installed Asterisk 1.4.2 Tried to make calls using the Originate command (Asterisk Manager Interface) All of the calls have zero billsec in the CDR. Stumbled upon this: http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=8680 so I guess the fix is not yet in 1.4.2. Is this fixed in 1.4.3/1.4.4?

[asterisk-users] Bug in voicemail module of Asterisk 1.4.2?

2007-05-08 Thread Sven Jacobs
Dear users, I think I may found a bug in the voicemail module of Asterisk 1.4.2! Outgoing email notifications should use a real existing domain (let's call it domain.real) instead of the local domain (domain.local) so that some mail servers won't reject the mails. That's why I've set the

Re: [asterisk-users] Bug in voicemail module of Asterisk 1.4.2?

2007-05-08 Thread Per Jessen
Sven Jacobs wrote: Dear users, I think I may found a bug in the voicemail module of Asterisk 1.4.2! Outgoing email notifications should use a real existing domain (let's call it domain.real) instead of the local domain (domain.local) so that some mail servers won't reject the mails.

Re: [asterisk-users] Bug in voicemail module of Asterisk 1.4.2?

2007-05-08 Thread Sven Jacobs
Per Jessen wrote: Outgoing email notifications should use a real existing domain (let's call it domain.real) instead of the local domain (domain.local) so that some mail servers won't reject the mails. That's why I've set the serveremail option in voicemail.conf to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [asterisk-users] Bug in voicemail module of Asterisk 1.4.2?

2007-05-08 Thread Per Jessen
Sven Jacobs wrote: You fix that in your mail-server with aliasing and/or canonicalising. I think the Asterisk behaviour is correct. It is similar to receiving an email from cron or some other daemon. That is sent from [EMAIL PROTECTED], which is fine for your internal purposes, but if you

Re: [asterisk-users] Bug in voicemail module of Asterisk 1.4.2?

2007-05-08 Thread Sven Jacobs
As far as I can tell (but I'm on 1.4.1), the serveremail option only sets the From-address, not the envelope-address. The envelope will probably always be asterisk-user@hostname The From-address ist set by the fromstring option - which works btw - so you are wrong :) Unfortunately setting the

Re: [asterisk-users] Bug in voicemail module of Asterisk 1.4.2?

2007-05-08 Thread Per Jessen
Sven Jacobs wrote: As far as I can tell (but I'm on 1.4.1), the serveremail option only sets the From-address, not the envelope-address. The envelope will probably always be asterisk-user@hostname The From-address ist set by the fromstring option - which works btw - so you are wrong :)

Re: [asterisk-users] Bug in voicemail module of Asterisk 1.4.2?

2007-05-08 Thread Sven Jacobs
Maybe I'm misinterpreting things, but this is what I se: fromstring = the From:-text, not the From:-address. I'm just using the default fromstring, but I've set serveremail = asterisk@realdomain With this I get From: Asterisk PBX [EMAIL PROTECTED] Still, the envelope is [EMAIL

Re: [asterisk-users] Bug in voicemail module of Asterisk 1.4.2?

2007-05-08 Thread Joshua Colp
Sven Jacobs wrote: Maybe I'm misinterpreting things, but this is what I se: fromstring = the From:-text, not the From:-address. I'm just using the default fromstring, but I've set serveremail = asterisk@realdomain With this I get From: Asterisk PBX [EMAIL PROTECTED] Still, the envelope is

Re: [asterisk-users] Bug in voicemail module of Asterisk 1.4.2?

2007-05-08 Thread Per Jessen
Joshua Colp wrote: The voicemail email gets handed off to sendmail for actual sending. It's adding on the envelope above. Yes, but asterisk is writing the From: header. /Per Jessen, Zürich -- ENIDAN Technologies GmbH - managed email security. Starting at SFr1/month/user -

[asterisk-users] Bug ???

2006-11-09 Thread phil . dawson
Hi All, I have tried everything to get callerid to work reliably but to no avail. I have configured zapata.conf as per documentation but still only get 50% of callerid's through. As a test I called our system with my mobile a number of times and only 50% get through. I do get warnings about

Re: [asterisk-users] Bug in chan_sip mysql support and canreinvite?

2006-07-06 Thread Olle E Johansson
5 jul 2006 kl. 13.46 skrev Roger Schreiter: Hi, I did not yet study the newest chan_sip.c versions, but it seems, that chan_sip treats mysql-peers different from other peers, concerning the variable canreinvite. If this variable is not explicitely set for a peer or user in sip.conf, the

[asterisk-users] Bug in chan_sip mysql support and canreinvite?

2006-07-05 Thread Roger Schreiter
Hi, I did not yet study the newest chan_sip.c versions, but it seems, that chan_sip treats mysql-peers different from other peers, concerning the variable canreinvite. If this variable is not explicitely set for a peer or user in sip.conf, the global value for canreinvite in sip.conf is taken

[Asterisk-Users] Bug in asterisk static realtime?

2006-06-20 Thread Andrea Spadaccini
Hi folks, I used the ast2sql.pl script (found on www.voip-info.org) to put into the database a simple sip.conf. Among other entries, you could find: [general] context=sip-in ;incoming sip calls Well, the script put the comment into the database entry, and asterisk started complaining about a

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Bug in asterisk static realtime?

2006-06-20 Thread Olle E Johansson
20 jun 2006 kl. 13.33 skrev Andrea Spadaccini: Hi folks, I used the ast2sql.pl script (found on www.voip-info.org) to put into the database a simple sip.conf. Among other entries, you could find: [general] context=sip-in ;incoming sip calls Well, the script put the comment into the database

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Bug in asterisk static realtime?

2006-06-20 Thread Andrea Spadaccini
Ciao Olle, IMHO the comments should be stripped off by asterisk itself!! It should be easy to modify the script, but the problem would remain. Should it be filed as an Asterisk bug? A semicolon in realtime separates multiple values, it is *not* used as a comment. So you should fix

[Asterisk-Users] Bug in Voicemail ??

2006-06-13 Thread Stefan-Michael. Guenther (in-put GbR)
Hello, I have setup an Asterisk 1.2.7.1 system, with a working voicemail box: /etc/asterisk/extensions.conf exten = 83086921,1,Answer exten = 83086921,2,Dial(SIP/stefan,5,r) exten = 83086921,3,VoiceMail,u111 exten = 83086921,4,Hangup exten =

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Bug in Voicemail ??

2006-06-13 Thread Victor Moreno
Hi, I'm still a newbie, but try to help you, my voicemail works ok, I can also record messages ok. My extension part is: exten = s,1,Background(welcome-cisl) exten = 1,1,Dial(Sip/vmoreno,10) exten = 1,2,Voicemail(victor) exten = 2,1,Dial(Sip/juliansip,10) exten = 2,2,Voicemail(aajulian) exten

Re: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Bug in Voicemail ??

2006-06-13 Thread Stefan-Michael. Guenther (in-put GbR)
Hello Victor, Hi, I'm still a newbie, but try to help you, THX ;-)) And voicemail.conf part is: [general] format=wav49 maxmessage=180 minmessage=2 maxsilence=2 silencethreshold=150 maxlogins=3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] skipms=3000 [victor] victor = 1234, Victor Moreno, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Asterisk-Users] bug? asterisk -rx show dialplan default

2006-06-08 Thread Erick Perez
Before going to MANTIS, I want to ask if it's ok that the output of: asterisk -rx show dialplan default does not include in the output the dialplans available via the INCLUDE feature: [default] include = sipmanualoutbound; allow to make manual calls include = sipoutbound ; _91X

Re: [Asterisk-Users] bug? asterisk -rx show dialplan default

2006-06-08 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
- Erick Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: does not include in the output the dialplans available via the INCLUDE feature: [default] include = sipmanualoutbound; allow to make manual calls include = sipoutbound ; _91X calls to US48 include = sipcalluk ;

[Asterisk-Users] BUG: FOP reports incorrect (duplicate) IP address until restarted

2006-03-30 Thread Chuck Bunn
Hi, This problem may be related to a configuration problem but I believe it is a bug in the FOP since restarting the FOP server clears the problem. Here is the scenario: Using AgentCallBackLogin and have four agents logged in a call is made to one of the agents directly from an internal

[Asterisk-Users] BUG 0003710 - RE: Transfer Calls - REFER

2006-03-27 Thread Douglas Garstang
I just realised my problem seems to be related to bug 0003710 - 0003710: [patch] Consultative transfers between asterisk servers. It's unclear from the bug info if this problem has been resolved yet. Anyone know? Doug. -Original Message- From: Douglas Garstang Sent: Monday, March

[Asterisk-Users] Bug Help or Suggestion - Grandstream GXP2000 (firmware 1.0.2.8) - BLF, Hints, call-limit

2006-03-14 Thread Corporate IT Solutions - Michael Dunne
Version - Asterisk SVN-trunk-r12793M (1.2.4) I have 4 Grandstream GXP 2000 phones configured. However at the moment, I have had to disable BLF, Hints, and Call Limiting due to an extremely annoying bug which seems to make the phones channels lock in busy after a call has been hungup. If I do a

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Bug Help or Suggestion - Grandstream GXP2000(firmware 1.0.2.8) - BLF, Hints, call-limit

2006-03-14 Thread Richard Cheung
PROTECTED] Behalf Of Corporate IT Solutions - Michael Dunne Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 8:30 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Bug Help or Suggestion - Grandstream GXP2000(firmware 1.0.2.8) - BLF, Hints, call-limit Version - Asterisk SVN-trunk-r12793M (1.2.4) I

[Asterisk-Users] Bug in AMP 1.10.010 in sip outbound callerid

2006-02-14 Thread asterisk
If you define a sip peer, wheather or not you put an entry in the field OUTBOUND CID, if you dial an external extension (let's say an extension on another asterisk server, connected via IAX2 connection) the callerid received by the foreign asterisk is device YOURNUMBER: i.e device 567 If you take

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Bug in AMP 1.10.010 in sip outbound callerid

2006-02-13 Thread asterisk
[Asterisk-Users] Bug in AMP 13/02/2006 17.14 1.10.010 in sip outbound callerid

Re: [Asterisk-Users] bug in bristuff?

2006-02-13 Thread Conrad Wood
On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 22:58 +, Conrad Wood wrote: Unqiueid: asterisk-1713-1139266402.909 ^ Please note the spelling of uniqueid. I find the spelling in res_features.c - but only once I patched it with bristuff patches. Does anyone know whether that is a known problem with

Re: [Asterisk-Users] bug in bristuff?

2006-02-09 Thread Conrad Wood
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 08:35 +0100, stoffell wrote: On 2/6/06, Conrad Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please note the spelling of uniqueid. I find the spelling in res_features.c - but only once I patched it with bristuff patches. Does anyone know whether that is a known problem with bristuff?

Re: [Asterisk-Users] bug in bristuff?

2006-02-07 Thread stoffell
On 2/6/06, Conrad Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please note the spelling of uniqueid. I find the spelling in res_features.c - but only once I patched it with bristuff patches. Does anyone know whether that is a known problem with bristuff? If so is it fixed in a later version? What version of

[Asterisk-Users] bug in bristuff?

2006-02-06 Thread Conrad Wood
Hi everyone, I get these events sent like this: Event: ParkedCall Privilege: call,all Exten: 701 Channel: Zap/4-1 From: IAX2/cnw-4 Timeout: 120 CallerID: X CallerIDName: Conrad Wood Unqiueid: asterisk-1713-1139266402.909 ^ Please note the spelling of uniqueid. I find the

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Bug in attended transfer or as expected?

2006-01-25 Thread Moises Silva
Its not so hard to look into the source code and make small changes. Im not sure how hard it would be to implement what you want, but i have tested it, and yes, you are right, the call get disconnected, and i agree that souldnt be that way. You may want to open a feature request in bugs.digium.com

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Bug in attended transfer or as expected?

2006-01-25 Thread Alex Barnes
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Moises Silva Sent: 25 January 2006 16:27 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Bug in attended transfer or as expected? Its not so

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Bug in attended transfer or as expected?

2006-01-24 Thread Alex Barnes
Sorry for bumping my own thread but just hoping that someone out there can help, I don't want to raise a bug on * if this is a strange issue with my dial plan Just to clarify this is attended transfer using asterisk and not a phone feature (not joining two held calls etc) Could someone with

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Bug in attended transfer or as expected?

2006-01-23 Thread Moises Silva
The problem is when reception is busy she doesn't always wait for someone to answer the call, however hanging up a ringing transfer on attended also hangs up the caller. If you have enabled Disconnect Call feature, then you can hangup with *0 for example, that will hangup only the current

Re: [Asterisk-Users] bug in Authenticate application ?

2006-01-23 Thread Don Pobanz
I can not get this to work either. Here is an except from my extensions.conf exten = 123,1,Answer exten = 123,2,Authenticate(1|j) exten = 123,3,SayDigits(3) exten = 123,4,Hangup exten = 123,102,SayDigits(102) exten = 123,103,SayDigits(103) exten = 123,104,SayDigits(104) After dialing 123 and

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Bug in attended transfer or as expected?

2006-01-23 Thread steve
The problem is when reception is busy she doesn't always wait for someone to answer the call, however hanging up a ringing transfer on attended also hangs up the caller. Its the phone that is responsible for hanging up both calls, not Asterisk. On the SNOM phones you can disable

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Bug in attended transfer or as expected?

2006-01-23 Thread Alex Barnes
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Moises Silva Sent: 23 January 2006 15:35 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Bug in attended transfer or as expected

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Bug in attended transfer or as expected?

2006-01-23 Thread Alex Barnes
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 24 January 2006 05:53 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Bug in attended transfer or as expected

[Asterisk-Users] Bug in attended transfer or as expected?

2006-01-22 Thread Alex Barnes
Hi all, I have had quite a few customer complaints about attended transfer cutting off callers. The problem is when reception is busy she doesn't always wait for someone to answer the call, however hanging up a ringing transfer on attended also hangs up the caller. I have checked the scripts I

[Asterisk-Users] bug in Authenticate application ?

2006-01-18 Thread aki toku
I'm Japanese. Sorry,English is not so understood,Please let me question by items. In Asterisk-1.2.1 and 1.2.2,I cannnot understand the operation of Authenticate application's'j' option. exten = 123,1,Answer() exten = 123,2,Authenticate(789,j)exten = 123,3,Playback(pin-number-accepted)exten =

[Asterisk-Users] BUG? AGI stuck in ast_waitfor_nandfds()

2005-12-28 Thread Moises Silva
I just have upgraded from Asterisk 1.0.7 to 1.2.1 and im having problems with my AGI script that takes care about routing the calls. It worked perfectly for the last year with 1.0.7, now is getting stuck when the is launched. I have agi debug enabled and this is the output: -- Launched

[Asterisk-Users] bug in asterisk 1.2.0.rc2

2005-11-15 Thread Thomas Hoellriegel
Hi, i found 2 bugs in asterisk 1.2.0rc1. I using debian stable. I start asterisk with: /usr/sbin/asterisk -U thomas or an different user, Asterisk is starting. Autodialing are Ignored. (/var/spool/asterisk/outgoing). Asterisk ignore to dial a Number / Extension, automaticlly. When i start

[Asterisk-Users] Bug in 1.2rc1

2005-11-10 Thread Anton Krall
Guys. I just discovered a bug in rc1, whenever We try to do an addqueuemember, asterisk core dumps. Here is the dialplan: exten = 766,1,AddQueueMember(Ventas) exten = 766,2,AddQueueMember(Soporte-Tecnico) exten = 766,3,AddQueueMember(Soporte-Contrato) exten = 766,4,UserEvent(Agentlogin|Agent:

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Bug in 1.2rc1

2005-11-10 Thread BJ Weschke
Anton - Thanks for the report. I've just posted a bug for you on the bug tracker at http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=5705 Please refer to that URL for further information/resolution. On 11/10/05, Anton Krall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Guys. I just discovered a bug in rc1, whenever We try

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Bug in 1.2rc1

2005-11-10 Thread Anton Krall
: [Asterisk-Users] Bug in 1.2rc1 | | Anton - | | Thanks for the report. I've just posted a bug for you on the |bug tracker at | | http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=5705 | | Please refer to that URL for further information/resolution. | |On 11/10/05, Anton Krall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Guys. | I just

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Bug in 1.2rc1

2005-11-10 Thread BJ Weschke
List - Non-Commercial Discussion |Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Bug in 1.2rc1 | | Anton - | | Thanks for the report. I've just posted a bug for you on the |bug tracker at | | http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=5705 | | Please refer to that URL for further information/resolution

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Bug in 1.2rc1

2005-11-10 Thread Waldo Rubinstein
I had the same problem when I upgraded and fixed it by using the following syntax: AddQueueMember({queue_name}|{channel}) So, before when I had: AddQueueMember(Ventas), Now, I need to have: AddQueueMember(Ventas|SIP/1234). Because I don't know of a function that will just give me the

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Bug in 1.2rc1

2005-11-10 Thread Anton Krall
Any way I can help BJ... |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of |BJ Weschke |Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 12:22 PM |To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion |Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Bug in 1.2rc1 | |On 11/10/05

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Bug in 1.2rc1

2005-11-10 Thread Anton Krall
|Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Bug in 1.2rc1 | |I had the same problem when I upgraded and fixed it by using |the following syntax: | |AddQueueMember({queue_name}|{channel}) | |So, before when I had: | |AddQueueMember(Ventas), | |Now, I need to have: | |AddQueueMember(Ventas|SIP/1234). | |Because I don't

[Asterisk-Users] bug tracker down?

2005-08-27 Thread Damon Estep
Perfect timing, 1.2beta1 is released and the bug tracker is broken! Try to submit a bug and get error 1303, invalid field value. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list

Re: [Asterisk-Users] bug tracker bug?

2005-08-27 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Damon Estep wrote: ast_expr2f.c:1784: warning: no previous prototype for âast_yyget_columnâ ast_expr2f.c:1860: warning: no previous prototype for âast_yyset_columnâ ast_expr2f.c:1259: warning: âyyunputâ defined but not used These are not errors, that's why they are called 'warnings'.

Re: [Asterisk-Users] bug tracker down?

2005-08-27 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Damon Estep wrote: Try to submit a bug and get error 1303, invalid field value. I just entered a test bug and it worked fine. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com

RE: [Asterisk-Users] bug tracker down?

2005-08-27 Thread Damon Estep
List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] bug tracker down? Damon Estep wrote: Try to submit a bug and get error 1303, invalid field value. I just entered a test bug and it worked fine. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation

RE: [Asterisk-Users] bug tracker bug?

2005-08-27 Thread Damon Estep
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin P. Fleming Sent: Saturday, August 27, 2005 9:30 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] bug tracker bug? Damon Estep wrote

Re: [Asterisk-Users] bug tracker bug?

2005-08-27 Thread Julian Lyndon-Smith
AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] bug tracker bug? Damon Estep wrote: ast_expr2f.c:1784: warning: no previous prototype for âast_yyget_columnâ ast_expr2f.c:1860: warning: no previous prototype for âast_yyset_columnâ ast_expr2f.c:1259

RE: [Asterisk-Users] bug tracker bug?

2005-08-27 Thread Damon Estep
- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin P. Fleming Sent: Saturday, August 27, 2005 9:30 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] bug tracker bug? Damon Estep wrote: ast_expr2f.c:1784: warning: no previous prototype for âast_yyget_columnâ

[Asterisk-Users] bug tracker bug?

2005-08-26 Thread Damon Estep
Cant submit bugs error 1303, invalid value for field when submitting a new issue. Bug info Failure on build with 1.2beta1 on fresh FC4 install ast_expr2f.c:1784: warning: no previous prototype for âast_yyget_columnâ ast_expr2f.c:1860: warning: no previous prototype for

[Asterisk-Users] Bug in Mailman version 2.1.5

2005-06-26 Thread Khubeka JM
Bug in Mailman version 2.1.5 We're sorry, we hit a bug! If you would like to help us identify the problem, please email a copy of this page to the webmaster for this site with a description of what happened. Thanks! Traceback: Traceback (most recent call last): File

[Asterisk-Users] Bug found in SJLabs SJPhone concerning dialpad

2005-05-02 Thread Tim Connolly
Seems as though the dialpad in SJPhone cannot me used to signal *. *2 doesn't do anything except play a DTMF in your ear. If you use your keyboard to send shift-8, 2, all works as expected. Bug report submitted already. Cheers Tim ___

[Asterisk-Users] Bug?

2005-04-21 Thread Kevin Bockman
Hello, I have found a possible bug in Asterisk. The reason I say this is that it does not coredump when I call locally over SIP, only when it goes over the net via IAX. I'm running an AGI (in PHP) which does not apparantly complete. It shows in the console that it runs, but never completes.

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Bug?

2005-04-21 Thread Kevin Bockman
Darn, I forgot to say that I'm running: Asterisk CVS-HEAD-04/21/05-16:53:20 FreeBSD 5.3 ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Bug?

2005-04-21 Thread Ronald Wiplinger
Kevin Bockman wrote: Hello, I have found a possible bug in Asterisk. The reason I say this is that it does not coredump when I call locally over SIP, only when it goes over the net via IAX. I'm running an AGI (in PHP) which does not apparantly complete. It shows in the console that it runs, but

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Bug?

2005-04-21 Thread Kevin Bockman
From all what I can see here is that there might be a bug in the php program. Have you already checked the line 47 and 92 in the php program if you have missed the semicolon at the end? If that is not the case, can you dump the kernel to the list along with your bank account info, so

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Bug?

2005-04-21 Thread Ronald Wiplinger
Kevin Bockman wrote: From all what I can see here is that there might be a bug in the php program. Have you already checked the line 47 and 92 in the php program if you have missed the semicolon at the end? If that is not the case, can you dump the kernel to the list along with your bank

[Asterisk-Users] Bug fixes IPSwitchBoard

2005-03-28 Thread Thorben Jensen
Hi all, I have just released IPSwitchBoard version 0.70. There are no major changes, but a few important bug fixes. You can download IPS from the new website I have created for IPSwitchBoard: http://ipswitchboard.thorben.dk Regards Thorben ___

[Asterisk-Users] Bug in SUBSCRIBE handling : running out of RTP ports

2005-02-24 Thread Sarat Vemuri
While trying to deploy a bunch of Polycom IP 500 phones, I ran in to the following. I limited the RTP ports from 8000-8050 to limit holes in firewall. Pretty soon Asterisk ran out of RTP ports. Traced the problem back to how * is handling SUBSCRIBE. A sip structure is allocated as soon as

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Bug in SUBSCRIBE handling : running out of RTP ports

2005-02-24 Thread Olle E. Johansson
Sarat Vemuri wrote: While trying to deploy a bunch of Polycom IP 500 phones, I ran in to the following. I limited the RTP ports from 8000-8050 to limit holes in firewall. Pretty soon Asterisk ran out of RTP ports. Traced the problem back to how * is handling SUBSCRIBE. A sip structure is

[Asterisk-Users] bug? Unterminated comment detected beginning on line 0

2005-02-21 Thread Stig Andersson
Hi, Using latest cvs. A comment-line begins with semicolon ; However - if the line contains ;-- or like this ; -- blabla bla -- You get this error and * stops reading that file: Feb 21 13:47:12 WARNING[17393]: config.c:664 config_text_file_load: Unterminated comment detected beginning

[Asterisk-Users] Bug? Background() doesn't recognize D tone.

2005-02-08 Thread David Brodbeck
I finally figured out my extension D issue. The extension works fine as long as Background() has finished playing. But during playback, the D tone is not recognized. Is there any way to configure this? Is this a bug? ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Bug? Background() doesn't recognize D tone.

2005-02-08 Thread David Brodbeck
-Original Message- From: David Brodbeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I finally figured out my extension D issue. The extension works fine as long as Background() has finished playing. But during playback, the D tone is not recognized. Is there any way to configure this? Is

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Bug, Feature, or Limitation?

2004-12-22 Thread Steve Kann
Steve Murphy wrote: --On Tuesday, December 21, 2004 9:37 AM -0700 Steve Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Howdy-- I'm playing with different IAX softphones. I've got DIAX and IAXPHONE on a windows (XP) machine on my network, and I'm

[Asterisk-Users] Bug, Feature, or Limitation?

2004-12-21 Thread Steve Murphy
Howdy-- I'm playing with different IAX softphones. I've got DIAX and IAXPHONE on a windows (XP) machine on my network, and I'm running asterisk on a newly loaded Fedora Core 3 machine. I set up a separate IAX account for each phone. I was EXPECTING them to each register seperately with

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Bug, Feature, or Limitation?

2004-12-21 Thread Ed Greenberg
--On Tuesday, December 21, 2004 9:37 AM -0700 Steve Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Howdy-- I'm playing with different IAX softphones. I've got DIAX and IAXPHONE on a windows (XP) machine on my network, and I'm running asterisk on a newly loaded Fedora Core 3 machine. I set up a separate IAX

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Bug, Feature, or Limitation?

2004-12-21 Thread Greg - Cirelle Enterprises
At 11:37 AM 12/21/04, you wrote: Howdy-- I'm playing with different IAX softphones. I've got DIAX and IAXPHONE on a windows (XP) machine on my network, and I'm running asterisk on a newly loaded Fedora Core 3 machine. I set up a separate IAX account for each phone. I was EXPECTING them to each

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Bug, Feature, or Limitation?

2004-12-21 Thread Steve Murphy
--On Tuesday, December 21, 2004 9:37 AM -0700 Steve Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Howdy-- I'm playing with different IAX softphones. I've got DIAX and IAXPHONE on a windows (XP) machine on my network, and I'm running asterisk on a newly loaded Fedora Core 3 machine. I

[Asterisk-Users] Bug 3020 needs supporters :-)

2004-12-14 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
For any of you that are running CVS (recent enough to have the wildcard config file include change), I have posted another enhancement that makes it even more useful :-) Bug 3020 adds the ability for the same context to appear multiple times, in multiple files, and have them add together. This

[Asterisk-Users] Bug with Dial in AGI script?

2004-11-20 Thread kido noagbodji
Hi all, I wrote an AGI script in perli asked the script to dial a number $AGI-set_callerid($calleridnum); if($left 0) { $AGI-exec('Dial',"H323/$phonenumber"); }else{ $res = mystreamfile("vm-goodbye"); $AGI-hangup(); } The chan_h323 registers well to my gnugk. I call

[Asterisk-Users] Bug in app_queue/AgentCallbackLogin

2004-10-14 Thread Michael Loftis
Bit of transcript below, relevant portion is this though:: -- Executing ChanIsAvail(SIP/4111-6358, Agent/@1) in new stack Oct 14 16:58:43 NOTICE[101393]: chan_agent.c:549 agent_hangup: Agent 'Michael Loftis' didn't answer/confirm within 20 seconds (waited 118) Agent was logged in via

<    1   2   3   >