Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Caller ID (name) - where does it come from?
My primary issue is for calls that are placed FROM my client's PBX, via
VOIP provider (Teliax). The recipients of those calls are the ones that
are not getting the proper CNAM
How does that work?
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Steve Totaro
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 8:18 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users
Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Caller ID (name) - where does it come from?
snip
I get paid every time I call someone that subscribes to caller ID.
--
Thanks,
Steve Totaro
+18887771888 (Toll Free)
+12409381212 (Cell)
+12024369784 (Skype
Barry D. Hassler wrote:
So how does Teliax (for instance) go about getting their client's
information into these directories? Do they establish a relationship
with someone like TargusInfo (described above)?
How do other ITSP's provide this service, or do they ignore it as well?
Yes, either
Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Caller ID replacement
Could you give me an example of how this would look in the dialplan?
Thanks,
David Ruggles
CCNA MCSE (NT) CNA A+
Network EngineerSafe Data, Inc.
(910) 285-7200 da...@safedatausa.com
I'm working on building a pbx that will allow us to use our cellphones as
extensions (to some extent)
The dialout is working fine. What I would like to do is have an inbound
cellphone call appear as if it were an extension. So right now if I call in
from cell #9995551212 the caller id is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Ruggles wrote:
global variables that link the cell phone #'s and extensions and have this
done somewhat automagically.
Load your cross-reference in AstDB and do the lookup that way. If the
cell number exists in the database, replace the
On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 11:27 -0500, David Ruggles wrote:
I'm working on building a pbx that will allow us to use our cellphones as
extensions (to some extent)
The dialout is working fine. What I would like to do is have an inbound
cellphone call appear as if it were an extension. So right now
...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Matthew
Nicholson
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 11:48 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Caller ID replacement
On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 11:27 -0500, David Ruggles wrote:
I'm working on building a pbx
...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of David Ruggles
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 12:24 PM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Caller ID replacement
Could you give me an example of how this would
Joseph wrote:
We have a caller ID from our phone provider Shaw Cable (digital phone) and
it was working OK until recently.
I get an error:
WARNING[6769]: chan_sip.c:8553 check_auth: username mismatch, have 4,
digest has pstn-
NOTICE[6769]: chan_sip.c:14316 handle_request_invite:
We have a caller ID from our phone provider Shaw Cable (digital phone) and it
was working OK until recently.
I get an error:
WARNING[6769]: chan_sip.c:8553 check_auth: username mismatch, have 4, digest
has pstn-
NOTICE[6769]: chan_sip.c:14316 handle_request_invite: Failed to authenticate
Hi
I'm using the latest 1.4 asterisk, when I get an incoming call from
sipgate ( my only sip trunk) the variable Noop(${CALLERID(num)})
is populated with the ower channel ID not the callerid is this correct?
the correct callerid show on the internal phones though!!
if so how do I get the
Hi All;
We added the callerid service on our telephone line, once that done, now when
we call to the Asterisk PBX or we need to place outside call via the digium
(zaptel channel), the PBX got a problem in the network, and we become not able
to reach it, this stay for a while of time (about 5
Hi All;
If I need to see on my Polycom LCD the caller id of the other caller extension
(for example, if 801 called the polycom of 802 then how can I let the LCD of
polycom of the extension 802 to display the 801 as caller)? My polycom model is
330.
Also, I have IAX trunk between two Asterisk
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Daniel Lynes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brian J. Murrell wrote:
I have a Wildcard FXO: Wildcard X100P (clone) in my Asterisk (1.4.17)
machine and as of late, Caller-ID on it seems to be failing more
frequently than not. Sometimes I get callerid.c:613
I have a Wildcard FXO: Wildcard X100P (clone) in my Asterisk (1.4.17)
machine and as of late, Caller-ID on it seems to be failing more
frequently than not. Sometimes I get callerid.c:613 callerid_feed:
Caller*ID failed checksum sometimes it fails without even that.
In Zapata.conf I have:
Brian J. Murrell wrote:
I have a Wildcard FXO: Wildcard X100P (clone) in my Asterisk (1.4.17)
machine and as of late, Caller-ID on it seems to be failing more
frequently than not. Sometimes I get callerid.c:613 callerid_feed:
Caller*ID failed checksum sometimes it fails without even that.
Hi all,
I am not getting the dial tone when i dial the zero digit.
And i am using analog card,for my operator phone caller id is not displaying on
the phone.I am in india.
In india is it possible to get the caller id for analog cards.
Can any body help me.
Please reply.
ThanksRegards,
hi all,
how to set the caller id facility for
the TDM400p card in INDIA.
thanks
sandeep.s
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
Hi,
For the caller id there is a patch available for digium cards. you can
patch that file. I am not aware about those files. so please refer some
googleing.
On Jan 18, 2008 2:57 PM, sandeep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi all,
how to set the caller id facility for
the TDM400p card in INDIA.
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 02:57:23PM +0530, sandeep wrote:
hi all,
how to set the caller id facility for
the TDM400p card in INDIA.
http://bugs.digium.com/6683
Hmmm looks like it needs some love and care. I wasn't following it
carefully. Can anybody update me on it?
--
I have a strange issue with CLID that I would appreciate if someone
could point me in the right direction. When a call comes in (either
from another SIP user on the same Asterisk box or from the ISDN PRI) the
Caller ID Name is displayed correctly, but the Caller ID Number seems to
be empty. My
Am Mittwoch, den 12.12.2007, 09:14 -0500 schrieb Lutgring, Sam:
I have a strange issue with CLID that I would appreciate if someone
could point me in the right direction. When a call comes in (either
from another SIP user on the same Asterisk box or from the ISDN PRI)
the Caller ID Name is
That definitely makes sense, but how is it done on the phone level
(polycom 501 and 601s)? I looked through all the configs and can't seem
to find it in there, which is why I thought it might be an asterisk thing.
Rob
CunningPike wrote:
Disable URI dialing on your phones.
CP
Rob Schall
learning to ignore it
Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Schall
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 9:54 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Caller ID Question
That definitely makes
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Bell
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 10:24 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Caller ID Question
Rob
Search your sip.cfg in your polycom directory for
feature.9.name=url
: [asterisk-users] Caller ID Question
Rob
Search your sip.cfg in your polycom directory for
feature.9.name=url-dialing feature.9.enabled=1
Set it to enabled=0
I have this same issue with my 550's and 650's Turning off URI dialing
in the Polycoms only fixed the inbound calls all internal cals
We just installed an Asterisk 1.4 system and have a Polycom 501 phone we
are using to test it. We have a PRI installed as well and it works well.
The problem
When a call is incoming, the caller id says:
99
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
how do you get it to just say 99 and remove all
I have an asterisk 1.4 setup with a PRI installed and working. We are
using a Polycom 501 to test the setup..
Inbound calls work great as do phone to phone calls.
However in all cases, the caller id is a bit odd. It shows:
99
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
what cause's this? How do I get just
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 12:54:22 -0600, Rob Schall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
what cause's this? How do I get just 99?
Maybe there's a better way, ie. making the ISDN card or Polycom unit
handle the presentation, but you could have Asterisk rewrite the CID
name/number on the fly.
I have the same issue and I cant fix it :(
On Nov 21, 2007 9:56 PM, Vincent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 12:54:22 -0600, Rob Schall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
what cause's this? How do I get just 99?
Maybe there's a better way, ie. making the ISDN card or Polycom unit
Are you calling the other phones by URL or through asterisk? if your
phone is registered to asterisk, and you ask to dial a number, it will
connect through asterisk to another registered phone. If you ask to
dial a url from the polycoms, i.e. sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED], then it will connect
Disable URI dialing on your phones.
CP
Rob Schall wrote:
I have an asterisk 1.4 setup with a PRI installed and working. We are
using a Polycom 501 to test the setup..
Inbound calls work great as do phone to phone calls.
However in all cases, the caller id is a bit odd. It shows:
Hi,
Normally my T1 implementations are PRI.
However, I do have a customer who uses channelized T1 (24 channels).
I have setup a 'test' environment, and have two T1 channels back-to-back
in my [*] box.
Both are setup with signalling = em_w.
Calls DO go back forth, but I can not see the callerID
I've not seen an EM/Wink that supported Caller*ID. You can fake it by
sending something like *CALLERID*DID and then on the far end break that
out and set the callerid and goto the DID.
Willy Wouters wrote:
Hi,
Normally my T1 implementations are PRI.
However, I do have a customer who uses
when executing a NOOP(caller id ${CALLERIDNUM}) in the dialplan
I am getting odd caller id results from a SIP connection. The SIP
Connection is to
a nortel cs 1000.
*4145664222;phonecontext=+1
notice the extra stuff after the number
I am using asterisk 1.2.17
Is there a caller ID issue?
--- Jerry Geis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
when executing a NOOP(caller id ${CALLERIDNUM})
I am using asterisk 1.2.17
I use CALLERID(num) or CALLERID(all) in 1.2+.
I don't know if that can help.
Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 6:20 AM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Caller ID Spoofing to be banned in the USA
The Proposed bill S704 reads It shall be unlawful for any person within the
United States, in connection with any telecommunications
Dovid B wrote:
You are right but my concerns is the ITSP's may stop allowing it
because they don't want to get in to trouble. They may request a list
of all the DID's that I have and limit me setting my CID to the list
that I gave them.
I doubt this will ever be an issue. The telco companies
On Jul 2, 2007, at 11:56 PM, Ron Stephan wrote:
Please tell me how you can construe making a call with the the
CID of a number in your control to be Misleading or inaccurate
Sure - it goes like this - The less scrupulous among us might use a
spoofed cid to get people to do something
Andrew Joakimsen wrote:
The Proposed bill S704 reads It shall be unlawful for any person
within the United States, in connection with any telecommunications
service or IP-enabled voice service, to cause any caller
identification service to transmit misleading or inaccurate caller
On 7/3/07, J. Oquendo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're answering your own question. Forwarding a call with a number
that is not the originating number is what (drum roll)
And in a corporate environment, what is the originating number? Is it
the main line, the DID, or what?
If I am at my house,
Lacy Moore - Aspendora wrote:
This all gets complicated, and there is not a US Representative or US
Senator smart enough to figure this out, that's the scary part. Most
probably don't even know what a DID is. By the time it is over with,
laws will be passed to outlaw legitimate purposes.
Actually, I *NEED* to change the caller ID. Here's why...
Someone dials into my DID, their caller ID reflects their (cell, home
office, etc...)
The call then rings my VoIP phones.
It then announces Outside Transfer after 3 rings, at which time it
rings my VoIP phones AND my cell phone.
If PSTN
Many times the news does not carry information about bills before
congress. So the only time we hear about them is after the fact. I blame
the news in the US as they are the ones initiating the stupid Paris
Hilton stories instead of the Real news.
Bob R
J. Oquendo wrote:
Lacy Moore -
On 7/3/07, Karl J. Vesterling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And frankly, *NO*... I don't want to give anyone my cell number. Once
you give out the cell number, people call you on it before they attempt any
other number.
You are absolutely correct. I walk down the hall of our office and see
Karl J. Vesterling wrote:
Actually, I *NEED* to change the caller ID. Here's why...
CID internal and external are two different things.
If PSTN gateway providers lock the callerid to my DID and I have no
way to change it, then I have no idea whom is calling me. And that is
a
on TV.
Ron Elvis Stephan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bryan Laird
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 3:54 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Caller ID Spoofing to be banned
J. Oquendo wrote:
Karl J. Vesterling wrote:
Actually, I *NEED* to change the caller ID. Here's why...
CID internal and external are two different things.
I think Karl was referring to external caller ID.
If PSTN gateway providers lock the callerid to my DID and I have no
way to change
Stephen Bosch wrote:
I ask that you treat people respectfully on the list. The poster has a
valid point and does not deserve that kind of response.
It's possible to disagree and still be civil, and I've no doubt you're
able to do it.
Thanks,
Right sorry list for living in a place called
J. Oquendo wrote:
Stephen Bosch wrote:
I ask that you treat people respectfully on the list. The poster has a
valid point and does not deserve that kind of response.
It's possible to disagree and still be civil, and I've no doubt you're
able to do it.
Thanks,
Right sorry list for
@lists.digium.com
*Sent:* Thursday, June 28, 2007 5:43 PM
*Subject:* [asterisk-users] Caller ID Spoofing to be banned in the USA
Anyone running caller id spoofing applications in the USA running
asterisk?
Then it’s time to move them to Canada or similar.
http://arstechnica.com
Discussionasterisk-users@lists.digium.com
*Sent:* Thursday, June 28, 2007 5:43 PM
*Subject:* [asterisk-users] Caller ID Spoofing to be banned in the USA
Anyone running caller id spoofing applications in the USA running
asterisk?
Then it's time to move them to Canada or similar.
http
, 2007 8:21 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Caller ID Spoofing to be banned in the USA
The Proposed bill S704 reads It shall be unlawful for any person within the
United States, in connection with any
telecommunications service or IP
On 28 Jun 2007, at 17:42, J. Oquendo wrote:
Dean Collins wrote:
Anyone running caller id spoofing applications in the USA running
asterisk?
Then it’s time to move them to Canada or similar.
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070627-caller-id-spoofing-
about-to-be-outlawed.html
Well the gun owner will go to jail!
Take a look at your local news.
Best regards,
Al Bochter
Bochter Services
---
Need to call use our web phone at the link below
http://www.bochterservices.com/voip/iaxphone.php?cn=250
Al Bochter wrote:
Well the gun owner will go to jail!
Take a look at your local news.
If you own a gun, it's your responsibility to keep it secure. I don't
know of an OECD juridiction where that's not the case.
-Stephen-
___
--Bandwidth and
I think you should be able to spoof your caller id to a number you are
in control of.
Like a toll free number, your main inbound and/or a number that goes to
that ext.
I think it is a big pain that anyone can spoof your cellular number and
if you don't use a password can check your voicemail.
for legitimate
reasons.
- Original Message -
From: Dean Collins
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 5:43 PM
Subject: [asterisk-users] Caller ID Spoofing to be banned in the USA
Anyone running caller id spoofing applications
Anyone running caller id spoofing applications in the USA running
asterisk?
Then it's time to move them to Canada or similar.
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070627-caller-id-spoofing-about-t
o-be-outlawed.html
Regards,
Dean Collins
Cognation Pty Ltd
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dean Collins wrote:
Anyone running caller id spoofing applications in the USA running
asterisk?
Then it’s time to move them to Canada or similar.
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070627-caller-id-spoofing-about-to-be-outlawed.html
Why it means nothing...
You're a carrier doing
: [asterisk-users] Caller ID matching
Yeah, I was trying to have it match the caller ID with what they're
dialing so that I don't have a separate entry for every customer.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
[EMAIL
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 9:37 AM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Caller ID matching
Yeah, I was trying to have it match the caller ID with what they're
well i have tried to solve your problem, making your extensions in my
dialplan and reloading dialplan gives me segmentation fault. im afraid i
cant help u :)
exten = 555*,1,NoOp(${CALLERID(num)})
exten = 555*,2,Hangup
On 5/20/07, Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's going on
I did it anyway. i used another way around to do it:
suppose 88777 is your number
exten= 88777,1,Dial(SIP/you)
exten= 88777/88777,1,VoiceMailMain()
but in this case you will have to make a separate vm extension for every
user.
On 5/22/07, Rizwan Hisham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hisham
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 5:14 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Caller ID matching
I did it anyway. i used another way around to do it:
suppose 88777 is your number
exten= 88777,1,Dial(SIP/you)
exten= 88777
What's going on here? 555* seems to indicate that the number is being
passed as the callerID because NoOp says the phone number.
I'm trying to emulate cell phone voicemail where you call your own number to
check your voicemail.
-- Accepting AUTHENTICATED call from 65.182.165.XXX:
Hi Folks,
Recent installation with a simple TDM11B (one FXO, one FXS) that I've set up
(at home). I am receiving callerID fine from the telco, as it shows up in my
call detail records, AND on 2 SIP phones. However, I'm not reliably
receiving it (that is, very seldom does it come through) on the
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 04:31:07PM -0500, Barry D. Hassler wrote:
Recent installation with a simple TDM11B (one FXO, one FXS) that
I've set up (at home). I am receiving callerID fine from the telco,
as it shows up in my call detail records, AND on 2 SIP phones.
However, I'm not
There are 3 or 4 analog phones connected on the FXS port. Only 2 of them
have callerID.
On the CNAME as opposed to CNID, have NO idea! The callerID worked fine on
these phones until I cut them over to the asterisk server this weekend.
On 2/26/07, Jay R. Ashworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
Am Mittwoch, 10. Januar 2007 22:49 schrieb Yuan LIU:
From: Tobias Unsleber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm wondering why asterisk is not transferring the callerid to the sip
device. Scenario as follows:
sangoma --- zaptel --- asterisk --- sip --- SIP-Device
zaptel is reporting the callerid, but
From: Tobias Unsleber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Am Mittwoch, 10. Januar 2007 22:49 schrieb Yuan LIU:
From: Tobias Unsleber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm wondering why asterisk is not transferring the callerid to the sip
device. Scenario as follows:
sangoma --- zaptel --- asterisk --- sip --- SIP-Device
Hello,
I'm wondering why asterisk is not transferring the callerid to the sip device.
Scenario as follows:
sangoma --- zaptel --- asterisk --- sip --- SIP-Device
zaptel is reporting the callerid, but in the sip packages the sip-address
shows unknown as user part, as this sip debug package
From: Tobias Unsleber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I'm wondering why asterisk is not transferring the callerid to the sip
device.
Scenario as follows:
sangoma --- zaptel --- asterisk --- sip --- SIP-Device
zaptel is reporting the callerid, but in the sip packages the sip-address
shows unknown
Dear List,
My problem is that the incoming Caller Id is not displayed on the local analog
phones (connected to a TDM400 card).
I receive the CID correctly from my telco, but when I place the call to the
internal analog line, the CID is not propagated.
An interesting point: when I try to place
always include a wait before a dial
give the callerid time to get into * before dialing, it arrives
between the first and second ring, if you have * dial after the first
ring it will not be there yet to pass along
On Jan 9, 2007, at 12:16 PM, Anton Frolov wrote:
Dear List,
My problem
From: Jerry Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
always include a wait before a dial
give the callerid time to get into * before dialing, it arrives between
the first and second ring, if you have * dial after the first ring it will
not be there yet to pass along
Is there a way to count number of
thanks, Jerry
but I don't thinks it's a problem, since I correctly get the CID from external
line (moreover, I do some lookup of the received number in my LDAP database and
making some decisions based on it).
So when I call the Dial function, the CID is present in asterisk for sure.
AF.
Jerry
Most SIP phones handle this functionality by recognizing numbers from
speed dial or address book entries in the phone itself. I believe
that the PolyCom SIP phones do this (IP430, IP501, IP601, IP650).
I hope that this is helpful.
Bryan M. Johns
Partner
Shelton | Johns Technology Group
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
James Andrewartha
Sent: 04 January 2007 05:26
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] caller id ring tones for Asterisk Phone
Jeronimo Romero
I'm going to be rolling out asterisk at a small office and one requested
feature was the ability to have a phone that can be configured so that
ringtones can be configured according to the callerid of the caller.
Does anyone have Asterisk experience with such a phone? Any suggestions
would be
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 11:15:19PM -0500, Jeronimo Romero wrote:
I'm going to be rolling out asterisk at a small office and one requested
feature was the ability to have a phone that can be configured so that
ringtones can be configured according to the callerid of the caller.
Does anyone
Jeronimo Romero wrote:
I'm going to be rolling out asterisk at a small office and one requested
feature was the ability to have a phone that can be configured so that
ringtones can be configured according to the callerid of the caller.
Does anyone have Asterisk experience with such a phone?
Is there a utility or srcipt in asterisk which accepts calls based on
caller ID and gives a busy signal if the caller ID is not on the list.
Thanks
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or
Vernier Umali wrote:
Is there a utility or srcipt in asterisk which accepts calls based on
caller ID and gives a busy signal if the caller ID is not on the list.
Thanks
Search the Wiki or Mailing List archives for the ex-girlfriend option.
___
Thanks
On 12/13/06, Eric ManxPower Wieling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vernier Umali wrote:
Is there a utility or srcipt in asterisk which accepts calls based on
caller ID and gives a busy signal if the caller ID is not on the list.
Thanks
Search the Wiki or Mailing List archives for the
I looked at the ex-girlfriend option and it's just part of what I
needed. What I do want is to setup a whitelist or numbers which can
access the asterisk box and its extensions. All other numbers will be
given a congestion or busy tone regardless of what extension they are
trying to reach. It
Use astdb for such apps. Look at Lookupblacklist, similarly, you can
set up ur whitelist
http://www.asteriskguru.com/tutorials/lookupblacklist.html
Vernier Umali wrote:
I looked at the ex-girlfriend option and it's just part of what I
needed. What I do want is to setup a whitelist or
Thanks a lot. I think that's what I needed
On 12/13/06, Benjamin Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Use astdb for such apps. Look at Lookupblacklist, similarly, you can
set up ur whitelist
http://www.asteriskguru.com/tutorials/lookupblacklist.html
Vernier Umali wrote:
I looked at the
Am Freitag, den 01.12.2006, 20:41 + schrieb David Bath:
Hi,
Thanks for quick response.
I changed it as you suggested, but it has the same effect:
In the console I get:
--Executing
Set(SIP/604625-b79140a8,CALLERID(number)=44${CALLERID(number)}) in
new stack
It's running the IF
:16
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Caller ID Rewrite
Am Freitag, den 01.12.2006, 20:41 + schrieb David Bath:
Hi,
Thanks for quick response.
I changed it as you suggested, but it has the same effect:
In the console I get
Hi All,
I have a quick query which I'm sure someone will have done before.
Essentially, I have a 3rd party desktop app which does number lookup in
Outook via the manager interface. Works wonderfully. However, it's
not very clever in the number matching. I have all my contacts stored
in
Am Freitag, den 01.12.2006, 14:26 + schrieb David Bath:
So onto the problem… I’m trying to write a quick on-liner which will
fix up incoming UK format numbers (0 + 10digits) into (44 + 9 digits).
I got as far as this:
exten = incoming extension,1,Set(foo=${IF(REGEX(^0[1-9][0-9]\{9
-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Caller ID Rewrite
Am Freitag, den 01.12.2006, 14:26 + schrieb David Bath:
So onto the problem... I'm trying to write a quick on-liner which will
fix up incoming UK format numbers (0 + 10digits) into (44 + 9 digits).
I got as far
Am Freitag, den 01.12.2006, 20:03 + schrieb David Bath:
Hi Anselm,
Thanks for the help...
I'm slightly confused as to your response.
Wouldn't that look for a /dialled/ number in the format _0number try
and jump to another extension 0044number with priority 1?
If so, that's not
...
Cheers,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anselm
Martin Hoffmeister
Sent: 01 December 2006 20:26
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Caller ID Rewrite
Am Freitag, den 01.12.2006
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anselm
Martin Hoffmeister
Sent: 01 December 2006 20:26
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Caller ID Rewrite
Am Freitag, den 01.12.2006, 20:03 + schrieb David Bath:
Hi Anselm,
Thanks for the help...
I'm
I am going to be on site at one of my recent installs tomorrow and I am
hoping to fix an issue with the caller id. I would like suggestions for
possible problem areas and so I thought I would give as much details as I
can. The system has a Sangoma A200D card in it with 4 FXO ports and 2 FXS,
The
Bruce Reeves wrote:
Nov 21 16:54:09 ERROR[6039] caller id.c: fsk_serie made mylen 0 (-9)
Nov 21 16:54:09 WARNING[6039] chan_zap.c: CallerID feed failed: Success
Nov 21 16:54:09 WARNING[6039] chan_zap.c: CallerID returned with error
on channel 'Zap/1-1'
I have exactly the same problem with
101 - 200 of 616 matches
Mail list logo
