Rich Adamson wrote:
Mike Fedyk wrote:
Rich Adamson wrote:
Had a Pent 4 server running fc3 crash (kernel panic) and am
I then noticed that FreePBX installed using a SMP kernel (and grub
indicated a non-SMP kernel was installed as well).
Would running an SMP kernel on a Pent 4 potentially
Tomas Stribrny wrote:
Rich Adamson wrote:
Mike Fedyk wrote:
Rich Adamson wrote:
Had a Pent 4 server running fc3 crash (kernel panic) and am
I then noticed that FreePBX installed using a SMP kernel (and grub
indicated a non-SMP kernel was installed as well).
Would running an SMP kernel on a
Mike Fedyk wrote:
Rich Adamson wrote:
Had a Pent 4 server running fc3 crash (kernel panic) and am rebuilding
from scratch. I installed FreePBX (CentOs) from scratch and asterisk
was running, but had not yet been configured. It too crashed with a
kernel panic. Ran memtest for 24 hours; no
Had a Pent 4 server running fc3 crash (kernel panic) and am rebuilding
from scratch. I installed FreePBX (CentOs) from scratch and asterisk was
running, but had not yet been configured. It too crashed with a kernel
panic. Ran memtest for 24 hours; no errors or issues uncovered.
I then noticed
Well, are you running an SMP box, or is it just hyperthreaded?
I know there are issues with running an SMP kernel on a machine that's
only HT.
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, Rich Adamson wrote:
Had a Pent 4 server running fc3 crash (kernel panic) and am rebuilding from
scratch. I installed FreePBX
Rich Adamson wrote:
Had a Pent 4 server running fc3 crash (kernel panic) and am rebuilding
from scratch. I installed FreePBX (CentOs) from scratch and asterisk
was running, but had not yet been configured. It too crashed with a
kernel panic. Ran memtest for 24 hours; no errors or issues
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 03:48:19PM -0500, John HIll wrote:
I have a small test system -- 6 phones. It is a dual processor server. I
noticed that asterisk spawns 12 child processes. Can this be controlled? I
would think 2-4 would be plenty for this test site.
Asterisk generally spans a
Tzafrir,
Thanks for the reply.
This is a 2.6.13 kernel. Runs very well.
It really is not hurting anything memory usage is ok and it is responsive.
Just my old school resource attitude.
Shana Tova
--john
--
This mail was scanned by AntiVir Milter.
This product is licensed for non-commercial
I have a small test system -- 6 phones. It is a dual processor server. I
noticed that asterisk spawns 12 child processes. Can this be controlled? I
would think 2-4 would be plenty for this test site.
Thanks
--john
--
This mail was scanned by AntiVir Milter.
This product is licensed for
On Sat, 2004-09-25 at 09:49, Michael Bielicki wrote:
64bit it :)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
cpu family : 15
model : 5
model name : AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 244
Any idea to the number of channels your
I am new to Asterisk and I am investigating setting up a very large
Asterisk server farm. I have found a lot of good information on this topic
on the Wiki pages. I am drinking from the fire hose and I thought that I
read somewhere on Wiki a caution about a potential problem with running
Jonathan Augenstine a écrit :
I am new to Asterisk and I am investigating setting up a very large
Asterisk server farm. I have found a lot of good information on this
topic on the Wiki pages. I am drinking from the fire hose and I
thought that I read somewhere on Wiki a caution about a
: 2787.439
cache size : 512 KB
[...]
- Original Message -
From: administrator tootai [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 5:12 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] SMP support
Jonathan Augenstine
64bit it :)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
cpu family : 15
model : 5
model name : AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 244
physical id : 0
siblings: 1
stepping: 8
cpu MHz : 1791.799
cache size
Meaning Asterisk won't/can't take advantage of the four CPU's? Or it's
overkill for this scenario?
-Original Message-
From: joachim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 12:52 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users
: [Asterisk-Users] SMP Performance
Send me the quad and i'll send you a 200$ pc to do this job.
The quad is heavily overpowered.
Joachim.
At 22:00 24/08/2004, you wrote:
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary
Er, I wasn't the one who owns the quad xeon. Just a curious person. :-)
-Original Message-
From: mattf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 8:43 AM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] SMP Performance
out there that are decently priced?
Nortel? 3Com?
-Tim
-Original Message-
From: mattf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 8:43 AM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] SMP Performance
There is nothing wrong
-
From: mattf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 8:43 AM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] SMP Performance
There is nothing wrong with running Asterisk on SMP. It runs quite well
actually.
I'm assuming you just have
Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] SMP Performance
25 should be the max ever. This machine used to be my testbed server. I
may end up swapping it out later for a 1U IBM, but I just wanted to make
sure that in the meantime it'd be able to handle what we
Were looking at implementing Asterisk in our
department in the near future, were looking at anywhere from 15-25
extensions. The machine we were looking at running this on was a Quad Xeon 450mhz (2MB L2 Cache) w/ 1GB of ram. Ive heard bad
things about running Asterisk on SMP machines? Would
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 24 August 2004 04:00 pm, Tim Jackson wrote:
We're looking at implementing Asterisk in our department in the near
future, we're looking at anywhere from 15-25 extensions. The machine we
were looking at running this on was a Quad Xeon
Send me the quad and i'll send you a 200$ pc to do this job.
The quad is heavily overpowered.
Joachim.
At 22:00 24/08/2004, you wrote:
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary=_=_NextPart_001_01C48A15.130BF232
We're looking at
Hi all,
Does anyone have any experience with running a X100P card with * in an SMP
machine?
I have plugged the card into a 4way 2.4 GHz server, and the hardware config
seems ok -- the passthrough phone line works, the card has it's own IRQ on
CPU0, and /proc/zaptel/1 doesn't show any errors.
*
24 matches
Mail list logo
