Fulajtár Pál wrote:
Hi,
I am recently updated my asterisk 1.4.1 to 1.6.2.6 because of fax
service. I have installed spandsp 0.0.5, then 0.0.6 pre 17 as well
because to have support. app_fax is available in menuselect and loaded
into my asterisk. The upgrade went without any problems.
Hi,
I am recently updated my asterisk 1.4.1 to 1.6.2.6 because of fax
service. I have installed spandsp 0.0.5, then 0.0.6 pre 17 as well
because to have support. app_fax is available in menuselect and loaded
into my asterisk. The upgrade went without any problems.
ast*CLI module show like fax
- Original Message -
From: Tilghman Lesher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2007 5:33 PM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk+HylaFAX+SpanDSP+IAXmodem tutorial.
On Saturday 24
On Saturday 24 November 2007 00:16:11 Steve Totaro wrote:
Alex Balashov wrote:
Asterisk 1.4 does have this ability natively. However, it is somewhat
limited in its flexibility / in terms of what I can do with it, and
I have gotten reports that HylaFAX works better. I haven't actually
On Sat, 24 Nov 2007, Steve Totaro wrote:
No functional FreePBX, I just used the ISO for a quick linux install and
World Community Grid is a better benchmark than bogomips.
Or it could potentially be a hidden CPU hog to leave running to
increase your stats in a competitive distributed
LOL.
Alex Balashov wrote:
On Sat, 24 Nov 2007, Steve Totaro wrote:
No functional FreePBX, I just used the ISO for a quick linux install and
World Community Grid is a better benchmark than bogomips.
Or it could potentially be a hidden CPU hog to leave running to
increase your
Sounds remarkably like a deployment that I just did. Almost like you
reverse engineered it and wrote a FAQ. Pure genius!
Thanks,
Steve Totaro
888.777.1888
Alex Balashov wrote:
I made a little write-up that attempts to synthesise a lot of the
information out there about how to get HylaFAX
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alex
Balashov
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2007 7:06 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk+HylaFAX+SpanDSP+IAXmodem tutorial.
I made a little write-up that attempts to synthesise a lot of the
information out there about
Hello Alex,
On Nov 24, 2007 8:06 AM, Alex Balashov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you get a chance and take a look, I would appreciate it.
First of all, thank you for sharing your experiences on how you setup
Fax to E-Mail.
I am currently trying to figure out on how to setup an inter-Asterisk
and will
read your blog entry.
Thanks
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alex
Balashov
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2007 7:06 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk+HylaFAX+SpanDSP+IAXmodem tutorial.
I
Not entirely. :-) Your deployment involved a lot more FreePBX than I
would have liked, not to mention some unsolicited WorldComputingGrid
clients.
I mostly just tried to take all the information already out there on the
voip-wiki, etc., follow it, and then sum it up more coherently.
On Fri,
I made a little write-up that attempts to synthesise a lot of the
information out there about how to get HylaFAX working with Asterisk
by way of IAXmodem for inbound faxing:
http://blog.evaristesys.com/?p=24
Of course, there are bound to be some things I've left out or are grossly
in need
No functional FreePBX, I just used the ISO for a quick linux install and
World Community Grid is a better benchmark than bogomips.
Neither of which have any bearing on how I setup Hylafax and Asterisk,
otherwise, great job of reverse engineering what I did and documenting
it as your own
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alex
Balashov
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2007 7:06 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk+HylaFAX+SpanDSP+IAXmodem tutorial.
I made a little write-up that attempts to synthesise a lot
Michael J. Liberatore wrote:
Alex, I thought asterisk 1.4 supports faxing internally now without the
need for extra software? Is your solution a different one? I have no
experience with faxing yet but plan to soon, that's why I ask and will
read your blog entry.
You need extra software,
Hi
As there been any progress regarding the use of spandsp 0.3 with
Asterisk 1.2.13?
Last month there was a thread about how spandsp 0.3 and rxfax from
http://www.soft-switch.org/downloads/snapshots/spandsp
made asterisk crash.
Is there any resources on how to get spandsp 0.3 work with
Hi,
I'm trying to get my asterisk recieve faxes via rxfax and spandsp. It creates
the connection, recieves some info about the sender and dies. Result is not
valid tif file of size 330 or 334 B. Debug messages are shown only sometimes
and it ends with something like FLOW Fast carrier
Hi,
I'm trying to get my asterisk recieve faxes via rxfax and spandsp. It
creates
the connection, recieves some info about the sender and dies. Result is
not
valid tif file of size 330 or 334 B. Debug messages are shown only
sometimes
and it ends with something like FLOW Fast carrier
Hi,
Have a look at AsterFax (https://sourceforge.net/projects/asterfax/).
AsterFax can be configured to use spandsp through RxFax and TxFax and it
works very well with telephony hardware.
AsterFax uses spandsp 0.0.2pre26 by default but I've tested it with
0.0.2pre21 and Asterisk 1.2.9.1 and
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 03:27:57PM +0200, Jan Fousek wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to get my asterisk recieve faxes via rxfax and spandsp. It creates
the connection, recieves some info about the sender and dies. Result is not
valid tif file of size 330 or 334 B. Debug messages are shown only
YUP!!!
I guess working on this at 11:30pm at night, really need your wits about
you... Thanks... did that and it worked like a champ..
One other question I have the app_dtmftotext.c file is located at the
root of spandsp... however, when I had this file in my Makefile to
compile, and then
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One other question I have the app_dtmftotext.c file is located at the
root of spandsp... however, when I had this file in my Makefile to
compile, and then have asterisk load it, asterisk complains on it.. Is it
really needed?
That I couldn't tell you.
Doug
app_dtmftotext.c is a separate application. If you don't want an
application which turns DTMF into text, then don't use it.
Regards,
Steve
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
YUP!!!
I guess working on this at 11:30pm at night, really need your wits about
you... Thanks... did that and it worked like a
I'm trying to put together a package of asterisk-head, spandsp, and
app_rx,tx fax.
I can get everything to compile:
spandsp-0.0.2pre20
asterisk-head (cvs co -r HEAD asterisk)
the app_rx/tx from soft-switch.org in the 1.1 folder
However, asterisk complains that there is unused symbols when
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 08:32:34AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to put together a package of asterisk-head, spandsp, and
app_rx,tx fax.
I can get everything to compile:
spandsp-0.0.2pre20
asterisk-head (cvs co -r HEAD asterisk)
the app_rx/tx from soft-switch.org in the 1.1
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 08:32:34AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to put together a package of asterisk-head, spandsp, and
app_rx,tx fax.
I can get everything to compile:
spandsp-0.0.2pre20
asterisk-head (cvs co -r HEAD asterisk)
the app_rx/tx from soft-switch.org in the 1.1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, asterisk complains that there is unused symbols when running
/usr/sbin/asterisk -vvvgc
I've been bitten by this before. You've installed a newer version of
SpanDSP over an older version. Remove the spandsp libraries in the
/usr/local/lib folder
I have asterisk 1.0.9 installed with spandsp 0.0.2pre20.
Asterisk crashes on boot while loading app_txfax.so
app_rxfax.so. If I move the files out of /usr/lib/asterisk/
modules asterisk boots fine.
Running on FC3, Linux asterisk.crocker.com 2.6.11-1.27_FC3smp #1
SMP Tue May
Hello,
I have asterisk 1.0.9 installed with spandsp 0.0.2pre20.
Asterisk crashes on boot while loading app_txfax.so app_rxfax.so.
If I move the files out of /usr/lib/asterisk/modules asterisk boots
fine.
Running on FC3, Linux asterisk.crocker.com 2.6.11-1.27_FC3smp #1 SMP
Tue
Hi,
I have asterisk 1.0.9 installed with spandsp 0.0.2pre20.
Asterisk crashes on boot while loading app_txfax.so app_rxfax.so.
If I move the files out of /usr/lib/asterisk/modules asterisk boots
fine.
Running on FC3, Linux asterisk.crocker.com 2.6.11-1.27_FC3smp #1 SMP
Tue May
Hi
Steve
We
have been struggling for some time to get spandsp working properly on our
asterisk system.
We
are using a TE410P card with a single E1 from our PTT (Zaptel primary clock
source) and another E1 to a NEC PBX.
The NEC
PBX in turn has an E1 connection to a Tenovis I55 PBX,
Peter Svensson wrote:
On Mon, 16 May 2005, Steve Underwood wrote:
It is possible, though complicated, to synchronize the 2Mbit clocks on two
unrelated cards by measuring the accumulated phase shift (difference in
interrupt rate) over time and compensating, thus implementing a PLL in
It doesn't help at all, since you are talking rubbish. Try to keep track
of the subject matter. We are discussing modems, where not slipping is
vital.
Regards,
Steve
Rich Adamson wrote:
It doesn't make any difference. The pcm data that arrives from the telco
is buffered in the zaptel and/or
Hi Jean-Yves,
As a new topic it would have been nicer to everyone to start a new thread.
Are you talking about sending or receiving faxes?
txfax can insert a header on each page when it sends a fax. There is a
parameter for that.
When a fax is received the header you see is part of the image. As
Steve, the stuff below was in direct response to a user question
regarding T1 timing sync and understanding why that might be
important relative to spandsp and/or other modem use. So it does
apply directly. (Of coarse it slid into a tangent.)
It doesn't help at all,
On Tue, 17 May 2005, Steve Underwood wrote:
In most hardware the clock you use is not provided by a crystal. Rather
the crystal provides a reference for a pll. The conversion factor between
the crystan and the derived clock is usually tunable.
Nope. Its always a crystal. Its either a
On Tue, 17 May 2005, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
Side questions about spandsp... Is it possible to print the fax
header like what most faxes do (that is: who is sending the fax, how
many pages are included etc...) I'm not talking about printing
callerid, often I receive fax from the US
Lee Howard wrote:
On Tue, 17 May 2005, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
Side questions about spandsp... Is it possible to print the fax
header like what most faxes do (that is: who is sending the fax, how
many pages are included etc...) I'm not talking about printing
callerid, often I receive fax
How about this...
Replace the old text in /usr/src/zaptel/zaptel.conf.sample:
# span=span num,timing,line build out (LBO),framing,coding[,yellow]
#
# The timing parameter determines the selection of primary, secondary, and
On Mon, 16 May 2005, Michael Welter wrote:
Where is the clock source that the T1/E1 board, with 0 for timing,
uses to generate the tx data stream? Is there a PLL on each board? Or
is some central source used?
For example, I have one system with two separate T100P cards--one for a
Peter Svensson wrote:
On Mon, 16 May 2005, Michael Welter wrote:
Where is the clock source that the T1/E1 board, with 0 for timing,
uses to generate the tx data stream? Is there a PLL on each board? Or
is some central source used?
For example, I have one system with two separate T100P
How about this...
Replace the old text in /usr/src/zaptel/zaptel.conf.sample:
# span=span num,timing,line build out
(LBO),framing,coding[,yellow]
#
# The timing parameter determines the selection of
On Mon, 16 May 2005, Rich Adamson wrote:
It doesn't make any difference. The pcm data that arrives from the telco
is buffered in the zaptel and/or asterisk code, and sent out the second
T1 card as soon as it can. That buffering reduces (or eliminates) the
need to sync one T1 card to another.
Actually.. I
seem to have jumped to improper conclusion..
One thing you will
find abour spandsp is that some fax machines will just plain have a problem
sending to spandsp, period. Mr. Underwood has localized it to cetain HP fax
machines and I can confirm that HP all-in-one
On Mon, 16 May 2005, Steve Underwood wrote:
It is possible, though complicated, to synchronize the 2Mbit clocks on two
unrelated cards by measuring the accumulated phase shift (difference in
interrupt rate) over time and compensating, thus implementing a PLL in
software. Digium has not
On 16/05/2005, at 11:48 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:How can that work? You can measure the error, but you have no ability to tweak the clock from software. Two cards could only be synced by hardware.Side questions about spandsp... Is it possible to print the fax header like what most faxes do (that
HelloOn 15/05/2005, at 1:55 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:The right thing to do is to sync to the PSTN. The E1s connected to the PSTN should be listed as the lowest numbered clock sources, starting from 1. Places you never want to sync to should be set to zero. Your mail was very interesting, but to
Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
Hello
On 15/05/2005, at 1:55 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:
The right thing to do is to sync to the PSTN. The E1s connected to
the PSTN should be listed as the lowest numbered clock sources,
starting from 1. Places you never want to sync to should be set to zero.
Your mail
Hello SteveOn 15/05/2005, at 4:40 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:The second parameter now says "treat this E1 as the first priority as the clock source". Your box should lock itself to the PSTN's clock. If that makes no sense, the bottom line is "this is good". :-) I do not know if it was from
HelloOn 15/05/2005, at 4:40 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 The second parameter now says "treat this E1 as the first priority as the clock source". Your box should lock itself to the PSTN's clock. If that makes no sense, the bottom line is "this is good". :-) Hum.. an
On May 15, 2005, at 00:38, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:HelloOn 15/05/2005, at 4:40 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 The second parameter now says "treat this E1 as the first priority as the clock source". Your box should lock itself to the PSTN's clock. If that makes no sense, the
Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
Hello Steve
On 15/05/2005, at 4:40 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:
The second parameter now says treat this E1 as the first priority as
the clock source. Your box should lock itself to the PSTN's clock.
If that makes no sense, the bottom line is this is good. :-)
I do not
Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
Hello
On 15/05/2005, at 4:40 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:
span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4
The second parameter now says treat this E1 as the first priority as
the clock source. Your box should lock itself to the PSTN's clock.
If that makes no sense, the bottom line is this is
HiOn 15/05/2005, at 5:51 PM, Bryce Chidester wrote:I have the same trouble with wct1xxp. I'd just chalked it up to a PCI bug or other low-level hardware problem with the Digium card. I've simply learned not to, though it would be nice to not have to learn work-arounds.This only happen if I have
Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
Hi
On 15/05/2005, at 5:51 PM, Bryce Chidester wrote:
I have the same trouble with wct1xxp. I'd just chalked it up to a PCI
bug or other low-level hardware problem with the Digium card. I've
simply learned not to, though it would be nice to not have to learn
HelloOn 15/05/2005, at 5:49 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:I don't get that with a TE410P. What happens if you disconnect the cable first, so your box cannot sync to the port, and no longer treats the far end as the clock master? Can you remove the module like that? Whatever, it is a bug, and should be
On May 15, 2005, at 00:55, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
Hi
On 15/05/2005, at 5:51 PM, Bryce Chidester wrote:
I have the same trouble with wct1xxp. I'd just chalked it up to a
PCI bug or other low-level hardware problem with the Digium card.
I've simply learned not to, though it would be nice to
On 15/05/2005, at 5:58 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:Well, it could be worse. You could be using Dialogic card, which randomly crash the machine when you try to restart the drivers, and have continued to do so through 10 years of updates. :-\ Seriously, this really shouldn't happen. It must be a
On May 15, 2005 03:46 am, Steve Underwood wrote:
Maybe someone should submit a patch which changes the documentation to
something the average person will interpret correctly. It would have
saved me at least a hundred hours of support hassles in the last year.
Someone's already done it:
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
On May 15, 2005 03:46 am, Steve Underwood wrote:
Maybe someone should submit a patch which changes the documentation to
something the average person will interpret correctly. It would have
saved me at least a hundred hours of support hassles in the last year.
Steve Underwood wrote:
Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
Is there any future support for fax in colours? just wondering, I
don't think I've ever used it before anyway :)
Priorities:
1. T.38
2. A more complete T.30
3. ECM (which is really a part of 2)
4. Things like colour FAX (which in part
Lee Howard wrote:
The next HylaFAX release (current CVS HEAD already has it) will have
color fax receiving support in Class 1/1.0... provided that the
prerequisites are met.
As HylaFAX depends on libtiff for it's image file handling color fax
support with HylaFAX requires that libtiff also
Steve Underwood wrote:
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
On May 15, 2005 03:46 am, Steve Underwood wrote:
Maybe someone should submit a patch which changes the documentation to
something the average person will interpret correctly. It would have
saved me at least a hundred hours of support hassles in the
On Sun, 15 May 2005, Steve Underwood wrote:
Lee Howard wrote:
The other option to color faxing is JBIG compression. The problem
there, is that JBIG is fairly heavily patented still. Thus many fax
machines just aren't supporting it yet.
Thanks Lee. I found that helpful, except the
What is in the bug tracker helps make things clearer to people who know
what they are doing. What we need is something that makes things clear
to laymen. Saying internally and externally clocked doesn't cut it. It
needs to be made clear to laymen that clocking internally is rarely
right; that
Michael Welter wrote:
What is in the bug tracker helps make things clearer to people who
know what they are doing. What we need is something that makes things
clear to laymen. Saying internally and externally clocked doesn't cut
it. It needs to be made clear to laymen that clocking internally
On 15 May 2005, at 17:26, Steve Underwood wrote:
Michael Welter wrote:
What is in the bug tracker helps make things clearer to people
who know what they are doing. What we need is something that
makes things clear to laymen. Saying internally and externally
clocked doesn't cut it. It
What is in the bug tracker helps make things clearer to people who know
what they are doing. What we need is something that makes things clear
to laymen. Saying internally and externally clocked doesn't cut it. It
needs to be made clear to laymen that clocking internally is rarely
Rich Adamson wrote:
What is in the bug tracker helps make things clearer to people who know
what they are doing. What we need is something that makes things clear
to laymen. Saying internally and externally clocked doesn't cut it. It
needs to be made clear to laymen that clocking internally is
u said:
I will try upgrading to a newer kernel (I'm using Fedora Core 2 with
2.6.8 kernel), turn off hyper-threading and see if it makes any
difference...
i said:
wierd. Im running fc2 2.6.8 smp no problems. Could be timing slips on your
PRI, happened to me until I looked hard at the PRI
good
HelloOn 15/05/2005, at 12:00 AM, Colin Anderson wrote:wierd. Im running fc2 2.6.8 smp no problems. Could be timing slips on your PRI, happened to me until I looked hard at the PRI So you turned off Hyperthreading on your linux box or not??What could I do to check if my PRI has timing slips? I have
Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
Hello
On 15/05/2005, at 12:00 AM, Colin Anderson wrote:
wierd. Im running fc2 2.6.8 smp no problems. Could be timing slips on
your
PRI, happened to me until I looked hard at the PRI
So you turned off Hyperthreading on your linux box or not??
What could I do to check if
Dear allI have a Asterisk server (version 1.0.7) running with a TE110P card on a 3Ghz P4 machine (running nothing else but asterisk)So far so good.Today I was trying to receive faxes using spandsp fax client.I used spandsp v0.0.2pre18 (which compiled against libtiff 3.5.7)It compiled fine,
But when sending a fax (from a Brother fax
machine) the image received is always corrupted: lines are missing,segments of the faxed page aren't there
etc...
Run
ZTTEST in /usr/src/zaptel. Your output should be 99.98XXX% or higher. If it
isn't the corruption is most likely because of IRQ
On 14/05/2005, at 3:59 AM, Colin Anderson wrote: Run ZTTEST in /usr/src/zaptel. Your output should be 99.98XXX% or higher. If it isn't the corruption is most likely because of IRQ misses by the card. Run it for a couple of minutes. Your "worst" should be 99.98XXX%. Subtle timing errors and IRQ
75 matches
Mail list logo
