Hi list,
we have 2 asterisk boxes in VM (kvm) on 2 different Dell servers, one is
Lenny kernel 2.6.26 asterisk 1.6.2.20, the second CentOS 2.6.18 asterisk
1.4.36 (Elastix). Both 64bits, no hardware involved, dahdi on both
machines for meetme timing.
Doing core show translation give on the
On 09/30/2011 03:56 AM, Administrator TOOTAI wrote:
Hi list,
we have 2 asterisk boxes in VM (kvm) on 2 different Dell servers, one is
Lenny kernel 2.6.26 asterisk 1.6.2.20, the second CentOS 2.6.18 asterisk
1.4.36 (Elastix). Both 64bits, no hardware involved, dahdi on both
machines for meetme
Le 30/09/2011 14:05, Kevin P. Fleming a écrit :
On 09/30/2011 03:56 AM, Administrator TOOTAI wrote:
Hi list,
we have 2 asterisk boxes in VM (kvm) on 2 different Dell servers, one is
Lenny kernel 2.6.26 asterisk 1.6.2.20, the second CentOS 2.6.18 asterisk
1.4.36 (Elastix). Both 64bits, no
On 09/30/2011 07:49 AM, Administrator TOOTAI wrote:
Le 30/09/2011 14:05, Kevin P. Fleming a écrit :
On 09/30/2011 03:56 AM, Administrator TOOTAI wrote:
Hi list,
we have 2 asterisk boxes in VM (kvm) on 2 different Dell servers, one is
Lenny kernel 2.6.26 asterisk 1.6.2.20, the second CentOS
In article 4e85d19f.4090...@digium.com,
Kevin P. Fleming kpflem...@digium.com wrote:
On 09/30/2011 07:49 AM, Administrator TOOTAI wrote:
Le 30/09/2011 14:05, Kevin P. Fleming a écrit :
On 09/30/2011 03:56 AM, Administrator TOOTAI wrote:
Hi list,
we have 2 asterisk boxes in VM (kvm) on 2
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2011 10:54 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Core show translation 4000ms
Maybe, but that still doesn't explain why there is a factor of 2000 between
some conversions and others. And 4001, 4002 and 4003 are remarkably like a big
On 09/30/2011 09:53 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote:
In article 4e85d19f.4090...@digium.com,
Kevin P. Fleming kpflem...@digium.com wrote:
This is why the output was changed to microseconds from milliseconds; in
the older version, the lowest number that should be shown was 1
millisecond, even if
: [asterisk-users] Core show translation 4000ms
Maybe, but that still doesn't explain why there is a factor of 2000 between
some conversions and others. And 4001, 4002 and 4003 are remarkably like a big
round number plus a tiny offset! I would agree with the OP that the values
shown look
Le 30/09/2011 17:02, Jason Parker a écrit :
On 09/30/2011 09:53 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote:
In article4e85d19f.4090...@digium.com,
Kevin P. Flemingkpflem...@digium.com wrote:
This is why the output was changed to microseconds from milliseconds; in
the older version, the lowest number that