Re: [asterisk-users] RE: Welcome to the asterisk-users mailing list
Most want the 2.0.1 firmware for a few reasons:A) They have the latest; although, this is a poor reason, it's still a reason people download and use the latest firmware - remember here always, "If it's not broken, DON'T fix it!"B) They are hoping to fix a previous problem they've had in the past (i.e. stability issues - usually caused by other factors besides just firmware)C) They are told to. IF you are needing to talk to a support professional, especially Polycom, you NEED to upgrade to the latest firmware or they simply will not help you (most of the times anyways)These are a few I can think of anyways; and unfortunately, it's going to be a problem sooner or later. Jessee HolmesAtacomm / Ataractic Corporationwww.atacomm.comV: 1-877-700-VOIP[EMAIL PROTECTED]Looking for voice over IP products? Visit our VoIP store at http://voipstore.atacomm.com/ On Oct 10, 2006, at 4:56 PM, Eric ManxPower Wieling wrote:What I don't understand is why people MUST use the 2.0.x firmware.Jessee J Holmes wrote: A few of our technical support staff here at Atacomm are currently working on this issue with Polycom, Digium and one of our customer's (who posted in here earlier this week).There are some major differences from the 1.x.x firmware and the 2.01 firmware. Obviously, many on here, voip-info.org, and all over the Internet have reported troubles where their presence feature that stops working after they upgrade their Polycom phones to firmware revision 2.0.1 when the phones are configured with an Asterisk system. A couple new things have been added to the .cfg files that MUST now be set in order for presence to work again with an Asterisk system.In the sip.cfg file:feature feature.1.name="presence" feature.1.enabled="1"In the phone[mac].cfg file:attendant attendant.uri="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" attendant.reg=""/However, there are still confirmed problems with this setup (i.e. LEDs not working), which Polycom and ourselves are currently testing in our labs trying to fix. The reasoning for this is Digium doesn't seem to follow the "standards" for presence support and are currently working to change this functionality within Asterisk. Polycom designed their phones, and specifically their firmware, to work with the "standards" (more specifically, the Microsoft LCS - Live Communications Server).This issue has been reported on multiple instances to Polycom, Digium, and ourselves; but, no real resolution is completed yet. We'll continue working on this issue within our labs and post an official answer when one is available.Sorry for the bit of bad news, if anyone is willing to contribute working / half working code, we'd be more than happy to look at it and work with Polycom and Digium on getting this fixed for everyone AS ___--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --asterisk-users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] RE: Welcome to the asterisk-users mailing list
I'm not saying Microsoft is the standard (they usually aren't by FAR), but how Microsoft handles presence and interoperates with presence on various IP phones is what Polycom calls a "standard" (guess I should have quoted that word originally).I believe there is some RFC for presence out there that some people consider the "standard"; although, I'm not sure what this is... Saying the word standard to me is like saying that someone is "normal" . there is no such thing. It's normally just something that "most" people agree on as a standard. Anyways, some of us here at Atacomm are currently arguing with Polycom why they can't make their phones support BOTH "methods" of handling presence, we think that would be the simplest solution instead of just shutting out some of the systems like Asterisk. Jessee HolmesAtacomm / Ataractic Corporationwww.atacomm.comV: 1-877-700-VOIP[EMAIL PROTECTED]Looking for voice over IP products? Visit our VoIP store at http://voipstore.atacomm.com/ On Oct 10, 2006, at 6:05 PM, Mike Clark wrote:Jessee J Holmes wrote:snipped However, there are still confirmed problems with this setup (i.e. LEDsnot working), which Polycom and ourselves are currently testing in ourlabs trying to fix. The reasoning for this is Digium doesn't seem tofollow the "standards" for presence support and are currently working tochange this functionality within Asterisk. Polycom designed theirphones, and specifically their firmware, to work with the "standards"(more specifically, the Microsoft LCS - Live Communications Server). What are the specific standards to which you refer? To my knowledge,Microsoft LCS is *not* an industry adopted standard.___--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --asterisk-users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] RE: Welcome to the asterisk-users mailing list
Dean,Try obtaining the latest bootrom again, should be 3.2.2, we've seen this happen before for various odd reasons and Polycom's recommended fix is get the "non-engineering version" of the bootrom (don't ask please, just do it).So download the bootrom again and attempt it once more, while you're at it, be safe and get the 2.0.1 firmware again as well. Let me know if this fixes you're problem. By the way, are you using IP 500's? or 501's? 500's may not take, I think we had that discussion in this list before. Jessee HolmesAtacomm / Ataractic Corporationwww.atacomm.comV: 1-877-700-VOIP[EMAIL PROTECTED]Looking for voice over IP products? Visit our VoIP store at http://voipstore.atacomm.com/ On Oct 10, 2006, at 7:10 PM, Dean Collins wrote:I've had problems loading 2.01 onto 2 of my 4 polycom 500's2 work great no probs, 2 I cant get it to upload without failing.Cheers,Dean -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Eric "ManxPower" WielingSent: Tuesday, 10 October 2006 5:56 PMTo: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial DiscussionSubject: Re: [asterisk-users] RE: Welcome to the "asterisk-users" mailing listWhat I don't understand is why people MUST use the 2.0.x firmware. ___--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --asterisk-users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] RE: Welcome to the asterisk-users mailing list
Limit was increased in firmware 2.0.1.NOTE: a new Polycom Administrator's guide is now also available covering the 2.0.1 features. Re-obtain this manual if you haven't from your reseller or from Polycom direct if you're certified. Jessee HolmesAtacomm / Ataractic Corporationwww.atacomm.comV: 1-877-700-VOIP[EMAIL PROTECTED]Looking for voice over IP products? Visit our VoIP store at http://voipstore.atacomm.com/ On Oct 11, 2006, at 12:01 AM, Douglas Garstang wrote:I think that limit was increased in 1.6.6 or 1.6.7. -Original Message- From: C F [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tue 10/10/2006 6:57 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Cc: Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] RE: Welcome to the "asterisk-users" mailing list On 10/10/06, Eric ManxPower Wieling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What I don't understand is why people MUST use the 2.0.x firmware. I believe it's because the limit of how many can be monitored at once, someone correct me if I'm wrong. Jessee J Holmes wrote: A few of our technical support staff here at Atacomm are currently working on this issue with Polycom, Digium and one of our customer's (who posted in here earlier this week). There are some major differences from the 1.x.x firmware and the 2.01 firmware. Obviously, many on here, voip-info.org, and all over the Internet have reported troubles where their presence feature that stops working after they upgrade their Polycom phones to firmware revision 2.0.1 when the phones are configured with an Asterisk system. A couple new things have been added to the .cfg files that MUST now be set in order for presence to work again with an Asterisk system. In the sip.cfg file: feature feature.1.name="presence" feature.1.enabled="1" In the phone[mac].cfg file: attendant attendant.uri="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" attendant.reg=""/ However, there are still confirmed problems with this setup (i.e. LEDs not working), which Polycom and ourselves are currently testing in our labs trying to fix. The reasoning for this is Digium doesn't seem to follow the "standards" for presence support and are currently working to change this functionality within Asterisk. Polycom designed their phones, and specifically their firmware, to work with the "standards" (more specifically, the Microsoft LCS - Live Communications Server). This issue has been reported on multiple instances to Polycom, Digium, and ourselves; but, no real resolution is completed yet. We'll continue working on this issue within our labs and post an official answer when one is available. Sorry for the bit of bad news, if anyone is willing to contribute working / half working code, we'd be more than happy to look at it and work with Polycom and Digium on getting this fixed for everyone AS ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --asterisk-users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] RE: Welcome to the asterisk-users mailing list
We
must have had the magic version of 1.6.x then, because we increased our buddy
watch limit from 8 to 48 in that version.
-Original Message-From: Jessee J Holmes
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 8:18
AMTo: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
DiscussionSubject: Re: [asterisk-users] RE: Welcome to the
"asterisk-users" mailing listLimit was increased in
firmware 2.0.1.
NOTE: a new Polycom Administrator's guide is now also available covering
the 2.0.1 features. Re-obtain this manual if you haven't from your reseller or
from Polycom direct if you're certified.
Jessee Holmes
Atacomm / Ataractic Corporation
www.atacomm.com
V: 1-877-700-VOIP
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looking for voice over IP products? Visit our VoIP store at http://voipstore.atacomm.com/
On Oct 11, 2006, at 12:01 AM, Douglas Garstang wrote:
I think that limit was increased in 1.6.6 or
1.6.7.
-Original Message-
From: C F [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tue 10/10/2006 6:57 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List -
Non-Commercial Discussion
Cc:
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] RE: Welcome to
the "asterisk-users" mailing list
On 10/10/06, Eric ManxPower Wieling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I don't understand is why people
MUST use the 2.0.x firmware.
I believe it's because the limit of how many
can be monitored at once,
someone correct me if I'm wrong.
Jessee J Holmes wrote:
A few of our technical support
staff here at Atacomm are currently
working on this issue with
Polycom, Digium and one of our customer's
(who posted in here earlier this
week).
There are some major differences
from the 1.x.x firmware and the 2.01
firmware. Obviously, many on here,
voip-info.org, and all over the
Internet have reported troubles
where their presence feature that stops
working after they upgrade their
Polycom phones to firmware revision
2.0.1 when the phones are
configured with an Asterisk system. A couple
new things have been added to the
.cfg files that MUST now be set in
order for presence to work again
with an Asterisk system.
In the sip.cfg file:
feature feature.1.name="presence"
feature.1.enabled="1"
In the phone[mac].cfg file:
attendant
attendant.uri="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" attendant.reg=""/
However, there are still confirmed
problems with this setup (i.e. LEDs
not working), which Polycom and
ourselves are currently testing in our
labs trying to fix. The reasoning
for this is Digium doesn't seem to
follow the "standards" for
presence support and are currently working to
change this functionality within
Asterisk. Polycom designed their
phones, and specifically their
firmware, to work with the "standards"
(more specifically, the Microsoft
LCS - Live Communications Server).
This issue has been reported on
multiple instances to Polycom, Digium,
and ourselves; but, no real
resolution is completed yet. We'll continue
working on this issue within our
labs and post an official answer when
one is available.
Sorry for the bit of bad news, if
anyone is willing to contribute
working / half working code, we'd
be more than happy to look at it and
work with Polycom and Digium on
getting this fixed for everyone AS
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by
Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options
visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by
Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options
visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com
--
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] RE: Welcome to the asterisk-users mailing list
Hi Jesse, 4 x ip500s Ive held off upgrading the bootrom past 2.62 as I understand this is a one way trip to 3.01 and above. As Im a second hand hardware user I dont have access to Polycoms direct firmware and have been upgrading from freedomphone.net Cheers, Dean From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jessee J Holmes Sent: Wednesday, 11 October 2006 10:17 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] RE: Welcome to the asterisk-users mailing list Dean, Try obtaining the latest bootrom again, should be 3.2.2, we've seen this happen before for various odd reasons and Polycom's recommended fix is get the non-engineering version of the bootrom (don't ask please, just do it). So download the bootrom again and attempt it once more, while you're at it, be safe and get the 2.0.1 firmware again as well. Let me know if this fixes you're problem. By the way, are you using IP 500's? or 501's? 500's may not take, I think we had that discussion in this list before. Jessee Holmes Atacomm / Ataractic Corporation www.atacomm.com V: 1-877-700-VOIP [EMAIL PROTECTED] Looking for voice over IP products? Visit our VoIP store at http://voipstore.atacomm.com/ On Oct 10, 2006, at 7:10 PM, Dean Collins wrote: I've had problems loading 2.01 onto 2 of my 4 polycom 500's 2 work great no probs, 2 I cant get it to upload without failing. Cheers, Dean -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Eric ManxPower Wieling Sent: Tuesday, 10 October 2006 5:56 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] RE: Welcome to the asterisk-users mailing list What I don't understand is why people MUST use the 2.0.x firmware. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] RE: Welcome to the asterisk-users mailing list
Issac Simchayof wrote: Polycom 601 with Sip 2.01 Anyone using Sip 2.01? I have upgraded my phones and now presence no longer functions. Buddy list shows all phones online but status does not change when someone is on a call. Also blf does not function. I am using trixbox, 1.67 was working fine on the same box. Any ideas? Yes. Don't use such a useless subject for your queries to the list, and you might find them better received. . . The archives of this list is a valuable resource for those doing due diligence before bothering list members. A subject like yours hides the intent and content of your message totally, making it worthless as a subject search target. Why not SIP 2.01 on Polycom? Too late now, though :-) B. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] RE: Welcome to the asterisk-users mailing list
Dean,Tough call ... I haven't played with an IP 500 in a long time now and all that I know is Polycom officially doesn't support them.I'm sure the 2.0.1 firmware wasn't designed to ever work with bootroms 2.xx. I'm sure the problem lies with either the phone not supporting it or the bootrom not accepting the firmware, but I'd be very weary of upgrading an IP 500 to a 3.xx bootrom.Maybe someone else has better experience with this that has some of the older phones. Jessee HolmesAtacomm / Ataractic Corporationwww.atacomm.comV: 1-877-700-VOIP[EMAIL PROTECTED]Looking for voice over IP products? Visit our VoIP store at http://voipstore.atacomm.com/ On Oct 11, 2006, at 10:29 AM, Dean Collins wrote: Hi Jesse,4 x ip500’s I’ve held off upgrading the bootrom past 2.62 as I understand this is a one way trip to 3.01 and above. As I’m a second hand hardware user I don’t have access to Polycom’s direct firmware and have been upgrading from freedomphone.net Cheers, Dean From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jessee J Holmes Sent: Wednesday, 11 October 2006 10:17 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] RE: Welcome to the "asterisk-users" mailing list Dean, Try obtaining the latest bootrom again, should be 3.2.2, we've seen this happen before for various odd reasons and Polycom's recommended fix is get the "non-engineering version" of the bootrom (don't ask please, just do it). So download the bootrom again and attempt it once more, while you're at it, be safe and get the 2.0.1 firmware again as well. Let me know if this fixes you're problem. By the way, are you using IP 500's? or 501's? 500's may not take, I think we had that discussion in this list before. Jessee HolmesAtacomm / Ataractic Corporationwww.atacomm.comV: 1-877-700-VOIP[EMAIL PROTECTED] Looking for voice over IP products? Visit our VoIP store at http://voipstore.atacomm.com/ On Oct 10, 2006, at 7:10 PM, Dean Collins wrote:I've had problems loading 2.01 onto 2 of my 4 polycom 500's 2 work great no probs, 2 I cant get it to upload without failing. Cheers, Dean -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Eric "ManxPower" Wieling Sent: Tuesday, 10 October 2006 5:56 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] RE: Welcome to the "asterisk-users" mailing list What I don't understand is why people MUST use the 2.0.x firmware. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --asterisk-users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] RE: Welcome to the asterisk-users mailing list
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 09:13:26AM -0500, Jessee J Holmes wrote: I believe there is some RFC for presence out there that some people consider the standard; although, I'm not sure what this is... XMPP; RFC 3920, et al. Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth[EMAIL PROTECTED] Designer Baylink RFC 2100 Ashworth AssociatesThe Things I Think'87 e24 St Petersburg FL USA http://baylink.pitas.com +1 727 647 1274 That's women for you; you divorce them, and 10 years later, they stop having sex with you. -- Jennifer Crusie; _Fast_Women_ ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] RE: Welcome to the asterisk-users mailing list
Polycom 601 with Sip 2.01 Anyone using Sip 2.01? I have upgraded my phones and now presence no longer functions. Buddy list shows all phones online but status does not change when someone is on a call. Also blf does not function. I am using trixbox, 1.67 was working fine on the same box. Any ideas? ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] RE: Welcome to the asterisk-users mailing list
A few of our technical support staff here at Atacomm are currently working on this issue with Polycom, Digium and one of our customer's (who posted in here earlier this week).There are some major differences from the 1.x.x firmware and the 2.01 firmware. Obviously, many on here, voip-info.org, and all over the Internet have reported troubles where their presence feature that stops working after they upgrade their Polycom phones to firmware revision 2.0.1 when the phones are configured with an Asterisk system. A couple new things have been added to the .cfg files that MUST now be set in order for presence to work again with an Asterisk system.In the sip.cfg file:feature feature.1.name="presence" feature.1.enabled="1"In the phone[mac].cfg file:attendant attendant.uri="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" attendant.reg=""/However, there are still confirmed problems with this setup (i.e. LEDs not working), which Polycom and ourselves are currently testing in our labs trying to fix. The reasoning for this is Digium doesn't seem to follow the "standards" for presence support and are currently working to change this functionality within Asterisk. Polycom designed their phones, and specifically their firmware, to work with the "standards" (more specifically, the Microsoft LCS - Live Communications Server).This issue has been reported on multiple instances to Polycom, Digium, and ourselves; but, no real resolution is completed yet. We'll continue working on this issue within our labs and post an official answer when one is available.Sorry for the bit of bad news, if anyone is willing to contribute working / half working code, we'd be more than happy to look at it and work with Polycom and Digium on getting this fixed for everyone ASAP.Jessee HolmesAtacomm / Ataractic Corporationwww.atacomm.comV: 1-877-700-VOIP[EMAIL PROTECTED]Looking for voice over IP products? Visit our VoIP store at http://voipstore.atacomm.com/ On Oct 10, 2006, at 3:07 PM, Issac Simchayof wrote:Polycom 601 with Sip 2.01Anyone using Sip 2.01? I have upgraded my phones and now presence no longerfunctions. Buddy list shows all phones online but status does not change when someoneis on a call. Also blf does not function.I am using trixbox, 1.67 was working fine on the same box.Any ideas?___--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --asterisk-users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] RE: Welcome to the asterisk-users mailing list
What I don't understand is why people MUST use the 2.0.x firmware. Jessee J Holmes wrote: A few of our technical support staff here at Atacomm are currently working on this issue with Polycom, Digium and one of our customer's (who posted in here earlier this week). There are some major differences from the 1.x.x firmware and the 2.01 firmware. Obviously, many on here, voip-info.org, and all over the Internet have reported troubles where their presence feature that stops working after they upgrade their Polycom phones to firmware revision 2.0.1 when the phones are configured with an Asterisk system. A couple new things have been added to the .cfg files that MUST now be set in order for presence to work again with an Asterisk system. In the sip.cfg file: feature feature.1.name=presence feature.1.enabled=1 In the phone[mac].cfg file: attendant attendant.uri=[EMAIL PROTECTED] attendant.reg=/ However, there are still confirmed problems with this setup (i.e. LEDs not working), which Polycom and ourselves are currently testing in our labs trying to fix. The reasoning for this is Digium doesn't seem to follow the standards for presence support and are currently working to change this functionality within Asterisk. Polycom designed their phones, and specifically their firmware, to work with the standards (more specifically, the Microsoft LCS - Live Communications Server). This issue has been reported on multiple instances to Polycom, Digium, and ourselves; but, no real resolution is completed yet. We'll continue working on this issue within our labs and post an official answer when one is available. Sorry for the bit of bad news, if anyone is willing to contribute working / half working code, we'd be more than happy to look at it and work with Polycom and Digium on getting this fixed for everyone AS ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] RE: Welcome to the asterisk-users mailing list
Jessee J Holmes wrote: snipped However, there are still confirmed problems with this setup (i.e. LEDs not working), which Polycom and ourselves are currently testing in our labs trying to fix. The reasoning for this is Digium doesn't seem to follow the standards for presence support and are currently working to change this functionality within Asterisk. Polycom designed their phones, and specifically their firmware, to work with the standards (more specifically, the Microsoft LCS - Live Communications Server). What are the specific standards to which you refer? To my knowledge, Microsoft LCS is *not* an industry adopted standard. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] RE: Welcome to the asterisk-users mailing list
I've had problems loading 2.01 onto 2 of my 4 polycom 500's 2 work great no probs, 2 I cant get it to upload without failing. Cheers, Dean -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric ManxPower Wieling Sent: Tuesday, 10 October 2006 5:56 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] RE: Welcome to the asterisk-users mailing list What I don't understand is why people MUST use the 2.0.x firmware. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] RE: Welcome to the asterisk-users mailing list
On 10/10/06, Eric ManxPower Wieling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What I don't understand is why people MUST use the 2.0.x firmware. I believe it's because the limit of how many can be monitored at once, someone correct me if I'm wrong. Jessee J Holmes wrote: A few of our technical support staff here at Atacomm are currently working on this issue with Polycom, Digium and one of our customer's (who posted in here earlier this week). There are some major differences from the 1.x.x firmware and the 2.01 firmware. Obviously, many on here, voip-info.org, and all over the Internet have reported troubles where their presence feature that stops working after they upgrade their Polycom phones to firmware revision 2.0.1 when the phones are configured with an Asterisk system. A couple new things have been added to the .cfg files that MUST now be set in order for presence to work again with an Asterisk system. In the sip.cfg file: feature feature.1.name=presence feature.1.enabled=1 In the phone[mac].cfg file: attendant attendant.uri=[EMAIL PROTECTED] attendant.reg=/ However, there are still confirmed problems with this setup (i.e. LEDs not working), which Polycom and ourselves are currently testing in our labs trying to fix. The reasoning for this is Digium doesn't seem to follow the standards for presence support and are currently working to change this functionality within Asterisk. Polycom designed their phones, and specifically their firmware, to work with the standards (more specifically, the Microsoft LCS - Live Communications Server). This issue has been reported on multiple instances to Polycom, Digium, and ourselves; but, no real resolution is completed yet. We'll continue working on this issue within our labs and post an official answer when one is available. Sorry for the bit of bad news, if anyone is willing to contribute working / half working code, we'd be more than happy to look at it and work with Polycom and Digium on getting this fixed for everyone AS ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] RE: Welcome to the asterisk-users mailing list
I think that limit was increased in 1.6.6 or 1.6.7. -Original Message- From: C F [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tue 10/10/2006 6:57 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Cc: Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] RE: Welcome to the asterisk-users mailing list On 10/10/06, Eric ManxPower Wieling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What I don't understand is why people MUST use the 2.0.x firmware. I believe it's because the limit of how many can be monitored at once, someone correct me if I'm wrong. Jessee J Holmes wrote: A few of our technical support staff here at Atacomm are currently working on this issue with Polycom, Digium and one of our customer's (who posted in here earlier this week). There are some major differences from the 1.x.x firmware and the 2.01 firmware. Obviously, many on here, voip-info.org, and all over the Internet have reported troubles where their presence feature that stops working after they upgrade their Polycom phones to firmware revision 2.0.1 when the phones are configured with an Asterisk system. A couple new things have been added to the .cfg files that MUST now be set in order for presence to work again with an Asterisk system. In the sip.cfg file: feature feature.1.name=presence feature.1.enabled=1 In the phone[mac].cfg file: attendant attendant.uri=[EMAIL PROTECTED] attendant.reg=/ However, there are still confirmed problems with this setup (i.e. LEDs not working), which Polycom and ourselves are currently testing in our labs trying to fix. The reasoning for this is Digium doesn't seem to follow the standards for presence support and are currently working to change this functionality within Asterisk. Polycom designed their phones, and specifically their firmware, to work with the standards (more specifically, the Microsoft LCS - Live Communications Server). This issue has been reported on multiple instances to Polycom, Digium, and ourselves; but, no real resolution is completed yet. We'll continue working on this issue within our labs and post an official answer when one is available. Sorry for the bit of bad news, if anyone is willing to contribute working / half working code, we'd be more than happy to look at it and work with Polycom and Digium on getting this fixed for everyone AS ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Re: Welcome to the Asterisk-Users mailing list
Unable to login to the MySQL database 'tiki' on 'localhost' as user 'tiki' Go here to begin the installation process, if you haven't done so already. Lost connection to MySQL server during query Hi, Everyone: What is the URL of the list archive? The 'wiki' seems broken. I want to connect to a single home POTS from an internet connection. i.e. I want to be able to make telephone calls on my home POTS from anywhere that I can obtain an internet connection with a device with a microphone and a speaker. e.g. My laptop and a headphone with boom microphone. Does 'Asterisk' do this? Should I look elsewhere for this task? If this is answered in the list archive, please respond with the URL of the list archive. Best regards, Chuck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Welcome to the Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com mailing list! Before posting to the Asterisk user list, please be sure your question hasn't already been answered in the list archive or in the Asterisk wiki at http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk. For more information see asterisk.org Also, if you want to search the lists for a particular topic, you can do so through Google, by using something along the lines of: quot;asterisk rules site:lists.digium.comquot; (without the quotes) as your search string. If your postings don't seem to go through, please ensure that your reply-to address is the same address that you've used to sign up to the list with. Do NOT call Digium if you're unable to make or receive postings, please send an e-mail to the list administrator. --Bandwidth and Colocation Sponsored by Easynews.com-- To post to this list, send your email to: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com General information about the mailing list is at: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users If you ever want to unsubscribe or change your options (eg, switch to or from digest mode, change your password, etc.), visit your subscription page at: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/options/asterisk-users/chuck%40gelm.net You can also make such adjustments via email by sending a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word `help' in the subject or body (don't include the quotes), and you will get back a message with instructions. You must know your password to change your options (including changing the password, itself) or to unsubscribe. It is: wb8qxn Normally, Mailman will remind you of your lists.digium.com mailing list passwords once every month, although you can disable this if you prefer. This reminder will also include instructions on how to unsubscribe or change your account options. There is also a button on your options page that will email your current password to you. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Welcome to the Asterisk-Users mailing list
On Tue, September 20, 2005 2:10, chuck gelm said: SNIP What is the URL of the list archive? As listed at the bottom of each email on the list: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users You can also use google: SEARCH KEYWORDS site:lists.digium.com The 'wiki' seems broken. It's working fine from here I want to connect to a single home POTS from an internet connection. i.e. I want to be able to make telephone calls on my home POTS from anywhere that I can obtain an internet connection with a device with a microphone and a speaker. e.g. My laptop and a headphone with boom microphone. Does 'Asterisk' do this? Should I look elsewhere for this task? It's a bit overkill, but it can certainly do it! If this is answered in the list archive, please respond with the URL of the list archive. As this is the premise of (*), being a software PABX, the entire list is *full* of posts on this topic... You might want to search for Asterisk @ Home (aka AAH, [EMAIL PROTECTED]) though... Best regards, Chuck PS: Please do not reply to an existing email to start a new thread, neither with or without changing subjects, etc. It really screws up threaded email clients. I had to page back all the way to my first email to find your question, as it was sorted under *my* welcome email... (I only did it because it showed 1 unread email, and I do not like unread emails hanging around. Usually I have less time and just click 'mark all read' when this happens, and I know there are many more. Also your mail would have never come up if I had the thread marked for deletion... So it's not only courteous, it's also good sense! G) Just click new and send to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cleaner, easier and it doesn't screw up threading in mailclients... (You can add the list to your address book too!) Good luck! -- Francesco Peeters GPG Key = AA69 E7C6 1D8A F148 160C D5C4 9943 6E38 D5E3 7704 If your program doesn't recognize my signature, please visit http://www.CAcert.org/index.php?id=3 to retrieve the Root CA certificate. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
