kernel: [c0109023]
Jun 24 18:23:25 mspgate03 kernel:
Thank you.
Alex Zarubin
-Original Message-
From: The Traveller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 3:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Dual T400P, SMP, performance issues
24 18:23:25 mspgate03 kernel: [c0109023]
Jun 24 18:23:25 mspgate03 kernel:
Thank you.
Alex Zarubin
-Original Message-
From: The Traveller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 3:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Dual T400P, SMP
Title: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Dual T400P, SMP, performance issues
Here is info on the kernel panic with the high volume (110+) of calls.
Same configuration as before. Comments would be appreciated.
ksymoops 2.4.4 on i686 2.4.21. Options used
-V (default)
-k /proc/ksyms (default)
-l /proc
-
From: The Traveller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 3:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Dual T400P, SMP, performance issues
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 20:54:39 +0200, The Traveller wrote:
BTW: As I reported in my previous mail to the list
Title: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Dual T400P, SMP, performance issues
Mark, here is the info you requested. As far as multiple T400P boards
question, I believe this is the most probable reason for this behavior
(we haven't seen it on a single board machines). But in order to
prove it we need 4-5
As far as SMP and single T400P - we'll try and report the results
but the idea was to go with as high density as possible ...
Right, I'm just trying to narrow down the problem. I'm theorizing that
the problem is some sort of spinlock deadlock. Does it only occur if
there is activity or even
Title: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Dual T400P, SMP, performance issues
I believe this is related to the load, there are always calls in our test.
Attached is a part of /var/log/messages file with SysRq memory info - in
case you can see something in it. The box was rebooted 06-16 17:08
Title: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Dual T400P, SMP, performance issues
Mark,
As far as pings - we have cases when we could ping the box on both
interfaces and there are cases when we could not (we tried 3-4 sets of
NICs and drivers). All telnets, X, ssh etc. are definitely dead.
No coredumps
-
From: Mark Spencer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2003 10:23 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Dual T400P, SMP, performance issues
When you say stops responding do you mean no more pings, telnet dead,
etc? Or do you mean asterisk stops
: 0
MIS: 0
Thank you.
Alex Zarubin
-Original Message-
From: Martin Pycko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 9:48 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Dual T400P, SMP, performance issues
Are you sure that you compiled zaptel
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 07:23:42PM -0500, Alex Zarubin wrote:
Zaptel was compiled with -D__SMP__
We've installed irqbalance and the picture improved a lot
(thanks to Jared Smith). Do you still see problems in our /proc/interrupts?
Well, maybe i'm nitpicking, but there's a subtle issue there.
Title: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Dual T400P, SMP, performance issues
Zaptel was compiled with -D__SMP__
We've installed irqbalance and the picture improved a lot
(thanks to Jared Smith). Do you still see problems in our /proc/interrupts?
The big issue for us now is that after 24+ hours
Are you sure that you compiled zaptel for __SMP__ ?
Edit your zaptel/Makefile.
0: 75283844 75241320 75286285 75247088IO-APIC-edge timer
1: 1 0 1 1IO-APIC-edge keyboard
2: 0 0 0 0 XT-PIC
H, I to appear to have an odd mix of interrupts. It seems that the second CPU
doesn't do much
at all on my dual Xeon...
CPU0 CPU1
0: 40652580 0IO-APIC-edge timer
1:926 0IO-APIC-edge keyboard
2: 0 0 XT-PIC
My dual-proc Xeon boxes didn't share IRQs across CPUs until I installed
the kernel-utils RPM and made sure the irqbalance service was
running... Just a word to the wise!
Jared Smith
On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 09:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
H, I to appear to have an odd mix of interrupts. It
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 10:14:09AM -0600, Jared Smith wrote:
My dual-proc Xeon boxes didn't share IRQs across CPUs until I installed
the kernel-utils RPM and made sure the irqbalance service was
running... Just a word to the wise!
Yes, you need irqbalance and a kinda modern kernel in order to
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
H, I to appear to have an odd mix of interrupts. It seems that the second CPU
doesn't do much
at all on my dual Xeon...
You might have 'noapic' on your kernel command line... or your bios isnt
configured for MP 1.4 ...
-Dan
17 matches
Mail list logo
