Re: [asterisk-users] How to Busy signals on DAHDI

2014-02-06 Thread giovanni.v
Il 05/02/2014 8.42, Olivier ha scritto: channel then it depends upon what you have the priindication option set to. With priindication=outofband then a busy cause code is sent to the network and the call is hung up. With priindication=inband then a busy tone is sent

[asterisk-users] Looking for some guidance with the Asterisk 12 ARI/API

2014-02-06 Thread James Wystead
Hi - I figured this was probably the best place to ask this question Is there anyone that has done anything practical with the API and/or Real Time Database config? If so, I would like to pick your brains if I may. Thanks - G --

Re: [asterisk-users] Looking for some guidance with the Asterisk 12 ARI/API

2014-02-06 Thread Joshua Colp
On 14-02-06 11:10 AM, James Wystead wrote: Hi - I figured this was probably the best place to ask this question Is there anyone that has done anything practical with the API and/or Real Time Database config? We actually have a new mailing list[1] that is focused on discussion about the new

Re: [asterisk-users] Looking for some guidance with the Asterisk 12 ARI/API

2014-02-06 Thread Ishfaq Malik
We run a multi node, multi tenanted hosted VoIP service using centralised databases for sip/extensions/voicemail configuration allowing resellers and end users to make updates to their walled garden themselves. We're using asterisk 1.8 but Realtime is no different on asterisk 12 (with the

Re: [asterisk-users] auto-answer call

2014-02-06 Thread Salaheddine Elharit
hi when i try to this with page() exten = 506,1,SIPAddHeader(Call-Info:__\; answer-after=0) exten = 506,n,page(SIP/105) CLIAccepting call from '0661xx' to '506' on channel 1/13, span 1 -- Executing [506@default:1] SIPAddHeader(DAHDI/13-1, Call-Info:__; answer-after=0) in new stack

[asterisk-users] multicastRTP source interface

2014-02-06 Thread Matt Hoskins
I have an asterisk 11.4.0 server with two interfaces, eth0 and eth1. Eth0 has a default gateway on it, eth1 is connected the subnet that has my phones registered. I'd like to use the multicastRTP driver to do paging. However, when a phone dials an extension with multicastRTP, the

[asterisk-users] SPA112 Won't stay up

2014-02-06 Thread Mike Diehl
Hi all, I have an SPA112 that in sitting behind a Ubee cable modem. The internet link is solid, but the device becomes unreachable within a day or so of being rebooted. Then the customer goes to reboot the device, they report that all 4 lights are lit. The ISP reports that the device does

Re: [asterisk-users] SPA112 Won't stay up

2014-02-06 Thread Leandro Dardini
How long is the registration timeout? If the device is behind a router/firewall, then you need to set a registration timeout lower than the state table life in the router/firewall. I usually set my devices to just 2 minutes and it works almost all the time. Most Cisco devices have a very long

Re: [asterisk-users] SPA112 Won't stay up

2014-02-06 Thread Mike Diehl
I've got the registration period set to 15 minutes. However, I've got similar devices all over the place that don't seem to have this unreliability issue. The way I solved it with the SPA303 that I had in the office was to replace the Ubee modem with a different make/model. That's not an option

Re: [asterisk-users] SPA112 Won't stay up

2014-02-06 Thread David Wessell
Is there another router in the mix? Put the cable modem in bridge mode and attAch a real router. http://401stblow.wordpress.com/2012/10/21/fixing-time-warner-cable-ubee-modem-connectivity-issues/ On Thursday, February 6, 2014, Mike Diehl mdiehlena...@gmail.com wrote: I've got the registration

Re: [asterisk-users] SPA112 Won't stay up

2014-02-06 Thread Jim Lucas
On 02/06/2014 09:25 AM, Mike Diehl wrote: I've got the registration period set to 15 minutes. However, I've got similar devices all over the place that don't seem to have this unreliability issue. The way I solved it with the SPA303 that I had in the office was to replace the Ubee modem with a

Re: [asterisk-users] SPA112 Won't stay up

2014-02-06 Thread Mike Diehl
Unfortunately, we plug straight into the Ubee and the ISP will not support any other modem. GRRr.. Mike. On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 12:34 PM, David Wessell da...@ringfree.biz wrote: Is there another router in the mix? Put the cable modem in bridge mode and attAch a real router.

[asterisk-users] Fax buffer overflow detected

2014-02-06 Thread Tech Support
All; I'm running Asterisk 1.8.15-cert3 with the newest version of spandsp. I've even tried unloading that and using Digium's FFA module but I receive the same error on an outbound transmission: [2014-02-06 14:35:14] ERROR[19066]: udptl.c:294 encode_open_type: UDPTL

Re: [asterisk-users] SPA112 Won't stay up

2014-02-06 Thread Andres
On 2/6/14, 11:18 AM, Mike Diehl wrote: Hi all, I have an SPA112 that in sitting behind a Ubee cable modem. The internet link is solid, but the device becomes unreachable within a day or so of being rebooted. Then the customer goes to reboot the device, they report that all 4 lights are

Re: [asterisk-users] SPA112 Won't stay up

2014-02-06 Thread David Wessell
Even if they don't support another modem, you can usually use another router. Just put the Ubee in bridge mode and slap a router behind it. This is our typical best practice install. You just can't trust the piece of shit routers that ISP's send out these days.. dw On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 12:54

[asterisk-users] Rejecting a call as if the extension does not exist.

2014-02-06 Thread John Kiniston
I'm trying to address a problem with users transferring to invalid destinations. In my sip peer I'm setting both __FORWARD_CONTEXT and __TRANSFER_CONTEXT to a context with a extension defined below to set some CDR variables before the call is transferred. [customer-forward] exten =

Re: [asterisk-users] Rejecting a call as if the extension does not exist.

2014-02-06 Thread isrlgb
You could have the call immediately return to the transferer -Original Message- From: John Kiniston johnkinis...@gmail.com Sender: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.comDate: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 17:14:02 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial

Re: [asterisk-users] Fax buffer overflow detected

2014-02-06 Thread Larry Moore
On 7/02/2014 3:38 AM, Tech Support wrote: All; I’m running Asterisk 1.8.15-cert3 with the newest version of spandsp. I’ve even tried unloading that and using Digium’s FFA module but I receive the same error on an outbound transmission: [2014-02-06 14:35:14] ERROR[19066]: udptl.c:294