Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax

2008-01-03 Thread Olivier
Hello, 2008/1/1, Steve Underwood [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi Rob, Rob Hillis wrote: Well that answers that question. I see that t38modem provides an H232 modem - is this unsuitable for HylaFAX's purpose? (ignoring the fact that it requires a kernel recompile on most newer distros.) Steve

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax

2008-01-02 Thread Norman Franke
On Jan 1, 2008, at 1:00 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The most recent versions of t38modem can apparently provide both a SIP and H.323 T.38 to class 1 FAX modem interface for HylaFAX. What it cannot provide is an audio FAX interface. The sipmodem code I am working on will integrate audio

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax

2008-01-01 Thread Rob Hillis
Well that answers that question. I see that t38modem provides an H232 modem - is this unsuitable for HylaFAX's purpose? (ignoring the fact that it requires a kernel recompile on most newer distros.) Steve Underwood wrote: Rob Hillis wrote: Last time I heard IAXModem didn't support T.38

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax

2008-01-01 Thread Steve Underwood
Hi Rob, Rob Hillis wrote: Well that answers that question. I see that t38modem provides an H232 modem - is this unsuitable for HylaFAX's purpose? (ignoring the fact that it requires a kernel recompile on most newer distros.) Steve Underwood wrote: Rob Hillis wrote: Last time I heard

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax

2008-01-01 Thread Al lists
I'm not looking at T.38 , at this time its terminating a SIP trunk with multiple DID's for fax. I'm using this configuration with linksys PAP ATA and satisfied with results. I'm looking at removing these ATA 's and using Asterisk ( or giving it a try ) for terminating fax. Last time I heard

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax

2008-01-01 Thread Rob Hillis
Then I suggest you prepare yourself for a lot of pain. Fax over the 'net without T.38 is almost guaranteed to not work. Al lists wrote: I'm not looking at T.38 , at this time its terminating a SIP trunk with multiple DID's for fax. I'm using this configuration with linksys PAP ATA and

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax

2008-01-01 Thread Jonn R Taylor
up connection. Jonn -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Hillis Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2008 12:51 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax Then I suggest you prepare

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax

2008-01-01 Thread Doug Lytle
Jonn R Taylor wrote: REALY?? Humm I have been doing this for over a year and we receive over 400 faxes a month! 8 iaxmodems with DID's from a real SIP provider. And this connection is used for ALL office traffic, mail, VPN, webmail, and DNS. NO echo and no voice quality issues. Now we

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax

2008-01-01 Thread Jonn R Taylor
Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax Jonn R Taylor wrote: REALY?? Humm I have been doing this for over a year and we receive over 400 faxes a month! 8 iaxmodems with DID's from a real SIP provider. And this connection is used for ALL office

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax

2008-01-01 Thread Doug Lytle
Jonn R Taylor wrote: I have it setup to email me any failed fax connections. Most of the faxes come from remote offices, distributors and customers. Same here, but HylaFAX won't send you any logs of attempts that haven't at least negotiated a fax transmission. Call comes in, tries to

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax

2008-01-01 Thread Guillermo Salas M.
On Tue, 2008-01-01 at 13:48 -0600, Jonn R Taylor wrote: REALY?? Humm I have been doing this for over a year and we receive over 400 faxes a month! 8 iaxmodems with DID's from a real SIP provider. And this connection is used for ALL office traffic, mail, VPN, webmail, and DNS. NO echo and

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax

2008-01-01 Thread Jonn R Taylor
List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax Jonn R Taylor wrote: I have it setup to email me any failed fax connections. Most of the faxes come from remote offices, distributors and customers. Same here, but HylaFAX won't send you any logs of attempts

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax

2008-01-01 Thread Doug Lytle
Jonn R Taylor wrote: If I had ANY failed faxes I would here about it. Iaxmodem creates a log of its own, so when I get a connection that fails hylafax sends the failure to me. One of the things that I found is you need to add nojitterbuffer to the iaxmodem config file, Really? I'll have

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax

2008-01-01 Thread Lee Howard
Jonn R Taylor wrote: One of the things that I found is you need to add nojitterbuffer to the iaxmodem config file The reason that you need the nojitterbuffer in the iaxmodem config file is because you're actually getting at least some jitter. IAXmodem's jitterbuffer simply fills-in gaps due

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax

2008-01-01 Thread Jonn R Taylor
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug Lytle Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2008 3:42 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax Jonn R Taylor wrote: If I had ANY failed faxes I would here about it. Iaxmodem creates

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax

2008-01-01 Thread Jonn R Taylor
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax Jonn R Taylor wrote: One of the things that I found is you need to add nojitterbuffer to the iaxmodem config file The reason that you need the nojitterbuffer in the iaxmodem config file is because

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax

2008-01-01 Thread Rob Hillis
I'd say consider yourself very lucky. I know I did some testing here some time ago with faxing over VoIP. * One extension to another over G711a with both extensions on the same LAN - worked 95% of the time * One extension on my Asterisk server to an Extension on a friend's

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax

2008-01-01 Thread Jonn R Taylor
NOT true and I have proven that for the last year. Jonn _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Hillis Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2008 4:13 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax I'd

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax

2008-01-01 Thread Doug Lytle
Jonn R Taylor wrote: FYI... I love this. Ben Franklin quote: I truly believe it. But, it being a Franklin quote is in some dispute. I like it all the same. Doug -- Ben Franklin quote: Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax

2008-01-01 Thread Steve Underwood
Jonn R Taylor wrote: I have always said that if some one said it can't be done, they did not try hard enough. FYI... I love this. Ben Franklin quote: Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. As the person

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax

2008-01-01 Thread Al lists
Guys! what i was looking here was a simple hint/recommendation for installing IaxModem and Hylafax. Let me try it myself and see how feasible this solutions is. On Jan 1, 2008 5:02 PM, Steve Underwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jonn R Taylor wrote: I have always said that if some one said it

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax

2008-01-01 Thread Jonn R Taylor
and I know how to make networks work the way they need to. Jonn -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Underwood Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2008 6:02 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax

2008-01-01 Thread Rob Hillis
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Rob Hillis *Sent:* Tuesday, January 01, 2008 4:13 PM *To:* Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion *Subject:* Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax I'd say consider yourself very

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax

2007-12-31 Thread Andrew Joakimsen
On Dec 28, 2007 8:28 PM, Al lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: what method is preferred: haylafax and Iaxmodem or spnadsp for faxing. What are you trying to do and do you have a T1 or ISDN line? ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax

2007-12-31 Thread Al lists
at this time is terminating a SIP trunk, each DID will get its own fax box. I guess at this time i'm looking to find a tutorial for installing iaxmodem and hylafax as it seems to be the answer. On Dec 31, 2007 9:11 PM, Andrew Joakimsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Dec 28, 2007 8:28 PM, Al lists

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax

2007-12-31 Thread Rob Hillis
Unless your provider provides a T.38 gateway, fax over SIP is pretty much guaranteed to be unusable. Often you can get away with it over a LAN using G711a or G711u, but any of the lower bandwidth codecs /won't/ be able to properly handle fax calls. Whilst I haven't used it myself, I believe

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax

2007-12-31 Thread Andrew Joakimsen
If by fax box you mean an ATA with a fax machine attached them Asterisk 1.4 with T38 passthrough should work if the SIP provider has T.38 capabilites. If by fax box you mean a 'faxmail inbox' then no Asterisk cannot help you terminate that from SIP. Get a Cisco gateway, make sure your provider

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax

2007-12-31 Thread Steve Underwood
Rob Hillis wrote: Last time I heard IAXModem didn't support T.38 because the IAX2 protocol didn't support T.38 - whether that's still the case or not, I don't know. There are actually two reasons. One is that T.38 over IAX is not defined. The other is the current T.38 termination support in

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax

2007-12-29 Thread Doug Lytle
Al lists wrote: So HylaFax and IaxModem is more preferred than using rxfax/txfax ? any reason? HylaFAX+ has built-in support for handling transmission errors. It used to be (Not sure now) that when rx/txfax encountered an error, it just quit. HylaFAX+ also has many features available for

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax

2007-12-29 Thread Al lists
Any recommended how to for 1.4 iaxmodem and hylafax+ ? On Dec 29, 2007 6:49 AM, Doug Lytle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Al lists wrote: So HylaFax and IaxModem is more preferred than using rxfax/txfax ? any reason? HylaFAX+ has built-in support for handling transmission errors. It used to

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax

2007-12-29 Thread Jonn R Taylor
Of Al lists Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 9:44 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax Any recommended how to for 1.4 iaxmodem and hylafax+ ? On Dec 29, 2007 6:49 AM, Doug Lytle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Al lists wrote

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax

2007-12-29 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 08:43:30AM -0700, Al lists wrote: Any recommended how to for 1.4 iaxmodem and hylafax+ ? Just a note: the interface of iaxmodem to Asterisk hasn't changed since 1.2 . Chances are older documentation will be relevant. -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax

2007-12-29 Thread Al lists
thank you all, still i'm seeking answer to original question, which one is more preferred in fax servers with 100 usres? On Dec 29, 2007 12:10 PM, Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 08:43:30AM -0700, Al lists wrote: Any recommended how to for 1.4 iaxmodem and

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax

2007-12-29 Thread Doug Lytle
Al lists wrote: thank you all, still i'm seeking answer to original question, which one is more preferred in fax servers with 100 usres? I believe I answered that question. HylaFAX+ and iaxmodem. Doug -- Ben Franklin quote: Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax

2007-12-29 Thread Jonn R Taylor
- Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax Al lists wrote: thank you all, still i'm seeking answer to original question, which one is more preferred in fax servers with 100 usres? I believe I answered that question. HylaFAX+ and iaxmodem. Doug -- Ben

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax

2007-12-28 Thread Lee Howard
Al lists wrote: what method is preferred: haylafax and Iaxmodem or spnadsp for faxing. I think that you mean to say HylaFAX and IAXmodem or txfax/rxfax ... because spandsp is but a DSP/DCE library, and it cannot work alone, and iaxmodem uses spandsp. Thanks, Lee.

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax

2007-12-28 Thread Doug Lytle
Al lists wrote: what method is preferred: haylafax and Iaxmodem or spnadsp for faxing. HylaFAX+ and iaxmodem (That includes SpanDSP). Doug -- Ben Franklin quote: Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax

2007-12-28 Thread Al lists
So HylaFax and IaxModem is more preferred than using rxfax/txfax ? any reason? On Dec 28, 2007 6:40 PM, Lee Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Al lists wrote: what method is preferred: haylafax and Iaxmodem or spnadsp for faxing. I think that you mean to say HylaFAX and IAXmodem or