On 09/30/2011 03:56 AM, Administrator TOOTAI wrote:
Hi list,
we have 2 asterisk boxes in VM (kvm) on 2 different Dell servers, one is
Lenny kernel 2.6.26 asterisk 1.6.2.20, the second CentOS 2.6.18 asterisk
1.4.36 (Elastix). Both 64bits, no hardware involved, dahdi on both
machines for meetme
Le 30/09/2011 14:05, Kevin P. Fleming a écrit :
On 09/30/2011 03:56 AM, Administrator TOOTAI wrote:
Hi list,
we have 2 asterisk boxes in VM (kvm) on 2 different Dell servers, one is
Lenny kernel 2.6.26 asterisk 1.6.2.20, the second CentOS 2.6.18 asterisk
1.4.36 (Elastix). Both 64bits, no
On 09/30/2011 07:49 AM, Administrator TOOTAI wrote:
Le 30/09/2011 14:05, Kevin P. Fleming a écrit :
On 09/30/2011 03:56 AM, Administrator TOOTAI wrote:
Hi list,
we have 2 asterisk boxes in VM (kvm) on 2 different Dell servers, one is
Lenny kernel 2.6.26 asterisk 1.6.2.20, the second CentOS
In article 4e85d19f.4090...@digium.com,
Kevin P. Fleming kpflem...@digium.com wrote:
On 09/30/2011 07:49 AM, Administrator TOOTAI wrote:
Le 30/09/2011 14:05, Kevin P. Fleming a écrit :
On 09/30/2011 03:56 AM, Administrator TOOTAI wrote:
Hi list,
we have 2 asterisk boxes in VM (kvm) on 2
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2011 10:54 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Core show translation 4000ms
Maybe, but that still doesn't explain why there is a factor of 2000 between
some conversions and others. And 4001, 4002 and 4003 are remarkably like a big
On 09/30/2011 09:53 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote:
In article 4e85d19f.4090...@digium.com,
Kevin P. Fleming kpflem...@digium.com wrote:
This is why the output was changed to microseconds from milliseconds; in
the older version, the lowest number that should be shown was 1
millisecond, even if
: [asterisk-users] Core show translation 4000ms
Maybe, but that still doesn't explain why there is a factor of 2000 between
some conversions and others. And 4001, 4002 and 4003 are remarkably like a big
round number plus a tiny offset! I would agree with the OP that the values
shown look
Le 30/09/2011 17:02, Jason Parker a écrit :
On 09/30/2011 09:53 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote:
In article4e85d19f.4090...@digium.com,
Kevin P. Flemingkpflem...@digium.com wrote:
This is why the output was changed to microseconds from milliseconds; in
the older version, the lowest number that
