23:13:56 +0200
From: Tzafrir Cohen tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] TDM2400 card FXS problems
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Message-ID: 20100128211356.gx3...@xorcom.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 07:25:18PM +, Noah I
2010 23:13:56 +0200
From: Tzafrir Cohen tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] TDM2400 card FXS problems
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Message-ID: 20100128211356.gx3...@xorcom.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 07:25:18PM +, Noah
,
Noah Engelberth
Direct Link Computer Systems
-
Message: 12
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 23:13:56 +0200
From: Tzafrir Cohen tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] TDM2400 card FXS problems
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Message-ID: 20100128211356.gx3...@xorcom.com
before without any success.
best regards;
--- On Fri, 1/29/10, Noah I. Engelberth n...@directlinkcomputers.com wrote:
From: Noah I. Engelberth n...@directlinkcomputers.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] TDM2400 card FXS problems
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com asterisk-users
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 07:25:18PM +, Noah I. Engelberth wrote:
We have a recently deployed server with a new TDM2400 card that will
not put dialtone or audio on FXS ports after the physical server
restarts
What's the output of lsdahdi in that case?
(though they will ring if called,
On 2/12/07, Paradise Dove [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
my card has just fxo modules and is put in a 3.3v slot.
when running modprobe wctdm24xxp
it waits for ever and dmesg shows Resetting the modules
what could be the problem?
when i put this card in another system with 5v slot it works fine.
Really? It's 9:23am EST and they aren't open yet.
I would call Digium's tech support. They open in 20 minutes.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
On 2/11/07, Paradise Dove [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
does TDM2400 work on 3.3v pci slot?
Yes, all of Digium's analog cards are dual voltage and can work with
either 3.3V or 5V slots. You just need to make sure you have an extra
molex connector if you're going to be using FXS modules on the
my card has just fxo modules and is put in a 3.3v slot.
when running modprobe wctdm24xxp
it waits for ever and dmesg shows Resetting the modules
what could be the problem?
when i put this card in another system with 5v slot it works fine.
On 2/12/07, William Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
] On Behalf Of David Gagnon
Sent: 25 January 2007 07:30
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] TDM2400 Hardware Echo Cancel[Spam score:
8%][Scanned]
I had the exact same problem, removing the hardware echo fix the problem but
this is not a solution
janvier 2007 14:42
À : Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Objet : RE: [asterisk-users] TDM2400 Hardware Echo Cancel
I have been having the same problems since installing a TDM2400 with
hardware echo canceller. The best way to describe the sound is a
background crackle or hiss
I have been having the same problems since installing a TDM2400 with
hardware echo canceller. The best way to describe the sound is a
background crackle or hiss that just can't be filtered out.
Increasing the RX gain just makes the problem worse.
SIP to SIP calls are flawless.
An acquaintance
-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 2:42 PM
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] TDM2400 Hardware Echo Cancel
I have been having the same problems since installing a TDM2400 with
hardware echo canceller. The best way to describe the sound is a
background
Hi
Echo cancel almost works, but the users
hear
what they describe as a 'crackle' coming back when they talk.
Just a thought, but check that your gain levels are not too high?
Ed
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
W
Envoyé : jeudi 18 janvier 2007 12:39
À : Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Objet : Re: [asterisk-users] TDM2400 Hardware Echo Cancel
Hi
Echo cancel almost works, but the users
hear
what they describe as a 'crackle' coming back when they talk.
Just a thought
Adam Sharples wrote:
I want to tune to echo canceller, but am unsure if any of the options
provided have any effect on the hardware module. Do the settings such
as
echocancel and echotraining in Zapata.conf affect the hardware module?
No. Hardware echo cancelers on Digium cards are
I am having 2 more issues, when starting asterisk I got the below message:
Dec 17 22:27:54 NOTICE[4554]: indications.c:505
ast_unregister_indication_country: Removed default indication country 'us'
Dec 17 22:27:54 WARNING[4554]: chan_zap.c:10874 setup_zap: Ignoring
signalling
Dec 17 22:27:54
After restarting the machine I am getting the below messages when dialing:
Dec 18 00:09:35 WARNING[2897]: channel.c:2571 ast_request: No translator
path exists for channel type Zap (native 68) to 256
Dec 18 00:09:35 NOTICE[2897]: app_dial.c:1056 dial_exec_full: Unable to
create channel of type
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 08:08:18PM -0500, Time Bandit wrote:
[channels]
context=default
signalling=fxs_ls
;channel=1-16
usecallerid=yes
hidecallerid=no
callwaiting=yes
restrictcid=no
echocancel=yes
echocancelwhenbridged=yes
rxgain=0.0
txgain=0.0
group=1
here is the latest update:
in zaptel.conf i used
fxsks=1-4
fxsks=5-8
fxsks=9-12
fxsks=13-16
zttool shows hardware OK
ztcfg worked normally
in zapata.conf when i define the channels channel=1-16 and restaring
asterisk it gives the below errors:
Dec 12 00:48:28 WARNING[3141]: chan_zap.c:921
I figured out the problem, it is the location of FXO boards on cards,
channels are from 9-24 not 1-16.
Thanks all for your help, specially Tzafrir, genzaptelconf shows it clearly.
On 12/11/06, O. Kamal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
here is the latest update:
in zaptel.conf i used
fxsks=1-4
[channels]
context=default
signalling=fxs_ls
;channel=1-16
usecallerid=yes
hidecallerid=no
callwaiting=yes
restrictcid=no
echocancel=yes
echocancelwhenbridged=yes
rxgain=0.0
txgain=0.0
group=1
;accountcode=lss0101
answeronpolarityswitch=yes
hanguponpolarityswitch=yes
To the best
Yes, signalling should be fks_ks, channel line must be the last one, I
will start live testing next week
On 12/12/06, Time Bandit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[channels]
context=default
signalling=fxs_ls
;channel=1-16
usecallerid=yes
hidecallerid=no
callwaiting=yes
restrictcid=no
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 02:52:03PM -0300, Robson Ribeiro wrote:
Erik, the TDM2400 is not in conflict with other interrupts BUT, i saw
something very weird:
Lspci
:04:09.0 Ethernet controller: Digium, Inc.: Unknown device 2400 (rev 11)
To get the latest list of PCI IDs descriptions,
What is reported depends totally on the version of lspci and it's
libraries. It's cosmetic.
Robson Ribeiro wrote:
Erik, the TDM2400 is not in conflict with other interrupts BUT, i saw
something very weird:
Lspci
:04:09.0 Ethernet controller: Digium, Inc.: Unknown device 2400 (rev
11)
Hi Tzafrir, i did update the PCI ID and now it shows::04:09.0 Ethernet controller: Digium, Inc. Wildcard TDM2400P (rev 11)
What do you get on zttest -v ?here is what i get on zttest -v:Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy...8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793%8192
Kerry:
I hope this helps.
I had EXACTLY the same symptom when I was trying to get an X100P clone
to work yesterday. Bumping the toneduration parameter in zapata.conf to
200 milliseconds cured the problem.
Roger
Kerry Garrison wrote:
Asterisk 1.2.1
Updated the TDM2400 driver over the
Thanks, I will try that.
-Kerry
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Hill
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 1:09 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM2400 wierdness
Kerry:
I
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Hill
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 1:09 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM2400 wierdness
Kerry:
I hope this helps.
I had EXACTLY the same symptom when I was trying to get
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger
Hill
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 1:09 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM2400 wierdness
Kerry:
I hope this helps.
I had EXACTLY the same
Hello folks !
TDM2400 with E for echocan module is ok for me, replacing my old passive
cards.
No more echo issues now. I had many before to switch to this wonderfull card
!
Perfect for my use...
Here is an Asterisk SVN-branch-1.2-r7608M, in an old PII-400 MHz
Linux version 2.6.12-1-686 (gcc
On 12/22/05, Guillermo Salas M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all, I was checking the TDM2400 features and seems to me very
interesating. I think is that I need :)
I want to know your experience with this card and if you know abouts
bugs, configuration and everithing thah I need to know before
Guillermo Salas M ha scritto:
Hi all, I was checking the TDM2400 features and seems to me very
interesating. I think is that I need :)
I want to know your experience with this card and if you know abouts
bugs, configuration and everithing thah I need to know before acquire
it :)
The
Massimo De Nadal wrote:
Works perfectly out of the box, almost for my customers :-)
The only note is to disable echo training.
Could you please elaborate which exact model you're using and what are
your opinion about the echo can/training quality? Have you tried spandsp
faxing?
Thanks in
34 matches
Mail list logo
