On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Benny Amorsen benny+use...@amorsen.dkwrote:
Gergo Csibra csi...@gmail.com writes:
Complaining about top posting on a list where's no moderation,
no sanction if somebody top posting is pointless.
There is a sanction. People like me will score top posters
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Christopher
Harrington
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 10:50 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Top
On 2 Jan 2013, at 15:54, Eric Wieling wrote:
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Benny Amorsen benny+use...@amorsen.dk
wrote:
There is a sanction. People like me will score top posters lower and
soon not see their posts at all.
I'm the opposite. I'm likely not to scroll down 10 pages to
] Top Posting
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Christopher
Harrington
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 10:50 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk
I'm the opposite. I'm likely not to scroll down 10 pages to see
the comments at the end.
Wouldn't need to if people trimmed their posts properly.
Precisely (e.g., see above)! Indeed, my sense is that top-posting
*discourages* properly trimming email and that's my main reason against it.
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Richard Kenner
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 10:00 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Top Posting
I'm the opposite. I'm
I'm the opposite. I'm likely not to scroll down 10 pages to see the
comments at the end.
Wouldn't need to if people trimmed their posts properly.
Precisely (e.g., see above)! Indeed, my sense is that top-posting
*discourages* properly trimming email and that's my main reason against it.
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Richard Kenner ken...@gnat.com wrote:
I'm the opposite. I'm likely not to scroll down 10 pages to see
the comments at the end.
Wouldn't need to if people trimmed their posts properly.
Precisely (e.g., see above)! Indeed, my sense is that top-posting
In this properly trimmed example, there's no record of who said what.
When it's relevant, I trim in such a way that that information is
preserved. But I would *never* leave in a header, just the identification
of the person who typed that part. Most mailers, when you include text
from another
If things were properly trimmed, the email would be short enough that it
really doesn't matter that much if the new material is on the top or
bottom, but people who top-post and don't trim create really hard-to-follow
emails.
Not really true often times when people do the right thing
On 1/2/2013 11:30 AM, Richard Kenner wrote:
If things were properly trimmed, the email would be short enough that it
really doesn't matter that much if the new material is on the top or
bottom, but people who top-post and don't trim create really hard-to-follow
emails.
Not really true often
On 1/2/2013 12:00 PM, j...@millican.us wrote:
On 1/2/2013 11:30 AM, Richard Kenner wrote:
If things were properly trimmed, the email would be short enough
that it
really doesn't matter that much if the new material is on the top or
bottom, but people who top-post and don't trim create really
Grow up, follow the rules, have a good day.
JohnM
PS. Did not intend to imply that it was Steve that hijacked the thread, in
case anyone read my comment that way JohnM
Steve has waded through enough of these that he should be a hijacker.
--
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 12:00 PM, j...@millican.us j...@millican.us wrote:
On 1/2/2013 11:30 AM, Richard Kenner wrote:
If things were properly trimmed, the email would be short enough that it
really doesn't matter that much if the new material is on the top or
bottom, but people who top-post
On 1/2/2013 12:20 PM, Steve Totaro wrote:
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 12:00 PM, j...@millican.us j...@millican.us wrote:
On 1/2/2013 11:30 AM, Richard Kenner wrote:
If things were properly trimmed, the email would be short enough that it
really doesn't matter that much if the new material is on the
On 01/02/2013 12:20 PM, Steve Totaro wrote:
good one - me too !
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 12:00 PM, j...@millican.us j...@millican.us wrote:
On 1/2/2013 11:30 AM, Richard Kenner wrote:
If things were properly trimmed, the email would be short enough that it
really doesn't matter that much if
At 08:22 AM 1/2/2013, you wrote:
Wouldn't need to if people trimmed their posts properly.
Precisely (e.g., see above)! Indeed, my sense is that top-posting
*discourages* properly trimming email and that's my main reason against it.
If things were properly trimmed, the email would be short
It is not hard to follow the rules . If the nice folks at Digium took the
time to post rules we should at least TRY to follow them. If you do not like
the rules you can always petition Digium to change them but, taking up
bandwidth on the list in this all to frequent pissing match is a futile
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Ira i...@extrasensory.com wrote:
And I started communicating with a 2400 baud modem so trimming was a
necessity and a requirement of friendship.
Bah, spoiled kids. Mine was a 110 baud acoustic.
I think the Will Asterisk run on a Rasberry Pi thread the
On 1/2/2013 1:10 PM, Don Kelly wrote:
It is not hard to follow the rules . If the nice folks at Digium took the
time to post rules we should at least TRY to follow them. If you do not like
the rules you can always petition Digium to change them but, taking up
bandwidth on the list in this all
On 02/01/2013 1:11 PM, Carlos Alvarez wrote:
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Ira i...@extrasensory.com
mailto:i...@extrasensory.com wrote:
And I started communicating with a 2400 baud modem so trimming was
a necessity and a requirement of friendship.
Bah, spoiled kids. Mine was a
On 01/02/2013 07:11 PM, Carlos Alvarez wrote:
The number of questions posted here that are easily answered with a
search or which are far too basic and open (how do I make Asterisk work)
is very high these days, and that does kill a list. A lot of us are
interested in helping people who help
On 1/2/2013 Don Kelly wrote:
... what product/procedure/whatever would
enable me to follow and participate in bottom-posted discussions as it
doesn't appear that Outlook or gmail are very effective.
Umm, what about positioning the cursor below the previous post before
writing your reply in
On 01/02/2013 06:20 PM, Steve Totaro wrote:
I became a list member way before any such rule and never had to click
through and agree to these update ToS.
I am grandfathered in.
Just looked it up. I see my first post back in April 2003, yours in
September 2003 and Jon in March 2003. Wow you
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 12:25 PM, j...@millican.us j...@millican.us wrote:
On 1/2/2013 12:20 PM, Steve Totaro wrote:
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 12:00 PM, j...@millican.us j...@millican.us
wrote:
On 1/2/2013 11:30 AM, Richard Kenner wrote:
If things were properly trimmed, the email would be
Hi,
one more hint... (trying to translate the commands to english)
in Thunderbird open - Extras - Filter.. -
Filter-Name: enter Top Posting
Subject - Contains: enter Top Posting
Action: Delete
Markus
Am 02.01.2013 21:31, schrieb Steve Totaro:
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 12:25 PM,
On 01/02/2013 12:16 PM, Don Kelly wrote:
I don't think Outlook does what I'd like, so I'm not limiting my options. I
can use different email to keep track of the Asterisk lists.
Thunderbird (by default) bottom posts. And it does the nice indenting
and allows you to turn off that HTML crap...
On 01/02/2013 03:22 PM, Patrick Lists wrote:
On 01/02/2013 06:20 PM, Steve Totaro wrote:
I became a list member way before any such rule and never had to click
through and agree to these update ToS.
I am grandfathered in.
Just looked it up. I see my first post back in April 2003, yours in
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 3:46 PM, jon pounder j...@inline.net wrote:
On 01/02/2013 03:22 PM, Patrick Lists wrote:
On 01/02/2013 06:20 PM, Steve Totaro wrote:
I became a list member way before any such rule and never had to click
through and agree to these update ToS.
I am grandfathered in.
On 01/02/2013 03:35 PM, Jim Lucas wrote:
On 01/02/2013 12:16 PM, Don Kelly wrote:
I don't think Outlook does what I'd like, so I'm not limiting my
options. I
can use different email to keep track of the Asterisk lists.
Thunderbird (by default) bottom posts. And it does the nice indenting
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of jon pounder
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 2:57 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Top Posting
On 01/02/2013 03:35 PM, Jim Lucas wrote
On 01/02/2013 09:46 PM, jon pounder wrote:
On 01/02/2013 03:22 PM, Patrick Lists wrote:
On 01/02/2013 06:20 PM, Steve Totaro wrote:
I became a list member way before any such rule and never had to click
through and agree to these update ToS.
I am grandfathered in.
Just looked it up. I see
We should all top *AND* bottom post!
On 31 Dec 2012, at 06:03, isr...@gmail.com wrote:
Just my pitch in to post
From a blackberry you can only top post there is no way of bottom posting
So if I would have to wait to get to a computer to bottom post I would just
never answer
We should all
isr...@gmail.com writes:
Just my pitch in to post
From a blackberry you can only top post there is no way of bottom
posting
So if I would have to wait to get to a computer to bottom post I would
just never answer
Just delete the original post then. Not including context is perfectly
fine,
***
***
Until Monopolysoft fixes Outlook, I think we should Middle Post - Happy
New Year to New Zealand!
***
***
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live
My assembler may be a little bit rusty, but wouldn't -1 against rule #5 =
+1 for rule #5?
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every
Deleting everything would really confuse me
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Top Posting
We should all top *AND* bottom post!
On 31 Dec 2012, at 06:03, isr...@gmail.com wrote:
Just my pitch in to post
From a blackberry you can only top post there is no way of bottom
posting So if I would have to wait to get to a computer to bottom post
List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Top Posting
Tongue firmly in both cheeks? How do you do that?
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Steven Howes
Sent: Monday, December 31
I participate in a lot of lists and top posting is now the norm since
people want to see quickly if the message is worth reading.
If the poster wants to intersperse comments in the following text, they
announce that at the top so readers know to look further down.
Modern e-mail programs make it
On 12/30/2012 04:26 PM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
I participate in a lot of lists and top posting is now the norm since
people want to see quickly if the message is worth reading.
Isn't it a bit of a stretch to extrapolate your experience with your
lists to top posting being the norm? I am
Sunday, December 30, 2012, 5:13:30 PM, Patrick wrote:
On 12/30/2012 04:26 PM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
I participate in a lot of lists and top posting is now the norm since
people want to see quickly if the message is worth reading.
Isn't it a bit of a stretch to extrapolate your experience with
Gergo Csibra csi...@gmail.com writes:
Complaining about top posting on a list where's no moderation,
no sanction if somebody top posting is pointless.
There is a sanction. People like me will score top posters lower and
soon not see their posts at all.
It is often a quick way to see if it is
On 12/30/2012 03:54 PM, Benny Amorsen wrote:
Boy what an elitist attitude.
I have been on this list far longer than most people - long before
digium even existed and if you don't value what I have to say - well
just don't read it.
If you or your mail reader can't slice and dice a mailing
On Sun, 30 Dec 2012, jon pounder wrote:
If you or your mail reader can't slice and dice a mailing list the way
you want to see it well maybe its your opinions us top posters won't
miss, since clearly you are lacking the skills to even have your tools
format documents for you.
And let the
On 30/12/2012 11:13 AM, Patrick Lists wrote:
On 12/30/2012 04:26 PM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
I participate in a lot of lists and top posting is now the norm since
people want to see quickly if the message is worth reading.
Isn't it a bit of a stretch to extrapolate your experience with your
On 30/12/2012 3:54 PM, Benny Amorsen wrote:
Gergo Csibra csi...@gmail.com writes:
Complaining about top posting on a list where's no moderation,
no sanction if somebody top posting is pointless.
There is a sanction. People like me will score top posters lower and
soon not see their posts at
I have an idea! Instead of arguing over whether or not top posting or
bottom posting is the way to go, something that obviously no one will
*ever*agree on, why not move to Google Groups instead (or something
similar to
Google Groups).
When I post to Doubango's list, it's easy, there's no top or
Sorry for double posting, but I realized it was JIRA I spoke with Digium
about, not Google Groups and the mailing list... However, I do think it's
worth investigating or looking into alternatives that are more user
friendly and that can make it easier to communicate with everyone on the
list,
Yeah. I never really got the whole fanatical top vs bottom thing.
Whatever, I have answered way more than my fair share of free
questions (as in beer). The person asking was always quite happy to
get a meaningful and helpful reply, no matter where it was in the body
of the content.
Why people
I just wish that my biggest problem with Asterisk was top or bottom posting!
Ron
On 30/12/2012 9:45 PM, James Mortensen wrote:
Sorry for double posting, but I realized it was JIRA I spoke with
Digium about, not Google Groups and the mailing list... However, I do
think it's worth investigating
There's nothing wrong with the list. The current whining will die off and
things will be back to normal shortly. Meanwhile I was tempted to bin the
entire thread then realized there's some funny human psychology to be
laughed at.
Top posting to make a few people crazy. Normally I wouldn't.
...@lists.digium.com
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 19:58:20
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
Discussionasterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Reply-To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Top Posting
On Sat, 29 Dec 2012, Don Kelly wrote:
2. How do we change rule #5?
-1.
--
Thanks in advance,
-
Steve Edwards sedwa...@sedwards.com Voice: +1-760-468-3867 PST
Newline
On 30/12/2012, Steve Edwards wrote:
On Sat, 29 Dec 2012, Don Kelly wrote:
2. How do we change rule #5?
-1.
+ -1 from me too!
Ie I dislike top-posting on mailing lists and if a democratic approach was
taken to rule changes (I have no idea is this is the case?) then I would vote
I'm a +1 for the change, should it come to a vote.
I realize the benefits of bottom-posting, especially when posting inline.
But top-posting keeps things in reverse chronological order so any reader
could catch up quickly on any missed messages in the chain. A new reader
scrolls to the bottom and
I realize the benefits of bottom-posting, especially when posting
inline. But top-posting keeps things in reverse chronological order
so any reader could catch up quickly on any missed messages in the
chain. A new reader scrolls to the bottom and reads up.
What's there to catch up with if you
I suppose I'm one of the few people that remember the content of threads by
subject and easily catch up...
I'm also on my phone 99% of the time time and the way Gmail lays out emails
makes top-posting beneficial to me.
On Dec 29, 2012 8:57 PM, Richard Kenner ken...@gnat.com wrote:
I realize
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 1:54 AM, Alec Davis siva...@paradise.net.nz wrote:
What's with the occasional Un-Top-posting, there is no rule that says
you can't, http://www.asterisk.org/community/rules
Really? Why bring this up again? The last 60-some odd thread in January
wasn't long enough for
Really? Why bring this up again? The last 60-some odd
thread in January wasn't long enough for you? Or perhaps
you're just out looking to troll?From the page you linked:
5.Responses should be placed under the original quoted text.
Sorry my mistake, didn't read to bottom of the
How amusing that you follow that statement by being too lazy to trim
all of the irrelevant crud after your comment by pressing
ctrl-shift-end followed by delete. It works in Outlook.
Tom
This is the problem, everyone has a personal goal. One side wants fast
replies at the top, with no
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Cary Fitch
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 3:06 AM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Top Posting
How
- Non-Commercial
Discussionasterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Reply-To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Top Posting
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 02:31 +, James Miller wrote:
I hate to disagree but I find
On 01/19/2011 12:18 AM, randulo wrote:
Although there's no requisite mention of ${Horrible_Dictator}, can't
we pretend there was, call a Godwin and kill this subject?
That would fall under Quirk's Exception: Intentionally invoking Godwin's Law to
attempt to kill a thread is rarely successful.
On 01/19/2011 12:18 AM, randulo wrote:
Although there's no requisite mention of ${Horrible_Dictator}, can't
we pretend there was, call a Godwin and kill this subject?
11:39 Parker said
That would fall under Quirk's Exception: Intentionally invoking Godwin's
Law to attempt to kill a
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 6:47 PM, Don Kelly d...@donkelly.biz wrote:
11:39 Parker said
That would fall under Quirk's Exception: Intentionally invoking Godwin's
Law to attempt to kill a thread is rarely successful. :)
Didn't work this time :)
Slightly OT: why is the Gmail ad server, which is
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 2:37 PM, randulo rand...@randulo.com wrote:
Slightly OT: why is the Gmail ad server, which is usually all about
PBX, Asterisk, etc, now showing me Justin Beiber concert tickets on
this thread? Are they seeing it as that childish?
/r
Also OT: Google combines message
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Mark Deneen
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 1:43 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Top Posting
On Wed
On Jan 19, 2011, at 10:06 AM, C F wrote:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 9:47 PM, James Miller paramedi...@gmail.com wrote:
When you get over 500 emails a day on your blackberry you have make a
decision on what is or is not worth reading at that moment.
Its not lazy at all its cutting through the
Also OT: Google combines message context with your personal search
history to do ad targeting, so look in the mirror.
I just made that up, though.
Not your mirror - your cookies!
No, it's true! Now I'm seeing Untimate Black Hat SEO (yes misspelled
because Ultimate was too expensive)
I was
@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Top Posting
On 01/17/2011 08:26 PM, Matt Riddell wrote:
On 17/01/11 4:29 PM, jon pounder wrote:
Surely there is some mail client smart enough to be able to flip
around the levels of indenting so most recent is top or bottom. If
not quit bitching and make
On 11-01-18 04:22 AM, Andrew Thomas wrote:
Top posting? Who cares? Get a life!
Clearly not you, so why both even replying? At worst case it is just
redundant information for people, best case somebody reads the email
thread at starts bottom posting. I suggest taking a moment and
re-reading
mine :P
Have a nice day!
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Paul
Belanger
Sent: 18 January 2011 14:35
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Top
] On Behalf Of Paul
Belanger
Sent: 18 January 2011 14:35
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Top Posting
On 11-01-18 04:22 AM, Andrew Thomas wrote:
Top posting? Who cares? Get a life!
Clearly not you, so why both even replying? At worst case
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 15:18 +, Andrew Thomas wrote:
Why do I top post? Simple. I read every message in the thread - and if
there are 10 messages (for example) in that thread - then why should I
have to read them all over again on the last one?
Top posting is here - to stay!
Stop
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Andrew Thomas a...@datavox.co.uk wrote:
Why do I top post? Simple. I read every message in the thread - and if
there are 10 messages (for example) in that thread - then why should I
have to read them all over again on the last one?
That's not the alternative
I also agree this is a pointless discussion because, clearly, nobody is
willing to budge, and it has nothing to do with Asterisk.
Amen :)
[oh no, a bottom post]
If you have received this communication in error we would appreciate
you advising us either by telephone or return of e-mail. The
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Andrew Thomas
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 10:01 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Top Posting
I
I also agree this is a pointless discussion because, clearly, nobody is
willing to budge, and it has nothing to do with Asterisk.
Amen :)
It may yet have a point - another few hundred (thousand) of these and the
board will blacklist items with the words top post and bottom post :)
And maybe If
I'm top-posting this simply to be consistent with the previous couple posts.
I agree that top-posting is preferable for the reason that Andrew pointed
out and I prefer no trimming (other than signatures--especially legal
disclaimers, etc.) so I can delete every message except the most recent and
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 03:18:49PM -, Andrew Thomas wrote:
Why do I top post? Simple. I read every message in the thread - and if
there are 10 messages (for example) in that thread - then why should I
have to read them all over again on the last one?
You mean: why should I have to read
SEE THE BOTTOM :P
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Tzafrir
Cohen
Sent: 18 January 2011 16:18
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Top Posting
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011
On Tuesday 18 Jan 2011, Don Kelly wrote:
PLONK is retro--like bottom-posting :)
--Don
Retro? For those of us who actually know what PLONK means, it's hilarious.
The fact that some people *don't* know what it means only makes it doubly so.
Now, here is a link that those of us who remember a
Now this thread is really starting to annoy me
Dieses Video enthlt Content von WMG. Es ist in
deinem Land nicht verfgbar.
..for non
On Tuesday 18 Jan 2011, Don Kelly wrote:
PLONK is retro--like bottom-posting :)
--Don
boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of A J Stiles
Retro? For those of us who actually know what PLONK means, it's
hilarious.
Now, here is a link
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R1JXYgwwDeY
On 01/18/2011 10:18 AM, Andrew Thomas wrote:
Why do I top post? Simple. I read every message in the thread - and if
there are 10 messages (for example) in that thread - then why should I
have to read them all over again on the last one?
OK, this is a stupid thread, nobody is going to be
I've been working with computers for over 40 years and don't have the
foggiest notion how the Green Day--Wake Me Up When September Ends video
applies to Top Posting.
It's a reference to the Everlasting September in 1993. AOL added
usenet access to its service, unleashing a horde of dirty,
I've been working with computers for over 40 years and don't have the
foggiest notion how the Green Day--Wake Me Up When September Ends video
applies to Top Posting.
It's a reference to the Everlasting September in 1993. AOL added
usenet access to its service, unleashing a horde of dirty,
Tom Rymes wrote:
On 01/18/2011 10:18 AM, Andrew Thomas wrote:
Why do I top post? Simple. I read every message in the thread - and if
there are 10 messages (for example) in that thread - then why should I
have to read them all over again on the last one?
OK, this is a stupid thread, nobody
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 18:17:31 +0200
Tzafrir Cohen tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com wrote:
It is interesting to note that your mailer (MS-Outlook) has very bad
support for threading. In fact, it (combined with the MS-Exchange
server) does not really bother reproducing the mail headers that are
required
On Jan 18, 2011, at 6:42 PM, Chad Wallace wrote:
We need to ban all versions of outlook until microsoft decides to fix
it.
Amen.
Chris
--
-
Chris Owen - Garden City (620) 275-1900 - Lottery (noun):
President
On 11-01-18 07:42 PM, Chad Wallace wrote:
We need to ban all versions of outlook until microsoft decides to fix
it.
Moderation would be another option (personally opinion). Regardless, we
should all now be aware of the rules [1] of the mailing lists. All we
can do now is hope people respect
Paul Belanger wrote:
Moderation would be another option (personally opinion). Regardless,
we should all now be aware of the rules [1] of the mailing lists.
All we can do now is hope people respect them.
[1] http://www.asterisk.org/community/rules
--
Paul Belanger
Digium, Inc. |
Although there's no requisite mention of ${Horrible_Dictator}, can't
we pretend there was, call a Godwin and kill this subject?
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us
On Sunday 16 January 2011 21:18:54 William Kenworthy wrote:
Peoples email clients, work habits and environment mean that people to
work the way thats comfortable to them. You want your mails read, you
work with them, not get on a soap box and say YOU MUST BOTTOM POST.
That was exactly my
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Tilghman
Lesher
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 11:53 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Top Posting
List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Top Posting
On Sunday 16 January 2011 21:18:54 William Kenworthy wrote:
Peoples email clients, work habits and environment mean that people to
work the way thats comfortable to them. You want your mails read, you
work with them
On 17/01/11 4:29 PM, jon pounder wrote:
Surely there is some mail client smart enough to be able to flip around
the levels of indenting so most recent is top or bottom.
If not quit bitching and make one - I will continue top posting since I
don't seem to be alone in preferring it.
I'm
On 01/17/2011 08:26 PM, Matt Riddell wrote:
On 17/01/11 4:29 PM, jon pounder wrote:
Surely there is some mail client smart enough to be able to flip around
the levels of indenting so most recent is top or bottom.
If not quit bitching and make one - I will continue top posting since I
don't seem
Shaun Ruffell sruffell at digium.com writes:
Whatever your preferred style, the following post is at least worth
considering.
http://brooksreview.net/2011/01/interleaved-email/
My belief is that it would be nearly impossible for me to follow a high
volume list if top posting was the
1 - 100 of 185 matches
Mail list logo
