Michael Cargile wrote:
Another reason I am sure that Digium has not released a DS3 TDM card is
the fact that asterisk currently cannot handle that many channels. I am
speaking from experience on this. We have build before a predictive
dialer with 16 PRIs. In order to do this and not have
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 2:01 AM, Alex Balashov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Cargile wrote:
Another reason I am sure that Digium has not released a DS3 TDM card is
the fact that asterisk currently cannot handle that many channels. I am
speaking from experience on this. We have build
Steve Totaro wrote:
A T3 MUXed into 28 T1 PRIs in one, or a few trunk groups inherently
has redundancy. If a box dies, the calls are dropped (unless you are
doing reinvite) and any call backs go right to the
Ts that are not in alarm.
True - and if you're simply using CT3 as an economical
On Sun, 6 Apr 2008 17:22:58 -0400, Jay R. Ashworth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Yes, I've seen that, and most of its arguments are specious, at best.
They amount to I am too stupid to find a mail user agent with List
Reply, and too lazy to switch to it.
Are there any MUAs (other than Microsoft's
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 2:46 AM, Alex Balashov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Totaro wrote:
A T3 MUXed into 28 T1 PRIs in one, or a few trunk groups inherently
has redundancy. If a box dies, the calls are dropped (unless you are
doing reinvite) and any call backs go right to the
Ts
Tilghman Lesher [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And the arguments on the other side come down to I'm using an ISP
which can't correctly configure their mailserver, and I'm too lazy to set one
up myself.
How can the mail server fix a broken reply-to? It can remove it of
course, but that is rather
Steve Totaro wrote:
7 HP DL320s, RAID 1 with Quad Sangoma. Not a dozen but more than
twice that, 28 T1s. What is your cheaper solution? Also, have two
cold spares in the rack. DL 320s are cheap and rarely fail using
1.2.X. I actually cannot remember a single failure over years of
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 02:46:48AM -0400, Alex Balashov wrote:
The point is that most people that want a DS3 interface really do want
to pump in a DS3's worth of calls, more or less, in which case they
really can't afford to have those DS1s going spare just for redundancy's
sake. And if
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 10:48:34AM +0100, Horwich IT Services wrote:
On Sun, 6 Apr 2008 17:22:58 -0400, Jay R. Ashworth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Yes, I've seen that, and most of its arguments are specious, at best.
They amount to I am too stupid to find a mail user agent with List
Reply,
On Mon, 7 Apr 2008 11:35:43 -0400, Jay R. Ashworth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Question is: does Mailman *set* it?
Yes.
--
Godwin Stewart - Horwich IT services
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users
On Monday 07 April 2008 07:05, Benny Amorsen wrote:
Tilghman Lesher [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And the arguments on the other side come down to I'm using an ISP
which can't correctly configure their mailserver, and I'm too lazy to set
one up myself.
How can the mail server fix a broken
On April 7, 2008 02:01:08 am Alex Balashov wrote:
A Lucent TNT Max outfitted with _plethoric_ VFCs might work okay. Apex
too, perhaps. Haven't tried to see how much it can handle when TDM-RTP
translation is required.
I'm curious; are the cpu/tdm/dsp requirements for 672 g729 rtp streams that
Andrew Kohlsmith (lists) wrote:
On April 7, 2008 02:01:08 am Alex Balashov wrote:
A Lucent TNT Max outfitted with _plethoric_ VFCs might work okay. Apex
too, perhaps. Haven't tried to see how much it can handle when TDM-RTP
translation is required.
I'm curious; are the cpu/tdm/dsp
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 10:46 AM, Alex Balashov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Totaro wrote:
7 HP DL320s, RAID 1 with Quad Sangoma. Not a dozen but more than
twice that, 28 T1s. What is your cheaper solution? Also, have two
cold spares in the rack. DL 320s are cheap and rarely fail
Steve Totaro wrote:
Nobody said anything about unused DS1s except you. Please re-read the thread.
Perhaps I misunderstood?
What you appeared to imply in regards to the failover benefits of having
T1s broken out of an M13 mux into multiple gateway machines is that if
one of the gateways go
Andrew Kohlsmith (lists) wrote:
On April 7, 2008 02:01:08 am Alex Balashov wrote:
A Lucent TNT Max outfitted with _plethoric_ VFCs might work okay. Apex
too, perhaps. Haven't tried to see how much it can handle when TDM-RTP
translation is required.
I'm curious; are the
On Sunday 06 April 2008 02:01:49 Matt Darnell wrote:
Any know what Digium hasn't released the DS3 card?
It was supposed to be out a while ago.
There was a fundamental problem with the chipset used, which precluded the
card from being useful. Specifically, the chipset only permitted the first
ok - but has a new release date be announced ?
or
Has Digium officially dropped the product ?
Steve Totaro wrote:
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 3:47 AM, Tilghman Lesher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 06 April 2008 02:01:49 Matt Darnell wrote:
Any know what Digium hasn't released the DS3
On 4/6/08, Tilghman Lesher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 06 April 2008 02:01:49 Matt Darnell wrote:
Any know what Digium hasn't released the DS3 card?
It was supposed to be out a while ago.
There was a fundamental problem with the chipset used, which precluded the
card from being
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 3:47 AM, Tilghman Lesher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 06 April 2008 02:01:49 Matt Darnell wrote:
Any know what Digium hasn't released the DS3 card?
It was supposed to be out a while ago.
There was a fundamental problem with the chipset used, which
On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 05:37:03AM -0400, Steve Totaro wrote:
There was a fundamental problem with the chipset used, which precluded the
card from being useful. Specifically, the chipset only permitted the first
255 channels to be addressed (instead of the full 672). Since that time,
and
On Sunday 06 April 2008 04:48:19 Al Baker wrote:
ok - but has a new release date be announced ?
or
Has Digium officially dropped the product ?
Once again, Digium does not announce products until they are ready to ship,
drivers included. Therefore, I cannot say, either way.
--
Tilghman
On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 09:44:30AM -0500, Tilghman Lesher wrote:
On Sunday 06 April 2008 04:48:19 Al Baker wrote:
ok - but has a new release date be announced ?
or
Has Digium officially dropped the product ?
Once again, Digium does not announce products until they are ready to ship,
Another reason I am sure that Digium has not released a DS3 TDM card is the
fact that asterisk currently cannot handle that many channels. I am speaking
from experience on this. We have build before a predictive dialer with 16
PRIs. In order to do this and not have audio quality issues we had to
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 10:44 AM, Tilghman Lesher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 06 April 2008 04:48:19 Al Baker wrote:
ok - but has a new release date be announced ?
or
Has Digium officially dropped the product ?
Once again, Digium does not announce products until they are ready
Should have read, I cannot recommend the Atran MX2800 M13 *enough*
Two controller cards, two power supplies, battery backup, this is a
nice little box.
It will probably be the most solid piece of equipment in your data center.
Thanks,
Steve Tototaro
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Steve
On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 11:12:33AM -0400, Steve Totaro wrote:
I cannot recommend the Adtran MX2800 M13, it has redundant everything
and is very easy to setup and not very expensive either.
We'll assume you meant that you can't recommend them enough. :-)
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth
I cannot recommend the Adtran MX2800 M13, it has redundant everything
and is very easy to setup and not very expensive either.
Thanks,
Steve Totaro
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Michael Cargile [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another reason I am sure that Digium has not released a DS3 TDM card is
On Sunday 06 April 2008 10:13:43 Steve Totaro wrote:
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 10:44 AM, Tilghman Lesher wrote:
On Sunday 06 April 2008 04:48:19 Al Baker wrote:
ok - but has a new release date be announced ?
or
Has Digium officially dropped the product ?
Once again, Digium does
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 11:58 AM, Tilghman Lesher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 06 April 2008 10:13:43 Steve Totaro wrote:
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 10:44 AM, Tilghman Lesher wrote:
On Sunday 06 April 2008 04:48:19 Al Baker wrote:
ok - but has a new release date be announced ?
http://www.vicidial.com/On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Tzafrir Cohen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've already connected ~600 analog extensions to Asterisk and we were
far from reaching the bottlenecks. We have used a machine that is hardly
a top-of-the line server (a dual-core Dell machine),
On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 12:12:17PM -0400, Michael Cargile wrote:
http://www.vicidial.com/On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Tzafrir Cohen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(Off-list, and not expecting an on-list reply)
We've already connected ~600 analog extensions to Asterisk and we were
far
On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 10:58:56AM -0500, Tilghman Lesher wrote:
Was this policy put in place after announcing the DS3 dud?
The policy was put into place for a number of reasons, the main one being that
it's generally a good idea and is therefore pretty industry standard.
Two words: Osborne
On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 07:38:06PM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 12:12:17PM -0400, Michael Cargile wrote:
http://www.vicidial.com/On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Tzafrir Cohen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(Off-list, and not expecting an on-list reply)
Ooh, geee: Why
On Sunday 06 April 2008 11:45:51 Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 07:38:06PM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 12:12:17PM -0400, Michael Cargile wrote:
http://www.vicidial.com/On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Tzafrir
Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 12:12:17PM -0400, Michael Cargile wrote:
http://www.vicidial.com/On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Tzafrir Cohen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(Off-list, and not expecting an on-list reply)
Sorry about that not used to gmail. :-)
Michael Cargile
Director of Consulting
The Vicidial Group
www.vicidial.com
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 12:45 PM, Jay R. Ashworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 07:38:06PM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 12:12:17PM
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
While I don't have your experince, I would still speculate that even for
trunks the average capacity is not ther same load as that of a
predictive dialer.
This is very true.
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Michael Cargile [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
While I don't have your experince, I would still speculate that even for
trunks the average capacity is not ther same load as that of a
Tilghman Lesher [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oh, please, don't start THAT flame war. People who consider Reply-To
munging harmful have obviously failed to read the ENTIRE rfc (especially
the part where it specifically says the use of the Reply-To header is for use
on listservs). :-P
It's
On April 6, 2008 11:12:33 am Steve Totaro wrote:
I cannot recommend the Adtran MX2800 M13, it has redundant everything
and is very easy to setup and not very expensive either.
Agreed; I've set these up and they are rock effing solid. We did have a shelf
controller die and without the backup
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 4:28 PM, Benny Amorsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tilghman Lesher [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oh, please, don't start THAT flame war. People who consider Reply-To
munging harmful have obviously failed to read the ENTIRE rfc (especially
the part where it specifically
On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 05:02:53PM -0400, Steve Totaro wrote:
http://www.metasystema.net/essays/reply-to.mhtml
Wildefires are harmful to forests and aniaml life but are essentially
a good thing in the balance and cycles of nature. It all depends on
your viewpoint.
Yes, I've seen that, and
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 4:28 PM, Benny Amorsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tilghman Lesher [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oh, please, don't start THAT flame war. People who consider Reply-To
munging harmful have obviously failed to read the ENTIRE rfc (especially
the part where it specifically
On Sunday 06 April 2008 15:56:22 Steve Totaro wrote:
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 4:28 PM, Benny Amorsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Tilghman Lesher [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oh, please, don't start THAT flame war. People who consider Reply-To
munging harmful have obviously failed to read the
On Sunday 06 April 2008 16:22:58 Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 05:02:53PM -0400, Steve Totaro wrote:
http://www.metasystema.net/essays/reply-to.mhtml
Wildefires are harmful to forests and aniaml life but are essentially
a good thing in the balance and cycles of nature.
46 matches
Mail list logo
