Hello
I'm using Atheros 9280 device.
I find interesting mailing list message about WoW.
-
Title:[PATCH v4 00/10] Add support for WOW in ath9k
Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan Tue, 10 Jul 2012 02:23:08 -0700
You should look at minstrel_ht code. there you can set specific rate at all
retry stages. But I think you should care about the error level, because
high error rates decreases Aggregate frame length consequently shows very
little throughput that may be not tolerable for your application.
Ahmad Showail wrote:
If possible, do you have a pointer to the regulatory limit that you mentioned?
I tried searching online, but couldn't find anything. The 802.11 standard
document defines the maximum length of A-MPDU to 65 535 bytes. It states that
the A-MPDU size may further be limited by
Francisco Cuesta wrote:
I was using that command, but I had understood that some channels were
available on the device even though they didn't appear with that command. For
instance, if the version of iw is older that the running hardware those
channels wouldn't be shown, am I mistaken?
iw
Hi all,
thanks for all your replies. Let me tell my findings just in case
it helps.
* adrian.ch...@gmail.com [mailto:adrian.ch...@gmail.com] wrote:
The general consensus at work is - BIOSes are buggy and don't
necessarily reset the PCI bus correctly.
So either you can do your own PCI bus
On Mar 28, 2013, at 4:32 AM, shinnazar wrote:
You should look at minstrel_ht code. there you can set specific rate at all
retry stages. But I think you should care about the error level, because
high error rates decreases Aggregate frame length consequently shows very
little throughput that
Which test modes are you after?
adrian
On 28 March 2013 10:45, John Clark jeclark2...@aim.com wrote:
On Mar 28, 2013, at 4:32 AM, shinnazar wrote:
You should look at minstrel_ht code. there you can set specific rate at all
retry stages. But I think you should care about the error level,
Hello,
I get a weak signal and dropped connections with AR9485 wireless card and
the ath9k driver on Ubuntu 12.10. The same device booted to Win8 has good
performance along with other devices connected to the same access point.
Below are the details of my setup. If anyone can confirm that AR9485
On 03/28/2013 04:04 PM, Steffen Dettmer wrote:
I talked with an expert of my unit about resetting PCI express
cards. The units have a special controller (I^2C) able to power
off and power on the card slots. I was told that this does not
handle the PCI reset line correctly (leaves it open),
On 2013-03-27 7:49 PM, John Clark wrote:
Many people seem to desire the bit rate to be the 'highest possible',
and have that automagically set.
What's wrong with the current behavior of picking the rate that causes
the least wasted airtime?
For some applications, I like to be able to set a
On Mar 28, 2013, at 11:19 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Which test modes are you after?
I'd like to be able to 'turn on' transmitter continuously, with all subcarriers
at max power, to then determine channel power.
This is a test mode, and not an operational mode.
Fixing the bit rate, loading up
On Mar 28, 2013, at 12:00 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
On 2013-03-27 7:49 PM, John Clark wrote:
Many people seem to desire the bit rate to be the 'highest possible',
and have that automagically set.
What's wrong with the current behavior of picking the rate that causes
the least wasted airtime?
On 28 March 2013 10:54, Ilya Bernshteyn ily...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I get a weak signal and dropped connections with AR9485 wireless card and
the ath9k driver on Ubuntu 12.10. The same device booted to Win8 has good
performance along with other devices connected to the same access point.
On 28 March 2013 12:29, John Clark jeclark2...@aim.com wrote:
On Mar 28, 2013, at 11:19 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Which test modes are you after?
I'd like to be able to 'turn on' transmitter continuously, with all
subcarriers at max power, to then determine channel power.
This is a test
How far away from the AP are you?
50 feet
What's the make/model of the AP?
* Manufacturer: NETGEAR, Inc.
* Model: WNDR3300
* Model Number: WNDR3300
Are you able to record signal level versus distance
I can be more exact if really necessary, but at 50 feet, it's slow, but
doesn't drop. At
On 28 March 2013 13:05, Ilya Bernshteyn ily...@gmail.com wrote:
I can be more exact if really necessary, but at 50 feet, it's slow, but
doesn't drop. At 100 feet, it's unusable -- drops/reconnects every minute.
What's the signal level at 50ft?
I'm just trying to establish a basic
What's the signal level at 50ft?
Link Quality=31/70 Signal level=-79 dBm
And here are some more data points...
0 feet: Link Quality=61/70 Signal level=-49 dBm
10 feet: Link Quality=37/70 Signal level=-73 dBm
20 feet: Link Quality=30/70 Signal level=-80
Yeah, that looks almost like a disconnected antenna.
Don't suppose you've ever opened the laptop up? :-) Or can get at the
wifi NIC to see if both antennas are connected?
Adrian
On 28 March 2013 13:42, Ilya Bernshteyn ily...@gmail.com wrote:
What's the signal level at 50ft?
Link
Yes I've opened it to add a memory chip. I can open it up again and take a
look. I upgraded the memory within 2 days of getting the laptop so I don't
even remember how the signal strength was before and after if it's possible
that I somehow disconnected an antenna.
Thanks,
Ilya
On Thu, Mar 28,
On 28 March 2013 13:48, Ilya Bernshteyn ily...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes I've opened it to add a memory chip. I can open it up again and take a
look. I upgraded the memory within 2 days of getting the laptop so I don't
even remember how the signal strength was before and after if it's possible
that
Well, a quick search of AR9485 in bugzilla shows I'm not the first with
this issue.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49201
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55171
Doesn't look like anyone is in a hurry to fix it. Say I wanted to take a
stab at submitting a patch, any
On 28 March 2013 15:19, Ilya Bernshteyn ily...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, a quick search of AR9485 in bugzilla shows I'm not the first with
this issue.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49201
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55171
Doesn't look like anyone is in a hurry to
Bug submitted. If I can help test, please let me know.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55901
Thank you for your help.
Ilya
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 28 March 2013 15:19, Ilya Bernshteyn ily...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, a quick
Hi,
If you able to add small piece of code to the driver, you can do the following:
Construct a single aggregate with desired parameters, NoAck bit set and 1 retry
count in the first retry series. Link last descriptor of the aggregate to the
first and drop this bomb into any TX queue. The
24 matches
Mail list logo
