On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 23:16:57 +, David Powell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've updated my Atom to RDF/XML XSLT transform to implement draft-06.
Great stuff!
I've updated links etc. accordingly at:
http://semtext.org/atom/
Anything needs adding there, please let me know.
Cheers,
Danny.
Hi, I just looked at Lawrence Lessig's presentation to the Library of
Congress [1],
and noticed his blog that shows Yahoo! search launching a creative
commons search
engine [2].
Clearly it would be very helpful if there were a machine readable way
to set copyright
policy on entries. Any
well, we did something similar with p3p, metadata consisting of a a vocab,
either associated with a namespace element, or with an html method.
during the life of the drm wg i discussed the possibility of a similar
mechanism to express some drm metadata.
from my pov, p3p already expresses
There are several RSS feeds out there that have dates where the day is
accurate but the time is always the same (usually 10am for some
reason), regardless of the time of publication, which completely messes
up sorting the day's entries. Currently the Atom spec implies that this
is bad practice
Henry Story wrote:
Yahoo! search launching a creative commons search engine ... it would be
very helpful if there were a machine readable way to set copyright
policy on entries.
I recently wrote on my blog about issues with Creative Commons. I
suggest you read the post. See:
On Mar 25, 2005, at 5:47 AM, Graham wrote:
Proposal: Add to Date Construct section:
Date values must have a granularity of one second
Could we make this a SHOULD? Whereas Graham is correct in the normal
case, I have an alternate scenario at 'ongoing'. Normally, the
updated comes from the
Currently we have this
A Date construct is an element whose content MUST conform to the
date-time BNF rule in [RFC3339]. I.e., the content of this element
matches this regular expression:
[0-9]{8}T[0-9]{2}:[0-9]{2}:[0-9]{2}(\.[0-9]+)
?(Z|[\+\-][0-9]{2}:[0-9]{2})
As a
Sounds like a plan to me. +1.
Robert Sayre
Graham wrote:
Currently we have this
A Date construct is an element whose content MUST conform to the
date-time BNF rule in [RFC3339]. I.e., the content of this element
matches this regular expression:
Bob Wyman wrote:
Henry Story wrote:
Yahoo! search launching a creative commons search engine ... it would be
very helpful if there were a machine readable way to set copyright
policy on entries.
..
So, in summary, let's not go down the DRM path. It is a snake pit
1. Why are these two statements in the same paragraph?
The content of an atom:id element MUST be created in a way that
assures uniqueness; it is suggested that the atom:id element be
stored along with the associated resource.
Storage assures persistence but does nothing to improve
On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 13:47:29 +, Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are several RSS feeds out there that have dates where the day is
accurate but the time is always the same (usually 10am for some
reason), regardless of the time of publication, which completely messes
up sorting the
On Mar 25, 2005, at 14:41, Henry Story wrote:
Clearly it would be very helpful if there were a machine readable way
to set copyright
policy on entries. Any thoughts on that?
Legalese is complicated enough that it cannot be fully expressed in
machine readable form unless the machine is
John Panzer wrote:
an example of an
obvious-to-the-practitioner-skilled-in-the-art indicator of a CC license for
Atom:
link
rel=license href=""
href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/
/
which of course
also extends to whatever
+1 on dropping the regex. It isn't from any of the other specs,
it isn't specifically called out as explanatory and non-normative,
and it is too long to be clear.
Some examples would be nice, along with some examples of things
which do not conform.
wunder
--On March 25, 2005 5:11:09 PM +
Henry Story wrote:
Clearly it would be very helpful if there were a machine readable way to
set copyright
policy on entries. Any thoughts on that?
This is not an appropriate time to discuss design changes. Please limit
list traffic to specific editorial suggestions and bug reports.
Robert Sayre
On Mar 25, 2005, at 18:38, Bob Wyman wrote:
http://bobwyman.pubsub.com/main/2005/03/lazyweb_query_a.html
The basic message is that we should not be writing anything that
implies that Creative Commons should be used for Digital Rights
Management.
+1
BTW, I think the anti-DRM clause of CC
16 matches
Mail list logo
