Re: Additional 'namespace' attribute on content element?

2007-01-05 Thread Martin Duerst
At 16:13 07/01/05, Asbj\x8F\xD3n Ulsberg wrote: On Thu, 04 Jan 2007 17:00:29 +0100, Jan Algermissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: on the NewsML list, an issue came up that due to they lack of a MIME type for NewsML using NewsML as Atom content is somewhat problematic[1]; I think this is the

Re: Additional 'namespace' attribute on content element?

2007-01-05 Thread Henri Sivonen
On Jan 5, 2007, at 09:47, Martin Duerst wrote: So I think that Atom is a bit out on it's egde if it says 'if you don't have a +xml Mime Type, you're not XML'. No, Atom says that if you don't use application/xml or an +xml type, you don't get to use an embedded subtree and your format gets

Re: Additional 'namespace' attribute on content element?

2007-01-05 Thread A. Pagaltzis
* James Aylett [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-01-04 18:55]: I don't see a big difference between dispatch on namespace of child of content (which is, I believe, legal in Atom 1.0) and dispatch on namespace attribute on content (which is what I think you're proposing). Except when there is nothing

Re: Additional 'namespace' attribute on content element?

2007-01-05 Thread Mark Baker
On 1/4/07, Jan Algermissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I recall Mark Baker using something similar in his former RDF Forms draft: rf:Container xmlns:rf=http://www.markbaker.ca/2003/rdfforms/; xmlns:rdf=http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#;

Re: Additional 'namespace' attribute on content element?

2007-01-05 Thread Asbjørn Ulsberg
On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 13:26:46 +0100, Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Atom is quite reasonable here. An XML vocabulary that doesn't have a MIME type that follows the convention *and* doesn't have a namespace is itself a badly-behaved XML vocabulary. My point exactly. -- Asbjørn

Re: Additional 'namespace' attribute on content element?

2007-01-05 Thread Jan Algermissen
Hi Mark, On Jan 5, 2007, at 6:21 PM, Mark Baker wrote: On 1/4/07, Jan Algermissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I recall Mark Baker using something similar in his former RDF Forms draft: rf:Container xmlns:rf=http://www.markbaker.ca/2003/rdfforms/;

Additional 'namespace' attribute on content element?

2007-01-04 Thread Jan Algermissen
Hi, on the NewsML list, an issue came up that due to they lack of a MIME type for NewsML using NewsML as Atom content is somewhat problematic[1]; I think this is the case with most of the more interesting XML applications out there. Is there any chance to extend/revise Atom to allow an

Re: Additional 'namespace' attribute on content element?

2007-01-04 Thread James M Snell
Jan Algermissen wrote: Hi, on the NewsML list, an issue came up that due to they lack of a MIME type for NewsML using NewsML as Atom content is somewhat problematic[1]; I think this is the case with most of the more interesting XML applications out there. Is there any chance to

Re: Additional 'namespace' attribute on content element?

2007-01-04 Thread James Holderness
Jan Algermissen wrote: on the NewsML list, an issue came up that due to they lack of a MIME type for NewsML using NewsML as Atom content is somewhat problematic[1]; From my brief reading of the thread, I got the impression that NewsML did have a media type (text/vnd.IPTC.NewsML) - it just

Re: Additional 'namespace' attribute on content element?

2007-01-04 Thread James Aylett
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 08:00:29AM -0800, Jan Algermissen wrote: Is there any chance to extend/revise Atom to allow an attribute on the content element that allows to specify the namespace of XML content given the MIME type is declared as application/xml or text/xml? What is the opinion

Re: Additional 'namespace' attribute on content element?

2007-01-04 Thread Asbjørn Ulsberg
On Thu, 04 Jan 2007 17:00:29 +0100, Jan Algermissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: on the NewsML list, an issue came up that due to they lack of a MIME type for NewsML using NewsML as Atom content is somewhat problematic[1]; I think this is the case with most of the more interesting XML