Re: Autodiscovery paces

2005-05-10 Thread Mark Pilgrim
On 5/9/05, Nikolas Coukouma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceAnchorSupport Autodicovery elements MAY appear in either the head or the body of the document. I believe this is incorrect. IIRC, link elements may only appear in the head, and a elements may only

Re: Autodiscovery paces

2005-05-10 Thread Anne van Kesteren
Nikolas Coukouma wrote: http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceAnchorSupport +1 with the same remark as Mark Pilgrim. http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceDifferentRelValue +1 if it is extended to support alternate as well when the feed really is the alternate version of the page. That

Re: Autodiscovery paces

2005-05-10 Thread Anne van Kesteren
Robert Sayre wrote: http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceDifferentRelValue +1 if it is extended to support alternate as well when the feed really is the alternate version of the page. That would be a requirement for page authors. Feed readers don't have to check that and can fetch every feed

Re: Autodiscovery paces

2005-05-10 Thread Graham
On 10 May 2005, at 3:38 am, Nikolas Coukouma wrote: http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceAnchorSupport -1 I also don't want to implement it. http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceDifferentRelValue -1 I mainly don't see the point of changing it. Also, while alternate expressly says the

Re: Autodiscovery paces

2005-05-10 Thread Eric Scheid
On 11/5/05 1:41 AM, Robert Sayre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't understand what the feed relation indicates. What benefit does it have over a href=... type=application/atom+xml.../a It indicates that the @href resource is a feed in the sense that it is a source of notifications of

Re: Autodiscovery paces

2005-05-10 Thread Thomas Broyer
Eric Scheid wrote: On 11/5/05 1:41 AM, Robert Sayre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't understand what the feed relation indicates. What benefit does it have over a href=... type=application/atom+xml.../a It indicates that the @href resource is a feed in the sense that it is a source of

Re: Autodiscovery paces

2005-05-10 Thread Robert Sayre
There's no reason for any of the ideas in this thread to be in the same draft as the concepts outlined in autodiscovery-01. Stamp Out Creativity Now. I'm strongly opposed to letting this draft turn into a vast metropolis of bikesheds, where we have 60-message threads on the right way to use HTML

Re: Autodiscovery paces

2005-05-10 Thread Eric Scheid
On 11/5/05 2:24 AM, Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceDifferentRelValue -1 I mainly don't see the point of changing it. The point is that just using 'alternate' is hideously ambiguous, and leads to interoperability problems because you cannot rely

Re: Autodiscovery paces

2005-05-10 Thread Eric Scheid
On 11/5/05 1:20 PM, Eric Scheid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also, while alternate expressly says the feed corresponds in some way to the content of the current page, feed simply says here is a feed of some kind, and isn't a relationship at all. Depends on how you read the word 'feed'. It can

Re: Autodiscovery paces

2005-05-10 Thread Eric Scheid
On 11/5/05 1:18 AM, Mark Pilgrim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceDifferentRelValue +0. Part of my newfound personal definition of a life well-lived is to never again argue about semantics, markup, or the correct way to use them. This Pace will break