Re: Why is alternate link a MUST?

been addressed before, could someone point me to the thread in the list archives? David -- == David Nesting WL7RO Fastolfe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://fastolfe.net/ == fastolfe.net/me/pgp-key A054 47B1 6D4C E97A D882 C41F 3065 57D9 832F AB01

Re: Why is alternate link a MUST?

and actually back an IETF standard syndication format for these purposes. The RSS implementations have just been proofs of concept at this point. Thanks for your time. David -- == David Nesting WL7RO Fastolfe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://fastolfe.net/ == fastolfe.net/me/pgp-key A054 47B1 6D4C E97A D882

Re: Why is alternate link a MUST?

because RSS does it. Why does RSS require it? Maybe we can start there. David -- == David Nesting WL7RO Fastolfe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://fastolfe.net/ == fastolfe.net/me/pgp-key A054 47B1 6D4C E97A D882 C41F 3065 57D9 832F AB01

Re: Autodiscovery

? David -- == David Nesting WL7RO Fastolfe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://fastolfe.net/ == fastolfe.net/me/pgp-key A054 47B1 6D4C E97A D882 C41F 3065 57D9 832F AB01

Re: the atom:copyright element

--say, secret.) I intended to use the copyright tag for that, because its semantics seemed closest to what I need. But now that someone else brought the issue up, I figured I'd offer my opinion. David -- == David Nesting WL7RO Fastolfe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://fastolfe.net/ == fastolfe.net/me

Re: PaceFeedIdOrSelf

to the feed's location. David -- == David Nesting WL7RO Fastolfe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://fastolfe.net/ == fastolfe.net/me/pgp-key A054 47B1 6D4C E97A D882 C41F 3065 57D9 832F AB01

Re: Which is the preferred feed?

always attach some caching headers to that 302 response to indicate that the 302 is semi-permanent. In theory, user agents could hold on to that 302 response for a little while and follow the cached redirection. David -- == David Nesting WL7RO Fastolfe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://fastolfe.net

Re: PaceFeedIdOrSelf

://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI.html -- == David Nesting WL7RO Fastolfe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://fastolfe.net/ == fastolfe.net/me/pgp-key A054 47B1 6D4C E97A D882 C41F 3065 57D9 832F AB01

Re: Fetch Me A Rock

place the emphasis of its processing on the summary. The feed as a whole is still valid, however, and it's expected that processors will handle entries that DO have summaries in the same feed as entries that do NOT. David -- == David Nesting WL7RO Fastolfe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://fastolfe.net

Re: Question on Use Case: Choosing atom:content's type when ArchivingMailing Lists

what I'm gaining by starting with Atom in the first place. David -- == David Nesting WL7RO Fastolfe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://fastolfe.net/ == fastolfe.net/me/pgp-key A054 47B1 6D4C E97A D882 C41F 3065 57D9 832F AB01

Re: IE7 Feed Rendering Issue

On 3/8/06, James Yenne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My counterpoint is that this is non-standard approach because the xml-stylesheet directive isa standard XML directive, and IE7 (the reader, not the browser) is essentially saying that RSS/Atom are notfirst of all XML and should be handled in some

Re: IE7 Feed Rendering Issue

On 3/9/06, David Nesting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/9/06, M. David Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If, in fact, what you mean by this *IS* that its the end users choice, then I would tend to agree... as long as the option exists. That was, actually, what I was trying to say. Oops, I quoted

Re: IE7 Feed Rendering Issue

On 3/9/06, M. David Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If, in fact, what you mean by this *IS* that its the end users choice, then I would tend to agree... as long as the option exists. That was, actually, what I was trying to say. You are publishing an XML feed, not a web page. You are publishing

Re: IE7 Feed Rendering Issue

On 3/9/06, Klaus Johannes Rusch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Unless the context is stored with the feed, the user experience willbe different when a user follows a link from another page (rendered asWeb page) and later loads the same link again from the bookmarks (rendered as an XML feed).If this is