On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 8:39 AM, Sanja Bonic wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the votes and the discussion. Noone contacted me that
> they don't have a Twitter account (I for example don't) so I'll take that as
> everyone who wanted to vote did so. Dusty expressed his vote here and on
> Twitter, Micha
Thanks everyone for the votes and the discussion. Noone contacted me that
they don't have a Twitter account (I for example don't) so I'll take that
as everyone who wanted to vote did so. Dusty expressed his vote here and on
Twitter, Michael Singh voted here (unknown whether also on Twitter).
https
On 02/19/2018 07:38 AM, Sanja Bonic wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> TL;DR: Vote on 1 | 2 | 3.
>
> 1: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1eVSN-bU7zNrut_taSRn4M28muIrrn8jm
> 2: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1WnaH8gLXZY6iqPCRdAob0a41KW4AOnyc
> 3: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1mRpKPq6UhKf9wjOKhL-sr2
On 02/19/2018 01:56 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> Generally speaking, I'm a big supporter of "if it didn't happen on the
> mailing list, it didn't happen." Votes during real-time meetings usually mean
> someone is being excluded by default because of time zones, overlapping
> commitments, etc.
On Tue, 2018-02-20 at 09:51 +, Sanja Bonic wrote:
> Please vote on the Twitter poll - if you don't have a Twitter
> account, vote via this e-mail thread.
I prefer the new logo, it has my vote.
Sent via Migadu.com, world's easiest email hosting
I have a lot to say from my previous community building experiences about
one identity regarding visuals and messaging - I'll not go into further
discussions on this thread but rather have a separate one at another time.
Here is the Twitter vote regarding the logo for those who haven't seen it
alr
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 10:33:38AM -0800, Jason Brooks wrote:
> >> Note that if we stay on 1 or 2 now, we will have to change at a later point
> >> in the future in case we want to introduce FAH and FAW logos (unless
> > FWIW the current Fedora Atomic Host logo we're using (at least on the
> > down
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 1:33 PM, Jason Brooks wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 10:13 AM, Matthew Miller
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 12:38:21PM +, Sanja Bonic wrote:
> >> Note that if we stay on 1 or 2 now, we will have to change at a later
> point
> >> in the future in case we want
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 10:13 AM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 12:38:21PM +, Sanja Bonic wrote:
>> Note that if we stay on 1 or 2 now, we will have to change at a later point
>> in the future in case we want to introduce FAH and FAW logos (unless
>
> FWIW the current Fedora
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 12:38:21PM +, Sanja Bonic wrote:
> Note that if we stay on 1 or 2 now, we will have to change at a later point
> in the future in case we want to introduce FAH and FAW logos (unless
FWIW the current Fedora Atomic Host logo we're using (at least on the
download page) is
Update: Thanks to Jason Brooks, we found the original logo artist including
the fonts used - that means we can recreate the logos for FAW and FAH in
the same style as the old logo.
Let me know your votes (1, 2, 3) and/or proposed changes to either of them
on Wednesday in the atomic-wg meeting or h
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 8:08 AM, Sanja Bonic wrote:
> For your information regarding the voting: The final votes should be cast in
> the atomic-wg meeting. I just wanted to make this more accessible in case
> other community members who are not in the WG would like to vote or comment
> as well.
>
For your information regarding the voting: The final votes should be cast
in the atomic-wg meeting. I just wanted to make this more accessible in
case other community members who are not in the WG would like to vote or
comment as well.
Cheers,
Sanja
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 12:38 PM, Sanja Bonic
13 matches
Mail list logo
