Not certain if this is of use ...but I use a modded src 2496...I take
the digital output of the sb3 and then upsample ...you can clearly hear
the effect when you drop back to the standard cd rate on the src
--
zanash
Its relatively simple to build a set of attenuator
take
1 locking type phono plug and one socket
take one resistor of 10k and one of 6k.
solder the 10k from centre pin to centre pin and the 6k fron plug
centre pin to ground...this wil give you about 8db if my memory is
correct..use the
omega;212374 Wrote:
But This friday AUDIO LAB DATA is coming home to my flat and measure
!
I will start with Pink Noise Wave and se if we see something.
But the guy a talked with said that a Spektrum Analyse maybe not
showing anything.
They measure from 20 HZ - 20.000 HZ Only and if
adamslim;212501 Wrote:
I find it disappointing that it is so hard in the UK to try a TP out.
SD's system in the US is great - order it, return if it does not live
up to your expectations. Why is this not available from the UK distro?
There's a law in the UK whose name I forget (I think it
I've heard what MrS's SB+ can do, the combo is awesome. i'd like to
think that with my diy linear psu I'm getting someway towards the +
..oddly using the Quad99cdp2 as dac to the sb3 this sounds as good
[different flavour] to the 99 as a disc player ..a fine achievement!...
Running the SRC as
great idea but ...in practice I think your ears are more sensitive ...
in my system I thought flac sounded better than wav ...In another
system Flac was superior to applelossless on the same track ...flac had
more bit and energy ..the apple sounded light weight.
But thats getting of the topic
zanash;212454 Wrote:
the src needs a few tweaks to get the best from it but is a very cost
effective solution
zanash:
I'm pretty wedded to my current DAC; therefore, I would like to buy an
SRC for its jitter correction and upsampling capabilities. That being
the case, are the mods less
cliveb;212552 Wrote:
There's a law in the UK whose name I forget (I think it includes the
phrase distance selling) which concerns buying things mail order.
Basically, anything you buy mail order can be returned for a full
refund within a certain number of days (not sure how many, probably 7
zanash;212544 Wrote:
Its relatively simple to build a set of attenuator
But if you're going to use the RCA output, then the Transporter's
built in attenuation makes more sense, and comes free with it.
I don't own one, but if I did I would choose the RCA connection and
internal
The attenuation provided by jumper settings in the Transporter is there
to protect your amp and speakers if you should choose 100 on the
regular volume control. It is not intended as a volume control, since
it isn't variable.
For volume control you have three choices:
1. Using the volume control
I've thought about doing this as well, but wouldn't doing so lose any
5.1 channel info beyond just the left and right speakers?
-Greg
--
GoCubs
GoCubs's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=312
View
darrenyeats;212597 Wrote:
For volume control you have three choices:
1. Using the volume control in the Transporter (could bad because you
turn down the music volume but not the noise).
2. Using passive volume control (variable attenuator aka passive
preamp).
3. Using a normal active
Clive,
cliveb;212599 Wrote:
Please don't misrepresent what Slim Devices have to say about option 1.
What they DO say is that you should not use the built-in volume control
to correct a mismatch between Transporter output level and amplifier
input sensitivity. I have never seen any suggestion
fob144;212428 Wrote:
Was the Elpac significantly better than the stock power supply? (I know
this must have been covered here before, so please excuse me if htis
post bothers you.)
I felt the Elpac was a substancial improvment over the stock walwart.
Much blacker background and improved
cliveb;212599 Wrote:
having established a match (possibly using passive attenuation)
What is the difference between attenuation inside the Transporter and
an external one like the passive preamp I asked about above?
How do I match between the Transporter output level and amplifier input
I know what it ought to mean ...it should mean that its identical to the
original data but different processing will cause different sound
interpretations now I'm no expert on digital recording etc ..but I
do have a good ear for music...
the differences were reasonably plain to hear
Omega - If you have slimserver set to resume after power off it is
much easier to test - all you have to do is power off and then power on
- play starts again from where the power went off..
try this and see if you can still hear the problem?
(I can't on my Stax headphones...)
--
Phil Leigh
GoCubs;212602 Wrote:
I've thought about doing this as well, but wouldn't doing so lose any
5.1 channel info beyond just the left and right speakers?
-Greg
This will only work if your TV/cablebox allows you to set the digital
out to PCM output. Feeding a Dolby Digital signal into the
BUSINESS PROPOSAL FOR APPLE IPHONE 8GB AT $300USD
This is brand new Apple Iphone sealed in an original company. The
manufacturer warranty this products against any manufacturing for the
period of 1year and 8months return policy.
Purchased Products will be delivered to your Door Step using your
If you buy from Logitech Europe you have 14 days from the date the item
was delivered to return it.
Squeezeboxes in stock right now, Transporters soon.
http://shop.logitech.com/info?SID=d9b91e06f0e46bc3fc4afd46ac271ebec00:3380page=faq
Mike
--
mvalera
Michael Valera
Online Communities
cliveb;212552 Wrote:
There's a law in the UK whose name I forget (I think it includes the
phrase distance selling) which concerns buying things mail order.
Basically, anything you buy mail order can be returned for a full
refund within a certain number of days (not sure how many, probably 7
mvalera;212662 Wrote:
If you buy from Logitech Europe you have 14 days from the date the item
was delivered to return it.
Squeezeboxes in stock right now, Transporters soon.
http://shop.logitech.com/info?SID=d9b91e06f0e46bc3fc4afd46ac271ebec00:3380page=faq
Mike
Gosh, yes, it seems
Sorry folks...I'm not clear on why anyone accepts this answer. The
implementation is broken. There are times when I want to skip back or
skip forward in a song. Sometimes to hear a part over again.
Sometimes to get to my favorite part of the song (especially long
classical pieces). Right
thomsens;212680 Wrote:
I think the key is addressing the capability and not past
implementations. I'm surprised so much effort was spent discussing the
way CD players did it. Who cares?
I agree, but the fact that is does not work the same as a CD player has
been the overwhelming
Maybe a mechanism that allows you to ff/rr n seconds or n% _without_
audible feedback would make people happy (or _happier_, anyway ). It
would at least be (somewhat) feasible. Now that people are somewhat
used to dealing with video in this manner, it might just work.
I could see how such a
I really wish the Transporter internal attenuation pads worked with the
balanced outputs as well (like the Benchmark DAC1 does). This would
have been ideal. If this had been done, I would have already bought a
Transporter. :)
I wonder if SlimDevices would please consider making this the case
Remember Sean used to not have a boss (not in the corporate sense,
anyway). His boss was the customer. Now he probably reports to a
Logitech VP, and was probably asked the same question in his boss's
staff meeting last week! :o)
--
Zten
Zten;212695 Wrote:
Remember Sean used to not have a boss (not in the corporate sense,
anyway). His boss was the customer. Now he probably reports to a
Logitech VP, and was probably asked the same question in his boss's
staff meeting last week! :o)
Rght my boss cares about the fast
28 matches
Mail list logo
