michael123;523399 Wrote:
I recommend mp3tag
I use mp3tag, very good software.
But it is some hands on work anyway, for example all Lord Of the Rings
soundtracks is on a single DVDA instead of 4 CD's so it's 31 tracks with
long and tedious names to write or cut and paste from some website.
Mnyb;523410 Wrote:
I use mp3tag, very good software.
But it is some hands on work anyway, for example all Lord Of the Rings
soundtracks is on a single DVDA instead of 4 CD's so it's 31 tracks with
long and tedious names to write or cut and paste from some website.
I use in this case
Initially, everywhere I looked the Berkeley was heralded as the latest
and greatest. But more recently, I read comments on various forums to
the effect that it's lacking a bit of warmth (compared to the Bryston in
particular). While all that is highly subjective, of course, the initial
hype seems
Hi
Not sure if this is the correct place to post this, but I figured ppl
on here would know! ;-)
I really like having SqueezePlay as a soft SB player for my PC, however
bit-perfect playback support via WASAPI in Vista, Windows 7 etc. seems
to be getting common in other s/w players e.g.
mr-b;523533 Wrote:
Hi
Not sure if this is the correct place to post this, but I figured ppl
on here would know! ;-)
I really like having SqueezePlay as a soft SB player for my PC, however
bit-perfect playback support via WASAPI in Vista, Windows 7 etc. seems
to be getting common in
Patches are more than welcome. :)
--
andyg
andyg's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3292
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=76025
mr-b;523533 Wrote:
Hi
Not sure if this is the correct place to post this, but I figured ppl
on here would know! ;-)
I really like having SqueezePlay as a soft SB player for my PC, however
bit-perfect playback support via WASAPI in Vista, Windows 7 etc. seems
to be getting common in
I think the latest version of portaudio supports WASAPI - I've not tried
though. Another reason to look at this though...
--
Triode
Triode's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17
View this thread:
downloaded test files and ran all but the 24 bit/ 96000 files worked,
now I thought that the 88.2 Khz files would not work but that the 24/96
Khz would, this seems strange since the stero review Mag review on the
transporter said that it was the other way around. thanks gimell.com for
the test
bobscomp;523602 Wrote:
downloaded test files and ran all but the 24 bit/ 96000 files worked,
now I thought that the 88.2 Khz files would not work but that the 24/96
Khz would, this seems strange since the stero review Mag review on the
transporter said that it was the other way around.
it's the 24 bit / 96 Khz that the transporter says are unsupported, I am
running the 7.5.0 version of squeezebox that I am running, I wonder if
that is a bug?
--
bobscomp
bobscomp's Profile:
bobscomp;523612 Wrote:
it's the 24 bit / 96 Khz that the transporter says are unsupported, I am
running the 7.5.0 version of squeezebox that I am running, I wonder if
that is a bug?
I didn't even know that there was a 7.5.0 build! You're dealing with
an early beta there, so I'd say the
DCtoDaylight wrote:
I didn't even know that there was a 7.5.0 build! You're dealing with
an early beta there, so I'd say the chances are very high you've hit a
bug. Certainly all bets are off!
Its not at all early I've been running it for many months
If you check the developers forum, you
I use a musical fidelity A3-24 DAC with the duet. The squeezebox sounds
much better with the DAC. Imaging and detail are very good and the combo
sounds better than my entry level NAD cd player. The bass is very tight
and much more defined with the DAC. I do not consider myself to be an
Thanks for all of the above recommendations. I too had difficulty with
'Spanish Harlem' from HDTracks. I reformatted it at a compression of
3,Flac,and still at 24/96 and the distortion was gone.
Fred
--
freddiejohn
15 matches
Mail list logo
