adamdea wrote:
> .
> One could go on, but the gist of it is that the level of understanding
> of perceptual science required to see through the entire subjectivist
> canon is about the same as the level of understanding of physics
> required to understanding that cartoon characters do not
That is a pretty good analysis. I always wonder if audio subjectivists
ever use a measuring tape, spirit level or even a car speedometer -
after all, aren't their senses perfect and absolute?
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high
Archimago wrote:
> Beyond that, I agree, there is no value in much of the subjective
> reviews out there when it comes to adjudicating sound quality.
>
> I think what is fascinating is how seriously the subjective reviewers
> take themselves and their opinions.
I think that part of the problem
