Michael, Yioryos,
Thank you for your suggestions.
I will update the aufs README file.
J. R. Okajima
--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
On Wed November 9 2011, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote:
>
> --- On Thu, 11/10/11, sf...@users.sourceforge.net
> wrote:
>
> > From: sf...@users.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: Re: 3.1 branch in aufs-util
> > To: "Yioryos Asprobounitis"
> > Cc: aufs-
--- On Thu, 11/10/11, sf...@users.sourceforge.net
wrote:
> From: sf...@users.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: 3.1 branch in aufs-util
> To: "Yioryos Asprobounitis"
> Cc: aufs-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Date: Thursday, November 10, 2011, 12:23 AM
>
> Yioryo
Yioryos Asprobounitis:
> =0AI guess my assumption the 3.x-rcN is closer to 3.1 than 3.0 is wrong.=0A=
> Indeed the 3.0 branch compiles fine with the 3.1 kernel.=0AMaybe 3.x-rcN sh=
> ould be renamed to something emphasizing that the `rcN' part is the importa=
> nt part. Or just write it clearly in
--- On Wed, 11/9/11, sf...@users.sourceforge.net
wrote:
> From: sf...@users.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: 3.1 branch in aufs-util
> To: "Yioryos Asprobounitis"
> Cc: aufs-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Date: Wednesday, November 9, 2011, 6:57 PM
>
> Hello Yior
Hello Yioryos,
Yioryos Asprobounitis:
> aufs-util does not have an aufs3.1 branch yet, thus compiling the aufs util=
> ities against the 3.1 kernel, fails with "wrong version". =0AI guess the 3.=
> 1 branch will be in the next release?=E2=80=A6=0A=0ABTW changing the versio=
> n in linux/aufs_type
aufs-util does not have an aufs3.1 branch yet, thus compiling the aufs
utilities against the 3.1 kernel, fails with "wrong version".
I guess the 3.1 branch will be in the next release?…
BTW changing the version in linux/aufs_type.h to "3.x-rcN" works fine ;)
Thank you for all your work.
