Re: [aur-general] TU resignation - Lukas Jirkovsky (stativ)

Le 11/10/2019 à 18:32, Morten Linderud via aur-general a écrit : > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 06:06:31PM +0200, Lukas Jirkovsky via aur-general > wrote: >> The packages left that I'm still listed as a sole maintainer doesn't get >> updates too often and are fairly trivial to update. Though I guess

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Jonas Witschel (diabonas)

Le 19/09/2019 à 19:51, Bruno Pagani a écrit : > Le 05/09/2019 à 21:53, Bruno Pagani a écrit : >> Hi there, >> >> On 05/09/2019 17:23, Jonas Witschel wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> my name is Jonas Witschel (online nick "diabonas" on the >>> AUR/GitHub/GitLab/...) and I am applying as an Arch Linux

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Jonas Witschel (diabonas)

Le 19/09/2019 à 19:51, Bruno Pagani a écrit : > Le 05/09/2019 à 21:53, Bruno Pagani a écrit : >> Hi there, >> >> On 05/09/2019 17:23, Jonas Witschel wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> my name is Jonas Witschel (online nick "diabonas" on the >>> AUR/GitHub/GitLab/...) and I am applying as an Arch Linux

Re: [aur-general] TU application: kpcyrd

Hy, Le 20/09/2019 à 22:09, kpcyrd a écrit : > Hello, > > My name is kpcyrd and I'm applying to become a Trusted User with anthraxx', > sangys and jelles sponsorship. Outside of any other consideration, your email should be PGP-signed. ;) Regards, Bruno signature.asc Description: OpenPGP

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Jonas Witschel (diabonas)

Le 05/09/2019 à 21:53, Bruno Pagani a écrit : > Hi there, > > On 05/09/2019 17:23, Jonas Witschel wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> my name is Jonas Witschel (online nick "diabonas" on the >> AUR/GitHub/GitLab/...) and I am applying as an Arch Linux Trusted User >> under the sponsorship of Bruno Pagani and

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Jonas Witschel (diabonas)

Hi there, On 05/09/2019 17:23, Jonas Witschel wrote: > Hi all, > > my name is Jonas Witschel (online nick "diabonas" on the > AUR/GitHub/GitLab/...) and I am applying as an Arch Linux Trusted User > under the sponsorship of Bruno Pagani and Alad Wenter. I hereby confirm my sponsorship of Jonas. 

Re: [aur-general] Are AUR VCS packages that depend on AUR VCS packages from other projects a good idea and who should decide on that ?

Le 03/05/2019 à 18:29, Eli Schwartz via aur-general a écrit : > On 5/3/19 11:44 AM, Bruno Pagani wrote: >> I still think that you would get a better user experience even for this >> case by telling the users explicitely that this depends on llvm-git. >> Because else, people would install mesa-git

Re: [aur-general] Are AUR VCS packages that depend on AUR VCS packages from other projects a good idea and who should decide on that ?

Le 03/05/2019 à 17:32, Eli Schwartz a écrit : > On 5/3/19 11:25 AM, Bruno Pagani wrote: >> Yes, and he can solves that by *pinning a comment telling so*. ;) > Pinning a comment telling people how to get the default expected User > Experience in a non-default way, sucks. Not “the default”. LW’s

Re: [aur-general] Are AUR VCS packages that depend on AUR VCS packages from other projects a good idea and who should decide on that ?

Le 03/05/2019 à 17:14, Eli Schwartz via aur-general a écrit : > On 5/3/19 10:23 AM, Bruno Pagani wrote: >> Le 03/05/2019 à 16:04, Eli Schwartz via aur-general a écrit : >>> Lone Wolf's point here, is that mesa-git results in different codegen >>> and different features, if the build-time

Re: [aur-general] Are AUR VCS packages that depend on AUR VCS packages from other projects a good idea and who should decide on that ?

Le 03/05/2019 à 16:04, Eli Schwartz via aur-general a écrit : > On 5/1/19 10:53 AM, Doug Newgard via aur-general wrote: >> On Wed, 1 May 2019 12:38:41 +0200 >> Lone_Wolf wrote: >>> Assumptions : >>> >>> mesa-git depends on llvm and llvm-libs >>> >>> AUR only has one mesa-git package >>> >>> User

Re: [aur-general] Are AUR VCS packages that depend on AUR VCS packages from other projects a good idea and who should decide on that ?

Le 17/04/2019 à 00:54, Lone_Wolf a écrit : > On 16-04-2019 18:28, Bruno Pagani wrote: >> >> Can you show me the diff that you would have between a PKGBUILD >> compiling against llvm-svn and one compiling against llvm? I need this >> to assess what to do in this situation. >> >> Regards, >> Bruno

Re: [aur-general] Are AUR VCS packages that depend on AUR VCS packages from other projects a good idea and who should decide on that ?

rsion >> just build against that, no other changes needed. > > On 16-04-2019 15:33, Bruno Pagani via aur-general wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Le 16/04/2019 à 15:19, Lone_Wolf a écrit : >>> Are AUR VCS packages that depend on AUR VCS packages from other >>> projects a

Re: [aur-general] Are AUR VCS packages that depend on AUR VCS packages from other projects a good idea and who should decide on that ?

Hi, Le 16/04/2019 à 15:19, Lone_Wolf a écrit : > Are AUR VCS packages that depend on AUR VCS packages from other > projects a good idea and who should decide on that? Upstream generally. If packages are tightly coupled (e.g. ring-* as far as I’m concerned, or Intel GPU toolchain), they will

Re: [aur-general] Is a deleted aur comment retrievable ?

Le 20/03/2019 à 12:09, Lone_Wolf a écrit : > Hi, > > > I just made a mistake and deleted the pinned comment for my mesa-git > package, https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mesa-git . > > I don't have it stored elsewhere, is it possible to restore that > comment ? > > > Lone_Wolf Found it on page 9.

Re: [aur-general] Is a deleted aur comment retrievable ?

Hi, Le 20/03/2019 à 12:09, Lone_Wolf a écrit : > Hi, > > > I just made a mistake and deleted the pinned comment for my mesa-git > package, https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mesa-git . > > I don't have it stored elsewhere, is it possible to restore that comment ? Comments are never really

Re: [aur-general] Spam comments on makemkv

Hi, Le 20/03/2019 à 11:43, Cedric Girard a écrit : > Hi, > > The user Frittata [1] is spamming the makemkv page [2] with > advertising for another software. Could someone delete this user and > comments? > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Frittata/comments > [2]

Re: [aur-general] Away until January 31st

Le 24/01/2019 à 23:33, Jerome Leclanche a écrit : > Hey folks, > > I'm on a pretty awful laptop + internet right now and unable to attend > to TU duties until end of the month. > I'll note that I'm unable to even load https://aur.archlinux.org -- it > seems to hang at the TLSv1.3 handshake on my

Re: [aur-general] TU application_R: Metal A-wing (a-wing)

Hi, Le 09/01/2019 à 17:20, Metal A-wing a écrit : >> * [ ] source_x86_64: should be source, don't upload binary data to the >> AUR, > About source binary. Improve the build speed of AUR, Reduce makedependence > The result of the build is the same What do you mean by “same” and how did you

Re: [aur-general] On TU application, TU participation and community/ package quality

Le 27/11/2018 à 16:32, Santiago Torres-Arias via aur-general a écrit : > On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 01:29:31PM -0500, Santiago Torres-Arias via > aur-general wrote: >> On TU applications, TU participation and package quality: >> everythign snipped > I just wanted to bump this thread. > > It appears

Re: [aur-general] Change pkgbase of AUR package

Hi, Le 27/11/2018 à 15:03, Michael Straube via aur-general a écrit : > Hi All, > > I want to remove the python3 package from the python-visitor split > package [1], > since it's already in [community]. > > Will simply changing the pkgbase/pkgname and pushing be enough? > > change: >

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Maxim Baz

Le 20/11/2018 à 15:18, Eli Schwartz via aur-general a écrit : > On 11/20/18 6:30 AM, Morten Linderud via aur-general wrote: >> Yo! The vote is over, and the results are inn! >> >> Yes: 33 >> No: 10 >> Abstain: 9 >> Participation: 100%(!!!) > (That would be

Re: [aur-general] Auto-generated Github tarballs format change (Was: TU Application: Daniel M. Capella)

Le 15/11/2018 à 10:52, Baptiste Jonglez a écrit : > On 15-11-18, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: >> On 11/14/18 11:50 PM, Daniel M. Capella via aur-general wrote: >>> Quoting Levente Polyak via aur-general (2018-11-14 17:00:38) - tests are awesome <3 run them whenever possible! more is

Re: [aur-general] Package present in aur-git, but not in the aur

Hi, Le 11/11/2018 à 15:37, pianoslum via aur-general a écrit : > Hi@all, > > I searched whether elster (a program for German tax declaration) was > present in the aur (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?K=elster) and > found out it wasn't. When I finished my own PCKBUILD and tried to > upload

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Maxim Baz

Hi William, Le 11/11/2018 à 15:07, William Gathoye a écrit : > Hello Bruno, > > On 6/11/18 10:24, Bruno Pagani via aur-general wrote: >> is wrong. We have managed to do that in cozy-stack, gitea and >> matterbridge to only cite a few (also in mattermost, but the

Re: [aur-general] TU Membership Application

Le 08/11/2018 à 04:34, Santiago Torres-Arias via aur-general a écrit : >>>- I noticed that you didn't add a LICENSE file for this package. >> Artistic2.0 is a uncommonly used common license! >> (/usr/share/licenses/common/Artistic2.0/license.txt) >> >> > Yes, my bad. I was told about this on

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Maxim Baz

Le 06/11/2018 à 10:36, Levente Polyak via aur-general a écrit : > On November 6, 2018 10:24:43 AM GMT+01:00, Bruno Pagani > wrote: >> Le 06/11/2018 à 02:13, Levente Polyak via aur-general a écrit : >>> Hi Maxim, >>> >>> On 11/6/18 1:05 AM, Maxim Baz via aur-general wrote: > You might want to

Re: [aur-general] TU application: Maxim Baz

Hi, I didn’t read everything yet because I lack the time for this, but… Le 06/11/2018 à 02:13, Levente Polyak via aur-general a écrit : > Hi Maxim, > > On 11/6/18 1:05 AM, Maxim Baz via aur-general wrote: >>> You might want to use go-pie btw, to actually have PIE support >>> >>> browserpass W:

[aur-general] Results for TU Application: Daniel Bermond (dbermond)

Le 29/10/2018 à 13:22, Bruno Pagani a écrit : > Hi everyone, > > Le 14/10/2018 à 21:49, Daniel Bermond via aur-general a écrit : >> Hi, >> >> My name is Daniel Bermond and my alias on the AUR and forums is >> dbermond[1][3]. >> >> Bruno Pagani (alias: ArchangeGabriel) is sponsoring my Trusted User

Re: [aur-general] Electron packaging guidelines

Le 05/11/2018 à 13:07, Tom Hale a écrit : > I've noticed that there are no Electron packaging guidelines at: > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_package_guidelines > > What are the best-of-breed PKGBUILDs out there for Electron apps? Most important point is using system electron. Some

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Daniel Bermond (dbermond)

Hi everyone, Le 14/10/2018 à 21:49, Daniel Bermond via aur-general a écrit : > Hi, > > My name is Daniel Bermond and my alias on the AUR and forums is > dbermond[1][3]. > > Bruno Pagani (alias: ArchangeGabriel) is sponsoring my Trusted User > application. The discussion period is over here too,

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Daniel Bermond (dbermond)

Hi, I hereby confirm my sponsorship of Daniel. Let the (new 14 days format) discussion period begin! Regards, Bruno P.S.: Please excuse the absence of line wrapping in Daniel e-mail, that’s my fault for having attempted to fix the reverse problem (text editor + TB line wrapping). Le

Re: [aur-general] nextcloud-client: suggestion of moving to [community]

Hi, Le 20/09/2018 à 21:34, Damian Nowak via aur-general a écrit : > Hello! > > Back in 2014, I sent the same request for owncloud-client. > > This time, I'd like to suggest nextcloud-client [1] as a potential > candidate for [community]. It has 240 votes, nextcloud (the webapp) is > already in

Re: [aur-general] upgrade of "conf.d/*.conf"-style packages containing example configs

Le 31/05/2018 à 22:00, J. Konrad Tegtmeier-Rottach via aur-general a écrit : > Hi, > > I've run into a general issue with software packages that use a > configuration directory, aggregate configs therein using a glob rule > on the filenames, and contain an example config. > > An example is

Re: [aur-general] Go package dependencies

Le 28/02/2018 à 03:05, Eli Schwartz via aur-general a écrit : > I just think glibc, bash, coreutils, util-linux, and other similar > packages should be a special exception. ;) > > Maybe one day we will actually decide on a "base-sytem" metapackage that > guarantees that all Arch systems have

Re: [aur-general] Issue with proper packaging

Le 21/02/2018 à 13:55, Konstantin Gizdov a écrit : > Hi, > > I'm having trouble making a package under the Arch Packaging Standards. The > package in question is `simpletools`. > > The problem I'm having is that if I use `prepare()` & `build()` directives > as intended, then the target `make

Re: [aur-general] Package not updating on AUR

Le 15/01/2018 à 15:16, Kyle McNally via aur-general a écrit : > Hello, > > I recently became the co-maintainer of the plex-sub-zero package [1]. I > pushed to it's repo, but the > version isn't being updated on the AUR. Should the AUR update when I push, > or does the maintainer need to do

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Andrew Crerar

Hi Andrew, Le 17/11/2017 à 13:22, Andrew Crerar a écrit : > Hi Everyone! > > My name is Andrew Crerar (aka andrewSC) and I'm applying to become a Trusted > User. Big thanks to Johannes Löthberg for being my sponsor! :) > > At the moment I'm a Research Software Engineer at The Laboratory for

Re: [aur-general] Today is AUR Cleanup Day!

Le 20/09/2017 à 10:13, Michael Straube a écrit : > Hi, I hope the wiki is still valid about mailing suggestions to > aur-general. > > Following packages are all reported to be in [community] by aurdupes. > > cryptol > cura-resources-materials > deepin-boot-maker > deepin-screen-recorder > dingo >

Re: [aur-general] saving AUR history (Re: TU Application: Thore Bödecker)

Le 05/06/2017 à 20:46, Frederik “Freso” S. Olesen via aur-general a écrit : > (That said, I really like keeping the history together, so I'd vote for > preserving AUR history when import to "real" Arch repositories, if at > all possible...) We all do. But as other pointed out, Arch repo are

Re: [aur-general] first package submission

Hi, Le 03/04/2017 à 08:17, David CARLIER via aur-general a écrit : > Hi all, > > I wished to submit this new package, the only thing is the main source file > needs to be taken from the url (e.g needs a registration) but that s all so > I dunno if I can apply for submitting this to aur ? So,

Re: [aur-general] git push - Permissions denied

Le 04/04/2017 à 18:43, Dan B via aur-general a écrit : > Package: aur.archlinux.org/libcs50 > >> » git push >> Enter passphrase for key '/home/krakn/.ssh/id_rsa': >> git-receive-pack: permission denied: krakn >> fatal: Could not read from remote repository. >> >> Please make sure you have the

Re: [aur-general] Deletion requests

Le 02/04/2017 à 05:51, Konstantin Gizdov a écrit : > Hi all, > > So I updated my packages and had other people also update theirs so that > pythia8 and xrootd-abi0 are now completely redundant. I submitted requests > for deletion a while ago and I am just writing to confirm that they can be >

Re: [aur-general] Package is available via git but not in aur Webinterface and Clients like yaourt.

Le 17 février 2017 07:59:45 GMT+01:00, Carsten Feuls a écrit : >Hello Everybody, > >i have some strange situation and I don't know is the error on my site >or in >"aur". > >I want to provide some new packages in aur. For this package I need >haskell- >curl. >This

Re: [aur-general] Python packaging: to build or not to build (Re: Review request for 3 related PKGBUILDs)

Le 15/02/2017 à 01:20, Eli Schwartz a écrit : > On 02/14/2017 06:11 PM, Bruno Pagani wrote: >> Le 03/01/2017 à 22:36, Eli Schwartz via aur-general a écrit : >> >>> On 01/03/2017 04:12 PM, Leonid Bloch wrote: Thanks! That was very helpful! All applied, except... "--skip-build" -

[aur-general] Python packaging: to build or not to build (Re: Review request for 3 related PKGBUILDs)

Le 03/01/2017 à 22:36, Eli Schwartz via aur-general a écrit : > On 01/03/2017 04:12 PM, Leonid Bloch wrote: >> Thanks! That was very helpful! >> >> All applied, except... "--skip-build" - indeed it makes sense, but I >> have never seen it with other Python packages. So I wonder if indeed it >> is

Re: [aur-general] pending merge request for python-git/python-gitpython, please cancel

Le 14/02/2017 à 14:56, Daniel Milde a écrit : > Dne 14.2.2017 v 14:50 Frederik “Freso” S. Olesen napsal(a): >> Den 14-02-2017 kl. 12:19 skrev Daniel Milde: >>> Yes, python-git should be probably renamed to something like >>> python-gitlib and python-hg[1] should be renamed to python-git. >> If

Re: [aur-general] pending merge request for python-git/python-gitpython, please cancel

Le 14/02/2017 à 12:11, Bruno Pagani a écrit : > Le 13/02/2017 à 17:03, brent timothy saner via aur-general a écrit : > >> i requested a merge of python-gitpython into python-git >> >> THIS SHOULD BE CANCELED. >> >> They need to be separate packages. they are for different things. >> >> PRQ # is

Re: [aur-general] pending merge request for python-git/python-gitpython, please cancel

Le 13/02/2017 à 17:03, brent timothy saner via aur-general a écrit : > i requested a merge of python-gitpython into python-git > > THIS SHOULD BE CANCELED. > > They need to be separate packages. they are for different things. > > PRQ # is 7484 > > Sorry for the confusion Please note that PRQs

Re: [aur-general] LaTeX compilation error in makepkg

I believe this is your issue: https://github.com/matze/mtheme/issues/217 For the record, this theme is already included in texlive-latexextra present in the repo (but obviously at version 1.1 though), and that’s the reason why it was deleted:

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Bruno Pagani

Le 20/01/2017 à 11:11, Bartłomiej Piotrowski a écrit : > On 2017-01-13 09:54, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote: >> On 2017-01-07 16:18, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote: >>> Let the games begin, good luck! >>> >>> Bartłomiej >>> >> Unless I'm a victim of some time-space distortions, 5 days of discussion >>

Re: [aur-general] Package review bitcoin-classic

Le 11/01/2017 à 19:43, Eli Schwartz via aur-general a écrit : > On 01/11/2017 01:15 PM, Bruno Pagani via aur-general wrote: > >> After a quick glance at your install file, I think it should be as >> simple and short as this (+eventual notice for CoW): >> post_install() {

Re: [aur-general] Package review bitcoin-classic

Le 07/01/2017 à 16:41, Tom Zander a écrit : > Hi, > > I created some AUR packages after various people requested it (I'm the > upstream release manager) and since I'm rather new to packaging in Arch, I > would love to have some feedback. Arch packaging is consederably easier than > debian, I

Re: [aur-general] Package review bitcoin-classic

Le 11/01/2017 à 16:19, Doug Newgard a écrit : > On Wed, 11 Jan 2017 13:22:05 +0100 > Tom Zander wrote: > >> On Saturday, 7 January 2017 14:29:58 CET Doug Newgard wrote: >>> Hardcoding the >>> version here also makes no sense when you could just use $pkgver and only >>> have

Re: [aur-general] Package review bitcoin-classic

Le 11/01/2017 à 18:01, Tom Zander a écrit : > On Wednesday, 11 January 2017 09:19:45 CET Doug Newgard wrote: >> I'm not talking about the package function, I'm talking about the .install >> file with the post_{install,upgrade,remove} scriptlets. Specifically: > My apologies, I must have misread

Re: [aur-general] Not receiving own emails send to the list

Le 11/01/2017 à 17:37, Vanush Misha Paturyan via aur-general a écrit : > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 01:08:07AM +0100, Bruno Pagani via aur-general wrote: >> Hi there, >> >> With my recent email address change followed by my email spree to this >> list (because of my T

Re: [aur-general] Package review bitcoin-classic

Le 11/01/2017 à 13:22, Tom Zander a écrit : > On Saturday, 7 January 2017 14:29:58 CET Doug Newgard wrote: >> Alright, I've looked at the first one. There's a whole lot of >> simplification you could do, and a few actual problems. >> >> Problems: >> >> You need to rename the source file. It's

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Bruno Pagani

Le 10/01/2017 à 18:38, Eli Schwartz via aur-general a écrit : > On 01/10/2017 10:11 AM, Levente Polyak wrote: >> mpd-server-minimal: >> - maybe sed-ing the mpd.service.in in a prepare() would be nicer then >> after processing/install in the package() function > That, plus learning to use the

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Bruno Pagani

Le 10/01/2017 à 16:11, Levente Polyak a écrit : > On 01/07/2017 03:32 PM, Bruno Pagani via aur-general wrote: >> Hi everyone, > Hi Bruno o/ Hi Levente, >> Do not hesitate if you have any questions on anything or any comments >> regarding my AUR packages. ;) > su

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Bruno Pagani

Le 10/01/2017 à 16:15, Levente Polyak a écrit : > On 01/10/2017 04:11 PM, Levente Polyak wrote: >> audiothumbs-frameworks: >> - a pkgver() function could be handy when using commit hashes, that >> helps avoiding to manually keep pkgver parts in sync (like r5 part >> before the partial hash)

[aur-general] Not receiving own emails send to the list

Hi there, With my recent email address change followed by my email spree to this list (because of my TU application mostly), I’ve noticed I’m not receiving my own emails, despite “Receive your own posts to the list?” being set to “Yes”. I suppose this is linked to SPF/DKIM/DMARC and the fact

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Bruno Pagani

Le 08/01/2017 à 19:19, Maxime Gauduin a écrit : > You piqued my interest with bs1770gain, any idea how it fares speed-wise > against the default gstreamer backend? I kept using wine + foobar2000 to > compute my replaygain values even after transitioning to beets because it's > infinitely

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Bruno Pagani

Le 10/01/2017 à 20:48, Frederik “Freso” S. Olesen via aur-general a écrit : > Den 09-01-2017 kl. 20:15 skrev Bruno Pagani via aur-general: >> Le 08/01/2017 à 19:19, Maxime Gauduin a écrit : >>> You piqued my interest with bs1770gain, any idea how it fares speed-wise >&

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Bruno Pagani

Le 08/01/2017 à 19:19, Maxime Gauduin a écrit : > Hi Bruno, Hi Maxime, > Nice to see a fellow beets lover apply! Your PKGBUILDs look nice and tidy, > you'll most likely fit right in :) Thanks! :) > You piqued my interest with bs1770gain, any idea how it fares speed-wise > against the

Re: [aur-general] Review request for a PKGBUILD

Le 08/01/2017 à 22:55, Eli Schwartz via aur-general a écrit : > On 01/08/2017 04:35 PM, Bruno Pagani via aur-general wrote: >> started partially because someone didn’t took it[0], but here see Eli >> and Doug comments, this is really unnecessary. ;) > Would this be a bad t

Re: [aur-general] Review request for a PKGBUILD

Le 08/01/2017 à 22:13, Leonid Bloch a écrit : > Bruno, thanks for the catch! You are right! > > But I prefer to keep the quotes: too many times I fell for some > unexplained behavior in Bash the reason for which was forgetting to > quote a variable. I try to quote wherever possible since. :)

Re: [aur-general] Review request for a PKGBUILD

Le 08/01/2017 à 05:59, Leonid Bloch a écrit : > pkgver() { > cd "${srcdir}/${pkgname%-git}" > > prepare() { > cd "${srcdir}/${pkgname%-git}" > > build() { > cd "${srcdir}/${pkgname%-git}/LZ4" > > package() { > cd "${srcdir}/${pkgname%-git}/LZ4" Just a tiny thing, but makepkg

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Bruno Pagani

Le 07/01/2017 à 16:05, NicoHood a écrit : > Hey Bruno, > nice to hear that you want to join the great ArchLinux project as TU. I > am aware the discussion period has not started yet, but I think its fine > if I already give some feedback. Hi Nico, You’ve been very fast indeed, but the

Re: [aur-general] Package review bitcoin-classic

Hi Tom, Le 07/01/2017 à 16:41, Tom Zander a écrit : > Hi, > > I created some AUR packages after various people requested it (I'm the > upstream release manager) and since I'm rather new to packaging in Arch, I > would love to have some feedback. Arch packaging is consederably easier than >

[aur-general] TU Application: Bruno Pagani

Hi everyone, My name is Bruno Pagani (a.k.a. ArchangeGabriel, or just archange sometimes), long time Linux user and Arch user since January 2014. I have since fallen in love with pacman/PKGBUILDs, the community and the distribution in its whole more generally. I took maintainership of my first