[aur-general] AUR maintenance works

2011-11-27 Thread Lukas Fleischer
Some of you might have noticed that the AUR has been in maintenance mode for the last three hours. We did a full backup of the server and prepared everything for a drive replacement that is scheduled for tomorrow, 28. Nov 2011. The server might be down again tomorrow for a couple of minutes. Sorr

Re: [aur-general] Developer/TU key signing

2011-11-25 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 03:42:59PM +0100, Laurent Carlier wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 03:27:28PM +0200, Ionut Biru wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > my arch master key is available [1] with fingerprint 44D4 A033 AC14 0143 > > > 9273 97D4 7EFD 567D 4C7E A887. > > > > > > Every packager please d

Re: [aur-general] Developer/TU key signing

2011-11-25 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 03:27:28PM +0200, Ionut Biru wrote: > Hi, > > my arch master key is available [1] with fingerprint 44D4 A033 AC14 0143 > 9273 97D4 7EFD 567D 4C7E A887. > > Every packager please do: > > 1) reply this email in the mailing list, include gerolde/sigurd username > and sign y

Re: [aur-general] Dropping tango-icon-theme{,-extras}

2011-11-24 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 06:20:42PM +0200, Evangelos Foutras wrote: > On 24/11/11 10:05, Andrea Scarpino wrote: > > On 22 November 2011 10:17, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > >> Hi! > >> > >> All sources hosted at tango.freedesktop.org became inaccessible [1] a >

[aur-general] Dropping tango-icon-theme{,-extras}

2011-11-22 Thread Lukas Fleischer
Hi! All sources hosted at tango.freedesktop.org became inaccessible [1] a couple of days ago, probably due to some software upgrade on freedesktop.org. I contacted upstream yesterday and was told that tango-icon-theme, tango-icon-theme-extras and icon-naming-utils are dead and that we shouldn't r

Re: [aur-general] Orphaning a 1000 packages

2011-11-18 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 04:39:09PM -0500, Justin Davis wrote: > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Magnus Therning wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 09:15:32AM +0100, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:22:45PM +0100, Magnus Therning wrote: > >> >

Re: [aur-general] Orphaning a 1000 packages

2011-11-11 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:22:45PM +0100, Magnus Therning wrote: > I'm the current maintainer of ArchHaskell and within the small team > we've reached the decision to drop support for the huge set of package > owned by the user arch-haskell on AUR. > > Currently we maintain 300+ binary packages, a

Re: [aur-general] install instead of mkdir and cp, was: Re: TU application

2011-10-29 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 04:13:18PM +0200, Christoph wrote: > Out of curiosity: > > > * Use install(1) instead of mkdir(1) and cp(1). > > Why? I find the install command sometimes a bit uncomfortable, especially if > you have to copy a hierarchy of directories (and their content). What is the >

Re: [aur-general] TU application

2011-10-28 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 09:17:23AM +0100, Peter Lewis wrote: > Hi Jonathan, > > Thanks for your interest. I don't personally think it's a problem that you > don't > currently have a sponsor, since I think people should be able to solicit to > the > list if they would like to apply, rather than b

Re: [aur-general] TU application

2011-10-28 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 08:41:45AM +0100, Jonathan Steel wrote: > > Thanks for applying. Do you have a link to your AUR packages and > > possibly a sponsor? > > I see the link has been given. I have also contributed to a few other > packages (fakenes for one) but if I do not plan to use them much

Re: [aur-general] TU Resignation

2011-10-24 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:47:20PM -0500, Brad Fanella wrote: > *sigh* I dreaded having to write this message. If anyone has noticed, I've > been inactive in the Arch community for at least two or three weeks now, and > my TU duties haven't been fulfilled in at least as long, if not more. > > With

Re: [aur-general] Aur error: Invalid name: only lowercase letters are allowed.

2011-10-23 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 09:00:29PM +0200, Ondřej Kučera wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to upload and updated PKGBUILD for my package > spring-framework but I'm getting the error message "Invalid name: > only lowercase letters are allowed.". I've never seen this before > and also this is the first

Re: [aur-general] kpackagekit -> apper

2011-10-11 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 09:04:23AM +0200, Ike Devolder wrote: > move kpackagekit https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20413 > to > apper https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=53061 > > pls, thank you > > kpackagekit got renamed to apper, just for mailing list reference Done, thanks!

Re: [aur-general] Orphaning some community packages

2011-10-09 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 06:37:06AM -0300, Ángel Velásquez wrote: > Hi people, > > I've been orphaning a list of packages in the few days, but I do want > to find a maintainer first before orphaning them (*tsk* *tsk* for > non-TU maybe if you're interested in some of them is time to apply to > be a

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request : gnash-bzr and gnash-common-bzr

2011-09-23 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 09:53:32PM +0800, Jekyll Wu wrote: > The upstream[1] is using git now, so gnash-bzr[2] and > gnash-common-bzr[3] can be deleted now. Done, thanks! > > [1] - http://www.gnu.org/software/gnash/download.html > [2] - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30304 > [3] - htt

Re: [aur-general] Deletion requests: python-yenc and texmakerx

2011-09-21 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 01:14:33PM +0200, Clément Démoulins wrote: > Hi, > Could you please delete the following packages : > * python-yenc [1] has been renamed python2-yenc > * texmakerx [2] has been renamed texstudio Merged python-yenc into python2-yenc and texmakerx into texstudio. Thanks! >

Re: [aur-general] Mandatory comment along with OOD-flag

2011-09-20 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 11:26:35AM +0200, nem wrote: > On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 12:23:54 +0200 Lukas Fleischer > wrote: > > I kind of like the idea of adding a comment field. I wondered why some > > package has been flagged out-of-date a couple of times and I think > > havi

Re: [aur-general] Vote on Alexander Rødseth's (trontonic) TU application

2011-09-17 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 03:22:54PM +0300, Evangelos Foutras wrote: > On 09/09/11 16:26, Evangelos Foutras wrote: > > Dear TUs, > > > > The discussion period for Alexander's TU application has ended. > > > > Please hop onto the web interface to vote: > > > > https://aur.archlinux.org/tu.php?id=49

Re: [aur-general] Mandatory comment along with OOD-flag

2011-09-14 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 04:19:27PM +0200, Martti Kühne wrote: > > so if some other maintainers experience the same it would be something > > nice to have. > > > > Let the ood flag be there, it doesn't hurt anyone if that's not true. > You already stated it's the latest stable release in the commen

Re: [aur-general] TU Application

2011-09-09 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 04:15:34PM -0400, keenerd wrote: > Looks good, you've got my vote. > > Just to chip in 2 cents on the addinclude thing, does it offer any > benefit over say > > sed -i '1i #include ' foo.c As Dave and I already mentioned on IRC, it *might* be useful if it would check for

Re: [aur-general] Please post any unmaintained AUR packages here

2011-09-09 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 08:22:59PM +0100, Matej Ľach wrote: > I now have several hours a day of spare time and I would like to > give them back to Arch users. > I would also like to learn more about building packages for AUR by > practice... > > So, if anyone saw an unmaintained AUR package or doe

Re: [aur-general] Flashplugin Duplicates

2011-09-07 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 08:01:31PM -0700, Anish Bhatt wrote: > Can I request that some sort of system be put in place for informing > maintainers that their package is being deleted ? I was afk for a week or so > and I come back to a deleted package. While that was the eventual idea, I > had a clos

Re: [aur-general] Delete scriptish

2011-09-06 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 12:47:34AM +0100, Joao Cordeiro wrote: > scriptish [1] has been replaced with firefox-extension-scriptish [2]. > > First one should be deleted. Done, thanks. > > Thanks. > Joao > > [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47669 > [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/package

Re: [aur-general] Securing the AUR website

2011-09-05 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 03:01:03PM +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Am 05.09.2011 14:51, schrieb Lukas Fleischer: > > On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 02:44:29PM +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote: > >> Am 03.09.2011 17:49, schrieb Gordon JC Pearce: > >>> The other is that switch

Re: [aur-general] Securing the AUR website

2011-09-05 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 02:44:29PM +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Am 03.09.2011 17:49, schrieb Gordon JC Pearce: > > The other is that switching to https has left AUR in a fundamentally broken > > state. If you search for a package on AUR with any of the significant > > search engines, they retu

Re: [aur-general] Wicd KDE duplicates

2011-09-02 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 12:26:56PM -0300, Antonio Lucas wrote: > Hi, > > > I dont know the correct naming, but these packages have basically the same > PKGBUILD: > > wicd-client-kde 0.2.1-2 > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40666 > > wicd-kde 0.2.2-1 > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages

Re: [aur-general] wtf? tcp_wrappers back in [community]?

2011-09-02 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 06:04:04PM +0400, Sergej Pupykin wrote: > At Fri, 02 Sep 2011 11:22:02 +0200, > Laurent Carlier wrote: > > > > See https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/23929 > > > > It is not issue. This is rather controversial philosophy/architecture > questions and care about home users (I

Re: [aur-general] wtf? tcp_wrappers back in [community]?

2011-09-01 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 07:05:01PM +0400, Sergej Pupykin wrote: > > Dave, > > we should not recompile anything. But it is usefull package with 24 > votes which has many dependencies in AUR. It is just a way to make > things easier for guys who want to use tcp_wrappers. > > I assume all developer

Re: [aur-general] Securing the AUR website

2011-09-01 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 12:51:24PM +0200, Philipp Überbacher wrote: > Excerpts from Lukas Fleischer's message of 2011-09-01 12:32:03 +0200: > > On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 12:13:53PM +0200, Philipp Überbacher wrote: > [...] > > > I sadly followed this discussion only remotely when it was ongoing, so I

Re: [aur-general] Securing the AUR website

2011-09-01 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 12:13:53PM +0200, Philipp Überbacher wrote: > Excerpts from Lukas Fleischer's message of 2011-08-06 12:14:14 +0200: > > On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 11:10:48AM +0200, Pierre Schmitz wrote: > > > On Sat, 6 Aug 2011 02:29:13 +0200, Lukas Fleischer wrote: &g

Re: [aur-general] TU Resignation

2011-08-31 Thread Lukas Fleischer
may still throw a few patches > around if I find the time. I've asked Lukas Fleischer to assume my duty > of adding new TUs. Yeah, the Wiki has already been updated [1]. Of course, I will continue to maintain the AUR, also. > > It was a pleasure to work with you folks. See

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

2011-08-28 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:12:59AM +0400, Seven seven wrote: > Please delete kdeaccessibility4-svn > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10678. Reason: moved to git. > Thanks. Done, thanks!

[aur-general] aurdupes 0.6 released

2011-08-23 Thread Lukas Fleischer
Now provides an "-A" option to spot dupes with suffixes such as "-fixed", "-new", "-newest", "-updated", ...: $ aurdupes -A aurman * aurman https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26452 * aurman-latest https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33626 (alias) conky * conky [extra] * conky-new

Re: [aur-general] Orphan Request

2011-08-23 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 05:11:10PM +, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > The package evilvte[1] has been out of date for a month and even the > maintainer announced in the comments that he doesn't want to maintain it > anymore. > Trying to mail him failed at his nonexisting mail address. Done, feel fre

Re: [aur-general] Orphaning out-of-date packages

2011-08-22 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 02:51:33AM +0200, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > Andrea suggested this about two months ago [1] - it's time to take the > gloves off. I just created a list of packages that have been flagged > out-of-date for almost 6 months now and still have a maintainer [2

Re: [aur-general] Merge of virtualbox_bin into virtualbox-bin

2011-08-22 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:50:34AM +0200, Seblu wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Lukas Fleischer > wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:35:34AM +0200, Seblu wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> Can you merge virtualbox_bin into virtualbox-bin ? >

Re: [aur-general] Merge of virtualbox_bin into virtualbox-bin

2011-08-22 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 02:15:23PM +0530, KESHAV P.R. wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 14:10, Lukas Fleischer > wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:35:34AM +0200, Seblu wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> Can you merge virtualbox_bin into virtualbox-bin ? >

Re: [aur-general] Merge of virtualbox_bin into virtualbox-bin

2011-08-22 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:35:34AM +0200, Seblu wrote: > Hello, > > Can you merge virtualbox_bin into virtualbox-bin ? > > The reason are those requested by josephgbr in > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=9753 > > > The reason I'm asking this is that every time I update my packages > w

[aur-general] AUR upgraded to 1.9.0

2011-08-20 Thread Lukas Fleischer
I just upgraded the official Arch Linux AUR setup to 1.9.0. For a short list of changes, read [1]. All AUR helper developers are encouraged to check for the latest RPC interface changes and the new package locations (we use segmented upload directories now). We also recommend to use the "URLPath"

Re: [aur-general] Securing the AUR website

2011-08-16 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 01:21:57PM +0530, KESHAV P.R. wrote: > Also please ensure aur-notify mails for package comments provide https links. That has been implemented for a long time [1]. [1] http://projects.archlinux.org/aur.git/commit/?id=973e4f85

[aur-general] Orphaning out-of-date packages

2011-08-13 Thread Lukas Fleischer
Andrea suggested this about two months ago [1] - it's time to take the gloves off. I just created a list of packages that have been flagged out-of-date for almost 6 months now and still have a maintainer [2]. If you maintain any of these packages, feel free to update it. I will re-generate that li

Re: [aur-general] OK! changing a PKG's name and retaining votes/comments

2011-08-11 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 07:09:44PM +0200, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 05:35:00PM +0200, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:52:54AM -0400, member graysky wrote: > > > Crap... I thought it was a done deal :( > > > > This

Re: [aur-general] Securing the AUR website

2011-08-07 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Sun, Aug 07, 2011 at 11:31:58AM +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Am 06.08.2011 14:32, schrieb Lukas Fleischer: > > For all tl;dr guys around. This is my proposal: > > > > * Use HTTPs links by default (this is already implemented). > > > > * Enable secure cookie

Re: [aur-general] Securing the AUR website

2011-08-06 Thread Lukas Fleischer
For all tl;dr guys around. This is my proposal: * Use HTTPs links by default (this is already implemented). * Enable secure cookies. * Disallow HTTP login (or at least print a big, fat warning if a user tries to login via HTTP). * Possibly use HSTS. This should fix all possible vulnerabiliti

Re: [aur-general] Securing the AUR website

2011-08-06 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 02:15:43PM +0200, Florian Pritz wrote: > On 06.08.2011 13:43, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 01:25:05PM +0200, Florian Pritz wrote: > >> On 06.08.2011 13:13, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > >> > On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 01:02:03

Re: [aur-general] Securing the AUR website

2011-08-06 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 01:40:38PM +0200, Pierre Schmitz wrote: > On Sat, 6 Aug 2011 04:30:09 -0400, Loui Chang wrote: > > This is why the redirects are also a charade. > > If Bob requests http://aur.archlinux.org but is redirected to > > http://aur.archlinux.frank.org rather than https://aur.archl

Re: [aur-general] Securing the AUR website

2011-08-06 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 01:25:05PM +0200, Florian Pritz wrote: > On 06.08.2011 13:13, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 01:02:03PM +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote: > >> Am 05.08.2011 23:54, schrieb Lukas Fleischer: > >> > [1] http://projects.archlinux.o

Re: [aur-general] Securing the AUR website

2011-08-06 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 01:02:03PM +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Am 05.08.2011 23:54, schrieb Lukas Fleischer: > > [1] http://projects.archlinux.org/aur.git/commit/?id=1e7b9d57 > > [2] http://projects.archlinux.org/aur.git/commit/?id=5ea9fc19 > > [3] http://projects.archlin

Re: [aur-general] Securing the AUR website

2011-08-06 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 11:21:47AM +0200, Pierre Schmitz wrote: > On Fri, 5 Aug 2011 19:22:21 -0400, Loui Chang wrote: > > If I recall correctly some time after that debate/argument there was a > > problem with certificates and wget > > Wget was broken, yes. But this is fixed by now. > > > - a pr

Re: [aur-general] Securing the AUR website

2011-08-06 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 11:10:48AM +0200, Pierre Schmitz wrote: > On Sat, 6 Aug 2011 02:29:13 +0200, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > > Agreed. I'm still against completely disabling HTTP. We will use HTTPs > > for all links by default so there shouldn't be any users unintentional

Re: [aur-general] Securing the AUR website

2011-08-05 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 12:09:34AM +0200, Pierre Schmitz wrote: > On Fri, 5 Aug 2011 23:54:57 +0200, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > > We won't do that. HTTPs will be the default but we won't force users to > > use HTTPs. If you decide to use HTTP intentionally, we won't

Re: [aur-general] Securing the AUR website

2011-08-05 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 01:16:45AM +0300, Ionut Biru wrote: > On 08/06/2011 12:54 AM, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > > >> > >>To prevent session hijacking, mtm attacks or whatnot I'd recommend the > >>following: > >>* Redirect all http traffic to https by

Re: [aur-general] Securing the AUR website

2011-08-05 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 11:36:06PM +0200, Pierre Schmitz wrote: > Hi TUs, > > the AUR still handles user logins and sessions in a insecure way that > can easily be exploited. The last approach to use https by default was > denied a long time ago. But I hope you guys will reconsider this > decision

Re: [aur-general] about hal removing

2011-08-03 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 04:06:51PM +0400, Sergej Pupykin wrote: > Hi, > > it looks synce-odccm and thoggen hardly depend on hal. I suggest > move it to community instead of removing. How about contacting upstream and dropping synce-odccm and thoggen as well if there's no easy way to make them wor

Re: [aur-general] OK! changing a PKG's name and retaining votes/comments

2011-07-31 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 05:35:00PM +0200, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:52:54AM -0400, member graysky wrote: > > Crap... I thought it was a done deal :( > > This is still on my TODO list. I'll probably implement this once my > development box is up a

Re: [aur-general] remove kernel26-bede

2011-07-22 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 06:04:22PM +0200, Ike Devolder wrote: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44336 > > why ? updated to linux-bede 3.0.0, see: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50914 Done, thanks!

Re: [aur-general] OK! changing a PKG's name and retaining votes/comments

2011-07-22 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:52:54AM -0400, member graysky wrote: > Crap... I thought it was a done deal :( This is still on my TODO list. I'll probably implement this once my development box is up again (it died some days ago). Further details should be discussed on aur-dev, please.

Re: [aur-general] mcabber-module-*-git: Outdated VCS packages in the AUR

2011-07-20 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:17:36AM -0400, Dave Reisner wrote: > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 04:29:23PM +0200, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > > > > $ aurdupes -V | grep -A2 ^mcabber-module > > mcabber-module-activity (VCS) > > * mcabber-module-activity-git > > https://

[aur-general] mcabber-module-*-git: Outdated VCS packages in the AUR

2011-07-13 Thread Lukas Fleischer
$ aurdupes -V | grep -A2 ^mcabber-module mcabber-module-activity (VCS) * mcabber-module-activity-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31825 * mcabber-module-activity-hg https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50202 mcabber-module-avatar (VCS) * mcabber-module-avatar-git https://aur.

Re: [aur-general] Please remove package awmcc (replaced by awmtt)

2011-06-28 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 03:56:23AM -0400, Evan LeCompte wrote: > The package is just a shell script, but awmcc has been flagged out-of-date > and awmtt not. > > All it does is allow awesome window manager users to test their > configurations > inside an instance of Xephyr X11 display nesting appli

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: perl-file-inline

2011-06-09 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 09:42:18PM +0200, Anton Leontiev wrote: > Hi, > > Please, delete "perl-file-inline" package [1]. It is misspelling of > "perl-file-inplace" [2]. Done, thanks! > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44419 > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44420

Re: [aur-general] [AUR] Orphan all old packages flagged as out-of-date

2011-06-07 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 12:14:09PM +0200, Andrea Scarpino wrote: > Hi TUs, > I'd like to orphan all packages in AUR flagged as out-of-date before February > 2011 (for example, I think 3 months are enough). > > What do you think about? Maybe Loui/Lukas can provide a list? Yeah, I had the same ide

Re: [aur-general] [PATCH 1/1] TUs can change package names

2011-06-01 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 04:47:16PM +0300, Evangelos Foutras wrote: > On 1 June 2011 16:04, D. Can Celasun wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Daenyth Blank wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 05:32, Alexander Rødseth wrote: > >> > I like both the idea of it being possible to change the

Re: [aur-general] [PATCH 1/1] TUs can change package names

2011-06-01 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 04:13:09PM +0300, D. Can Celasun wrote: > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Martti Kühne wrote: > > > > I'm glad the patch looks fine, though I'm not sure I understand the issue > > > about dependencies? > > > > > > > Well, AUR packages can depend on other AUR packages. If a

Re: [aur-general] My first PKGBUILD (ttf font)

2011-05-15 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 04:11:48PM +0300, jesse jaara wrote: > 2011/5/15 Kwpolska > > > On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 09:54:36AM -0300, Ian Brunton wrote: > > > This is my first attempt at creating a package. It's for a TTF font. I > > > know it works, at least on my machine. I'd appreciate any feedbac

Re: [aur-general] What happened to haskell-ghc-paths?

2011-04-29 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:41:41AM -0400, Dave Reisner wrote: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 05:26:38PM +0200, Kwpolska wrote: > > > removed it from the AUR > > Here's your answer. You shall to add it back to the AUR. > > -- > > Not an acceptable solution, as per the AUR guidelines: > > "Check [core

Re: [aur-general] What happened to haskell-ghc-paths?

2011-04-28 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:01:14AM +0200, Peter Simons wrote: > Hi, > > it appears that the package 'haskell-ghc-paths' has been removed from > AUR. Is there a particular reason why that was done? > > I would have expected the package to be removed because it's been moved > to [extra] or somethin

Re: [aur-general] VCS dupes in the AUR

2011-04-14 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 12:45:52PM +0200, Martti Kühne wrote: > +1 for *-git vcs dupes to stay, where upstream vcs is a different one. > -1 for removal of vcs dupes in general, since apparently different > people prefer different vcs. Besides, how much space are these taking > all together? 600Kb?

[aur-general] VCS dupes in the AUR

2011-04-11 Thread Lukas Fleischer
Following package lists were created by `aurdupes -V`, removing false positives (like "git-hg" and "bzr-svn"/"bzr-git") and grouping packages by removal categories. These packages should most likely be removed (flagged out of date or new VCS repository announced in comments section, plus there's a

[aur-general] AUR migrating to gettext and Transifex

2011-04-10 Thread Lukas Fleischer
Hi, folks! I've just merged my gettext wip branch into master and pushed that to gerolde. From now on, AUR translations will be managed via Transifex [1]. That removes the need for sending git-formatted patches to aur-dev and improves collaboration. It'll hopefully also support cross-project work

[aur-general] Upgraded AUR to 1.8.2

2011-04-10 Thread Lukas Fleischer
The official Arch Linux AUR setup has been upgraded to 1.8.2. For a short list of changes, read [1]. Please report any issues on the AUR bug tracker [2]. [1] http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-dev/2011-April/001565.html [2] https://bugs.archlinux.org/index.php?project=2

Re: [aur-general] AUR message notification

2011-04-04 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 05:02:38PM +0200, Cédric Girard wrote: > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Stéphane Gaudreault > wrote: > > > Le 3 avril 2011 22:23:42, Loui Chang a écrit : > > > > > > > > Mainly because 'suivre' means 'follow' rather than 'notify'. I didn't > > > want to be pushing somethin

Re: [aur-general] AUR message notification

2011-04-03 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 11:00:24PM +0200, Baptiste wrote: > On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 10:36:03PM +0200, Pierre Bourdon wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 22:30, Baptiste wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > Hi, > > > > > I know there is a way to get an email notification when somebody > > > writes a comment

Re: [aur-general] TU application (Kyle Keen) - Voting Period Results

2011-03-17 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 06:43:39PM -0400, keenerd wrote: > On 3/16/11, Xyne wrote: > > Congratulations, Kyle, and welcome to the team! I have updated your AUR > > status. > > Please make your way through the TODO list: > > Thank you. > > I'll get started on moving Pacgraph and Zeromq tonight. C

Re: [aur-general] AUR 1.8.1 - Can No Longer Upload Packages

2011-03-14 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 04:16:49PM +0200, Det wrote: > On 3/14/11, Tony C wrote: > > Here is the build. I really do not see any reason why the build is being > > rejected, I would have to agree that this is a bogus error. > > > > -- > > Tony > > I tried test uploading this by changing the pkgname

Re: [aur-general] AUR 1.8.1 - Can No Longer Upload Packages

2011-03-14 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 11:58:04PM -0400, Loui Chang wrote: > On Sun 13 Mar 2011 20:44 -0700, Tony C wrote: > > Apologies for the noise. AUR does not reject my package now after first > > creating the directory name for the package I have. I do not ever > > remember needing to create a special dire

Re: [aur-general] Upgraded AUR to 1.8.1

2011-03-11 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 08:25:02PM +0100, Thomas Jost wrote: > On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 14:16:53 -0500, Adam Weiss wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 13:54, Lukas Fleischer > > wrote: > > > That seems to happen with WebKit only. Any Safari/Chrom{e,ium} user > > > ar

Re: [aur-general] Alternative Links

2011-03-10 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 08:20:41PM +0200, Det wrote: > On 3/10/11, Det wrote: > > References: when logged in [1] and when not [2]. > > > > [1] http://www.image-upload.net/images/0ixc5luiei3xkrvp3gft.jpg > > [2] http://www.image-upload.net/images/41665a4m8wfr066itbyi.jpg > > Image-upload.net doesn

Re: [aur-general] Upgraded AUR to 1.8.1

2011-03-10 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 08:03:42PM +0200, Det wrote: > On 3/10/11, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > > The official Arch Linux AUR setup has been upgraded to 1.8.1. For a > > short list of changes, read [1]. > > > > Please report any issues on the AUR bug tr

[aur-general] Upgraded AUR to 1.8.1

2011-03-10 Thread Lukas Fleischer
The official Arch Linux AUR setup has been upgraded to 1.8.1. For a short list of changes, read [1]. Please report any issues on the AUR bug tracker [2]. [1] http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-dev/2011-March/001456.html [2] https://bugs.archlinux.org/index.php?project=2

[aur-general] aurdupes 0.5 released

2011-03-07 Thread Lukas Fleischer
Hi, folks! I've just released aurdupes 0.5, which is able to detect duplicate VCS packages in the official repositories and the AUR: $ aurdupes -V | head 3dslicer (VCS) * 3dslicer-git https://aur.archlinux.org//packages.php?ID=45280 * 3dslicer-svn https://aur.archlinux.org//packages.php?ID=4

Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD URL has changed

2011-02-27 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 04:37:19PM -0500, Justin Davis wrote: > I just wanted to let AUR helper authors (or other AUR enthusiasts) > know that the PKGBUILD URL has changed on the AUR. All AUR helpers > should update your code. I knew the AUR was updated recently but I did > not realize that the URL

[aur-general] Adding AUR packages to [community] packages' provides

2011-02-25 Thread Lukas Fleischer
Well, I'm addressing current blacklisting issues with the AUR [1]. I noticed that some of the packages in the official repos have AUR packages as provides, some of them (well, at least one of them, didn't search for more) were even added due to FRs [2]. Donnu if this applies to [core] and [extra]

Re: [aur-general] Remove Request: Civicrm

2011-02-25 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 02:57:51AM -0800, reality gaps wrote: > I'd like to request the removal of my Civicrm package from AUR: > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34379 > > Civicrm is no longer available as a standalone project and must now be used > in conjunction with a CMS. > > Thanks

Re: [aur-general] Remove Request: WordpressMU

2011-02-25 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 02:56:23AM -0800, reality gaps wrote: > I'd like to request the removal of my WordpressMU package from AUR: > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27757 > > Wordpress MU is no longer a separate project and exists as part of wordpress > now. (http://mu.wordpress.org/) >

Re: [aur-general] Blacklisted - postgresql-client

2011-02-25 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 09:15:29PM +1100, Phillip Smith wrote: > > > On 25/02/2011, at 10:18, Ionuț Bîru wrote: > > > On 02/25/2011 01:17 AM, Stefan Husmann wrote: > >> Am 25.02.2011 00:00, schrieb Phillip Smith: > >>> Well this is new > >>> "postgresql-client is on the package blacklist, p

Re: [aur-general] Blacklisted - postgresql-client

2011-02-25 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 01:18:53AM +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote: > On 02/25/2011 01:17 AM, Stefan Husmann wrote: > >Am 25.02.2011 00:00, schrieb Phillip Smith: > >>Well this is new > >>"postgresql-client is on the package blacklist, please check if it's > >>available in the official repos." > >> > >

Re: [aur-general] Upgraded AUR to 1.8.0

2011-02-22 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 11:11:28AM +0100, Pierre Chapuis wrote: > On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 14:46:24 -0500, Loui Chang wrote: > > >Functionality needs to be moved to the > >clients for the better future of the AUR. Let's not think of the > >AUR as > >a mere webapp. > > Couldn't you think of the webapp

Re: [aur-general] AUR no more extracting source tarballs ( was: Upgraded AUR to 1.8.0)

2011-02-22 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 06:16:08PM -0500, Loui Chang wrote: > On Tue 22 Feb 2011 00:51 +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote: > > On 02/22/2011 12:35 AM, Isaac Dupree wrote: > > >On 02/21/11 10:54, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > > >>Yes, like having two 1GB large files `tar -czf`'e

Re: [aur-general] Upgraded AUR to 1.8.0

2011-02-21 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 02:31:31AM +0800, Ray Rashif wrote: > On 22 February 2011 02:06, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 02:03:38AM +0800, Ray Rashif wrote: > >> On 21 February 2011 18:08, Dieter Plaetinck wrote: > >> > On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 10:47:5

Re: [aur-general] Upgraded AUR to 1.8.0

2011-02-21 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 02:03:38AM +0800, Ray Rashif wrote: > On 21 February 2011 18:08, Dieter Plaetinck wrote: > > On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 10:47:50 +0100 > > Lukas Fleischer wrote: > > > >> The official Arch Linux AUR setup has been upgraded to 1.8.0. For a >

Re: [aur-general] AUR no more extracting source tarballs ( was: Upgraded AUR to 1.8.0)

2011-02-21 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 11:46:51AM -0500, keenerd wrote: > R.Daneel approves of these ideas! Some needed patches to my scraper > (where did LocationID go?) but overall I'm very happy to see these > changes. The "LocationID" field is gone [1]. > There are many ways to safely inspect tarballs, eve

Re: [aur-general] AUR no more extracting source tarballs ( was: Upgraded AUR to 1.8.0)

2011-02-21 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 10:51:01AM -0500, Loui Chang wrote: > On Mon 21 Feb 2011 16:35 +0100, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 03:46:47PM +0100, Dieter Plaetinck wrote: > > > On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 14:50:39 +0100 > > > Lukas Fleischer wrote: > >

Re: [aur-general] AUR no more extracting source tarballs ( was: Upgraded AUR to 1.8.0)

2011-02-21 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 04:42:49PM +0100, Dieter Plaetinck wrote: > On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 16:35:33 +0100 > Lukas Fleischer wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 03:46:47PM +0100, Dieter Plaetinck wrote: > > > On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 14:50:39 +0100 > > > Lukas Fleischer

Re: [aur-general] AUR no more extracting source tarballs ( was: Upgraded AUR to 1.8.0)

2011-02-21 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 03:46:47PM +0100, Dieter Plaetinck wrote: > On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 14:50:39 +0100 > Lukas Fleischer wrote: > > > > The only issue that might affect the end users as well is "ZIP bombs". > > Most users will probably notice such a thing b

Re: [aur-general] AUR no more extracting source tarballs ( was: Upgraded AUR to 1.8.0)

2011-02-21 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 01:46:33PM +0100, Dieter Plaetinck wrote: > On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 12:19:08 +0100 > Lukas Fleischer wrote: > > > > > Moreover, I've heard of some encoding issues with users just > > > > copy-pasting files from the AUR frontend. > &

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

2011-02-21 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 01:10:52PM +0100, Alessio Sergi wrote: > On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Lukas Fleischer > wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 12:50:08PM +0100, Alessio Sergi wrote: > > > Hi TUs, > > > please delete amule-devel [1] because it's s

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

2011-02-21 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 12:50:08PM +0100, Alessio Sergi wrote: > Hi TUs, > please delete amule-devel [1] because it's superseded by amule [2] in > [extra]. >From the names, I'd guess that amule-devel follows unstable releases whereas the amule package in [extra] doesn't. Isn't that the case here?

Re: [aur-general] Upgraded AUR to 1.8.0

2011-02-21 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 11:55:59AM +0100, Dieter Plaetinck wrote: > On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 11:37:18 +0100 > Lukas Fleischer wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 11:08:05AM +0100, Dieter Plaetinck wrote: > > > what's the reasoning behind no longer showing all files in

Re: [aur-general] Upgraded AUR to 1.8.0

2011-02-21 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 11:08:05AM +0100, Dieter Plaetinck wrote: > what's the reasoning behind no longer showing all files in the "source > package"? I found this feature quite useful. There were several vulnerabilities with the automatic tarball extraction. Think of "tarballs bombs" (as in "ZIP

<    1   2   3   4   5   >