Eli Schwartz via aur-general schrieb am Di.,
16. Aug. 2016, 19:24:
> On 08/16/2016 01:12 PM, Patrick Eigensatz wrote:
> > No, the errors I experienced were all PKGBUILD syntax related mistakes;
> > also I didn't know I could use full bash syntax in the PKGSRC file this
> > is why I "extended" .
On 08/16/2016 01:12 PM, Patrick Eigensatz wrote:
> No, the errors I experienced were all PKGBUILD syntax related mistakes;
> also I didn't know I could use full bash syntax in the PKGSRC file this
> is why I "extended" ./ to shto eliminate possible error causes
> I would not have been awa
Eli Schwartz via aur-general schrieb am Di.,
16. Aug. 2016, 15:10:
> On 08/16/2016 06:54 AM, Patrick Eigensatz via aur-general wrote:
> > I usually do run my shellscripts via ./ too, but when I experimented with
> > makepkg I experienced some errors and I wasn't sure if makepkg would know
> > how
On 08/16/2016 06:54 AM, Patrick Eigensatz via aur-general wrote:
> I usually do run my shellscripts via ./ too, but when I experimented with
> makepkg I experienced some errors and I wasn't sure if makepkg would know
> how to interpret ./ so I wrote sh. I'll change this back soon.
What kind of err
Am 15.08.2016 02:57 schrieb "Eli Schwartz via aur-general" <
aur-general@archlinux.org>:
>
> On 08/13/2016 03:47 PM, Patrick Eigensatz via aur-general wrote:
> > Then I read I could ask here for suggestions and improvements.
> > Is there something I didn't do which is e.g. a good habit? Or did I
>
> I don't usually see people running shellscripts using `sh $shellscript`
> -- it is usually `./$shellscript`.
> It really makes no difference (practical or otherwise) except for
> looking odd...
I can make a difference. "sh shellscript" will run the script using
sh, whereas "./shellscript" will r
On 08/13/2016 03:47 PM, Patrick Eigensatz via aur-general wrote:
> Then I read I could ask here for suggestions and improvements.
> Is there something I didn't do which is e.g. a good habit? Or did I
> something that I shouldn't have done?
Including the feedback you have already received, it looks
Alad Wenter schrieb am Sa., 13. Aug. 2016 um
23:25 Uhr:
> Op 13.08.2016 om 22:39 schreef Patrick Eigensatz via aur-general:
> > @Alad:
> >
> > Thanks, I changed this as well!
> >
> >
> > @Florian:
> > I thought if there was a variable for both I'd set both :)
> > Should I remove the md5sum? Is th
Op 13.08.2016 om 22:39 schreef Patrick Eigensatz via aur-general:
> @Alad:
>
> Thanks, I changed this as well!
>
>
> @Florian:
> I thought if there was a variable for both I'd set both :)
> Should I remove the md5sum? Is there a guarantee every Archsystem
> has the md5sum and/or the sha256 command
@Alad:
Thanks, I changed this as well!
@Florian:
I thought if there was a variable for both I'd set both :)
Should I remove the md5sum? Is there a guarantee every Archsystem
has the md5sum and/or the sha256 command available?
Another question just popped in my mind:
How does namcap find depend
Op 13.08.2016 om 22:18 schreef Patrick Eigensatz via aur-general:
> Hello Alad, Hello Dan
>
> Thank you very much for your ideas. I just pushed a new version of the
> PKGBUILD
> here:
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=qjournalctl
>
>
> Are there further improvements? The po
* Patrick Eigensatz via aur-general [2016-08-13
20:18:05 +]:
> Thank you very much for your ideas. I just pushed a new version of the
> PKGBUILD
> here:
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=qjournalctl
>
>
> Are there further improvements? The point with the substitut
Hello Alad, Hello Dan
Thank you very much for your ideas. I just pushed a new version of the
PKGBUILD
here:
https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=qjournalctl
Are there further improvements? The point with the substitutions of $pkgver
seems very handy to me!
Thank you!
Dan
Remove the "make -j 9" line. I'll review the rest in a sec
On Aug 13, 2016 2:47 PM, "Patrick Eigensatz via aur-general" <
aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
> Hello folks!
>
> I am a beginner in Arch packaging but I just came to a stable point writing
> my small systemd journal analyzer and beeing
Op 13.08.2016 om 21:47 schreef Patrick Eigensatz via aur-general:
> Hello folks!
>
> I am a beginner in Arch packaging but I just came to a stable point writing
> my small systemd journal analyzer and beeing a Arch user for some years now
> I thought it would
> be a good exercise for me to write a
Hello folks!
I am a beginner in Arch packaging but I just came to a stable point writing
my small systemd journal analyzer and beeing a Arch user for some years now
I thought it would
be a good exercise for me to write a PKGBUILD for my program and try to
upload it to the AUR.
It is now online @
16 matches
Mail list logo