On 22/10/18 7:30 pm, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
On 10/22/18 7:19 AM, mar77i via aur-general wrote:
I must be misreading this, because I don't see why you shouldn't use
the exact same pkgver/pkgrel as the original package? If you want to
port the modified package to the subsequent
On 22/10/18 5:47 pm, Tinu Weber wrote:
On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 21:01:56 -0400, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
On 10/20/18 7:51 AM, Tinu Weber wrote:
On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 12:11:04 +0100, Jonathon Fernyhough wrote:
On 20/10/2018 03:05, hagar wrote:
Because of the Maintainers increasing
On 23/10/18 4:52 am, Jonathon Fernyhough wrote:
On 22/10/2018 11:27, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
To clarify the confusion here, this is not a decimal.
1.0 is no different here than in the pkgver itself -- it is 1, and a
subrel of 0.
...
So Jonathon's system only works at all, due to
Good morning All,
I understand that there are 3 version control tags in the PKGBUILD file.
pkgver - The Actual Package version
pkgrel - The Arch modification/release count - for changes to the
patches, install file's.
epoch - Special version control number.
If I need to rebuild a package
subsequent builds on each pkgrel.
The docs say that it can be of type ver.subver.
would this work?
Thanks
Macca
On 20/10/18 9:42 am, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Sat, 20 Oct 2018 08:59:06 +0800, hagar wrote:
If I need to rebuild a package due to dependancy rebuilds/changes how
do I mark the new
Good morning, Afternon, Evening (as appropriate :/) all,
I have been a Linux user for about 25 years.
I was introduced to it when it had to be downloaded from a Bulletin
Board via (cough) a 1200 baud modem.
(For those who don't know, Its like writing the code into the computer
while
Thanks all for the information.
It would probably help if this information was more easily available and
explained when reading the docs.
Especially the below information.
Thanks
Macca
On 20/10/18 4:24 pm, Florian Bruhin wrote:
On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 10:05:44AM +0800, hagar wrote
On 16/11/18 1:03 am, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
On 11/15/18 7:57 AM, Morgan Adamiec via aur-general wrote:
On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 at 12:49, hagar wrote:>> But my main
question is how do you get around a circular dependancy. eg.
mingw-w64-harfbuzz depends on - mingw-w64-freetype2
G'Day all,
I have been rebuilding all my packages properly in a clean chroot.
I wwas writing a smaill script to put all the packages in order and I
accidentaly got "http 429".
Any Idea how long that lasts? - I figured out what caused it and fixed
it. ( damned thing wasnt querying the
On 22/1/19 1:16 pm, Daniel M. Capella via aur-general wrote:
Based on the loosely defined "cleanup criteria"[], we're overdue for a
little purge. The candidates can be found here:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?O=0=nd==on=l=a=250_Orphans=Orphans
On 22/1/19 2:18 pm, hagar wrote:
On 22/1/19 1:16 pm, Daniel M. Capella via aur-general wrote:
Based on the loosely defined "cleanup criteria"[], we're overdue for a
little purge. The candidates can be found here:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?O=0=nd==on=l=a=250_Orphans=Orpha
On 23/1/19 12:11 am, Bert Peters via aur-general wrote:
Levente Polyak via aur-general schreef op 2019-01-22 16:10:
On January 22, 2019 4:03:29 PM GMT+01:00, Bert Peters via aur-general
wrote:
Levente Polyak via aur-general schreef op 2019-01-22 13:40:
On January 22, 2019 1:25:20 PM
Good morning All,
I have been cleaning up my build system and building all my packages.
In doing so I have come across a problem that affects all mingw packages
that nuse gcc.
mingw-w64-gcc is built with --disable-dw2-exceptions
however it would seem that windows is a dwarf system, so
On 21/12/18 5:21 am, Florian Pritz via aur-general wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 11:02:31PM +0200, Jerome Leclanche
wrote:
That should probably be fixed as well, but I agree with making the rate
limit window 1 hour, at most. A 24 hour API restriction on the AUR API is
really nasty imo.
So
On 26/12/18 6:39 am, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
On 12/25/18 5:23 PM, hagar wrote:
That part I knew.
I am even considering adopting a package or two.
But I was looking for some general PKGBUILD syntax and usage help.
This list is one of the several places to get exactly such help
On 26/12/18 7:24 am, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
On 12/25/18 6:05 PM, hagar wrote:
On 26/12/18 6:39 am, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
On 12/25/18 5:23 PM, hagar wrote:
That part I knew.
I am even considering adopting a package or two.
But I was looking for some general
On 26/12/18 3:19 am, Daniel M. Capella via aur-general wrote:
On December 25, 2018 7:37:32 AM EST, hagar wrote:
Merry Christmas all,
I have been looking for a general PKGBUILD forum to get some help with
some build problems.
There's #archlinux-aur on irc.freenode.net and an Arch forum:
https
Merry Christmas all,
I have been looking for a general PKGBUILD forum to get some help with
some build problems.
I have been trying to build the mingw packages using makechrootpkg -c
I have built 436 out of 497 packages.
There are a few corrections I have to submit.
BUT
There are a few
On 23/12/18 7:13 am, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
On 12/22/18 5:40 PM, hagar wrote:
On 23/12/18 2:40 am, Florian Pritz via aur-general wrote:
On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 04:41:28PM +0800, hagar
wrote:
Is there anything wrong with creating a pertner file to the packages
file
that has
On 23/12/18 2:40 am, Florian Pritz via aur-general wrote:
On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 04:41:28PM +0800, hagar wrote:
Is there anything wrong with creating a pertner file to the packages file
that has the pkgname, provides, description and git address in it.
Not sure what 'pertner' is supposed
On 27/1/19 7:01 pm, stefan-husm...@t-online.de wrote:
Hello,
Can someone please have a look on what happens on server side?
I want to update gtkhtml4 in AUR adding a long proposed (in the comments) patch.
This fails with
fatal: unable to access 'https://aur.archlinux.org/gtkhtml4.git/': The
On 28/1/19 7:57 am, Mark Weiman wrote:
On Mon, 2019-01-28 at 07:42 +0800, hagar wrote:
On 27/1/19 11:27 pm, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
On 1/27/19 6:13 AM, Hagar wrote:
On 27/1/19 7:01 pm, stefan-husm...@t-online.de wrote:
Hello,
Can someone please have a look on what happens
On 28/1/19 8:46 am, Mark Weiman wrote:
On Mon, 2019-01-28 at 08:09 +0800, hagar wrote:
...
As I mentioned a couple of months back - Not everyone has the same
communication skills.
What may be clear to you may not be to someone else. I learned the
hard
way that -
"There is no such
23 matches
Mail list logo
