t;
> +1
>
> Every DC agreement I’ve seen (3) have mentioned that you are responsible
> for supplying it with power and they aren’t responsible if it loses power
> (i.e. use an ATS).
>
>
>
> *From:* AusNOG [mailto:ausnog-boun...@lists.ausnog.net
> <javascript:
snog-requ...@lists.ausnog.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> ausnog-ow...@lists.ausnog.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of AusNOG digest..."
>
>
> Tod
Reports say fire is out and was on Level 2 of the exchange.
Level 2 according to a Telstra mate has an AXE PSTN switch and a power room.
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Brad Gould wrote:
> There are fire trucks out the front of the building and Police are closing
> off
Hi Matt,
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 8:05 PM, Matt Selbst
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Hoping for some advice. What is everyone doing for
> terminating point-to-point Ethernet services like AAPT's e-Line in a high
> availability environment? Cisco environment.
>
> With PPPoE, high
What changed with your position since September last year when you raised
concerns about even daring to speak about potential to abuse security
issues on this list?
http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/2016-September/036957.html
I agree that's sloppy housekeeping on Telstra's part. What did
You've just added two switches as additional points of failure.
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Chris Kawchuk
wrote:
> Yep, but rule out the PE or CE device as a SPOF. Lets you make code
> upgrades on the network devices without knocking out the link.
>
> If the link
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Paul Wilkins
wrote:
> Just so. If you care about configuration control and change management,
> you'll be using structured cabling with access from the front of the rack.
> You really don't need to be fiddling around in the back of a
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Paul Wilkins
wrote:
> Sure, but when one observes the default vendor position is front to back
> airflow, if one then applies logic, you can conclude back to front is
> deployed as a cost cutting measure sans structured cabling.
>
>
I
Hi Dino,
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 7:49 AM, Dino Sosic
wrote:
> Indeed Mark. I apologize to you and all the other ladies out there that
> may have felt left out with that salutation :)
> I disagree on the 2nd point, but thats ok too.
>
With regards to you disagreeing
The List Charter is your go-to in times like this:
http://www.ausnog.net/mailing_list/charter
This is NOT a forum for journalists to pick up leads, sales people to
sell things, end-users to pester their ISP, or bush lawyers to posit
their beliefs. Such behaviour will not be tolerated (see
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Paul Wilkins
wrote:
> There's enterprise racks, and SP racks and I'd say to generalise,
> Enterprise do the ports to the front to structured cabling, while SPs will
> reverse mount for shorter wire runs and density. Also swapping out
Luckily while a very male-dominated industry, we're not lacking eminently
qualified and talented women so I'm certain a gender balanced board is
easily achievable.
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 1:00 PM James Troy <
james.t...@agilityapplications.com> wrote:
> Benno,
>
> As I mentioned on the backlash –
Ethernet? With it’s statistical multiplexing?
Surely it can’t be anywhere near as reliable as circuit-switching or cell
switching ;)
On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 at 3:17 pm, Matt Perkins wrote:
> Dont worry. NBN Enterprise Ethernet will be soo much more reliable.
>
> hahahaha
>
> Matt
>
>
> On
13 matches
Mail list logo