Date:Fri, 1 Feb 2019 20:46:18 +
From:Harald van Dijk
Message-ID:
| Your proposed wording makes this conditional on whether or not
| the token is the first in the input stream.
That wasn't the intent - there was an alternation, either the first
token (which
On 01/02/2019 09:56, Robert Elz wrote:
Date:Fri, 1 Feb 2019 08:00:16 +
From:Harald van Dijk
Message-ID: <5cd22a9c-b213-8ffb-da45-f71057eba...@gigawatt.nl>
| I was referring to the second token on the second line, which is foo,
| not foo=bar.
Oh,
On 01/02/2019 09:53, Geoff Clare wrote:
I agree that's an improvement, but I see one slight problem with it: it
says "tokens previously read from the input" but the previous tokens
could have come from an alias substitution. Here's an attempt to fix
that:
* the TOKEN could be parsed as
On 01/02/2019 02:55, Robert Elz wrote:
Date:Thu, 31 Jan 2019 22:04:30 +
From:Harald van Dijk
Message-ID: <126fa44f-05bb-abc2-d6c9-40b82b36f...@gigawatt.nl>
|alias foo=bar
|echo foo
|
| alias substitution should not be performed on "foo".
