DannyNiu wrote, on 20 Feb 2024:
>
> I see. May I suggest a different editorial fix:
>
> Change line 3215-3216
>
> > The following functions shall synchronize memory with respect to other
> > threads on all successful calls
>
> To
>
> > The functions in the following list, as well as the ones
BTW, WinXP had a `SleepEx` interface that can function as a `sched_yield`
before Windows eventually got condvars. Given that `sched_yield` and
`thrd_yield`, `nanosleep` and `thrd_sleep` may be used for similar purposes,
should they be considered as synchronization operations?
> 2024年2月20日
I see. May I suggest a different editorial fix:
Change line 3215-3216
> The following functions shall synchronize memory with respect to other
> threads on all successful calls
To
> The functions in the following list, as well as the ones discussed further
> down in the prose, shall
The following issue has been CLOSED.
==
https://www.austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1814
==
Reported By:dannyniu
Assigned To:
The following issue has been CLOSED.
==
https://www.austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1814
==
Reported By:dannyniu
Assigned To:
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
==
https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1814
==
Reported By:dannyniu
Assigned To:
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
==
https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1814
==
Reported By:dannyniu
Assigned To:
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
https://www.austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1814
==
Reported By:dannyniu
Assigned To: