DannyNiu wrote, on 20 Feb 2024: > > I see. May I suggest a different editorial fix: > > Change line 3215-3216 > > > The following functions shall synchronize memory with respect to other > > threads on all successful calls > > To > > > The functions in the following list, as well as the ones discussed further > > down in the prose, shall synchronize memory with respect to other threads > > on all successful calls. >
I think you may have been misled by the use of "additional" in the bug note. Your suggested text would be incorrect for pthread_once() and the mutex functions. Some successful calls for those functions do not synchronize memory. That's why they aren't in the table. > > 2024年2月20日 03:58，Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open > > Group <[email protected]> 写道： > > > > > > The following issue has been CLOSED. > > ====================================================================== > > https://www.austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1814 > > ====================================================================== > > Reported By: dannyniu > > Assigned To: > > ====================================================================== > > Project: Issue 8 drafts > > Issue ID: 1814 > > Category: Base Definitions and Headers > > Type: Omission > > Severity: Editorial > > Priority: normal > > Status: Closed > > Name: DannyNiu/NJF > > Organization: <individual> > > User Reference: > > Section: XBD 4.15.2. MemorySynchronization > > Page Number: 104-105 > > Line Number: 3210-3626 > > Final Accepted Text: > > Resolution: Rejected > > Fixed in Version: > > ====================================================================== > > Date Submitted: 2024-02-17 09:07 UTC > > Last Modified: 2024-02-19 16:27 UTC > > ====================================================================== > > Summary: `pthread_{spin,rwlock}_*` missing from > > discussion > > ====================================================================== > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > (0006666) Don Cragun (manager) - 2024-02-19 16:27 > > https://www.austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1814#c6666 > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > The functions mentioned in this bug are already included in the table > > requiring synchronization. The paragraphs after the table place additional > > syncronization requirements on the functions discussed in those paragraphs. > > Therefore, this bug is rejected. -- Geoff Clare <[email protected]> The Open Group, Apex Plaza, Forbury Road, Reading, RG1 1AX, England
