A NOTE has been added to this issue. ====================================================================== https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1814 ====================================================================== Reported By: dannyniu Assigned To: ====================================================================== Project: Issue 8 drafts Issue ID: 1814 Category: Base Definitions and Headers Type: Omission Severity: Editorial Priority: normal Status: New Name: DannyNiu/NJF Organization: <individual> User Reference: Section: XBD 4.15.2. MemorySynchronization Page Number: 104-105 Line Number: 3210-3626 Final Accepted Text: ====================================================================== Date Submitted: 2024-02-17 09:07 UTC Last Modified: 2024-02-19 16:18 UTC ====================================================================== Summary: `pthread_{spin,rwlock}_*` missing from discussion ======================================================================
---------------------------------------------------------------------- (0006665) shware_systems (reporter) - 2024-02-19 16:18 https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1814#c6665 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I don't think it's too much. For software only locks probably, I agree, but side effects on hardware based locks may still make it desirable. Any changes shouldn't preclude the possibility, anyways. Issue History Date Modified Username Field Change ====================================================================== 2024-02-17 09:07 dannyniu New Issue 2024-02-17 09:07 dannyniu Name => DannyNiu/NJF 2024-02-17 09:07 dannyniu Organization => <individual> 2024-02-17 09:07 dannyniu Section => XBD 4.15.2. MemorySynchronization 2024-02-17 09:07 dannyniu Page Number => 104-105 2024-02-17 09:07 dannyniu Line Number => 3210-3626 2024-02-19 10:30 geoffclare Note Added: 0006663 2024-02-19 16:18 shware_systems Note Added: 0006665 ======================================================================
