Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 2008-11-28 17:21, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
>> Since LZIP support has appeared apparently out of the blue (no
>> prior discussion on this list), and Automake already had LZMA
>> support, can someone please explain LZIP vs LZMA and why we now
>> hav
On Saturday 2008-11-29 10:06, Jim Meyering wrote:
>Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Friday 2008-11-28 17:21, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
>>> Since LZIP support has appeared apparently out of the blue (no
>>> prior discussion on this list), and Automake already had LZMA
>>> support, can s
* Jan Engelhardt wrote on Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 08:51:58PM CET:
>
> Sigh, I so really prefer doing a
> git-archive HEAD | tar -C /tmp/whereever -xf- &&
> run autogen.sh in whereever &&
> pack up the stuff
> over distcheck atm :-P
The above is an approximation of 'make dist', not of distcheck
Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 2008-11-29 10:06, Jim Meyering wrote:
>>Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Friday 2008-11-28 17:21, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
Since LZIP support has appeared apparently out of the blue (no
prior discussion on this list), a
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008, Jim Meyering wrote:
I have been following lzma-utils development closely for some time,
and my impression is that xz obviates lzip. I would not want to
encourage use of lzip without a convincing argument to the contrary.
As soon as there's a beta xz release (i.e., stable f
On Saturday 2008-11-29 17:04, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Nov 2008, Jim Meyering wrote:
>>
>> I have been following lzma-utils development closely for some time,
>> and my impression is that xz obviates lzip. I would not want to
>> encourage use of lzip without a convincing argument to th
Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Nov 2008, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> I have been following lzma-utils development closely for some time,
>> and my impression is that xz obviates lzip. I would not want to
>> encourage use of lzip without a convincing argument to the contrary.
>>
> On Friday 2008-11-28 21:37, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> >
> > It makes sense to me that periodically Automake maintainers make an
> > evaluation (and with the blessing of the FSF) intentionally
> > deprecate generation of certain archive types as new archive types
> > are added. The intention would
Hello,
* Jim Meyering wrote on Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 05:13:04PM CET:
> Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If new formats are added, the least worthy of the existing supported
> > distribution formats should be deprecated and eventually removed.
> > This means that if .xz is added that .
On Saturday 2008-11-29 17:30, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>> On Friday 2008-11-28 21:37, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
>> >
>> > It makes sense to me that periodically Automake maintainers make an
>> > evaluation (and with the blessing of the FSF) intentionally
>> > deprecate generation of certain archive typ
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
On Friday 2008-11-28 21:37, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
It makes sense to me that periodically Automake maintainers make an
evaluation (and with the blessing of the FSF) intentionally
deprecate generation of certain archive types as new archive types
are
Craig Sanders wrote:
Greetings Lorenzo.
I have used the GNU Autotools in the past to build some simple projects which
made use of the Qt Library. I prefer to use the GNU Autotools as I find them
much more flexible and much more powerful than qmake.
As I recall, there are 2 key steps that need
Is the following kosher?
shell32src=libsrc/shell32.c
lib32_LIBRARIES += lib32/libshell32.a
lib32_libshell32_a_SOURCES = $shell32src
lib32_libshell32_a_CPPFLAGS = -m32
lib64_LIBRARIES += lib64/libshell32.a
lib64_libshell32_a_SOURCES = $shell32src
Basically, all the sources are the same, so I do
On Sunday 2008-11-30 01:52, NightStrike wrote:
>Is the following kosher?
It will produce two 32-bit libraries on all architectures where
gcc defaults to a 32-bit output.
>shell32src=libsrc/shell32.c
>
>lib32_LIBRARIES += lib32/libshell32.a
>lib32_libshell32_a_SOURCES = $shell32src
>lib32_libshe
Lorenzo Bettini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>
> Craig Sanders wrote:
>> Greetings Lorenzo.
>>
>> I have used the GNU Autotools in the past to build some simple
>> projects which made use of the Qt Library. I prefer to use the GNU
>> Autotools as I find them much more flexible and much more powerful
* NightStrike wrote on Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 01:52:23AM CET:
> Is the following kosher?
Yes, except that you need to use $(shell32src) instead of $shell32src in
both places.
> shell32src=libsrc/shell32.c
>
> lib32_LIBRARIES += lib32/libshell32.a
> lib32_libshell32_a_SOURCES = $shell32src
> lib32_
16 matches
Mail list logo
