Re: [avr-gcc-list] More results from the testsuite with avrtest

2008-01-22 Thread Paulo Marques
Weddington, Eric wrote: -Original Message- From: Paulo Marques [...] This gives us 13781 revisions to test. By bisecting, we should be able to lock in on the offending patch in less than 14 attempts. A script that automated this bisection process (checkout middle revision, test it,

Re: [avr-gcc-list] More results from the testsuite with avrtest

2008-01-22 Thread Andrew Hutchinson
Ok, here are my test results - same GCC as Paulo - except I have install some patches in avr to fix some reported bugs (hence I'm testing patches) I did NOT include Paulo's testcase patch for gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/pr23484-chk.c: (Paulo please state effect on numbers for this)

Re: [avr-gcc-list] More results from the testsuite with avrtest

2008-01-22 Thread Andrew Hutchinson
Here is my list: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010122-1.c execution, -O0 FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010122-1.c execution, -O1 FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010122-1.c execution, -O2 FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010122-1.c execution, -O3 -g FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010122-1.c

Delta [was: RE: [avr-gcc-list] More results from the testsuite with avrtest]

2008-01-22 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: John Regehr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 8:58 PM To: Weddington, Eric Cc: Paulo Marques; Andrew Hutchinson; avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org; Andy Hutchinson Subject: RE: [avr-gcc-list] More results from the testsuite with avrtest

Re: [avr-gcc-list] More results from the testsuite with avrtest

2008-01-22 Thread Paulo Marques
Quoting Andrew Hutchinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Here is my list: [...] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/multi-ix.c compilation, -O0 FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/multi-ix.c compilation, -O1 FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/multi-ix.c compilation, -O2 FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/multi-ix.c compilation, -O3

Re: [avr-gcc-list] More results from the testsuite with avrtest

2008-01-22 Thread Andrew Hutchinson
That explains it! ___ AVR-GCC-list mailing list AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list

Re: [avr-gcc-list] More results from the testsuite with avrtest

2008-01-21 Thread Andrew Hutchinson
The bug with PR27364 testcase appears recent. It fails with my 4.3 experimental copy 13/12/2007 Ok with avr-gcc (GCC) 4.2.2 (WinAVR 20071221) reduced testcase is: long f2(long number_of_digits_to_use) { return ( number_of_digits_to_use * 11L ) ; }

Re: [avr-gcc-list] More results from the testsuite with avrtest

2008-01-21 Thread Andy Hutchinson
Paulo, please report bug with PR27364 testcase. I found that problem is somewhere in combine phase. Here it is trying to stick together pairs of instruction to make another. It fails but that is where load of constant dissappears. So if you post bug, I can add further info. Andy PS

Re: [avr-gcc-list] More results from the testsuite with avrtest

2008-01-21 Thread Paulo Marques
Quoting Andrew Hutchinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Here are my test results using Paulo simulator. Seems I have more tests! I'm now running from SVN, so I'm always testing the latest version, although my initial report was for gcc 4.2.2. One thing I noticed is that almost everyday there is a

Re: [avr-gcc-list] More results from the testsuite with avrtest

2008-01-21 Thread Paulo Marques
Quoting Andrew Hutchinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: The bug with PR27364 testcase appears recent. It fails with my 4.3 experimental copy 13/12/2007 Ok with avr-gcc (GCC) 4.2.2 (WinAVR 20071221) This got me thinking: it would be really nice if we could setup an automated bisection test. We could

RE: [avr-gcc-list] More results from the testsuite with avrtest

2008-01-21 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Paulo Marques Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 5:15 PM To: Andrew Hutchinson Cc: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org; Andy Hutchinson Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] More results from the testsuite

RE: [avr-gcc-list] More results from the testsuite with avrtest

2008-01-21 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Paulo Marques Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 5:14 PM To: Andrew Hutchinson Cc: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] More results from the testsuite with avrtest One

Re: [avr-gcc-list] More results from the testsuite with avrtest

2008-01-21 Thread Andrew Hutchinson
- created a sys/types.h with: #include inttypes.h #include stdint.h where do I put new include file? (directory relative to prefix root) I have updated my GCC to same rev as you. Ok with ldflags changes So hopefully I can re-run in sync with you. Andy

RE: [avr-gcc-list] More results from the testsuite with avrtest

2008-01-21 Thread Paulo Marques
Quoting Weddington, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [...] Ok, to try to synchronize with you, so that our tests are consistent, I'm running a test against svn revision 131704 (from today). Changes I've made so far to solve some of the failures: - created a sys/types.h with: #include inttypes.h

RE: [avr-gcc-list] More results from the testsuite with avrtest

2008-01-21 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: Paulo Marques [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 6:14 PM To: Weddington, Eric Cc: Andrew Hutchinson; avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: RE: [avr-gcc-list] More results from the testsuite with avrtest Thanks, but please bare

Re: [avr-gcc-list] More results from the testsuite with avrtest

2008-01-21 Thread Andrew Hutchinson
Ok my latest build is squawking - I assume because my binutils is out of step. ../../../../gcc/libgcc/../gcc/config/avr/libgcc.S:283: Error: illegal opcode mov w for mcu avr3 To make this painless, can someone please point me at correct sources for binutils - and assocated patch set (one

RE: [avr-gcc-list] More results from the testsuite with avrtest

2008-01-21 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Andrew Hutchinson Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 6:56 PM To: Paulo Marques; avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] More results from the testsuite with avrtest Ok my latest

Re: [avr-gcc-list] More results from the testsuite with avrtest

2008-01-21 Thread Paulo Marques
Quoting Andrew Hutchinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: - created a sys/types.h with: #include inttypes.h #include stdint.h where do I put new include file? (directory relative to prefix root) In Linux, the default dir is /usr/local/avr/include so the full path for the file becomes

RE: [avr-gcc-list] More results from the testsuite with avrtest

2008-01-21 Thread Paulo Marques
Quoting Weddington, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Ok my latest build is squawking - I assume because my binutils is out of step. ../../../../gcc/libgcc/../gcc/config/avr/libgcc.S:283: Error: illegal opcode mov w for mcu avr3 To make this painless, can someone please point me at correct sources for

RE: [avr-gcc-list] More results from the testsuite with avrtest

2008-01-21 Thread John Regehr
Please see the GCC project about this. IIRC, they already have a script that does a binary search on failing test cases. IIRC, it is in the contrib subdirectory. Also this Delta implementation is very useful for minimizing an offending test program (either before or after narrowing settling

RE: [avr-gcc-list] More results from the testsuite with avrtest

2008-01-21 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: John Regehr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 8:58 PM To: Weddington, Eric Cc: Paulo Marques; Andrew Hutchinson; avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org; Andy Hutchinson Subject: RE: [avr-gcc-list] More results from the testsuite with avrtest

[avr-gcc-list] More results from the testsuite with avrtest

2008-01-19 Thread Paulo Marques
Hi, all I've been running the testsuite from SVN with avrtest to track down the latest bugs. I've finally track down every failure in execute.exp, and I'm preparing to move on to the full testsuite (I hope). So, here's a list of all the problems so far: FAIL:

RE: [avr-gcc-list] More results from the testsuite with avrtest

2008-01-19 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Paulo Marques Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2008 11:27 AM To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: [avr-gcc-list] More results from the testsuite with avrtest Hi, all I've been running

RE: [avr-gcc-list] More results from the testsuite with avrtest

2008-01-19 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org] On Behalf Of Paulo Marques Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2008 11:27 AM To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org Subject: [avr-gcc-list] More results from the testsuite with avrtest Hi, all I've been running

RE: [avr-gcc-list] More results from the testsuite with avrtest

2008-01-19 Thread Paulo Marques
Quoting Weddington, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [...] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/built-in-setjmp.c execution, -O2 Now reported as bug #34879: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34879 FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtin-bitops-1.c compilation, -O0 [...] The undefined reference to