Hi,
I'm creating a table of pointers to functions, where each function is
like:
void func(void) { ... }
When I place the table into RAM, I can access elements, and dereference
those elements to execute the corresponding functions. This works fine.
For example:
void (*func_tab[])() = {
Hi all
Further to the issue of storing a table of function pointers into flash,
and accessing this table accurately..
I've tried several variations, and looked at the .lst files in each
case. Some variations were more elegant to the C purist, but caused
severe code bloat, even at -O3.
But I've
is important.
All good arguments.
I've dropped this whole notion, and switched to external crystals.
Seems one of my suppliers offers a 13.56MHz crystal. With UBRR set to 7,
this allows for 115.2kb/s serial with 4.2% error - very much good
enough.
Cheers
David
Dig Kleppe
David McNab wrote
Hi,
Can anyone please point me to some resources for learning about
interfacing C and assembler modules in gcc-avr?
I've been looking at the asmdemo code from avr-libc, but it only goes
part way with overall explanation.
I'm especially needing to learn how to write assembler (.S) modules
Hi,
I've already embarrassed myself on this list with my early naive
questions, as I battle to migrate from PIC to AVR, and I guess I'm going
to embarrass myself again.
What I want to ask is - what's the current thinking within the avr-gcc
community with respect to documentation, and the task of
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 18:59 -0500, Gary French wrote:
in the binutils src dir exec: make do-install-html
you'll get quite a bit of documentation in ${PREFIX}/share/doc
Huh?
There's no such target in the debian binutils-avr source package
makefiles.
Can you point me to a binutils-avr
On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 15:21 +0100, Joerg Wunsch wrote:
David McNab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- avr-as pseudo-ops - there seems to be no thorough list of
these. For example, I had to look through list archives to learn
how to declare a buffer in SRAM via the '.skip' pseudo-op
That's
On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 23:57 +0100, Joerg Wunsch wrote:
I don't mind, as long as it's really live. I know the Wiki from
www.mikrocontroller.net is, but that's German only.
Which is great for German speakers, but overall it alienates more than
95% of people.
So far, the best
international
On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 16:27 -0500, Bob Paddock wrote:
The Apostrophe Protection Society home page:
http://www.apostrophe.fsnet.co.uk/
They're making great effort's to purge the language from apostrophe
abuse's.
( /me ducks! )
___
AVR-GCC-list
On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 07:23 -0500, Graham Davies wrote:
Wikipedia is full of problems - systemic bias, errors, conflicting
agendas etc, but it's a heck of a lot better than having no wikipedia
at all.
Wikipedia is not full of problems. Pages with bias are marked as such.
Some pages are
10 matches
Mail list logo