Joerg Wunsch wrote:
As Ron Kreymborg wrote:
I now have a little more spare time, so would be willing to join as
a volunteer for this library.
As Frédéric Nadeau wrote:
I started such a project at the beginning of the year. Please check
at: http://code.google.com/p/avr-drv/
[...] I'm
Some thoughts on a library.
Let me start with a library that manages just the processor's internal
peripherals: best practise would have all data structures the code requires
declared as private (static). Data in, data out, exceptions and status would
all be accessible only via public functions
-Original Message-
From:
avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.
org] On Behalf Of Frédéric Nadeau
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 5:44 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re:
-Original Message-
From:
avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.
org] On Behalf Of David Brown
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 1:20 AM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev]
I volunteer to start the project.
I suggest we open a hosting on Savannha so that we can have a separate
mailing list and start discussion on that specific project. From there
on we could lay out a distribution plan, compilation method, etc.
I would personally name it avr-drv. Any better name or
I feel that naming it avr-drv restricts is too restrictive for what this
project is, since there has been mention of data structures and other things
besides drivers. The name should be distinctive (to make google searches for
it easier), but it doesn't need to be strictly explanatory, since
I think LibAVR might be too confusing. I know on avrfreaks a lot of people
complained that Procyon AVRLib (often shortened to just AVRLib) was too
easily confused with avr-libc. I guess we should think about what this
library really does (all I can think of is that it's utilities) and see if
-Original Message-
From: Ruddick Lawrence [mailto:rudd...@stanford.edu]
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 12:45 PM
To: Weddington, Eric
Cc: Frédéric Nadeau; avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [POSSIBLE VIRUS:###] RE: [avr-libc-dev] Adding
(some) Procyon AVRlib functionality
As Ruddick Lawrence wrote:
I think LibAVR might be too confusing.
I agree, though I also see Eric's point: assuming it will really
become an object library, a link specification like -lavr looks
good.
But then, just because the object library is named libavr.a, nobody
says this must exactly
-Original Message-
From:
avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.
org] On Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 1:14 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev]
As Frédéric Nadeau wrote:
I volunteer to start the project.
Great!
I suggest we open a hosting on Savannha so that we can have a
separate mailing list and start discussion on that specific
project. From there on we could lay out a distribution plan,
compilation method, etc.
Do you really
As Weddington, Eric wrote:
Regarding naming, here's another thought: Why does it even have to
have a separate name? If it's part of avr-libc, then let it be that:
just a part of avr-libc. The library that is built could be named
'libavr.a' and one links to it with '-lavr', but it's still
-Original Message-
From:
avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.
org] On Behalf Of Ron Kreymborg
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 6:22 AM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: RE: [avr-libc-dev]
As David Brown wrote:
One thing I'd like to suggest is that the library be divided into
separate areas. In particular, I'd like to see a stable area and
a staging or experimental area.
I don't mind that, just one remark: unless you got lots of people who
are eager to test it, there's some
-Original Message-
From:
avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.
org] On Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 1:28 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev]
-Original Message-
From:
avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.
org] On Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 1:33 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev]
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Weddington, Eric
eric.wedding...@atmel.com wrote:
Certainly, a hosting location needs to be picked. If Savannah is too
difficult, it's certainly easy to get a project started on SourceForge, and
of course it's a popular hosting site. I suppose Google would be
Wow, step out for lunch and miss a lot!
The confusion I was talking about with LibAVR was not with the existing
Procyon library, but with avr-libc. Of course that only becomes a problem if
they are indeed separate projects, which brings me to my second point...
I agree that associating this new
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:45:47 -0700
Ruddick Lawrence rudd...@stanford.edu wrote:
The confusion I was talking about with LibAVR was not with the existing
Procyon library, but with avr-libc. Of course that only becomes a problem if
they are indeed separate projects, which brings me to my second
I opened a SourceForge project currently named AVR C Library. I think
we can stick to that name for now as we can always change it later
when we have found a name that is 1) better, 2) suits everyone, most
at least.
I appreciate the suggestion for having a sub-mailing list to avr-libc.
However
-Original Message-
From:
avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.
org] On Behalf Of Frédéric Nadeau
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 3:57 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev]
2009/9/18 Weddington, Eric eric.wedding...@atmel.com:
-Original Message-
From:
avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.
org] On Behalf Of Frédéric Nadeau
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 3:57 PM
To:
-Original Message-
From:
avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.
org] On Behalf Of Frédéric Nadeau
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 5:20 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev]
Ok. But wait on setting up mailing lists, unless you're absolutely sure that
we can change *those* names after they've been created. ;-)
I thought about that for the forum, so I made the Open Discussion
forum public for now so that people can pitch their idea without
registering, at least.
-Original Message-
From:
avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.
org] On Behalf Of Frédéric Nadeau
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 5:46 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev]
Well since this is avr libc 'the next step' it's like avr++ which in a
literal sence would be bwr (a+1, v+1, r+1). Which happens to coincide with
burbon/beer, whisky, scotch. So libbwr. Where beer might refer to a
possible license...
On the other hand we could do something as simple as
-Original Message-
From:
avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.
org] On Behalf Of Ruddick Lawrence
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 6:24 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev]
Ok, I'm going to go ahead and make the call that it's named AVR Core Library
(avr-corelib) since it seems well received and choosing one will allow us to
move onto other issues.
Frederic said he might be gone for the weekend, and he hasn't given me any
privileges on the sourceforge account yet,
28 matches
Mail list logo
