At 1245756208 time_t, Uli Schlachter wrote:
+size = width * height;
Seems unused.
+static void
+do_update_shape(xcb_window_t win, xcb_shape_kind_t kind, image_t *image, int
offset)
+{
+xcb_pixmap_t shape;
+
+if(!image)
+{
+/* Reset the shape */
+shape
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Julien Danjou wrote:
At 1245756208 time_t, Uli Schlachter wrote:
+size = width * height;
Seems unused.
Seems you are right.
http://git.znc.in/?p=psychon/awesome.git;a=commitdiff;h=56d73102ea8995c911664f0203f77f7a3dc0767d
+static void
At 1245761941 time_t, Uli Schlachter wrote:
Uhm, how would I do that? I would need to do some evil math with cos and sin
for
this and then loop through the single pixels...
I'm not a geometry expert but if you need to draw a top left corner:
++
|1 / |
|/ 2 |
++
(1 is being
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Julien Danjou wrote:
At 1245761941 time_t, Uli Schlachter wrote:
Uhm, how would I do that? I would need to do some evil math with cos and sin
for
this and then loop through the single pixels...
I'm not a geometry expert but if you need to
Could the interface be simplified to leave the border related
calculations on the C side?
This was done for geometry to make the code clearer, is there any
reason to not do that here?
Maarten.
--
To unsubscribe, send mail to awesome-devel-unsubscr...@naquadah.org.
At 1245766970 time_t, Maarten Maathuis wrote:
Could the interface be simplified to leave the border related
calculations on the C side?
This was done for geometry to make the code clearer, is there any
reason to not do that here?
Because you can have border that are not regular I guess.
--
I wasn't expecting custom borders, so ignore me.
Maarten.
--
To unsubscribe, send mail to awesome-devel-unsubscr...@naquadah.org.
