Committed.
Thanks Dave!
--
Tom Jordahl
Macromedia
-Original Message-
From: Dave Dunkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 5:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] JavaUtils.xmlNameToJava() updates
The following patch fixes a few cases that aren&#
NameToJava("foo bar"));
+assertEquals("_1", JavaUtils.xmlNameToJava("-"));
+assertEquals("__", JavaUtils.xmlNameToJava("_"));
}
}
Dave
On Tuesday, February 12, 2002, at 01:26 PM, Tom Jordahl wrote:
>
> Thanks for doing
] JavaUtils.xmlNameToJava() updates
Dave, I just committed this (with a couple tweaks of my own). Thanks!
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Russell Butek/Austin/IBM@IBMUS on 02/12/2002 08:12:01 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] JavaUtils.xmlNameToJava
Dave, I just committed this (with a couple tweaks of my own). Thanks!
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Russell Butek/Austin/IBM@IBMUS on 02/12/2002 08:12:01 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] JavaUtils.xmlNameToJava() updates
Well
Well, strictly speaking, "FOOBar" stays "FOOBar" if it's a class name but
becomes "fOOBar" for a method name. Rather odd-looking, but it keeps the
rules simple.
I'll take a look at your patch as I get the chance sometime in the next day
or two.
Thanks for the work!
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECT
