Re: wsdd question

2002-11-19 Thread Russell Butek
+1 Russell Butek [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Steve Loughran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 11/19/2002 02:19:50 PM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject:Re: wsdd question - Original Message - From: "Tom Jordahl" <[EMAI

Re: wsdd question

2002-11-19 Thread Davanum Srinivas
+1 --- Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > - Original Message - > From: "Tom Jordahl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 06:28 > Subject: RE: wsdd question > > > > >

Re: wsdd question

2002-11-19 Thread Steve Loughran
- Original Message - From: "Tom Jordahl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 06:28 Subject: RE: wsdd question > > +1 for "qname=" I'll +1 this too, then. Any more votes or shall I close this one

RE: wsdd question

2002-11-19 Thread Tom Jordahl
+1 for "qname=" -- Tom Jordahl Macromedia Server Development -Original Message- From: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 6:35 PM To: axis-dev Subject: wsdd question ok, cleaning up wsdd and here is a big question should we enforce qName= foo or