+1
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Steve Loughran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 11/19/2002 02:19:50 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:Re: wsdd question
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Jordahl" <[EMAI
+1
--- Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Tom Jordahl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 06:28
> Subject: RE: wsdd question
>
>
> >
>
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Jordahl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 06:28
Subject: RE: wsdd question
>
> +1 for "qname="
I'll +1 this too, then.
Any more votes or shall I close this one
+1 for "qname="
--
Tom Jordahl
Macromedia Server Development
-Original Message-
From: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 6:35 PM
To: axis-dev
Subject: wsdd question
ok, cleaning up wsdd and here is a big question
should we enforce
ok, cleaning up wsdd and here is a big question
should we enforce qName= foo or qname=foo
at the moment both are used, we should drop down to one, which one is to be
preferred. Yes, this will involve retrofitting all the axis examples but
should not break things as axis seems to take either.
